Hearth Record

Erlanger Behavioral Hospital, LLC

A psychiatric hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404

804 North Holtzclaw Avenue, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404. (877) 249-2737.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 11, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 2, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer for 1 patient (#6) who presented to the Emergency Department with Suicidal Ideations (SI) of 20 records reviewed. The findings include: Patient #6 was admitted on 9/20/2025 with SI. The patient was a walk-in to the facility’s intake unit. She had been discharged from the facility on 9/19/2025. The patient was evaluated and a medical screening examination was provided. The facility did not have an open adult bed for the patient. In the medical screening documentation, there was documentation the patient would be transferred to Facility D. On the transfer from, there was documentation the patient was going to Facility C but then crossed out and documented as Facility B. There were no risks and benefits of transfer documented. There was no documentation of a receiving physician for the transfer. There was no medical record for Patient #6 at Facility B on 9/20/2025. On 9/20/2025 the patient presented to Facility D at 5:29 PM where a medical screening examination was completed. The patient was placed under a Certificate of Need (CON). Psychiatry was consulted who agreed the patient should be placed under a CON and transferred to an inpatient psychiatric facility. The patient was admitted to Facility E on 9/21/2025. Cross Refer to A-2409.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 1,348 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30553 Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer for 1 patient (#6) who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with Suicidal Ideations (SI) of 20 records reviewed. The findings include: Review of facility policy EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act), last revised 1/2026, showed “...a physician will sign a certification that based upon the information at the time of the transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of emergency medical treatment at another facility outweigh the increased risk to the individual...if a physician is not physically present in the facility at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person may sign the certification after the physician, in consultation with the qualified medical person, had made the determination...and subsequently countersigns the certification...Transfer: before a hospital may transfer an individual, the hospital must satisfy the following conditions: risk minimized...the transferring physician or registered nurse has notified a physician at the receiving facility and had obtained consent to the transfer and confirmation that the individual meets the facility’s admissions criteria related to appropriate bed, personnel and equipment necessary to treat the individual...a transfer summary signed by the transferring physician and or qualified medical person and which contains relevant information pertaining to the individual’s condition. At a minimum the transfer summary must contain...the name and address of the transferring physician, the name of the of the physician at the receiving hospital consenting for transfer...” Review of the ED Central logs showed Patient #6 was admitted to Facility A on 9/20/2025 and transferred to Facility D. Medical record review showed Patient #6 was admitted on 9/20/2025 at 2:20 PM with SI and Auditory Visual Hallucinations. The patient was a walk-in. The patient had been discharged from Facility A on 9/19/2025. She presented with a plan to “run her car off the road”. The facility did not have any open female beds and was unable to admit the patient. Medical record review of an EMTALA Request/Consent for Transfer form dated 9/20/2025 showed the patient was to be transferred. The consent form stated the patient would be going to Facility C. Further review showed Facility C was crossed out and documented the patient would be transferred to Facility B. Review of an EMTALA Memorandum of Transfer form dated 9/20/2025 at 4:13 PM showed the receiving hospital was Facility B. There was no documentation related to accepting physician. Medical record review of a Physician Certificate for Transfer dated 9/20/2025 at 4:30 PM showed no documentation of the Risk and Benefits were explained to the patient and the physician had not signed the Certificate for Transfer. The receiving hospital was not documented on the form. Medical record review of an Emergency Medical Service Certificate of Medical Necessity for Ambulance Services dated 9/20/2025 showed the patient was to be transported to Facility B. There was no medical record for the patient at Facility B which was documented on the transfer form and the Certificate of Medical Necessity for Ambulance Services at Facility A. The patient was admitted to Facility D’s ED on 9/20/2025 at 5:29 PM. There was no documentation the patient was accepted or transferred to Facility D in Facility A’s medical record on 9/20/2025. Medical record review showed the patient arrived at Facility D on 9/20/2025 at 5:35 PM with SI. She had been discharged from Facility A on 9/19/2025. A medical screening examination was completed. Psychiatry was consulted who recommended involuntary commitment and transfer to an inpatient psychiatric facility. A Certificate of Need (CON) for Emergency Involuntary Commitment was signed on 9/20/2025 at 6:24 PM. She was diagnosed with SI and depression. The patient was transferred to Facility E on 9/21/2025. Facility A’s Director of Quality Management sent an electronic intake report on 10/7/2025 at 5:24 AM related to Patient #6. The referral showed the patient was admitted to Facility A on 9/20/2025 but not admitted to the facility. Later the intake report showed a referral from Facility D was requested. The patient was accepted at Facility E on 9/20/2025. During an interview on 10/1/2025 at 2:30 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, confirmed there was no documentation of a physician who accepted the patient; it was not clear where the patient was transported to; and the Risk and Benefits of transfer was not documented. During an interview on 10/1/2025 at 3:00 PM, RN #2 confirmed there was no documentation of the Risk and Benefits of transfer and there was documentation of the provider who accepted the patient. She confirmed the transfer paperwork indicated the patient would be transferred to Facility B but the patient was transferred to Facility D. The ED Central log showed the patient was transferred to Facility D.”

    Rule A2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 7 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 11, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 29, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 4, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 2, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Oct 1, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 29, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Aug 15, 2018.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Acadia Chattanooga Holdings LLC owns 80% directly since Mar 7, 2018; Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital Authority owns 20% directly since Mar 7, 2016.
  • Acadia Management Company LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Deborah S Kraemer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Todd S Young (corporate officer, 0%); Manjari Singh (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Stacie L Harty (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brian Philip Farley (corporate officer, 0%); Timothy A Sides (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Debra K Osteen (corporate officer, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Acadia Healthcare Company Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Mar 7, 2016
Acadia Chattanooga Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly80%Mar 7, 2018
Acadia JV Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies80%Mar 7, 2016
Chattanooga Hamilton County Hospital AuthorityOwns 5% or more directly20%Mar 7, 2016
Acadia Management Company LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)0%Jun 15, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospitals CMS lists in Hamilton County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.