Hearth Record

Dyersburg Regional Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Dyersburg, Tennessee 38024

400 East Tickle Street, Dyersburg, Tennessee 38024. (731) 285-2410.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 26, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 6, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment

    The inspectors’ words, 2,974 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37530 Based on policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the hospital failed to ensure patient rights were protected for 1 of 4 (Patient #10) sampled patients by failing to adequately monitor and protect Patient #10 from alleged abuse and failed to conduct a thorough investigation. The findings included: 1. Review of the hospital policy titled, “Patient Abuse Protection,” dated 1/31/2017, revealed “...The intent of this policy is to prohibit all forms of abuse, neglect (as a form of abuse) and harassment whether from staff, other patients or visitors. The hospital will ensure the patients are free from all forms of abuse, neglect, or harassment and properly and thoroughly investigated all allegations and complaints. All patients have the right to be free from physical or mental abuse and corporal punishment... POLICY... All... personnel are expected to provide protection of patients from abuse, neglect and harassment of all forms... train employees in abuse prevention, intervention and detection... Protect patients during investigation... Investigate all allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment... Report/Respond to incidents of abuse, neglect or mistreatment in accordance to Local, State and/or Federal law... Employees who witness, discover or learn of alleged misconduct shall... Take immediate action to protect, comfort and assure the treatment and safety of the patient...Verbally notify their supervisor and the appropriate nurse manager... Initiate and occurrence report and document observations... Nursing personnel shall... Immediately assess the patient, assist in providing care and follow-up care and notify the patient’s physician... Facility investigation should include... Interviewing the patient victim... Interviewing the alleged perpetrator... I nterviewing all persons with first-hand knowledge of alleged incident... Obtaining written statements from victim, witnesses, and other persons with reported knowledge as appropriate...” Review of the hospital policy titled “Patient Rights/Responsibilities,” dated 10/2024, revealed “...To improve patient outcomes by respecting, protecting, and promoting each patient’s rights... The patient... has the right... To be treated in a dignified and respectful manner that supports his or her dignity... To be free from... any type of abuse, including verbal, mental, physical... abuse..” 2. Review of the closed medical record revealed Patient #10 was admitted to the hospital on 8/3/2024 with diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and Fall. Review of the “Discharge Report,” dated 8/3/2024, revealed “... History of Present Illness... Patient is a 77-year-old male medical history remarkable for Hypertension and Dementia. He presents to the emergency room with generalized weakness of several days duration. Patient had prostate biopsy at [Named Hospital #2] 2 days ago, wife reports patient had been more confused with decreased p. o. [oral intake]... since his biopsy... Patient was seen in emergency room the day before presentation diagnosed with UTI and discharged home. Since discharge, he has had 2-3 falls...” Review of the “Emergency Dept (Department),” dated 8/3/2024, revealed Medical Decision Making...Rationale...Escalation of Care Considered Admission indicated, patient workup resulted in criteria for observation/admission to the hospital...presents to emergency department generalized weakness and multiple falls with workup consistent with cystitis...” Review of the “Medication Administration Records” dated 8/5/2024 and 8/6/2024 revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #1 provided care for Patient #10. Review of the Hospital Orders dated 8/6/2024, revealed “...Discharge ... Inpatient Rehab [Rehabilitation]...Signed by RN #1...” Review of the Email dated 8/6/2024, documented by the Medical -Surgical Manager, revealed “...Yesterday around 1300 (1:00 PM), I received a call from [Named Patient Care Technician [PCT #1]...that she observed [Name Registered Nurse [RN #1] being too aggressive for a patient. I immediately went to one east where [Named PCT #1] was working. At this time another PCT, [Named PCT #2]...told me she observed [Named RN #1] being aggressive with the patient too. [Named PCT #5]...was on the cameras at this time and stated she witnessed [Named RN #1] raising his voice at the patient and being agitated. The patient was picking and pulling at his IV [Intravenous line]. [Named RN #1] then swatted at the patient’s wrist. Telling him not to pick at the IV. [Named PCT #5] stated [Named RN #1] then walked out of the patient’s room and walked back in and was calmer with the patient. [Named PCT #2]...stated she was not in the room with the patient and [Named RN #1] yet she heard [Named RN #1] screaming at the patient and throwing his arms up at the patient, raising his fist as the patient was trying to pick out his IV. [Named PCT #2] stated she saw [Named RN #1] grab towards the patient’s wrist but she stated she could not see if he grabbed it or hit it. Again, [Named PCT #1]...was the sitter of the patient in [Named Patient #10’s] room...[Named PCT #1] stated the patient was trying to pick and pull at his IV. She stated [Named RN #1] slapped the patient’s wrist where the IV was. [Named RN #1] kept telling the patient not to pull at his IV. [Named RN #1] then put his fist up at the patient...[Named Physical Therapy [PT] was asked to come in by [Named RN #1] as the patient was very agitated. [Named PT] stated she [he] was trying to calm the patient. He stated he saw [Named RN #1] with his fists raised but he did not see [Named RN #1] hit the patient. When asked if staff had ever witnessed [Named RN #1] being aggressive with patients...told patient she was being ridiculous when the patient did not want to swallow her meds [medications]...[Named PT] stated he has heard [Named RN #1] yell at a very unruly patient who was trying to pull a fire alarm. [Named Surgery Manager]...was brought in as a neutral party to witness this conversation. She witnessed me talking to [Named RN #1] about the perception of what was witnessed with the patient’s care. [Named RN #1] stated he did not hit the patient. He stated he tapped his hand to prevent him from pulling out his IV, I reviewed perception as well as keeping his voice down...Today we had a meeting about 1020 [10:20 AM] reviewing the follow up from yesterday. [Named RN #1] agreed that he can be too loud at times...He told me this patient had just been to much and it really got the best of him. He stated if we could have some extra education on the care of the dementia patients he would be willing to participate for sure. I informed him if he has a patient that is really too hard to handle or is too taxing, let his charge nurse, house supervisor, a lead or myself know. I told him if we had to we are able to swap with another nurse for the remainder of the shift so we care not too overwhelmed, as we want the best care for the patient. [Named RN #1] seems very remorse [remorseful] about the situation yesterday and told me he would never harm a patient. [Named RN #1] denies having any issues or concern outside of work we could assist him with...I have reminded him and other staff we do have the [Named Mental Health] program they are welcome to use if they need it, as mental health is very important for the success of our healthcare team...[Named Chief Nursing Officer] I know how we had previously mentioned [Named RN #1] might need a de-escalation class, I feel like given the conversation I had with [Named RN #1] I would rather look for some information/training/education on the care of dementia patient with redirecting...” Review of the Emailed Witness Statement dated 8/5/2024, documented by Physical Therapy (PT) revealed “...I was in Hallway at... Nursing station PCT [Patient Care Technician] came to door of room [Patient #10’s]...stating that he is trying to pull his IV out. I went into the room to Help PCT, nurse [Named RN #1] asked me if I could so he could call and gets some Meds [Medication] to help calm pt [patient]...while in room pt trying to pull covering off the IV site, I helped re-direct Pt from pulling out IV...after a few min [minutes] [Named RN #1] came in room, and I moved out of front of Pt to let him get next to pt...As [Named RN #1] was in front of Pt [Patient #10...he continued to try to remove his IV. [Named RN #1] attempted to stop Pt from pulling out is [his] IV telling Him No...and at one time patted at his hand to get it away from the IV...he patted his hand maybe twice...both Pt and Nurse [RN #1] tempers increased at this time with Pt and nurse Bringing fist up then Pt first then Nurse...at that time I steeped [stepped] in and attempt to calm pt and then stayed with pt until he calmed down...after a few min pt wife came in room and we were able to put some pajama pants on pt and get him to lie down from sitting Position...PCT in room to watch pt and I left room...to the best of My Knowledge this is what I saw...” 3. During an interview on 11/5/2024 at 8:54 AM, the Physical Therapist (PT) was asked if he was aware of any incident with RN #1 and any alleged patient abuse. The PT stated, “...I saw [Named RN #1] fist raised but he did not hit the pt [Patient #10]...I heard [Named RN #1] yell at pt who was trying to pull the fire alarm...I was standing in the hallway and heard him [RN #1] hollering “don’t touch the fire alarm”, it was a male pt... the pt was confused and disorient and very mobile...he [RN #1] was walking along with him...and trying to direct him back to his room...with his open hand he was going to pop his hand to keep it off the fire alarm...” The PT was asked if RN #1 made any contact with the patient. The PT stated, “...No, I did not see that...the incident in the patients room [Patient #10] when the patient tried to pull out his IV...he wanted me to help the PCT calm the pt down...I witnessed...he came into the room and did raise his hand...acting like he was going to swat his hand away with an open hand...his [RN #1] voice got up...I stepped in and asked the patient to let me see your hand...the patient calmed down...” The PT was asked if he agreed with the witness statement he documented on 8/5/2024 that at one time [RN #1] patted his [Patient #10] hand to get it away from the IV...he patted his hand maybe twice...both Pt and Nurse tempers increased at this time with Pt...Nurse Bringing fist up...” The PT confirmed what he wrote down that day is what happened. The PT signed, dated and confirmed the witness statement on 11/5/2024 at 9:13 AM. During a telephone interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:20 AM, PCT #1 was asked if she was the sitter in Patient #10’s room during the incident with RN #1. PCT #1 stated, “...Yes, I was the sitter in the room...don’t remember the room number...the patient was uncooperative and tried to pull the IV [Intravenous line] out...then [Named RN #1] comes in the room...gets agitated with the patient...he [RN #1] started slapping the patient’s wrist...then put his fist up towards the patient...” PCT #1 was asked if she remembered how many times RN #1 hit/slapped the patient. PCT #1 stated, “...I want to say once or twice on the wrist where the IV was...” PCT #1 was asked if she reported the incident. PCT #1 stated, “...Yes to [Named Med-Surg Manager]...” PCT #1 was asked if she was interviewed by the Med-Surg Manager and the Surgery Manager. PCT #1 she did not sit down with the Med-Surg manager and I don’t know who the Surgery Manager was. PCT #1 was asked if RN #1 continued to take care of Patient #10 on 8/5/2024. PCT #1 stated, “...Yes...as far as I know he did...” During a telephone interview on 11/5/2024 at 10:43 AM, RN #1 was asked to tell me about the incident with Resident #10. RN #1 stated, “...That same day my supervisor [Named Medical Surgical [Med-Surg] Manager] and the...[Name Surgery Manager] they talked to me about the same thing...they told me a couple of PCT’s was in the room...a gentleman with dementia a geriatric patient...they [PCT’s] were yelling for help...I came in there [the room]...he was swinging his arms...I tried to calm him down...he was trying to get out of the bed...he said “I’m leaving I don’t want to be here”...[Named PCT #1] was one of the PCT’s...not sure who the other one was...I was loud and firm with him...asking him to stop...I’m sure I grabbed his wrist...to stopped him from crawling or falling out of the bed...I was loud and trying to redirect him to get his attention...I believe the manager talked to all the people...[Named Med-Surg Manager] did call me...I told them [Med-Surg manager and Surgery Manager] I was loud...I did grab his wrist but did not use in violence...when I talked to the managers I told them we need training for Geri Psy [Geriatric Psychiatric ] patients...” RN #1 was asked if he was provided the training. RN #1 stated, “...No, I did not get the training on deescalating Geri Psy patients...they [Geri Psy patients] are a problem for us nurses...” RN #1 was asked at any time did he slap or hit the Patient #10’s wrist. RN #1 stated, “...No, I grabbed it...I don’t remember slapping the wrist...” RN #1 was asked if he remember raising his fists up towards Patient #10. RN #1 stated, “...I don’t remember...” RN #1 was asked you say you grabbed Patient #10’s wrist. RN #1 stated, “...Yes, he may have pulled away when I grab the wrist...I don’t think I was the aggressor...I was being defensive...the patient was the aggressor...” RN #1 was asked if he had told a female patient she was she was being ridiculous because she would not swallow her medication. RN #1 stated, “...I don’t recall that...if I said something like that...it was not mean or belittling...if anything it was taken out of context by the patient...” RN #1 was asked if he remembered an incident with a male patient trying to pull the fire alarm. RN #1 stated, “...I don’t remember anything like that...” RN #1 was asked if he was assigned to Patient #10 care on 8/5/2024. RN #1 stated, “...I don’t know if I was assigned to him at this point...I was on the floor and asked to handle a unrulily situation...I don’t know why I would not take care of him...I would not have any reason to switch patients...” During a telephone interview on 11/5/2024 at 9:29 AM, PCT #2 was asked is she was aware of any incident with male RN and a patient. The PCT #2 stated, “...I was not in the room with [Named RN #1] and the patient...I heard [Named RN #1] screaming at the patient and throwing his arms up at the patient...I saw him grab towards the patient’s wrist, but she stated she could not see if he grabbed it or hit it [the wrist]...I was at the nurse station on one east and saw into the room the door was open...I don’t recall the room number...I witnessed him [Named RN #1] yelling at a combative patient and him swatting his [Patient #10’s] hand...” PCT #2 was asked if RN #1 touched or made contact with the patient. PCT #2 stated, “...there was another PCT in the room at the time...she may have seen a little closer [Named PCT #1]...” PCT #2 was asked if she witnessed RN #1 raise his fists at Patient #10. PCT #2 stated, “...He had his arms up and his hand was in the shape of a fist...he was agitated with the patient...” During an interview on 11/6/2024 at 3:00 PM, the Medical-Surgical Manager (Med-Surg Manager) was asked if the hospital provided the training that RN #1 had requested. The Med-Surg Manager stated, “...No...they [staff] have access to the training...we prefer them to do it during the work hours...he has access to the training when needed...” The Med-Surg Manager was asked what the hospital did to protect the patient during the investigation and was RN #1’s assignment changed. The Med-Surg Manager stated, “...I have to look at the patients’ records...I know we reassign in different situations...” The Med-Surg Manager was asked if an occurrence report was completed and the physician notified. The Med-Surg Manager confirmed there was no occurrence report completed and no documentation the physician was notified of the incident. The Med-Surg Manager was asked if Patient #10 was assessed during and after the incident with RN #1. The Med-Surg Manager confirmed she did go and see the patient but have no documentation the patient was assessed or examined. The Med-Surg Manager asked if the allegation of abuse was reported to the state. The Med-Surg Manager stated, “...No, I reported it to my chain of command and CNO [Chief Nursing Officer]. The Med-Surg Manager was asked if she felt she did a thorough investigation of the allegation of abuse. The Med-Surg Manager stated, “...Yes ma’am...I can see there are things...that could be improved upon with my investigation...” The hospital failed to ensure Patient #10’s rights were protected during the investigation, failed to initiate, and completed an occurrence report, and failed to ensure Administration fully investigated the alleged allegation of abuse identified by direct care staff on 8/5/2024. The hospital was unable to provide documentation the patient was immediately assessed for evidence of abuse, the physician was notified, and that follow-up care was provided. The hospital failed to provide training to RN #1 post incident that accrued on 8/5/2024.”

    Rule A0145. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Nov 1, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19001 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the hospital failed to appropriately document the transfer for one of 21 (Patient #15) sampled patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) seeking medical treatment that was transferred. The findings included: Medical record review for Patient #15 revealed a 26 year old female who presented to Hospital #1’s ED on 8/1/2024 at 12:43 PM, with reported suicidal ideations. The Medical Screen Examination (MSE) was initiated at 1:09 PM and included an evaluation by Mobile Crisis services. The Mobile Crisis evaluator recommended psychiatric hospital placement. Patient #15 was transferred to an acute psychiatric facility on 8/1/2024 at 4:52 PM. Review of the Acute Care Transfer Form revealed ED Physician #2 did not fully complete the Patient Consent Section or the Risks and Benefits of Transfer Section. Cross Refer to A 2409.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 931 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19001 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the hospital medical staff failed to document the risks and benefits for transfer for one of 21 (Patient #15) sampled patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) seeking treatment that was transferred. The findings included: 1. Review of the hospital policy “EMTALA [Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act], Definitions and Terminology” revised 11/2019, revealed, “...Transfer means the movement of an individual outside the Hospital’s facilities at the direction of any person employed (or affiliated with) the Hospital... Transfers include transfers to a higher level of care and transfers requested by the individual...” Review of the hospital policy “EMTALA Stabilization and Transfer” revised 11/2029, revealed, “... To ensure compliance with the Emergency Treatment and Active Labor Act [EMTALA] requirements to stabilize and in some instances transfer, individuals presenting to [named Hospital] that are found to have emergency medical conditions... Transfer Documentation... Acute Care Transfer Form: For any patient care transfer involving a potentially emergent condition, each section of the Acute Care Transfer Form must be completed to document that the Hospital followed both its policies and procedures and the requirements of EMTALA...” 2. Medical record review for Patient #15 revealed a 26 year old female who presented to Hospital #1’s ED on 8/1/2024 at 12:43 PM, with reported suicidal ideations and a recent voluntary hospitalization for suicidal ideations. Triage was initiated at 12:50 PM, and MSE was initiated at 1:09 PM. Patient #15 had laboratory testing and a Mobile Crisis evaluation. The Mobile Crisis evaluator recommended psychiatric hospital placement. Patient #15 was transferred to an acute psychiatric facility on 8/1/2024 at 4:52 PM. Review of the Acute Care Transfer Form revealed ED Physician #2 did not fully complete the Patient Consent Section or the Risks and Benefits of Transfer Section. In a telephone interview on 11/1/2024 at 11:58 AM, the Quality Director stated Physician #2 was not available for interview, as he was not on the schedule for Hospital #1 for the month of November, and she had been unable to reach him by telephone. The Quality Director verified the expectation was for the ED Physician to fully complete the Acute Care Transfer Form on all patients transferred to a higher level of care.”

    Rule A2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 5 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 26, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 26, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 6, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Nov 1, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Sep 6, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 1 worse of 4; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (321 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 68% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 61% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 9.8%, pneumonia 20.7%, COPD 8.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21%, pneumonia 17.5%, COPD 21.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 177 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.13 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 81% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Dyersburg Health owns 100% directly since Jun 1, 2018; Jackson Madison County General Hospital owns 50% directly since Jun 1, 2018.
  • Jackson Madison County General Hospital and Dyersburg Health run it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Phil Bryant (corporate director); Jeffrey D Blankenship (corporate officer); Danny Wheeler (corporate director); Charlotte Burch (corporate director); Tina Prescott (corporate officer); Tina Prescott (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ray Washington (corporate director); Curtis Mansfield (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership, the latest on Jun 1, 2018.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Dyersburg HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 1, 2018
Jackson Madison County General HospitalOwns 5% or more directly50%Jun 1, 2018
Jackson Madison County General HospitalRuns it (operational or managerial control)50%Jun 1, 2018
Dyersburg HealthRuns it (operational or managerial control)50%Jun 1, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Dyer County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.