Hearth Record

East Tennessee Behavioral Health

A psychiatric hospital in Knoxville, Tennessee 37909

1444 Old Weisgarber Rd, Knoxville, Tennessee 37909. (865) 722-7780.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 visits on record, nothing cited. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2026: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 4 of them at condition level, the most serious.

4 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 visits on record, nothing cited. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

0 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 14, 2023: complaint inspection7 deficiencies
  • Compliance With Laws

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS CFR(s): 482.11 Compliance with Federal, State and Local Laws This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse related to an altercation between Patient #3 and Patient #4 where Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was injured and subsequently expired for 2 patients reviewed for abuse of 8 records reviewed. The findings include: Patient #3 and Patient #4 were admitted to the Facility A’s behavior unit. Both patients had known psychiatric diagnoses and behavior issues. The two patients had a previous verbal altercation on 9/19/1023. On 9/23/2023 the patients were involved in a verbal altercation where their behaviors escalated. The facility staff intervened and the patients de-escalated initially. The two patients escalated a second time. RN #1 entered the unit from another unit to assist the staff. Patient #3 pushed RN #1 to the floor resulting in injury to the RN. The unit staff took Patient #3 to the seclusion room and moved Patient #4 to another room. The RN was transported to Facility B on 9/23/2023 where the she was diagnosed with left impacted left femoral neck fracture (fracture to the femur bone). The RN required surgical intervention, she remained in the facility and subsequently expired on 10/25/2023. During the investigation, it was found the facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or to regulatory agencies. The facility interviewed staff on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident occurred). An investigation had been started but not completed. Refer to A-0021”

    Rule A0020. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 2,918 words

    “GOVERNING BODY CFR(s): 482.12 There must be an effective governing body that is legally responsible for the conduct of the hospital. If a hospital does not have an organized governing body, the persons legally responsible for the conduct of the hospital must carry out the functions specified in this part that pertain to the governing body ... This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of the Governing Body Bylaws, review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, review of facility video footage, medical record review and interviews, the facility’s Governing Body failed to provide oversight to ensure a timely investigation and reporting for abuse related to 2 patients (#3 and #4) and Registered Nurse (RN) #1 (the alleged victim) for 2 patients of 8 records reviewed. The findings include: Patient #3 and Patient #4 were admitted to the Facility A’s behavior unit. Both patients had known psychiatric diagnoses and behavior issues. The two patients had a previous verbal altercation on 9/19/1023. On 9/23/2023 the patients were involved in a verbal altercation where their behaviors escalated. The facility staff intervened and the patients de-escalated initially. The two patients escalated a second time. RN #1 entered the unit from another unit to assist the staff. Patient #3 pushed RN #1 to the floor, resulting in injury to the RN. The unit staff took Patient #3 to the seclusion room and moved Patient #4 to another room. RN #1 was transported to Facility B on 9/23/2023 where the she was diagnosed with left impacted left femoral neck fracture (fracture to the femur bone). The RN required surgical intervention, she remained in the facility and subsequently expired on 10/25/2023. During the investigation it was found the facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or to regulatory agencies. The facility interviewed staff on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident occurred). An investigation had been started but not completed. Review of the Governing Body Bylaws dated 7/2020 showed the Governing Body was “...ultimately accountable for the safety and quality of care, treatment, and services provided by the Facility. The primary function of the Governing Board is to assure that the Facility and its Medical Staff provide quality medical care that meets the needs of the community. For this purpose, the [Managing Member / Board of Directors] has delegated to the Governing Board the authority to...to oversee quality assessment and improvement, utilization review, risk management, and similar matters regarding the provision of quality patient care at the Facility, and to establish polices regarding these matters...[h] requiring that patients with comparable needs will receive the same standard of care, treatment and services at the Facility by ensuring that the Facility plans, designs, and monitors care, treatment, and services so they are consistent with the Facility’s mission, vision, and goals and ensuring the planning for care, treatment, and services addresses the following: (i) the needs and expectations of clients and, as appropriate, families, and referral sources; (ii) staff needs; (iii) the scope of care, treatment, and services needed by clients at all of the organization’s locations; (iv) resources (financial and human) for providing care and support services; (v) recruitment, retention, development, and continuing education needs of all staff; and (vi) data for measuring the performance of processes and outcomes of care...” Review of facility policy “Workplace Violence” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] is committed to providing an environment free from all forms to violence for its employees, patients, families, and vendors. Workplace violence includes but is not limited to harassment, intimidation, threats...and acts of physical assault and other disruptive behavior. All reports of violence will be treated seriously and fully investigated. [named facility] has a Zero tolerance approach to workplace violence...in the event of an act of violence which poses an immediate threat of others...local police and/or the facility security department should be notified immediately...supervisors are responsible for observing and reporting the unusual behavior or employees or other individuals who exhibit certain circumstances which may indicative of posing a potential threat. All reported incidents of threats or violent behavior will be investigated by the appropriate individuals in Administration, Security and/or Human Resource Representative...” Review of facility policy “Patient Abuse and Neglect” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] maintains Zero Tolerance for patient abuse or neglect...all instances of witnessed or alleged patient abuse or neglect must be immediately reported to the Risk Manager, a department head or supervisor...upon investigation and after an assessment of the findings, a final determination should be made by the Senior Facility Leader and senior management...upon the discretion of the facility and in accordance with applicable state and Federal requirements, such violations may be reported to employee state licensing agency and/or law enforcement agencies...” Review of the facility policy “Risk Management Incident Reporting Policy” reviewed 1/2023, showed “...an “incident” is an unanticipated event which results in, or nearly causes, a negative impact on patient care or visitor safety. Any harm caused can be temporary, long-term, or permanent and range in severity from no obvious or significant injury, up to death....[4.5] If the incident involves an injury to a facility employee or contracted employee the injured staff will complete an “Employee Report of Injury” and notify their immediate supervisor and the facility Human Resources Manager...[5.2] the Shift Supervisor or a Facility Designated Individual will conduct a preliminary incident review. Facility Risk Manager will investigate and will document the investigation’s findings, including determining a final severity level classification...[5.3] The facility Risk Manager will notify Corporate Risk Management of all Initial “Level I” and “Level II” incidents within 24 hours...Sentinel Event: Identifies a patient safety-related incident (not primarily related to the natural course of an illness or underlying condition of an individual served) that reaches an individual served and results in death, severe harm, or permanent harm where intervention was required to sustain life. Workplace Violence Event: Identifies an incident that specifically involved a person(s) who commits assault, engages in harassing or intimidating behaviors, or credibly threatens the personal safety of employees (including contracted/agency staff), patients, visitors, or vendors...” The Severity Level Classification was as follows: Level I (Major): Incidents which are considered serious events This may include sentinel events. Level II (Moderate): Injury or impairment in which the patient or visitor’s function is altered requiring outside medical intervention. Level III (Minor): Injury or impairment in which a patient or visitor’s function may be altered with treatment limited to first aid. Level IV (Inconsequential): Events which do not otherwise qualify as a Level I, II, or III and where no injury or outcome alters a patient or visitor’s function. Review of a facility investigation report dated 9/23/2023 at 2:48 PM, showed an altercation occurred between 2 patients and (Patient #3) pushed an RN. The summary of the event showed Patient #3 walked behind Patient #4 and a verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. Both patients ripped off their shirts, they started yelling at each other and attempted to approach each other. The facility staff intervened and stood between the 2 patients trying to “stop their behaviors with words.” RN #1 arrived on the unit to assist and Patient #3 pushed the RN onto floor. The ‘severity level’ was a 2 indicating a moderate classification. Review of facility video footage of the Unit 4 for 9/23/2023 showed the following: The times were only in seconds for real time, not the actual time of the incident: 00:04 seconds: Patient #3 was pacing in the hallway. Patient #4 was at the medication room door. 00:41 seconds: the patients were walking towards each other and appeared verbally aggressive with each other. 00:47 seconds: both patients took their shirts off and appeared verbally aggressive with each other. The staff members were in the nurses station and a Behavioral Health Assistant (BHA) was standing in front of Patient #3. 1:27 seconds: The RN (the victim) entered the hallway from the Nurses Station 1:29 seconds: Patient #3 ran toward Patient #4. Patient #3 pushed the RN to the floor. The RN was laying in the floor up against the wall. She appeared to be holding her hip and in pain. Medical record review showed Patient #3 was admitted on 9/5/2023 with diagnoses including chronic schizophrenia (mental disorder with psychosis) and depressive disorder. The patient was admitted under an involuntary commitment related to a change in his mental status, disorganized thought processes, speech with agitation, aggressive threatening behaviors and psychosis. Medical record review of a Seclusion Patient Debriefing for Patient #3 dated 9/23/2023 at 8:50 AM showed “...[Patient #3] was walking behind [Patient #4] who became very agitated at patient. [Patient #3] began cussing at [Patient#4] and took his shirt off to fight the other patient. He was unable to be redirected. As he lunged for [Patient #4], he hit an RN...and shoved her to the ground. She landed on her hip...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #3 dated 9/23/2023 at 10:40 AM showed “...the patient is a 33-year-old male presenting to the hospital for psychosis. Per nursing staff, pt. was involved in a confrontation with another patient...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #3 dated 10/1/2023 at 11:30 AM showed the patient continued to isolate himself in his room. He remained delusional with impaired insight and judgement. The patient had required Haldol Decanoate 200 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) on 9/29/2023. Medical record review showed Patient #4 was admitted on 9/15/2023 under an involuntary admission related to suicidal ideations [SI], Schizophrenia related to substance abuse psychosis related to amphetamines and cannabis use, visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts. The patient had previous history of bipolar, schizophrenia, and multiple personality disorder. Medical record review of a Restraint Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/19/2023 at 9:20 AM showed the patient had a verbal altercation with Patient #3 with threatening behaviors with the other patient. The patient required a physical hold at 8:53 AM related to aggressive behaviors. The patient required IM PRN [as needed] for agitation. He was given Zyprexa [medication used to treat schizophrenia] 10 mg IM at 9:15 AM. The care plan for the patient was to be updated related to anger and aggression. The care plan was not updated. Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note dated 9/23/2023 at 8:45 AM showed “...pt. [patient] at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway waiting. Pt. asked the other pt. to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and was shouting. Both pt’s. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to the hall from the med room, both pt’s. were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took PRN Zydis [Zyprexa] and was apologetic for the incident...” Medical record review of a restraint Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/23/2023 at 11:38 AM showed “...pt. at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway. Pt. asked the other pt to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and shouting. Both pts. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to hall from med room, both patients were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took Zydis and was apologetic for the incident...” Medical record review showed RN #1 was admitted to Facility B on 9/23/2023. Medical record review of an ED Physicians Record dated 9/23/2023 at 11:07 AM showed the patient was admitted after two patients had gotten in a fight and she was pushed where she fell on her left hip. Radiology diagnostic testing showed an impacted left femoral neck fracture. Orthopedics was consulted and the patient was admitted to the facility. Medical record review of an admission H&P dated 9/23/2023 at 12:44 PM showed the patient was a Behavioral Health Nurse and got pushed by a patient during an altercation between two patients. Orthopedics was consulted. Medical record review of a Discharge Summary dated 10/25/2023 at 3:38 PM showed the patient (the RN) expired. The patient’s diagnoses included Fracture of the Left Femoral Neck (part of the hip joint), Acute Respiratory Failure, Enterobacter Cloacae (infection) Pneumonia, Aspiration Pneumonia, Septic Shock, Type 2 Myocardial Infarction with Takostubo Cardiomyopathy (a weakening of the left ventricle, the heart’s main pumping chamber), Deep Vein Thrombosis (blood clot) right upper extremity, and Acute Tubular Necrosis (acute kidney injury). During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:30 AM, the Risk Manager, stated the incident occurred on 9/23/2023. The incident report showed the incident was prioritized at a lower level. The employee was transferred to Facility B for treatment. The Corporate HR was aware and were handling the incident as a Workman’s Compensation concern. The facility’s corporate Human Resource Department informed the facility of the need of an investigation once the facility was made aware of the extent of the employee’s injuries and status. Interviews with the staff were completed on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident). She confirmed the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was due next week but had not been completed and the facility “would look at the RCA and see what interventions, if any, needed to be performed.” During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:40 AM, Behavioral Health Associate (BHA) #1 stated the two patients become verbally aggressive with each other in the hallway. Patient #3 took his shirt off and walked toward Patient #4 who then took his shirt off and the two patients started walking toward each other. The nursing staff attempted to de-escalate and separate the patients. Patient #3 initially walked away but the patients remained verbally aggressive. RN #1 was on the other unit and heard the yelling and came to the unit to assist. She stated “...when I turned around, [Patient 3] was charging toward Patient #4. The next thing I saw, [RN #1] was in the floor and she stated her hip was hurt and she could not get up...” During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:55 AM, RN #2 stated she was giving medications to Patient #4. Patient #3 was pacing the hallway, talking to himself and had walked behind Patient #4. A verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. She came out of med room and saw the two patients had taken their shirts off and were trying to fight each other, but the staff were in between them. She had yelled for help. RN #1 came from the other unit to assist. Patient #4 had walked away toward the opposite end of the hall, but then turned around and started charging toward Patient #4. RN #1 grabbed [Patient #3’s] arm to try to stop him and [Patient #3] shoved the nurse to the ground. During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 10:45 AM, RN #3 stated she was the primary nurse for Patient #3 who had anger issues and rambled a lot. She heard the two patients yelling in the hallway and when she came to the hallway, other staff members were standing in between the patients. Both patients had taken their shirts off and were verbally aggressive with each other, but there were no hands on between the patients. She stated “...[RN #1] came from the other unit to help. [Patient #3] turned around and started charging toward [Patient #4]. [RN #1] tried to grab [Patient #3’s] arm and when she did...he pushed her and she landed in the floor...we were able to separate the patients and no hands-on occurred between the patients...” During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 11:00 AM the Human Resource Director stated the process for reporting an employee injury included reporting the injury to the 24-hour hot line and filling out the appropriate paperwork. The employee normally filled the paperwork out, but since the employee was injured, the House Supervisor would have completed the paperwork to send to Workman’s Compensation. Corporate HR normally takes the lead after an employee workman’s compensation claim. During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 1:25 PM RN #4 stated the two patients were verbally aggressive in the hallway towards each other. Both patients were very angry. She stated “...[RN #1] heard the call for help and came to the unit. At that point, [Patient #3] had walked away but then turned around and started to charge towards [Patient #4]. [RN #1] reached out to grab [Patient #3’s] arm and he pushed the nurse to the floor...” During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 4:10 PM the Chief Executive Officer stated she was made aware of the incident on 9/23/2023. On Monday (9/25/2023) the video footage was reviewed by the administrative staff. Interviews were completed with the staff involved on 10/7/2023 [15 days after the incident occurred]. On 10/17/2023 (25 days after the incident occurred) the facility provided training related to safety and de-escalating agitated psychiatric patients was provided during a staff meeting. The CEO confirmed the facility had not reported the incident to the local enforcement or regulatory agencies. During an interview on 11/9/2023 at 2:15 PM, RN #5 stated the two patients (#3 and #4) had a verbal altercation on 9/19/2023 where the staff had to intervene. There was no hands-on between the patients. Patient #4 required an as needed antipsychotic medication related to his behaviors. She had documented the need to update the care plan for Patient #4 for anger and aggression but had failed to update the care plan.”

    Rule A0043. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 277 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, review of facility video footage, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the safety of two behavioral health patients (#3 and #4) and the Registered Nurse (RN) #1 (the victim) who were involved in a verbal and physical altercation, for 2 patients reviewed of 8 records reviewed. The findings include: Patient #3 and Patient #4 were admitted to the Facility A’s behavior unit. Both patient’s had known psychiatric diagnoses and behavior issues. The two patients had a previous verbal altercation on 9/19/1023. On 9/23/2023 the patients were involved in a verbal altercation where their behaviors escalated. The facility staff intervened and the patients de-escalated initially. The two patients escalated a second time. RN #1 entered the unit from another unit to assist the staff. Patient #3 pushed RN #1 to the floor resulting in injury to the RN. The unit staff took Patient #3 to the seclusion room and moved Patient #4 to another room. The RN was transported to Facility B on 9/23/2023 where the she was diagnosed with left impacted left femoral neck fracture (fracture to the femur bone). The RN required surgical intervention, she remained in the facility and subsequently expired on 10/25/2023. During the investigation, it was found the facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or to regulatory agencies. The facility interviewed staff on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident occurred). An investigation had been started but not completed. Refer to A-0145”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Qapi

    The inspectors’ words, 366 words

    “QAPI CFR(s): 482.21 The hospital must develop, implement and maintain an effective, ongoing, hospital-wide, data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement program. The hospital’s governing body must ensure that the program reflects the complexity of the hospital’s organization and services; involves all hospital departments and services (including those services furnished under contract or arrangement); and focuses on indicators related to improved health outcomes and the prevention and reduction of medical errors. The hospital must maintain and demonstrate evidence of its QAPI program for review by CMS. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, review of facility video footage, medical record review, and interview, the facility’s Quality Assurance Performance Committee (QAPI) failed to identify and recognize verbal abuse and potential physical abuse for 2 patients (#3 and #4) resulting in Registered Nurse (RN) #1 (the victim) being injured with subsequent death. The facility’s QAPI failure placed potential or likelihood to create an Immediate Jeopardy situation for all 14 patients on the unit. The findings included: Patient #3 and Patient #4 were admitted to Facility A’s behavior unit. Both patients had known psychiatric diagnoses and behavior issues. The two patients had a previous verbal altercation on 9/19/1023. On 9/23/2023 the patients were involved in a verbal altercation where their behaviors escalated. The facility staff intervened and the patients de-escalated initially. The two patients escalated a second time. RN #1 entered the unit from another unit to assist the staff. Patient #3 pushed RN #1 to the floor resulting in injury to the RN. The unit staff took Patient #3 to the seclusion room and moved Patient #4 to another room. The RN was transported to Facility B on 9/23/2023 where the she was diagnosed with left impacted left femoral neck fracture (fracture to the femur bone). The RN required surgical intervention, she remained in the facility and subsequently expired on 10/25/2023. During the investigation it was found the facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or to regulatory agencies. The facility interviewed staff on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident occurred). An investigation had been started but not completed. Refer to A-0021”

    Rule A0263. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Compliance With Laws

    The inspectors’ words, 1,324 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS CFR(s): 482.11(a) The hospital must be in compliance with applicable Federal laws related to the health and safety of patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate and report and allegation of patient to staff abuse related to Patient #3 and Patient #4 and Registered Nurse (RN) #1 (the victim) which resulted in RN #1 being hospitalized with required surgical intervention, and subsequent death, for 2 patients (#3 and #4) of 8 records reviewed. The findings included: Review of facility policy “Workplace Violence” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] is committed to providing an environment free from all forms to violence for its employees, patients, families, and vendors. Workplace violence includes but is not limited to harassment, intimidation, threats...and acts of physical assault and other disruptive behavior. All reports of violence will be treated seriously and fully investigated. [named facility] has a Zero tolerance approach to workplace violence...in the event of an act of violence which poses an immediate threat of others...local police and/or the facility security department should be notified immediately...supervisors are responsible for observing and reporting the unusual behavior or employees or other individuals who exhibit certain circumstances which may indicative of posing a potential threat. All reported incidents of threats or violent behavior will be investigated by the appropriate individuals in Administration, Security and/or Human Resource Representative...” Review of facility policy “Patient Abuse and Neglect” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] maintains Zero Tolerance for patient abuse or neglect...all instances of witnessed or alleged patient abuse or neglect must be immediately reported to the Risk Manager, a department head or supervisor...upon investigation and after an assessment of the findings, a final determination should be made by the Senior Facility Leader and senior management...upon the discretion of the facility and in accordance with applicable state and Federal requirements, such violations may be reported to employee state licensing agency and/or law enforcement agencies...” Review of facility policy “Risk Management Incident Reporting Policy” reviewed 1/2023, showed “...an “incident” is an unanticipated event which results in, or nearly causes, a negative impact on patient care or visitor safety. Any harm caused can be temporary, long-term, or permanent and range in severity from no obvious or significant injury, up to death....[4.5] If the incident involves an injury to a facility employee or contracted employee the injured staff will complete an “Employee Report of Injury” and notify their immediate supervisor and the facility Human Resources Manager...[5.2] the Shift Supervisor or a Facility Designated Individual will conduct a preliminary incident review. Facility Risk Manager will investigate and will document the investigation’s findings, including determining a final severity level classification...[5.3] The facility Risk Manager will notify Corporate Risk Management of all Initial “Level I” and “Level II” incidents within 24 hours...Sentinel Event: Identifies a patient safety-related incident (not primarily related to the natural course of an illness or underlying condition of an individual served) that reaches an individual served and results in death, severe harm, or permanent harm where intervention was required to sustain life. Workplace Violence Event: Identifies an incident that specifically involved a person(s) who commits assault, engages in harassing or intimidating behaviors, or credibly threatens the personal safety of employees (including contracted/agency staff), patients, visitors, or vendors...” The Severity Level Classification was as follows: Level I (Major): Incidents which are considered serious events This may include sentinel events. Level II (Moderate): Injury or impairment in which the patient or visitor’s function is altered requiring outside medical intervention. Level III (Minor): Injury or impairment in which a patient or visitor’s function may be altered with treatment limited to first aid. Level IV (Inconsequential): Events which do not otherwise qualify as a Level I, II, or III and where no injury or outcome alters a patient or visitor’s function. Review of a facility investigation report dated 9/23/2023 at 2:48 PM showed an altercation occurred between 2 patients and [patient #3] pushed an RN. The summary of event showed Patient #3 walked behind Patient #4 and a verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. Both patients ripped off their shirts, they started yelling at each other and attempted to approach each other. The facility staff intervened and stood between the 2 patients trying to ‘stop their behaviors with words’. RN #1 arrived on the unit to assist and Patient #3 pushed the RN onto floor. The ‘severity level’ was a 2 indicating a moderate classification. Medical record review showed Patient #3 was admitted on 9/5/2023 with diagnoses including chronic schizophrenia (mental disorder with psychosis) and depressive disorder. The patient was admitted under an involuntary commitment related to a change in his mental status. He presented with disorganized thought processes and speech with agitation, aggressive threatening behaviors and psychosis. Medical record review showed Patient #4 was admitted on 9/15/2023 under an involuntary admission with diagnoses including Suicidal Ideations, Schizophrenia related to substance abuse psychosis related to amphetamines and cannabis use. The patient had previous history of bipolar, schizophrenia, and multiple personality disorder. He had visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts. Medical record review of a Restraint Progress Note dated 9/19/2023 at 9:20 AM, showed a verbal altercation occurred between Patient #3 and Patient #4. Patient #4 required a physical hold and he was given Zyprexa (medication used to treat schizophrenia) 10 milligrams (mg) IM (intramuscular) at 9:15 AM. The patient’s care plan was to be updated related to anger and aggression but the care plan was not updated. Medical record review of a Seclusion Patient Debriefing dated 9/23/2023 at 8:50 AM, showed “...Patient #3 was walking behind Patient #4 who became very agitated at patient. Patient #3 began cussing at Patient #4 and both patients took their shirts off and a verbal altercation occurred. Initially the patients were able to be redirected. Patient #3 lunged for Patient #4 and during the incident, Patient #3 shoved RN #1 to the ground where the nurse landed on her hip. Medical record review showed RN #1 was admitted to Facility B on 9/23/2023. Two patients had gotten in a fight and she was pushed where she fell on her left hip. She was unable to walk and had received 100 mcg (micromilligrams) of Fentanyl by EMS. Radiology diagnostic testing showed an impacted left femoral neck fracture. Orthopedics was consulted and the patient was admitted to the facility. The nurse required surgical intervention. The diagnoses included a Fracture of the left femoral neck (of the hip joint), Acute Respiratory Failure, Enterobacter Cloacae (infection) Pneumonia, Aspiration Pneumonia, Septic Shock, Type 2 Myocardial Infarction with Takostubo Cardiomyopathy (a weakening of the left ventricle, the heart’s main pumping chamber), Deep Vein Thrombosis (blood clot) of the right upper extremity, and Acute Tubular Necrosis (acute kidney injury). The RN expired at Facility B on 10/25/2023 at 3:38 PM. During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:30 AM, the Risk Manager stated the incident occurred on 9/23/2023. The incident report showed the incident was prioritized at a lower level. The employee was transferred to Facility B for treatment. The facility’s corporate Human Resource Department informed the facility of the need of an investigation once the facility was made aware of the extent of the employee’s injuries and status. Interviews with the staff were completed on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident). She confirmed the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was due next week but had not been completed. The facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or regulatory agencies. During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 4:10 PM, the Chief Executive Officer stated she was made aware of the incident on 9/23/2023. On Monday (9/25/2023) the video footage was reviewed by the administrative staff. Interviews were completed with the staff involved on 10/7/2023 [15 days after the incident occurred]. She confirmed the facility had not reported the incident to the local enforcement or regulatory agencies.”

    Rule A0021. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment

    The inspectors’ words, 3,010 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, review of facility video footage, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to protect Registered Nurse (RN) #1 from abuse, which had the potential to effect other staff members and patients, failed to follow facility policy regarding a timely investigation, and failed to provide immediate education to ensure the safety of two behavioral health patients (#3, #4) and RN #1 (the victim) who were involved in a verbal and physical altercation, for 2 patients reviewed of 8 patient records reviewed. The findings include: Review of facility policy “Workplace Violence” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] is committed to providing an environment free from all forms to violence for its employees, patients, families, and vendors. Workplace violence includes but is not limited to harassment, intimidation, threats...and acts of physical assault and other disruptive behavior. All reports of violence will be treated seriously and fully investigated. [named facility] has a Zero tolerance approach to workplace violence...in the event of an act of violence which poses an immediate threat of others...local police and/or the facility security department should be notified immediately...supervisors are responsible for observing and reporting the unusual behavior or employees or other individuals who exhibit certain circumstances which may indicative of posing a potential threat. All reported incidents of threats or violent behavior will be investigated by the appropriate individuals in Administration, Security and/or Human Resource Representative...” Review of facility policy “Patient Abuse and Neglect” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] maintains Zero Tolerance for patient abuse or neglect...all instances of witnessed or alleged patient abuse or neglect must be immediately reported to the Risk Manager, a department head or supervisor...upon investigation and after an assessment of the findings, a final determination should be made by the Senior Facility Leader and senior management...upon the discretion of the facility and in accordance with applicable state and Federal requirements, such violations may be reported to employee state licensing agency and/or law enforcement agencies...” Review of facility policy “Risk Management Incident Reporting Policy” reviewed 1/2023, showed “...an “incident” is an unanticipated event which results in, or nearly causes, a negative impact on patient care or visitor safety. Any harm caused can be temporary, long-term, or permanent and range in severity from no obvious or significant injury, up to death....[4.5] If the incident involves an injury to a facility employee or contracted employee the injured staff will complete an “Employee Report of Injury” and notify their immediate supervisor and the facility Human Resources Manager...[5.2] the Shift Supervisor or a Facility Designated Individual will conduct a preliminary incident review. Facility Risk Manager will investigate and will document the investigation’s findings, including determining a final severity level classification...[5.3] The facility Risk Manager will notify Corporate Risk Management of all Initial “Level I” and “Level II” incidents within 24 hours...Sentinel Event: Identifies a patient safety-related incident (not primarily related to the natural course of an illness or underlying condition of an individual served) that reaches an individual served and results in death, severe harm, or permanent harm where intervention was required to sustain life. Workplace Violence Event: Identifies an incident that specifically involved a person(s) who commits assault, engages in harassing or intimidating behaviors, or credibly threatens the personal safety of employees (including contracted/agency staff), patients, visitors, or vendors...” The Severity Level Classification was as follows: Level I (Major): Incidents which are considered serious events This may include sentinel events. Level II (Moderate): Injury or impairment in which the patient or visitor’s function is altered requiring outside medical intervention. Level III (Minor): Injury or impairment in which a patient or visitor’s function may be altered with treatment limited to first aid. Level IV (Inconsequential): Events which do not otherwise qualify as a Level I, II, or III and where no injury or outcome alters a patient or visitor’s function. Review of a facility investigation report dated 9/23/2023 at 2:48 PM, showed an altercation occurred between 2 patients and [patient #3] pushed an RN. The summary of event showed Patient #3 walked behind Patient #4 and a verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. Both patients ripped off their shirts, they started yelling at each other and attempted to approach each other. The facility staff intervened and stood between the 2 patients trying to ‘stop their behaviors with words’. RN #1 arrived on the unit to assist and Patient #3 pushed the RN onto floor. The ‘severity level’ was a 2 indicating a moderate classification. Review of facility video footage of Unit 4 for 9/23/2023 showed the following: The times were only in seconds not the actual time of the incident: 00:04 seconds: Patient #3 was pacing in the hallway. Patient #4 was at the medication room door 00:41 seconds: Patient #4 walked down the hallway towards Patient #3. Both patients were talking to each other 00:47 seconds: Patient #3 took his shirt off and threw in the floor. Patient #4 took his shirt off. Staff members were in the nurse’s station. Facility staff were in the hallway with the patients. 1:03 seconds: The nursing staff were in the hallway with the patients talking to the patients. 1:07 seconds: Mr. Easley walked away from the staff towards the other end of the hall. 1:26 seconds: RN supervisor talking with Patient #3. 1:27 seconds: The RN (the victim) entered the hallway from the Nurses Station 1:29 seconds: Patient #3 ran toward Patient #4. Patient #3 pushed the RN to the floor. 2:04 seconds: Male RN came into the hallway and immediately took Patient #3 into the seclusion room. Patient #4 was escorted into the activity room with staff. Medical record review of an admission Psychiatric Evaluation dated 9/5/2023 11:45 AM, showed Patient #3 was admitted under an involuntary commitment related to a change in his mental status and schizophrenia (mental disorder with psychosis). The patient presented with disorganized thought processes and speech with agitation, aggressive threatening behaviors and psychosis. The patient had religious preoccupations. He had sadness, depression, and agitation. Medical record review of a Seclusion Patient Debriefing for Patient #3 dated 9/23/2023 at 8:50 AM, showed “...Patient was walking behind patient [#4] who became very agitated at patient. [Patient #3] began cussing at [Patient #4] and took his shirt off to fight the other patient. He was unable to be redirected. As he lunged for [Patient #4] he hit an RN [#1 and the victim] and shoved her to the ground. She landed on her hip. Patient was brought to the seclusion room for patient and staff safety...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #3 dated 9/23/2023 at 10:40 AM, showed “...the patient [pt.] is a 33-year-old male presenting to the hospital for psychosis. Per nursing staff, pt. was involved in a confrontation with another patient. Two were separated and the other patient was moved to another unit...difficult to understand most of the time. Unsure if cultural or dysarthric [slurred speech]...does appear hypervigilant [abnormally alert to potential danger] and spending majority of the time on the unit as far end looking at activities in the hallway...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #3 dated 9/25/2023 at 10:30 AM, showed “...the patient reports there being a misunderstanding about an incident that occurred yesterday [9/23/2023] in which he was accused of being the aggressor in an altercation between himself and another patient. Patient reports the other patient was verbally aggressive towards him and he was simply trying to defend himself. The patient reports this resulted in him being placed in seclusion and given an injection of as needed medications which has contributed to elevate levels on anxiety and depression which he continues to persist today...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #3 dated 10/1/2023 at 11:30 AM, showed the patient continued to isolate himself in his room. He had refused to take some of his home medications, refused to participate in the interview for the psychiatric examination and remained delusional with impaired insight and judgement. The patient had required Haldol Decanoate (antipsychotic medication) 200 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) on 9/29/2023. Medical record review of an admission Psychiatric History and Physical (H&P) for Patient #4 dated 9/16/2023 at 8:43 AM, showed the patient had previous history of bipolar, schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder. The patient was admitted under an involuntary admission related to suicidal ideations [SI]. He had visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts. He had multiple SI attempts. Medical record review of a Restraint Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/19/2023 at 9:20 AM, showed the patient became agitated with Patient #3 and shouted obscenities at Patient #4. A verbal altercation occurred between the two patients and both patients threatened physical harm to peer. Patient #3 was making ‘gang signs and gesturing with his hands as if peer was holding a pointed gun at Patient #4. The staff separated the two patients but both patients were attempting to emptying to push past staff and attack peer. Patient #4 was placed in a physical hold at 8:53 AM for pt. and unit safety. Patient #4 was given (medication used to treat schizophrenia) 10 milligrams (mg) IM at 9:15 AM. The Care Plan was to be updated to include Anger and Aggression. Medical record review of the Care Plan for Patient #4 dated 9/19/2023, showed the Care Plan was not updated for anger and aggression. Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/23/2023 at 8:45 AM, showed “...pt. at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway waiting. Pt. asked the other pt. to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and was shouting. Both pt’s. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to the from the med room, both pt’s. were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took PRN Zydis [Zyprexa, antipsychotic medication] and was apologetic for the incident...[11:41 AM] pt. was moved to unit 3 without incident...” Medical record review of a restraint Progress Noted for Patient #4 dated 9/23/2023 at 11:38 AM, showed “...pt. at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway. Pt. asked the other pt to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and shouting. Both pts. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to hall from med room, both patients were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took Zydis and was apologetic for the incident...” Medical record review showed RN #1 was admitted to Facility B on 9/23/2023. Medical record review of an ED Physicians Record dated 9/23/2023 at 11:07 AM, showed the patient was admitted after two patients had gotten in a fight and she was pushed where she fell on her left hip. She was unable to walk and had received 100 micrograms (mcg) of Fentanyl (pain medication) by Emergency Medical Service (EMS). Radiology diagnostic testing showed an impacted left femoral neck fracture. Orthopedics was consulted and the patient was admitted to the facility. Medical record review of an admission H&P dated 9/23/2023 at 12:44 PM, showed the patient (RN #1) had previous history of Type 1 DM (diabetes), Hyperlipidemia (elevated blood lipids), Hyperthyroidism (elevated thyroid levels), Depression and Anxiety. The patient was a Behavioral Health Nurse and got pushed by a patient during an altercation between two patients. Orthopedics was consulted. The patients EKG (electrocardiogram) showed T wave inversions in V2 and V3 (indicating cardiac ischemia) which was thought not to be related to current cardiac injury. Lovenox (blood thinner) was held related to an impending surgical procedure. Medical record review of a Discharge Summary dated 10/25/2023 at 3:38 PM, showed the patient expired. The patient’s diagnoses included Fracture of the left femoral neck (part of the hip joint), Acute Respiratory Failure, Enterobacter Cloacae (infection) Pneumonia, Aspiration Pneumonia, Septic Shock, Type 2 Myocardial Infarction with Takostubo Cardiomyopathy (a weakening of the left ventricle, the heart’s main pumping chamber), Deep Vein Thrombosis (blood clot) right upper extremity, and Acute Tubular Necrosis (acute kidney injury). The patient had a prolonged hospital course and “...despite aggressive measures including but not limited to vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, multiple medications patient’s condition continued to deteriorate. During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:30 AM, the Risk Manager stated the incident occurred on 9/23/2023. The staff had intervened and handled the situation per facility policy using appropriate de-escalation techniques. The incident report showed the incident was prioritized at a lower level. The employee was transferred to Facility B for treatment. The Corporate HR was aware and were handling the incident as a Workman’s Compensation concern. The facility’s corporate Human Resource Department informed the facility of the need of an investigation once the facility was made aware of the extent of the employee’s injuries and status. Interviews with the staff were completed on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident). She confirmed the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was due next week but had not been completed. The facility “...would look at the RCA and see what interventions, if any, needed to be performed.” During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:40 AM, Behavioral Health Associate (BHA) #1 stated the two patients become verbally aggressive with each other in the hallway. Patient #3 took his shirt off and walked toward Patient #4 who then took his shirt off and the two patients started walking toward each other. The nursing staff came from the nurse’s station and attempted to de-escalate and separate the patients. Patient #3 initially walked away but the patients remained verbally aggressive. RN #1 was on the other unit and heard the yelling and came to the unit to assist. She stated “...when I turned around, [Patient 3] was charging toward Patient #4. The next thing I saw, [RN #1] was in the floor and she stated her hip was hurt and she could not get up...” During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:55 AM, RN #2 stated she was giving medications to Patient #4. Patient #3 was pacing the hallway, talking to himself and had walked behind Patient #4. Mr. A verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. The nursing staff in the nurse’s station came into the hallway and stood between the two patients. She came out of med room and saw the two patients had taken their shirts off and were trying to fight each other, but the staff were in between them. She had yelled for help. RN #1 came from the other unit to assist. Patient #4 had walked away toward the opposite end of the hall, but then turned around and started charging toward Patient #4. RN #1 grabbed [Patient #3’s] arm to try to stop him and [Patient #3] shoved the nurse to the ground. During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 10:45 AM, RN #3 stated she was the primary nurse for Patient #3 who had anger issues and rambled a lot. She heard the two patients yelling in the hallway and when she came to the hallway, other staff members were standing in between the patients. Both patients had taken their shirts off and were verbally aggressive with each other, but there were no hands on between the patients. She stated “...[RN #1] came from the other unit to help. [Patient #3] turned around and started charging toward [Patient #4]. [RN #1] tried to grab [Patient #3’s] arm and when she did...he pushed her and she landed in the floor...we were able to separate the patients and no hands-on occurred between the patients...” During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Human Resource Director stated the process for reporting an employee injury included reporting the injury to the 24-hour hot line and filling out the appropriate paperwork. The employee normally filled the paperwork out, but since the employee was injured, the House Supervisor would have completed the paperwork to send to Workman’s Compensation. Corporate HR normally takes the lead after an employee workman’s compensation claim. The corporate HR notified OSHA of the incident on 9/27/2023. During a telephone interview on 11/6/2023 at 1:25 PM, RN #4 stated the two patients were verbally aggressive in the hallway towards each other. Both patients were very angry. Patient #3 had been walking down the hallway and Patient #4 was at the medication window. The staff had intervened, and verbal de-escalation was attempted. The BHA and another nurse arrived and were able to keep the patients separated. She stated “...[RN #1] heard the call for help and came to the unit. At that point, [Patient #3] had walked away but then turned around and started to charge towards [Patient #4]. [RN #1] reached out to grab [Patient #3’s] arm and he pushed the nurse to the floor...” She had called 911 and informed them of the situation and told them RN #1 was injured. During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 4:10 PM, the Chief Executive Officer stated she was made aware of the incident on 9/23/2023. On Monday (9/25/2023) the video footage was reviewed by the administrative staff. Interviews were completed with the staff involved on 10/7/2023 [15 days after the incident occurred]. The facility had not reported the incident to the local enforcement or regulatory agencies and the investigation had not been completed. During an interview on 11/9/2023 at 2:15 PM, RN #5 stated the two patients (#3 and #4) had a verbal altercation on 9/19/2023 where the staff had to intervene. There was no hands-on between the patient. Patient #4 required an as needed antipsychotic medication related to his behaviors. She had documented the need to update the care plan for Patient #4 for anger and aggression but had failed to update the care plan.”

    Rule A0145. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Safety

    The inspectors’ words, 1,963 words

    “PATIENT SAFETY CFR(s): 482.21(a), (c)(2), (e)(3) (a) Standard: Program Scope (1) The program must include, but not be limited to, an ongoing program that shows measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that it will ... identify and reduce medical errors. (2) The hospital must measure, analyze, and track ...adverse patient events ... (c) Program Activities ..... (2) Performance improvement activities must track medical errors and adverse patient events, analyze their causes, and implement preventive actions and mechanisms that include feedback and learning throughout the hospital. (e) Executive Responsibilities, The hospital’s governing body (or organized group or individual who assumes full legal authority and responsibility for operations of the hospital), medical staff, and administrative officials are responsible and accountable for ensuring the following: ... (3) That clear expectations for safety are established. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of the Governing Body Bylaws, review of facility policy, review of a facility incident report, review of facility video footage, medical record review and interviews, the facility’s Quality Assurance Performance Committee (QAPI) failed to identify, recognize, and provide a timely investigation related to verbal abuse and potential physical abuse for 2 patients (#3 and #4) resulting in Registered Nurse (RN) #1 (the victim) being injured with subsequent death. The findings include: Review of the Governing Body Bylaws dated 7/2020, showed the Governing Body was “...ultimately accountable for the safety and quality of care, treatment, and services provided by the Facility. The primary function of the Governing Board is to assure that the Facility and its Medical Staff provide quality medical care that meets the needs of the community. For this purpose, the [Managing Member / Board of Directors] has delegated to the Governing Board...to oversee quality assessment and improvement, utilization review, risk management, and similar matters regarding the provision of quality patient care at the Facility, and to establish polices regarding these matters...” Review of facility policy “Workplace Violence” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] is committed to providing an environment free from all forms to violence for its employees, patients, families, and vendors. Workplace violence includes but is not limited to harassment, intimidation, threats...and acts of physical assault and other disruptive behavior. All reports of violence will be treated seriously and fully investigated. [named facility] has a Zero tolerance approach to workplace violence...in the event of an act of violence which poses an immediate threat of others...local police and/or the facility security department should be notified immediately...supervisors are responsible for observing and reporting the unusual behavior or employees or other individuals who exhibit certain circumstances which may indicative of posing a potential threat. All reported incidents of threats or violent behavior will be investigated by the appropriate individuals in Administration, Security and/or Human Resource Representative...” Review of facility policy “Patient Abuse and Neglect” revised 9/1/2015, showed “...[named facility] maintains Zero Tolerance for patient abuse or neglect...all instances of witnessed or alleged patient abuse or neglect must be immediately reported to the Risk Manager, a department head or supervisor...upon investigation and after an assessment of the findings, a final determination should be made by the Senior Facility Leader and senior management...upon the discretion of the facility and in accordance with applicable state and Federal requirements, such violations may be reported to employee state licensing agency and/or law enforcement agencies...” Review of facility policy “Risk Management Incident Reporting Policy” reviewed 1/2023, showed “...an “incident” is an unanticipated event which results in, or nearly causes, a negative impact on patient care or visitor safety. Any harm caused can be temporary, long-term, or permanent and range in severity from no obvious or significant injury, up to death....[4.5] If the incident involves an injury to a facility employee or contracted employee the injured staff will complete an “Employee Report of Injury” and notify their immediate supervisor and the facility Human Resources Manager...[5.2] the Shift Supervisor or a Facility Designated Individual will conduct a preliminary incident review. Facility Risk Manager will investigate and will document the investigation’s findings, including determining a final severity level classification...[5.3] The facility Risk Manager will notify Corporate Risk Management of all Initial “Level I” and “Level II” incidents within 24 hours...Sentinel Event: Identifies a patient safety-related incident (not primarily related to the natural course of an illness or underlying condition of an individual served) that reaches an individual served and results in death, severe harm, or permanent harm where intervention was required to sustain life. Workplace Violence Event: Identifies an incident that specifically involved a person(s) who commits assault, engages in harassing or intimidating behaviors, or credibly threatens the personal safety of employees (including contracted/agency staff), patients, visitors, or vendors...” The Severity Level Classification was as follows: Level I (Major): Incidents which are considered serious events This may include sentinel events. Level II (Moderate): Injury or impairment in which the patient or visitor’s function is altered requiring outside medical intervention. Level III (Minor): Injury or impairment in which a patient or visitor’s function may be altered with treatment limited to first aid. Level IV (Inconsequential): Events which do not otherwise qualify as a Level I, II, or III and where no injury or outcome alters a patient or visitor’s function. Review of a facility investigation report dated 9/23/2023 at 2:48 PM, showed an altercation occurred between 2 patients and (Patient #3) pushed an RN. The summary of event showed Patient #3 walked behind Patient #4 and a verbal altercation occurred between the two patients. Both patients ripped off their shirts, they started yelling at each other and attempted to approach each other. The facility staff intervened and stood between the 2 patients trying to “...stop their behaviors with words.” RN #1 arrived on the unit to assist and Patient #3 pushed RN #1 onto floor. The ‘severity level’ was a 2 indicating a moderate classification. Review of facility video footage of Unit 4 for 9/23/2023 showed the following: The times were only in seconds not the actual time of the incident: 00:04 seconds: Patient #3 was pacing in the hallway. Patient #4 was at the medication room door 00:41 seconds: Patient #4 walked down the hallway towards Patient #3. Both patients were talking to each other 00:47 seconds: Patient #3 took his shirt off and threw in the floor. Patient #4 took his shirt off. Staff members were in the nurse’s station. Facility staff were in the hallway with the patients. 1:03 seconds: The nursing staff were in the hallway with the patients talking to the patients. 1:07 seconds: Patient #3 walked away from the staff towards the other end of the hall. 1:26 seconds: RN supervisor talking with Patient #3. 1:27 seconds: The RN (the victim) entered the hallway from the Nurses Station 1:29 seconds: Patient #3 ran toward Patient #4. Patient #3 pushed the RN to the floor. Medical record review showed Patient #3 was admitted on 9/5/2023 with diagnoses including chronic schizophrenia [mental disorder with psychosis] and depressive disorder under an involuntary commitment related to a change in his mental status. The patient had previous history of psychiatric inpatient admissions. He presented with disorganized thought processes and speech with agitation, aggressive threatening behaviors and psychosis. Medical record review of a Seclusion Patient Debriefing for Patient #3 dated 9/23/2023 at 8:50 AM showed “...[Patient #3] was walking behind Patient #4 who became very agitated at patient. [Patient #3] began cussing at [Patient#4] and took his shirt off to fight the other patient. He was unable to be redirected. As he lunged for [Patient #4], he hit an RN...and shoved her to the ground. She landed on her hip...” Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note dated 10/1/2023 at 11:30 AM, showed the patient continued to isolate himself in his room. He remained delusional with impaired insight and judgement. The patient had required Haldol Decanoate 200 milligrams (mg) intramuscular (IM) on 9/29/2023. Medical record review showed Patient #4 was admitted on 9/15/2023 with diagnoses including Schizophrenia related to substance abuse psychosis related to amphetamines and cannabis use. The patient had previous history of bipolar, schizophrenia, and multiple personality disorder. The patient was admitted under an involuntary admission related to suicidal ideations [SI]. He had visual hallucinations and delusional thoughts. He had multiple SI attempts. Medical record review of a Restraint Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/19/2023 at 9:20 AM, showed the patient had a verbal altercation with Patient #3 with threatening behaviors with the other patient. The patient required a physical hold at 8:53 AM related to aggressive behaviors. The patient required IM PRN (as needed) for agitation. He was given Zyprexa (medication used to treat schizophrenia) 10 mg IM at 9:15 AM. The patients care plan was to be updated related to anger and aggressive behaviors which was not completed. Medical record review of a Psychiatry Progress Note for Patient #4 dated 9/23/2023 at 8:45 AM showed “...pt. [patient] at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway waiting. Pt. asked the other pt. to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and was shouting. Both pt’s. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to the hall from the med room, both pt’s. were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took PRN Zydis [Zyprexa] and was apologetic for the incident...” Medical record review of a restraint Progress Noted for Patient #4 dated 9/23/2023 at 11:38 AM showed “...pt. at med window getting meds and another patient was in the hallway. Pt. asked the other pt to ‘stop walking behind him and talking shit’. The other patient quickly escalated and shouting. Both pts. had shirts off by the time I was able to come to hall from med room, both patients were verbally threatening each other and staff separated them after the other patient pushed a staff to the floor. Pt. took Zydis and was apologetic for the incident...” Medical record review showed RN #1 was admitted to Facility B on 9/23/2023 after two patients had gotten into a fight and the nurse was pushed to the floor injuring her left hip. Radiology diagnostic testing showed an impacted left femoral neck fracture. Orthopedics was consulted and the patient was admitted to the facility. Review of the discharge summary showed the nurse expired on 10/25/2023 at 3:38 PM with the following diagnoses: Fracture of the Left Femoral Neck (part of the hip joint), Acute Respiratory Failure, Enterobacter Cloacae (infection) Pneumonia, Aspiration Pneumonia, Septic Shock, Type 2 Myocardial Infarction with Takostubo Cardiomyopathy (a weakening of the left ventricle, the heart’s main pumping chamber), Deep vein thrombosis (blood clot) right upper extremity, and acute tubular necrosis (acute kidney injury). During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 9:30 AM, the Risk Manager, stated the incident occurred on 9/23/2023. The incident report showed the incident was prioritized at a lower level. The facility’s corporate Human Resource Department informed the facility of the need of an investigation once the facility was made aware of the extent of the employes injuries and status. Interviews with the staff were completed on 10/7/2023 (15 days after the incident). She confirmed the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was due next week but had not been completed. The facility did not report the incident to local law enforcement or regulatory agencies. During an interview on 11/6/2023 at 4:10 PM the Chief Executive Officer stated she was made aware of the incident on 9/23/2023. On Monday (9/25/2023) the video footage was reviewed by the administrative staff. Interviews were completed with the staff involved on 10/7/2023 [15 days after the incident occurred]. She confirmed the facility had not reported the incident to the local enforcement or regulatory agencies and the investigation had not been completed.”

    Rule A0286. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 5, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 9, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 14, 2023Complaint inspection7 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Nov 15, 2022.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Acadia Knoxville Holdings, LLC owns 70% directly since Feb 2, 2019; Fortress Corporation & Subsidiaries owns 30% directly since Feb 2, 2019.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Deborah S Kraemer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Adam G Hyatt (corporate officer, 0%); Kelly A. George (managing employee (on the payroll)); Stacie L Harty (managing employee (on the payroll)); David M Duckworth (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Philip Farley (corporate officer, 0%); Diane F Henneman (corporate officer, 0%); Timothy A Sides (corporate officer, 0%); Debra K Osteen (corporate officer, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Acadia Healthcare Intermediate Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 10, 2026
Acadia Healthcare Company Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 2, 2019
Acute South Holdco LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 10, 2026
Acute Bh Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 10, 2026
Acadia Knoxville Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more directly70%Feb 2, 2019
Fortress Corporation & SubsidiariesOwns 5% or more directly30%Feb 2, 2019

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 hospitals CMS lists in Knox County, 4 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.