Hearth Record

Terrell State Hospital

A psychiatric hospital in Terrell, Texas 75160

1200 E Brin Street, Terrell, Texas 75160. (972) 524-6452.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 9, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 27, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 40989 Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an appropriate plan to keep patients safe in an environment with known, identified ligature risks in 3 (Unit 7A, Unit 7B, and the Geriatric Unit) of 3 units observed. Patients were allowed to be in areas of the Geriatric Unit, Unit 7A, and Unit 7B without staff supervision. This provided a patient with enough time to harm themselves without staff present to intervene. Refer to Tag A0144”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 950 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40989 Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an appropriate plan to keep patients safe in an environment with known, identified ligature risks in 3 (Unit 7A, Unit 7B, and the Geriatric Unit) of 3 units observed. Patients were allowed to be in areas of the Geriatric Unit, Unit 7A, and Unit 7B without staff supervision. This provided a patient with enough time to harm themselves without staff present to intervene. Findings: An observation tour was conducted on 2/27/2024 at 9:16 AM with the Director of Quality, Staff #3, and the Assistant Chief Nursing Executive, Staff #6. Upon entering Unit 7, a centralized nursing station and a large day room (a large area used by both male and female patients as a common area) were observed. There were 2 separate patient hallways. Patient rooms were observed in each hallway. One side was for female patients, Unit 7A, and the other side was for male patients, Unit 7B. At the entry of each hallway was a double door that the staff referred to as a “Smoke” door. Each door remained open so that patients were able to move around freely between the patient hallways and the day room. The doors were held open by a large magnet and in sync with the fire alarm. An automatic door closure and three hinge points were observed on each door. The Geriatric Unit had 1 double door that was opened to the patient hallway. This door remained open at all times so that patients could move freely within the locked unit. The unit had two hallways that were separated by a centralized nursing station. One hallway was used for female patients and the other was used for male patients. The double door that was referred to as a “smoke door” was held open by a large magnet and in sync with the fire alarm. An automatic door closure and three hinge points were observed on each door. The metal door closures, and hinge points presented a risk for self-harm to all patients. The door closures and hinge points would support the weight of a patient and could be used as a ligature to hang themselves. An interview was conducted on 2/27/2024 at 12:50 PM with Staff #4. Staff #4 was asked if the ligature risks had been identified and if there was a plan to correct them. Staff #4 replied, “The ligatures were identified in the annual risk assessment. We were placed on a ligature remediation plan and we have had to send in a monthly report since 2019. In 2019 we presented a Capital Construction Project request that included the ligature points on the doors in Unit 7 and the Geriatric Unit and also included multiple other areas needed for repair to include ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements as well. We were granted the funding, except it was not enough to cover all the repairs. We replaced the patient door hinges to their rooms and restrooms. The restrooms had to be repaired to meet the needs of the disabled patients as well and that required more of the funding to go towards that. In 2021 we did another request but we did not receive any funding for repairs but were granted the funding for a new hospital.” She was asked if the construction on the new hospital had started and she confirmed it has not started and it may be later this year before it does. Staff #4 stated that in 2023 she requested additional funding for repairs needed that also included the doors with ligature points on Unit 7 and the Geriatric Unit but that request would not be looked at until the year 2025. I have ordered concealed door closures for those doors but they have been on back order.” A review of an email provided by the facility confirmed the order was placed on 12/05/2023 for the concealed door closures. A follow-up email was presented for review confirming the concealed door closures were to arrive from the manufacturer on 3/21/2024. During an interview with Staff #4 it was confirmed that the concealed door closure would not conceal the ligature on the door closures or the hinge points on the door frame. A review of the documents titled, “Capital Construction Project Request” for 2019, 2021, and 2023 confirmed the request to replace the ligatures observed in Unit 7A, Unit 7B, and the Geriatric Unit. An interview was conducted with the Chief Nursing Executive (CNE) Staff #5 on 2/27/2024 at 2:20 PM. CNE Staff #5 was asked what process was in place to ensure that staff were able to visualize all patients entering and exiting through those open doors to ensure their safety. CNE Staff #5 replied, “The nursing station is right by the doors.” She was then asked if she could confirm that someone was always at the nursing station and watching the hallway to ensure safety and she confirmed she could not say there was always staff with a visual of the doors that contained the ligature risks. At the time of the survey Unit 7A had 7 patients, Unit 7B had 17 patients, and the Geriatric Unit had 23 patients. During an interview on 2/27/2024 at 2:45 PM with Registered Nurse (RN) Staff #9 and RN Staff #11 it was confirmed no one was assigned daily to monitor the area where the ligature risks were present. Also, it was confirmed that the ligature risks on the doors posed a threat to patient safety.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 9, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 27, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 14, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 27, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: government - state.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Government - State.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Health and Human Services Commission runs it.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: David Reagan Teel (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Kristy M Carr (corporate director, 0%); Kristy M Carr (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Kaufman County, none has an overall star rating from CMS.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital KaufmanNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.