Hearth Record

Vanderbilt Tullahoma-Harton Hospital

An acute care hospital in Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388

1801 N Jackson St Box 460, Tullahoma, Tennessee 37388. (931) 393-3000.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 29, 2026: a complaint inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 29, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “A Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation of TN00077781 was conducted by the State of Tennessee Health Facilities Commission on 05/29/2026. During this Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation, Vanderbilt Tullahoma- Harton Hospital was found in substantial compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 483.90(a), Life Safety from Fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 101-2012.”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Aug 20, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “A Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation of TN00076716 was conducted by the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission, on 08/20/2025. During this Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation, Vanderbilt Tullahoma-Harton Hospital was found in substantial compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 482.41(b), Life Safety from fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 101 (2012 Edition).”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 11, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “A Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation of TN00075782 was conducted by the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission, on 07/11/2025. During this Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation, Vanderbilt Tullahoma-Harton Hospital was found in substantial compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 482.41(b), Life Safety from fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 101 (2012 Edition)”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jun 6, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “A Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation of TN00075996 was conducted by the State of Tennessee Health Facilities Commission on 06/06/2025. During this Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation, Vanderbilt Tullahoma-Harton Hospital was found in substantial compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 483.90(a), Life Safety from Fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 101-2012.”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level. From a complaint.

May 13, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Therapeutic Diets

    The inspectors’ words, 1,373 words

    “THERAPEUTIC DIETS CFR(s): 482.28(b), (b)(1) §482.28(b) Menus must meet the needs of patients. (1) Individual patient nutritional needs must be met in accordance with recognized dietary practices. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51389 Based on review of medical record, review of the Clinical Dietician Job Description, review of the Clinical Nutrition Services Policy and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate nutritional needs in 1 patient (Pt #1) out of 4 patients reviewed. The findings include: Review of the Job Description for Clinical Dietician showed “...responsible for providing clinical nutrition services, including nutrition assessment, diet modification, self-management training, and nutrition intervention to patients...develops, revises, and individualizes nutrition care plans based on information from the patient, medical record, family, and health care team members...incorporates current evidence-based research into practice...complies with regulatory standards, including federal, state, and accrediting agencies...” Review of the Clinical Nutrition Services: Initial Screening, Prioritization, and Assessment Policy showed “An initial screening assessment and prioritization process is implemented to identify patients who may require medical nutrition therapy. Patients identified at nutrition risk during the initial screening will be further evaluated with a comprehensive assessment and receive nutrition intervention[s] when applicable...evaluates information from the following sources that include nutrition intervention: Nursing nutrition related protocol reports...information technology - diet orders and changes, admission diagnosis[es]...laboratory - nutrition related values...” Medical record review of Pt. #1’s hospital History and Physical dated 10/22/2022, showed an admission on 10/21/2022 with complaints of possible aspiration (accidental inhalation of fluids or liquids into the airway and lungs). Pt #1 had a history of Hypertension, Diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease, Sepsis (a body’s overwhelming reaction to an infection), Heart Disease, GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - stomach acid goes into the esophagus causing heart burn), Stroke, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), MI (myocardial infarction - heart attack) and previous Aspiration. The patient had a GJ tube (tube inserted into the stomach and goes into the first part of the intestine) and was on tube feeding at home. She was normally nonverbal prior to this admission. When Pt #1 arrived at the ED (Emergency Department) her blood pressure was 210/95 mm/Hg (millimeter of mercury - normal range less than 120/80 mm/Hg). She also had an elevated WBC (White Blood Cell - indicates infection) of 26.5/L (normal 4-12/Liter). Pt #1 also tested positive for COVID. Medical record review of the Medication Administration Record dated 10/21/2022, showed an order for sliding scale SA Insulin (short acting insulin to give based on the blood glucose level). Review of the order showed “...if >400 = 12u (units) of insulin and draw lab. Call the MD for 2 consecutive out of range, despite insulin coverage.” Medical record review of Bedside Glucose Checks and Medication Administration Record dated 10/22/2022 at 1:51 AM through 10/26/2022 at 11:35 AM, showed the following blood glucose levels and insulin doses: Date/Time Glucose Level Insulin/ Time 10/22/2022 at 1:51 AM 288 SA Insulin 4u at 1:50 AM 10/22/2022 at 7:31 AM 290 SA Insulin 4u at 8:20 AM and LA Insulin (Long-Acting Insulin) 10u at 9:59 AM 10/22/2022 at 10:16 AM 394 10/22/2022 at 12:35 PM 424 SA Insulin 12u at 12:15 PM 10/22/2022 at 2:48 PM 284 10/22/2022 at 4:41 PM 158 SA Insulin 4u at 5:19 PM 10/22/2022 at 10:22 PM 212 SA Insulin 6u at 10:40 PM 10/23/2022 at 7:57 AM 269 SA Insulin 6u at 6:26 AM and LA Insulin 10u at 8:18 AM 10/23/2022 at 11:54 AM 252 SA Insulin 8u at 12:49 PM 10/23/2022 at 4:31 PM 88 10/23/2022 at 9:39 PM 112 10/24/2022 at 7:49 AM 136 10/24/2022 at 4:44 PM 117 10/24/2022 at 11:14 PM 297 SA Insulin 8u at 12:00 AM 10/25/2022 at 7:58 AM 471 SA Insulin 12u at 8:31 AM and LA Insulin 10u at 10:01 AM 10/25/2022 at 8:57 AM 553 LABORATORY RESULT 10/25/2022 at 11:02 AM 492 SA Insulin 12u at 11:17 AM 10/25/2022 at 12:30 PM 442 10/25/2022 at 3:17 PM 361 10/25/2022 at 5:39 PM 282 SA Insulin 8u at 5:48 PM 10/25/2022 at 10:14 PM 213 SA Insulin 6u at 10:17 PM 10/26/2022 at 7:47 PM 364 SA Insulin 12u at 7:59 AM and LA Insulin 20u at 9:09 AM 10/26/2022 at 11:35 AM 290 SA Insulin 8u at 11:19 AM Medical record review of Nurses Notes dated 10/22/2022 at 11:00 AM, showed Pt #1 had approximately 300 ml (milliliter) of coffee ground material (indicates possible gastrointestinal bleeding) aspirated from her GJ tube. Medical record review of Physician Progress Notes dated 10/22/2022 at 1:44 PM, showed “... with 300 ml residual in stomach...coffee ground appearing...question if GJ port working...will consult surgery...” Medical record review of Physician Progress Notes dated 10/23/2022 at 7:24 AM, showed the physician noted “...awake and lucid...no further bleeding noted...hope to start tube feeding soon...” Medical record review of a Registered Dietician (RD) Progress Notes dated 10/23/2022 at 12:41 PM, showed the RD visited Pt #1 to review for tube feeding, but Pt #1 was NPO (nothing by mouth). The note stated would follow [Pt#1] when able to start tube feeding. Medical record review of Surgery Consultation Note dated 10/23/2022 at 8:32 PM, showed “...patient is stable and don’t think there was a need for an invasive procedure since the bleeding was probably related to mechanical trauma from the GJ tube...can resume tube feeding in the AM...” Medical record review of a RD Note dated 10/24/2022 at 12:15 PM, showed the RD saw Pt #1 to review the need for tube feeding, “...history reviewed...no pertinent past medical history...no past surgical history on file...previous diet...tube feedings...unknown formula or amounts...” An assessment of height, weight, estimated energy needs, estimated protein needs, and fluid needs wa completed. A review of Pt #1’s lab work and intake and output done. “Recommendations...to start tube feedings with [high carbohydrate tube feeding formula]...at 30 ml [milliliter]/hr. [hour] x 8 hours; then increase to goal rate of 60 ml/hr. as tolerated...add flushes [water] 130 ml every 4 hours...” Medical record review of Physician Orders dated 10/24/2022 at 12:17 PM, showed an order was placed for (high carbohydrate tube feeding formula) at 60 ml/hr. with 130 ml water bolus. Medical record review of Physician Progress Notes dated 10/24/2022 at 2:21 PM, showed “...no further bleeding...general surgery doesn’t want to scope...tube feeding restarted today...” Medical record review of a RD Progress Note dated 10/25/2022 at 11:39 AM, showed “...surgery has signed off on patient and GJ tube will now be used. This is a better option for tube feeds since the [high carbohydrate tube feeding formula] running through the tube has more carbohydrates in it and has caused blood sugar levels to spike...patient’s spouse has requested tube feeding to be stopped currently due to blood sugars...will now recommend...change to [lower carbohydrate tube feeding formula]...this should help with GI viability and blood sugar management...” Medical record review of Physician Orders dated 10/25/2022 at 11:46 AM, showed the tube feeding was changed to (lower carbohydrate tube feeding formula) at 40 ml/hr. Medical record review of Physicians Progress Notes dated 10/25/2022 at 4:15 PM, showed “...patient hyperglycemic [high blood glucose level] with [high carbohydrate tube feeding formula] now...will change to different...” Medical record review of the Physician’s Discharge Summary dated 10/26/2022 at 12:30 PM, showed “...patient...got very hyperglycemic [high blood glucose] from the use of [high carbohydrate tube feeding formula]...due to carb load but this was treated with insulin and improving after changing the formulation to something with fewer carbs...is stable for discharge home today with husband...” Home Health was also consulted to see Pt #1 after discharge. During an interview on 5/12/2025 at 1:30 PM, with a hospital Registered Dietician, the RD stated if a patient is on tube feeding at home and they do not know what the formula is they “...do an assessment to determine what they need. We look at the patient medical history, labs, fluid restrictions, are they diabetic, renal failure, etc...” She stated there is a specific formula they can use for diabetics if needed. She stated “if the patient had high glucose levels, I would make a recommendation and would generally speak 1:1 with the doctor, especially if the patient is in ICU...” She reviewed the initial tube feeding Pt #1 was ordered and did confirm it is higher in carbohydrates.”

    Rule A0629. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Mar 13, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “A Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation of TN00074421 was conducted by the Tennessee Health Facilities Commission on 03/13/2025. During this Life Safety Code Complaint Investigation, Vanderbilt Tullahoma - Harton Hospital was found in substantial compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 482.41(b), Life Safety from fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 101 (2012 Edition)”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 9 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 29, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
May 7, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 11, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 20, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jul 11, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jun 6, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
May 13, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Mar 13, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 7.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (512 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 68% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.1%, heart failure 11.6%, pneumonia 14.9%, COPD 8.7%, stroke 13.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.8%, heart failure 20.8%, pneumonia 16.7%, COPD 20.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 168 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 88% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.99 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Feb 3, 1967.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - other.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Other.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 62% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center owns 100% directly since Oct 9, 2020.
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center runs it.
  • 15 owners or officers are people: John R Ingram (corporate director, 0%); Cecelia Moore (corporate officer); Gail Carr Williams (corporate director, 0%); John Frederick Stein (corporate director); Angela Simmons (corporate director); Daniel Diermeier (corporate director); Edith Carell Johnson (corporate director); Richard Ellis (managing employee (under contract)); Makeba Williams (corporate director, 0%); Jane Freedman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Colin Reed (corporate director, 0%); Lucinda M Baier (corporate director, 0%); Sara Finley (corporate director, 0%); Raymond D Mefford (corporate officer, 0%); Jeffrey Balser (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Nov 1, 2003.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 9, 2020
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jan 1, 2021

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Coffee County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Unity Medical Center3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.