Hearth Record

Martin County Hospital District

A critical access hospital in Stanton, Texas 79782

600 E Interstate 20 PO Box 640, Stanton, Texas 79782. (432) 756-3345.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 28, 2025: a standard inspection.

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 28, 2025: standard inspection5 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 212 words

    “A life safety code (LSC) full survey was conducted on site on 07/29/2025 - 07/30/2025. An entrance conference was held for the CEO and Director of Quality and Risk Management on 07/29/2025 to discuss the purpose of the LSC survey, and the survey process was explained. Instructions were provided on writing plans of correction. An opportunity was provided for questions and discussion. The LSC survey was conducted under the authority of Chapter 2 of the State Operations Manual, Appendix A, Acute Care Hospitals, 42CFR482 to determine the Hospital’s compliance. An LSC exit conference was conducted on 07/30/2025 in the hospital. In attendance was the Director of Quality and Risk Management and Senior Technician. The preliminary findings of the survey and the next steps in the survey process were explained. An opportunity was provided for questions and discussion. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the plan of correction, correction dates, and the signature space. Any discrepancy in the original deficiency citation(s) will be reported to the Dallas Regional Office (RO) for referral to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for possible fraud. If information is inadvertently changed by the provider/supplier, the State Survey Agency (SA) should be notified immediately.”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Portable Fire Extinguishers

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Portable Fire Extinguishers CFR(s): NFPA 101 Portable Fire Extinguishers Portable fire extinguishers are selected, installed, inspected, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers. 18.3.5.12, 19.3.5.12, NFPA 10 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35321 K355 - Portable Fire Extinguishers Findings: The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the CEO and Director of Quality & Risk Management, during the hours of the survey from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm on 07/29/2025 and 7:30 am - 9 am on 07/30/2025, that there were the following issues: 1) Based on observations during the tour, fire extinguisher no. 16 located in Maintenance area had a pressure gauge indicator needle that was pointed in the overcharged zone.”

    Rule K0355. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Fire Drills CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Drills Fire drills include the transmission of a fire alarm signal and simulation of emergency fire conditions. Fire drills are held at expected and unexpected times under varying conditions, at least quarterly on each shift. The staff is familiar with procedures and is aware that drills are part of established routine. Where drills are conducted between 9:00 PM and 6:00 AM, a coded announcement may be used instead of audible alarms. 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35321 K712 - Fire Drills Findings: The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the CEO and Director of Quality & Risk Management, during the hours of the survey from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm on 07/29/2025 and 7:30 am - 9 am on 07/30/2025, that there were the following issues: 1) Based on review of the records, facility failed to perform fire drills at unexpected times, at least quarterly on each shift. For instance, for the year 2025, majority of drills were conducted during 1st shift between 7 am - 7 pm. The records failed to document whether drills included the transmission of a fire alarm signal. 2) Fire drill participation form evaluation assessment could be improved for readability and comprehension.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

  • Gas And Vacuum Piped Systems - Maintenance Pr

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Maintenance Pr CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Maintenance Program Medical gas, vacuum, WAGD, or support gas systems have documented maintenance programs. The program includes an inventory of all source systems, control valves, alarms, manufactured assemblies, and outlets. Inspection and maintenance schedules are established through risk assessment considering manufacturer recommendations. Inspection procedures and testing methods are established through risk assessment. Persons maintaining systems are qualified as demonstrated by training and certification or credentialing to the requirements of AASE 6030 or 6040. 5.1.14.2.1, 5.1.14.2.2, 5.1.15, 5.2.14, 5.3.13.4.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35321 K907 Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Maintenance Program Findings: The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the CEO and Director of Quality & Risk Management, during the hours of the survey from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm on 07/29/2025 and 7:30 am - 9 am on 07/30/2025, that there were the following issues: 1) Based on observations in Vacuum Pump Room, the vacuum pipe support Clevis hanger type all thread was separated from its saddle.”

    Rule K0907. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 306 words

    “Electrical Systems - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Maintenance and Testing Hospital-grade receptacles at patient bed locations and where deep sedation or general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing. Additional testing is performed at intervals defined by documented performance data. Receptacles not listed as hospital-grade at these locations are tested at intervals not exceeding 12 months. Line isolation monitors (LIM), if installed, are tested at intervals of less than or equal to 1 month by actuating the LIM test switch per 6.3.2.6.3.6, which activates both visual and audible alarm. For LIM circuits with automated self-testing, this manual test is performed at intervals less than or equal to 12 months. LIM circuits are tested per 6.3.3.3.2 after any repair or renovation to the electric distribution system. Records are maintained of required tests and associated repairs or modifications, containing date, room or area tested, and results. 6.3.4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35321 K914 - Electrical Systems - Maintenance and Testing Findings: The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the CEO and Director of Quality & Risk Management, during the hours of the survey from 4:30 pm to 6:30 pm on 07/29/2025 and 7:30 am - 9 am on 07/30/2025, that there were the following issues: 1) Based on review of the records, facility did not perform any receptacle maintenance and testing at all in patient care areas. NFPA 99-2012, section 6.3.3.2 lists the minimum requirements for receptacle testing regardless of hospital-grade or not. Describe the facility justification of testing frequency (e.g. appropriate testing intervals) based on documented performance data. For example, experiential data shows that retention force of the grounding blade of each electrical receptacle decreases over time due to repeated usage. Thus, the failure rate has a direct correlation to time and usage.”

    Rule K0914. Standard-level.

Mar 12, 2025: standard inspection7 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevent & Control & Abt Stewar Prog

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “INFECTION PREVENT & CONTROL & ABT STEWAR PROG CFR(s): The CAH must have active facility-wide programs, for the surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs and other infectious diseases and for the optimization of antibiotic use through stewardship. The programs must demonstrate adherence to nationally recognized infection prevention and control guidelines, as well as to best practices for improving antibiotic use where applicable, and for reducing the development and transmission of HAIs and antibiotic-resistant organisms. Infection prevention and control problems and antibiotic use issues identified in the programs must be addressed in coordination with the facility-wide quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility was found to be not in substantial compliance with the Condition of Participation §485.640 Infection Prevention & Control & Antibiotic Stewardship Program, by failing to have active hospital-wide programs for the surveillance, prevention, and control of Hospital Acquired Infections (HAIs) and other infectious diseases; and not addressing issues identified by the programs in coordination with the facility-wide quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure a clean and sanitary environment to avoid sources and transmission of infection. Cross-refer to C1208. 2. Ensure the infection prevention and control professional communicated and collaborated with the Critical Access Hospital’s (CAH’s) QAPI program about infection prevention and control issues. Cross-refer to C1237. 3. Ensure the infection prevention and control professional audited CAH personnel’s adherence to infection prevention and control policies and procedures. Cross-refer to C1240.”

    Rule C1200. Condition-level.

  • Infection Prevent Surveil & Control Of Hais

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “INFECTION PREVENT SURVEIL & CONTROL OF HAIs CFR(s): The infection prevention and control includes surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs, including maintaining a clean and sanitary environment to avoid sources and transmission of infection, and that the program also addresses any infection control issues identified by public health authorities; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on observations, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to avoid potential sources of infection by not maintaining a clean and sanitary environment. Findings were: During a facility tour on the afternoon of 3/11/25, dust was observed on horizontal surfaces throughout the radiology department and in central supply. A review of Infection Control Minutes and Documents reflected that during environmental rounds in Quarters, 1, 3, and 4, 2024, dust to horizontal surfaces was observed in the radiology department. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff #4 (Chief Nursing Officer(CNO)) verified the findings from the facility tour on the afternoon of 3/11/25.”

    Rule C1208. Standard-level.

  • Leadership Responsibilities

    The inspectors’ words, 470 words

    “LEADERSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): (2) The infection prevention and control professional(s) is responsible for:] (iii) Communication and collaboration with the CAH’s QAPI program on infection prevention and control issues. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on a review of facility documents, observations, and interviews, the infection prevention and control professional failed to communicate and collaborate with the CAH’s QAPI program on infection prevention and control issues. Findings were: The facility policy # IC 027 titled “Infection Control Responsibilities” effective 4/19/2020, last reviewed 4/25/2022, reflected: “The Infection Control Nurse ... is responsible for, but not limited to, the following: 2. Implementing policies governing asepsis and infection control. 3. Developing a system for identifying, investigating, reporting, and preventing the spread of infections and communicable diseases among patient and personnel ... ...7. Cooperating with other departments and services in the performance of quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) activities. ...” During facility tours with Staff #3 (Director of Quality), and Staff #4 (CNO), on 3/10/25 and 3/11/25, the following was observed: *Expired supplies throughout the facility including physical/occupational/speech therapy (PT/OT/ST), emergency, medical surgical (Med-Surg), radiology, respiratory, surgery, and laboratory departments. These expired supplies included: Intravenous (IV) start kits, gloves, masks, acupuncture needles, extension tubing, chlorhexidine swabs, cleaning wipes, and wound care cleaning solutions. *Opened and unlabeled containers included: -Radiology - opened, single-use package of foam positioning blocks, bulk lots of oxygen extension tubing separated by central supply into individual Ziploc bags dated 11/2024 with no indication what this date is, syringes stored in a cardboard box. -Emergency Department (ED) - open electrode packages in drawers in ED rooms, glucometer control solutions and test trips with no open or discard dates, overfilled sharps container. -Surgery - discolored and degraded pressure infuser bag dated 2016, open Burrette Set package, and an unpackaged single use Pressure Bag on shelf with sterile supplies. -PT/OT/ST - three containers of wound care cleaning solutions on the top of the wound care cart with no open/discard date (two of three were expired), and tube of Medi-honey with patient label in top drawer of wound care cart with no open/discard date. During these facility tours on 3/10/25 and 3/11/25, Staff # 3 (Director of Quality) and Staff #4 (CNO) witnessed and confirmed the above findings. Review of the Infection Control Meeting notes from Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 of 2024, reflected that expired supplies had been identified during environmental rounds in all four quarters of 2024. Review of the QAPI minutes notes from Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 of 2024 reflected that no Infection Control Meeting findings for 2024 were reported. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff #3 (Director of Quality) reported that Infection Control findings have not been reviewed in the QAPI meetings resulting in no action plan being developed to address these findings.”

    Rule C1237. Standard-level.

  • Leadership Responsibilities

    The inspectors’ words, 355 words

    “LEADERSHIP RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): (2) The infection prevention and control professional(s) is responsible for:] (v) The prevention and control of HAIs, including auditing of adherence to infection prevention and control policies and procedures by CAH personnel. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31690 Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the infection prevention and control professional failed to ensure the prevention and control of HAI’s, including adherence to infection prevention and control policies and procedures by CAH personnel. Findings were: During a tour of the therapy department on the afternoon of 3/11/25, the wound care cart was observed in the therapy room where outpatient wound care is performed. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff # 7 (Director of Therapy) reported that wound care is performed in this room and the cart is taken to inpatient rooms for wound care. When asked if the cart is taken into all patient rooms regardless of isolation status, he reported that “yes, it is”. Review of facility policy # IC 018 Titled “Non-Critical Medical Equipment, Cleaning of”, effective 4/19/2020, last reviewed 5/6/2022, reflected the following: 1. “Non-critical medical equipment used at... hospital will be maintained in a safe and effective manner to help prevent transmission of infections. 2. It is the responsibility of all healthcare staff using multi-patient equipment e.g., workstations on wheels, vital sign monitors, etc.) to manage, the cleaning and disinfection of these devices... 3. Shared equipment... that is shared between patients will be cleaned before and after every patient, and as needed by the staff using said item... 6. ... At a minimum, non-critical patient care equipment is disinfected when visibly soiled and on a regular basis (between patients or once daily ...).” Review of facility policy # IC 009 Titled “Isolation Precautions, Guidelines for”, Effective 4/9/2020, last revised 10/25/2019, reflected the following: “... 9. Equipment used in the isolation room should remain in the room. 10. Equipment removed from the room should be disinfected with an approved germicidal solution or spray prior to reuse...” During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff # 3 (Director of Quality) verified these findings.”

    Rule C1240. Standard-level.

  • Qapi

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “QAPI CFR(s): (b) Standard: QAPI Program Design and scope. The CAH’s QAPI program must: (2) Be ongoing and comprehensive. (3) Involve all departments of the CAH and services (including those services furnished under contract or arrangement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31690 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a QAPI Program that included all departments of the CAH. Findings were: Review of the QAPI minutes for 2024 reflected that no findings were reported from Infection Control Meetings for Quarters 1, 2, 3, and 4 of 2024. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff #3 (Director of Quality) reported that Infection Control findings have not been reviewed in the QAPI meetings. Therefore, no action plan was developed to address these findings.”

    Rule C1306. Standard-level.

  • Comp Assessment, Care Plan & Discharge

    The inspectors’ words, 1,128 words

    “COMP ASSESSMENT, CARE PLAN & DISCHARGE CFR(s): §485.645(d)(5) Comprehensive assessment, comprehensive care plan, and discharge planning (§483.20(b), and §483.21(b) and (c)(2) of this chapter), except that the CAH is not required to use the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by the State that is required under §483.20(b), or to comply with the requirements for frequency, scope, and number of assessments prescribed in §413.343(b) of this chapter). “ §483.20(b) Comprehensive assessments- (1) Resident assessment instrument. A facility must make a comprehensive assessment of a resident’s needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) specified by CMS. The assessment must include at least the following: (i) Identification and demographic information. (ii) Customary routine. (iii) Cognitive patterns. (iv) Communication. (v) Vision. (vi) Mood and behavior patterns. (vii) Psychosocial well-being. (viii) Physical functioning and structural problems. (ix) Continence. (x) Disease diagnoses and health conditions. (xi) Dental and nutritional status. (xii) Skin condition. (xiii) Activity pursuit. (xiv) Medications. (xv) Special treatments and procedures. (xvi) Discharge planning. (xvii) Documentation of summary information regarding the additional assessment performed on the care areas triggered by the completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS). (xviii) Documentation of participation in assessment. The assessment process must include direct observation and communication with the resident, as well as communication with licensed and nonlicensed direct care staff members on all shifts. (2) When required. Subject to the timeframes prescribed in §413.343(b) of this chapter, a facility must conduct a comprehensive assessment of a resident in accordance with the timeframes specified in paragraphs (b)(2) (i) through (iii) of this section. The timeframes prescribed in §413.343(b) of this chapter do not apply to CAHs. (i) Within 14 calendar days after admission, excluding readmissions in which there is no significant change in the resident’s physical or mental condition. (For purposes of this section, “readmission” means a return to the facility following a temporary absence for hospitalization or for therapeutic leave.) (ii) Within 14 calendar days after the facility determines, or should have determined, that there has been a significant change in the resident’s physical or mental condition. (For purposes of this section, a “significant change” means a major decline or improvement in the resident’s status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, that has an impact on more than one area of the resident’s health status, and requires interdisciplinary review or revision of the care plan, or both.) (iii) Not less often than once every 12 months. “ §483.21(b) Comprehensive care plans. (1) The facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at §483.10(c)(2) and §483.10(c)(3), that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident’s medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the following: (i) The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident’s highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required under §483.24, §483.25, or §483.40; and (ii) Any services that would otherwise be required under §483.24, §483.25, or §483.40 but are not provided due to the resident’s exercise of rights under §483.10, including the right to refuse treatment under §483.10(c)(6). (i) Any specialized services or specialized rehabilitative services the nursing facility will provide as a result of PASARR recommendations. If a facility disagrees with the findings of the PASARR, it must indicate its rationale in the resident’s medical record. (ii) In consultation with the resident and the resident’s representative(s)- (A) The resident’s goals for admission and desired outcomes. (B) The resident’s preference and potential for future discharge. Facilities must document whether the resident’s desire to return to the community was assessed and any referrals to local contact agencies and/or other appropriate entities, for this purpose. (C) Discharge plans in the comprehensive care plan, as appropriate, in accordance with the requirements set forth in paragraph (c) of this section. (2) A comprehensive care plan must be- (i) Developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment. (ii) Prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes but is not limited to- (A) The attending physician. (B) A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident. (C) A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident. (D) A member of food and nutrition services staff. (E) To the extent practicable, the participation of the resident and the resident’s representative(s). An explanation must be included in a resident’s medical record if the participation of the resident and their resident representative is determined not practicable for the development of the resident’s care plan. (F) Other appropriate staff or professionals in disciplines as determined by the resident’s needs or as requested by the resident. (iii) Reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. (3) The services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, must- (i) Meet professional standards of quality. (ii) Be provided by qualified persons in accordance with each resident’s written plan of care. (iii) Be culturally-competent and trauma-informed. “ §483.21(c)(2) Discharge summary. When the facility anticipates discharge a resident must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following: (i) A recapitulation of the resident’s stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results. (ii) A final summary of the resident’s status to include items in paragraph (b)(1) of §483.20, at the time of the discharge that is available for release to authorized persons and agencies, with the consent of the resident or resident’s representative. (iii) Reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident’s post-discharge medications (both prescribed and over-the-counter). (iv) A post-discharge plan of care that is developed with the participation of the resident and, with the resident’s consent, the resident representative(s), which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment. The post-discharge plan of care must indicate where the individual plans to reside, any arrangements that have been made for the resident’s follow up care and any post-discharge medical and non-medical services. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31690 Based on record reviews and interview the facility failed to have a multidisciplinary comprehensive care plan for 4 out of 4 (#1, 2, 3, and 14) swing bed patients reviewed. Findings were: Review of the interdisciplinary team plan documents for patients #1, 2, 3, and 14 reflected that there were no therapy notes related to wound care included in these Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) plans. During an interview on the afternoon of 3/12/25, Staff #4 (CNO) confirmed that all members of the IDT must document their progress on the IDT care plans.”

    Rule C1620. Standard-level.

  • Specialized Rehabilitative Services

    The inspectors’ words, 351 words

    “SPECIALIZED REHABILITATIVE SERVICES CFR(s): Specialized Rehabilitative Services (§483.65 of this chapter). “ §483.65 (a) Provision of services. If specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for a mental disorder and intellectual disability or services of a lesser intensity as set forth at §483.120(c), are required in the resident’s comprehensive plan of care, the facility must- (1) Provide the required services; or (2) In accordance with §483.70(g), obtain the required services from an outside resource that is a provider of specialized rehabilitative services and is not excluded from participating in any federal or state health care programs pursuant to section 1128 and 1156 of the Act. (b) Qualifications. Specialized rehabilitative services must be provided under the written order of a physician by qualified personnel. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have physician’s orders for physical therapy-provided wound care, on 4 of 4 swing bed patients (#1, 2, 3, and 14) reviewed. Findings were: Review of the facility policy # Rehab 00001, titled “Rehabilitation Department”, Effective date 5/1/2017, last revised 4/26/2022, reflected the following: “Policy/Criteria: 1. Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy and Speech Therapy evaluation and treatment services are considered medically necessary when all of the following critera are met... b. The treatment is ordered by an examining physician or appropriate health care provider. ...” Review of swing bed patient charts for patients #1, 2, 3, and 14 revealed that there were no physician orders for wound care. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, staff #7 (Director of Therapy) stated that he did not obtain physician orders for wound care that he and other physical therapists provided. He also reported that when he gets an order “to evaluate and treat” he was not required to have additional orders. During an interview, on the afternoon of 3/12/25, staff #4 (CNO) confirmed that prior to providing wound care to patients, physical therapy staff must submit their wound care plan to the provider or physician for approval and orders.”

    Rule C1622. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 28, 2025Standard inspection5 deficiencies cited
Mar 12, 2025Standard inspection7 deficiencies cited
Apr 15, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 120 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Aug 1, 2002.
  • Ownership: government - hospital district or authority.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Government - Hospital District or Authority.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 62% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Martin County Hospital District runs it.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Tonya Glisan (corporate officer); Tonya Glisan (corporate director); Tonya Glisan (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Elizabeth Cervantes (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth Cervantes (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Robert Gaitan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Robert Gaitan (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Nancy D Cooke (owns 5% or more through other companies); Nancy D Cooke (corporate officer); Nancy D Cooke (corporate director); Nancy D Cooke (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Albert Garza (corporate director); James W Pardue (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Martin County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.