Hearth Record

Kimble Hospital

A critical access hospital in Junction, Texas 76849

349 Reid Road, Junction, Texas 76849. (325) 446-3321.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 6, 2025: a standard inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 1, 2025: standard inspection6 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “. An on-site Life Safety Code (LSC) Recertification Survey was conducted on 07/01/2025. An entrance conference was held with the Chief Nursing Officer on the afternoon of 07/01/2025 to discuss the purpose of the LSC survey and the survey process was explained. Instructions were provided on writing plans of correction. An opportunity was provided for questions and discussion. The LSC survey was conducted under the authority of Chapter 2 of the State Operations Manual, Appendix A, Acute Care Hospitals, 42CFR482 to determine the Hospital’s compliance. A LSC exit conference was conducted on 07/01/2025 with the Chief Nursing Officer and the Life Safety Officer. The preliminary findings of the survey and the next steps in the survey process were explained. An opportunity was provided for questions and discussion. Note: The CMS-2567 (Statement of Deficiencies) is an official, legal document. All information must remain unchanged except for entering the plan of correction, correction dates, and the signature space. Any discrepancy in the original deficiency citation(s) will be reported to the Dallas Regional Office (RO) for referral to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for possible fraud. If information is inadvertently changed by the provider/supplier, the State Survey Agency (SA) should be notified immediately. .”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Hazardous Areas - Enclosure

    The inspectors’ words, 674 words

    “Hazardous Areas - Enclosure CFR(s): NFPA 101 Hazardous Areas - Enclosure Hazardous areas are protected by a fire barrier having 1-hour fire resistance rating (with 3/4 hour fire rated doors) or an automatic fire extinguishing system in accordance with 8.7.1 or 19.3.5.9. When the approved automatic fire extinguishing system option is used, the areas shall be separated from other spaces by smoke resisting partitions and doors in accordance with 8.4. Doors shall be self-closing or automatic-closing and permitted to have nonrated or field-applied protective plates that do not exceed 48 inches from the bottom of the door. Describe the floor and zone locations of hazardous areas that are deficient in REMARKS. 19.3.2.1, 19.3.5.9 Area Automatic Sprinkler Separation N/A a. Boiler and Fuel-Fired Heater Rooms b. Laundries (larger than 100 square feet) c. Repair, Maintenance, and Paint Shops d. Soiled Linen Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) e. Trash Collection Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) f. Combustible Storage Rooms/Spaces (over 50 square feet) g. Laboratories (if classified as Severe Hazard - see K322) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35939 . Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain fire rated construction and to fully identify Hazardous Area locations which required a 1-hour rated construction per NFPA 101, 2012 edition, 19.3.2.1 and 19.3.5.9. Fire rated construction for hazardous rooms/areas, was not fully identified nor maintained in a manner that could prevent the propagation of fire and smoke. This deficient practice could result in failure to contain toxic products of combustion to all smoke compartments, thus placing the patients, staff, and visitors of multiple smoke compartments in jeopardy in the event of a fire. The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer on 07/01/2025 from 12:45 PM to 1:45 PM the following: The electrical room, which is constructed as 2-hour rated construction, unsealed penetrations (openings). Additionally, there were multiple metal conduit sleeves that were not sealed at the end/tip. In an interview at the time of each finding, Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer were informed of the deficiencies, and they were able was able to observe the deficiencies. Further interview revealed there were no other fire rated rooms; however, upon further interview during the exit interview at approximately 2:45 PM on 07/01/2025 with the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer, it was revealed that there was a set of architectural as-built drawings. Record review of architectural as-built drawings showed additional 1-hour rated rooms (soiled rooms). The Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer were informed that the information on the as-built architectural drawings depicting rated construction should be readily available and accessible to ensure proper maintenance of all rated construction. Reference(s): NFPA 101, 2012 edition 8.3 Fire Barriers. 8.3.1 General. 8.3.1.1 Fire barriers used to provide enclosure, subdivision, or protection under this Code shall be classified in accordance with one of the following fire resistance ratings: (1) 3-hour fire resistance rating (2) 2-hour fire resistance rating (3) 1-hour fire resistance rating (4)*1?2-hour fire resistance rating 8.3.1.2* Fire barriers shall comply with one of the following: (1) The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, or a combination thereof, including continuity through all concealed spaces, such as those found above a ceiling, including interstitial spaces. (2) The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, and from the floor to the bottom of the interstitial space, provided that the construction assembly forming the bottom of the interstitial space has a fire resistance rating not less than that of the fire barrier. 8.3.1.3 Walls used as fire barriers shall comply with Chapter 7 of NFPA 221, Standard for High Challenge Fire Walls, Fire Walls, and Fire Barrier Walls. The NFPA 221 limitation on percentage width of openings shall not apply. 8.3.2 Walls. 8.3.2.1 The fire-resistive materials, assemblies, and systems used shall be limited to those permitted in this Code and this chapter. .”

    Rule K0321. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Testing And Maintenance

    The inspectors’ words, 377 words

    “Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance A fire alarm system is tested and maintained in accordance with an approved program complying with the requirements of NFPA 70, National Electric Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. Records of system acceptance, maintenance and testing are readily available. 9.6.1.3, 9.6.1.5, NFPA 70, NFPA 72 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35939 . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Smoke Detector Sensitivity test was completed every other year according to NFPA 72, 2012 edition, 14.4.5.3.2. The facility did not conduct a Smoke Detector Sensitivity test ever two years. This deficient practice could expose patients, staff and visitors to the harmful effects of smoke and fire resulting from potential delayed notification due to an improperly maintained Smoke Detection System. Findings Included: A record review of the facility’s life safety code documents revealed there was not documentation of a Smoke Detector Sensitivity test. Reference(s): NFPA 101 Life Safety Code 2012 Edition Chapter 19 Existing Health Care Occupancies 19.3 Protection. 19.3.4 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems. 19.3.4.1 General Health care occupancies shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 9.6 NFPA 101 Chapter 9 Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment 9.6 Fire Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems. 9.6.1 General. 9.6.1.3 A fire alarm system required for life safety shall be installed, tested, and maintained in accordance with the applicable requirements of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, unless it is an approved existing installation, which shall be permitted to be continued in use. NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code 2010 Edition Chapter 14 Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance 14.1.1 The inspection, testing, and maintenance of systems, their initiating devices, and notification appliances shall comply with the requirements of this chapter. 14.4 Testing. 14.4.5 Testing Frequency. Unless otherwise permitted by other sections of this Code, testing shall be performed in accordance with the schedules in Table 14.4.5 or more often if required by the authority having jurisdiction. 14.4.5 Table- Refer to 14.4.5.3.2 14.4.5.3.2 Smoke sensitivity shall be checked every alternate year unless otherwise permitted by compliance with 14.4.5.3.3. .”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Subdivision Of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie

    The inspectors’ words, 420 words

    “Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie CFR(s): NFPA 101 Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrier Construction 2012 EXISTING Smoke barriers shall be constructed to a 1/2-hour fire resistance rating per 8.5. Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall. Smoke dampers are not required in duct penetrations in fully ducted HVAC systems where an approved sprinkler system is installed for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. 19.3.7.3, 8.6.7.1(1) Describe any mechanical smoke control system in REMARKS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35939 . Based on observations and interview the facility failed to maintain smoke barrier walls to resist the passage of smoke as required by NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 19.3.7 and 8.5. The smoke barrier wall, which devides the hospital into two smoke compartments, had unsealed penetrations. This deficient practice could result in failure to contain toxic products of combustion to all smoke compartments, thus placing the patients, staff, and visitors of multiple smoke compartments in jeopardy in the event of a fire. The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer on 07/01/2025 from 12:45 PM to 1:45 PM the following: The smoke barrier wall by Lab had unsealed penetrations (openings). Additionally, there were multiple metal conduit sleeves that were not sealed at the end/tip. There were also multiple 1-inch diameter holes that were not firestopped (sealed). In an interview at the time of each finding, Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer were informed of the deficiencies, and they were able was able to observe the deficiencies. In an exit interview at approximately 2:45 PM on 07/01/2025, these deficiencies were discussed with the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer. Reference(s): NFPA 101, 2012 edition 19.3.7.3 Any required smoke barrier shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.5 and shall have a minimum 1/2-hour fire resistance rating, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following: (1) This requirement shall not apply where an atrium is used, and both of the following criteria also shall apply: (a) Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall constructed in accordance with 8.6.7(1)(c). (b) Not less than two separate smoke compartments shall be provided on each floor. (2) Smoke dampers shall not be required in duct penetrations of smoke barriers in fully ducted heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning systems where an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 19.3.5.8 has been provided for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. .”

    Rule K0372. Standard-level.

  • Fundamentals - Building System Categories

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Fundamentals - Building System Categories CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fundamentals - Building System Categories Building systems are designed to meet Category 1 through 4 requirements as detailed in NFPA 99. Categories are determined by a formal and documented risk assessment procedure performed by qualified personnel. Chapter 4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35939 . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a documented categorical risk assessment, in accordance with NFPA 99, 2012 edition, Chapter 4. This failure could compromise the hospital’s building systems and could adversely affect the safety of the patients in the event such systems failed. Findings included: During interviews and record review on 07/01/25 from 12:45 PM to 1:45 PM, the facility’s records did not include a documented categorial risk assessment based on the facility’s systems (essential electrical system, information technology and communications, plumbing, and mechanical) and their possible failure and potential effect on the delivery of healthcare services for a hospital. The Chief Nursing Officer and the Life Safety Officer both confirmed the observations when the surveyor discussed the finding. .”

    Rule K0901. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Other

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Electrical Systems - Other CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Other List in the REMARKS section any NFPA 99 Chapter 6 Electrical Systems requirements that are not addressed by the provided K-Tags, but are deficient. This information, along with the applicable Life Safety Code or NFPA standard citation, should be included on Form CMS-2567. Chapter 6 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35939 . Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain the area around electrical equipment in the electrical room in accordance with NFPA 70, 2011 edition, Article 110.26. A patient bed was stored in the electrical room which blocked access to electrical panel boards. This deficient practice could result in a delayed response/access to electrical equipment in the event of an electrical emergency, and/or a greater fire load by storing items in the electrical room. The surveyor observed, while accompanied by the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer on 07/01/2025 from 12:45 AM to 1:45 PM the following: A patient bed was stored in the electrical room. The bed blocked access to electrical panel boards. In an interview at the time of the observation, the Life Safety Officer and the Chief Nursing Officer both affirmed a patient bed was stored in the electrical room. Reference(s): NFPA 70, 2011 edition 110.26 Spaces About Electrical Equipment. Access and working space shall be provided and maintained about all electrical equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment. 110.26(B) Clear Spaces. Working space required by this section shall not be used for storage. When normally enclosed live parts are exposed for inspection or servicing, the working space, if in a passageway or general open space, shall be suitably guarded. .”

    Rule K0911. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 6, 2025Standard inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 1, 2025Standard inspection6 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 129 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since May 1, 2000.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 79% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Preferred Management Corporation runs it.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Donald A Freeman (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Susan M Parker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Luke Campbell (corporate officer); Jared Chanski (corporate officer); Josh Tucker (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Jun 1, 2008.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Kimble County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.