Hearth Record

Brownfield Regional Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Brownfield, Texas 79316

705 East Felt Street, Brownfield, Texas 79316. (806) 637-8252.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 13, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 1,393 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on a review of facility documents, medical record review, and interviews, licensed nurses employed by Brownfield Regional Medical Center failed to follow the policies and procedures of the hospital for 1 of 1 patients (#1) by not documenting appropriately for IVs [Intravenous catheters] and only attempting venipuncture twice for lab collection. Findings include: A review of facility documents revealed in part: * Policy titled “Standards of Nursing Care (Revised 1/2024)” - reveals in part: “Policy: It is the policy of Brownfield Regional Medical Center to abide by the following standards in providing to care to our patients. A. Standard I. Assessment- The nurse collects client health data. ...2. Pertinent data are collected using appropriate assessment techniques. ...5. Relevant data are documented in a retrievable form. ...D. Standard IV. Planning- The nurse develops a plan of care that prescribes interventions to attain expected outcomes. ...4. The plan is documented. ...E. Standard V. Implementation- The nurse implements the interventions identified in the plan of care. ...3. Interventions are documented. F. Standard VI. Evaluation- The nurse evaluates the client’s progress toward attainment of outcomes. ...2. The client’s responses to interventions are documented. 3. The effectiveness of interventions is evaluated... 4. Ongoing assessment data are used to revise diagnosis, outcomes, and the plan of care, as needed. 5. Revisions in diagnosis, outcomes, and the plan of care are documented ...” * Policy titled, “Medication: Intravenous Therapy (Revised 1/24)” reveals in part “8. At the beginning of each shift, it is the responsibility of the RNs [Registered Nurse] to assess all I.V.’s for patency ... Continued observation of the site with documentation should continue throughout the shift [sic] Every two hours is recommended. 9. Once a shift, or more frequently if indicated, nursing staff must document in the patient’s medical record the appearance/condition of the I.V. site. ...11. Initial documentation in EMR [Electronic Medical Record], for initiation of I.V. therapy must include I.V. site, size and type of cannula and number of attempts needed to successfully place.” * Policy titled, “Intravenous Maintenance and Catheter Care (Revised 1/2024)” -reveals in part “PROCEDURE: ...Observe infusion sites closely (Restart IV’s as necessary for infiltration or redness and swelling.) ...Intravenous Catheter Care ... PROCEDURE: ...Observe for redness, swelling, or leaking at insertion site, (Discontinue the IV if any of these are noted). ...chart the procedure describing any and all observation made ...” * Policy titled, “Specimen Collection - (revised 2/2024)” reveals in part “ ...Special Considerations ... It is best practice to adhere to a two-attempt limit for venipuncture. If unable to obtain specimens after 2 attempts, notify the nurse and the testing technologist/technician of the failed attempts. The nurse will determine the course of action after consulting with the ordering provider.” A review of Patient #1’s medical record reveals patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 7/10/25 at 1:08 PM. There was no documentation for initiation of I.V. therapy, including the I.V. site, size and type of cannula and number of attempts needed to successfully place. On 7/10/25, Staff #11, RN documents the administration of medications to a R arm IV at 1:30 PM, 2:50 PM, and 5:04 PM. No Physical Assessment, IV Assessment, (including patency, size and type of cannula) or Pain Assessment is documented. The following nursing notes were documented on 07/11/25: *12:53 AM - Staff #7, RN documents a 20-gauge Right ( R) Antecubital (AC) IV - “IV patent, site checked, drsg [dressing] secure, Dressing changed per policy ...” *8:10 AM - Staff #6, RN documents a 20-gauge R AC IV, “ No redness or edema at site ...” *1:59 PM - Staff #6 documents a set of vital signs (V/S), a 22-gauge R hand IV “patent, site checked, drsg secure. No redness or edema at site ...” Staff #6 documents a R AC IV at 8:10 AM and a R hand IV at 1:59 PM. No documentation exists for removing the R AC IV, starting the R hand IV, IV site, size, and type of cannula, and number of attempts needed to successfully place. On 7/12/25, there was no Physical Assessment including an IV or Pain Assessment documented. Patient #1 was discharged on 7/12/25 at 1:13 PM. Throughout Patient #1’s admission, nursing staff did not document the IV site per facility policy, including the I.V. site, size and type of cannula, number of attempts needed to successfully place, discontinuation of IV, patency at the beginning of each shift, and continued observation of the site (every two hours is recommended). There was no documentation related to the number of lab draw attempts. Interviews with staff at the hospital revealed in part: In an interview on 8/12/25 at 12:30 PM Staff #6, RN Utilization Review (UR) and Discharge Planning stated “I remember the patient [#1]. I gave her 2 units of blood and was in her room for hours. I was giving blood in her right AC and blood was leaking around the IV site during the middle of the 1st unit, so probably 30 minutes into it. I started looking for another IV site. Her left AC site was extremely bruised all around. She [Patient #1] said lab had done that, they tried to stick her about 9 times, her words.” Staff #6 reported that she started another IV in patient #1’s right hand “with 1 stick” and she had “no problems the rest of the time.” Staff #6 reported that she thought the repeated venipuncture attempts happened over night on 7/10 - 7/11 or day of admission on 7/10/25. When asked if she had documented discontinuing one IV and started another, she stated “I’m sure we are supposed to document start and stop but I don’t know where because I don’t normally work on 5 hall. Generally, when I can’t find a spot to chart, I make a narrative note but I was focused on vital signs while giving blood. The new IV was working as it should - no infiltration, no leaking, no pain - it worked perfectly the rest of the time - the entire dayshift.” In an interview on the afternoon of 8/12/25, Staff #7, RN, CN (charge nurse) reported that she was the CN on the night of 7/10/25. Staff #7 reported that she would try twice for an IV, if unsuccessful, she would ask another nurse to try twice, then she would message the doctor. In an interview on the afternoon of 8/12/25, Staff #8, RN, confirmed that she was the CN on the night of 7/11/25. Staff #8 reported that she does not remember anything about patient #1, her IV sites, or any interactions with family. Staff #8 stated, “ ...our lab tech ...is awesome. She tries twice and if she can’t get it, then she will tell an RN and ask if they want to try. Lab has a policy - they can only do two attempts. It’s usually, 2 or 3 sticks per nurse - but if we’re not having any luck, we’re not gonna try again. We’ll let the doctor know. And if the patient says they don’t want us to try again we won’t.” In an interview on the morning of 8/13/25, Staff #9, lead phlebotomist reported phlebotomists don’t document when labs are drawn, how many attempts it takes, or what body site is used. If a phlebotomist tries twice and are unsuccessful, they will get someone else. She did not remember a patient having 8 or 9 “sticks”. Staff #9 stated, “If a phlebotomist has trouble they come get me.” While reviewing the medical record for Patient #1 during interviews on 8/12/25 and 8/13/25 staff #3, DON (Director of Nursing) acknowledged that nurses did not provide adequate documentation of the patient’s IV or any interventions performed for her IVs, and reported these issues would be discussed at the next Nurses meeting and new procedures would be put in place to improve Nursing documentation.”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Blood Transfusions And Iv Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS AND IV MEDICATIONS CFR(s): Blood transfusions and intravenous medications must be administered in accordance with State law and approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51738 Based on a review of facility documents, medical record review, and interviews, blood transfusions were not administered in accordance with facility policies and procedures when nurses failed to use the appropriately sized IV catheter and did not document infusion time or vital signs at the required intervals for 1 of 1 patients (#1). Findings include: A review of facility policy titled, “Blood: Administration - Transfusion Therapy (Revised 1/2024)” reveals in part: “ ...Packed Red Blood Cells [PRBCs] ... Infusion time: 1.5 to 2 hours if patient not diagnosed with Heart Failure: not to infuse longer than 4 hours; or as specifically ordered by MD [Medical Doctor]... Vital Sign Frequency: Full set of VS prior to start (include Temperature, Pulse, Respirations, BP [blood pressure], O2 [Oxygen] saturation), then q15minutes x4 [every 15 minutes times 4], q30minutes until infusion is complete ... Administration: ...Patient must have a large bore IV catheter of nothing smaller than 20g. A CVL [Central venous line] is preferred.” A review of Staff #6’s nursing documentation from patient #1’s medical record on 7/11/25 reveals in part: *1:59 PM - Staff #6 documents a set of V/S, a 22-gauge R hand IV “patent, site checked, drsg secure. No redness or edema at site ... 1st unit of PRBCs transfusion start @ 1359 [1:59 PM]. VS will be monitored for the 1st 15 minutes and hourly thereafter.” *4:45 PM - Staff #6 documents a set of V/S and a “Nurses Notes: transfusion completed with no reaction noted. VS are still WNL [Within Normal Limits] and remain at patients [sic patient’s] baseline.” *6:26 PM - Staff #6 documents V/S. *6:46 PM - Staff #6 - “Nurses Notes: patient’s VS with baseline for patient, last unit of PRBC 1/2 in. Patient on phone with family. Denies needs.” After starting the PRBCs at 1:59 PM, Staff #6 only documented two more sets of V/S at 4:45 PM and 6:45 PM. Staff #6 did not follow facility policy, by not documenting V/S at appropriate intervals, not documenting the start and stop time for the 2nd unit, and by using a 22 gauge IV catheter instead of 20 gauge or larger. In an interview on 8/12/25 at 12:30 PM Staff #6, RN, stated “I remember the patient [#1]. I gave her 2 units of blood and was in her room for hours. I was giving blood in her right AC and blood was leaking around the IV site during the middle of the 1st unit, so probably 30 minutes into it. I started looking for another IV site.” Staff #6 reported that she started another IV in patient #1’s right hand [per the medical record a 22-gauge].”

    Rule A0410. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 13, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
May 8, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 2.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 16.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 112 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 4% left before being seen.
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.06 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: government - hospital district or authority.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Government - Hospital District or Authority.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 62% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Terry Memorial Hospital District runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Joe Silva (corporate director); Sue Marlane Cottrell (corporate director); Charles Nave (corporate director); Whitney Wilson (corporate director); Whitney Wilson (managing employee (on the payroll)); June Cooper (corporate director); Kyle Barnett (corporate director); Kyle Barnett (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sylvia Dingus (corporate director); Brian Paiva (corporate director); Justin Hesse (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Terry County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.