Williamson Medical Center
An acute care hospital in Franklin, Tennessee 37067
4321 Carothers Parkway, Franklin, Tennessee 37067. (615) 435-5000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 5of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 185 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 16, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 20, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With 489.24
The inspectors’ words, 296 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35244 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) for medical treatment, then leaving before receiving a medical screening examination (MSE), were advised of the risks prior to leaving the ED for 1 of 2 (Patient #6) sampled patients that left the ED before being medically screened. The findings included: 1. Medical record review revealed Patient #6 presented to the ED on 4/7/2025 at 10:57 PM with chief complaint of mouth, lungs and head pain. Review of an Account Representative (registration clerk) note dated 4/7/2025 at 11:25 PM revealed, “Patient did not want to sign consent [to treat] form at the time of registration... the questions that the patient was asking are out of my realm”. Review of an Account Representative note dated 4/8/2025 at 1:23 AM revealed, “Patient refused to sign the consent [to treat] form due to it saying something about paying...Patient then spoke with the nursing supervisor and essentially decided that she did not want to be seen... Patient refused to sign and left with out speaking to anyone”. Review of “Discharge Plan” dated 4/8/2025 at 1:41 AM revealed Patient #6’s disposition was documented as Left Without Being Seen (LWBS). There was no documentation a Left Without Being Seen form was completed; and no documentation Patient #6 refused to sign a LWBS form as per facility policy. There was no documentation ED staff attempted to locate Patient #6 to discuss the risks of leaving the ED without being seen by a provider for medical screening examination. Cross Refer to A2406.”
-
Medical Screening Exam
The inspectors’ words, 1,473 words
“MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM CFR(s): 489.24(a) & 489.24(c) (a) Applicability of provisions of this section. (1) In the case of a hospital that has an emergency department, if an individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits and regardless of ability to pay) “comes to the emergency department”, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the hospital must- (i) Provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. The examination must be conducted by an individual(s) who is determined qualified by hospital bylaws or rules and regulations and who meets the requirements of §482.55 of this chapter concerning emergency services personnel and direction; and (ii) If an emergency medical condition is determined to exist, provide any necessary stabilizing treatment, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, or an appropriate transfer as defined in paragraph (e) of this section. If the hospital admits the individual as an inpatient for further treatment, the hospital’s obligation under this section ends, as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2)(i) When a waiver has been issued in accordance with section 1135 of the Act that includes a waiver under section 1135(b)(3) of the Act, sanctions under this section for an inappropriate transfer or for the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location do not apply to a hospital with a dedicated emergency department if the following conditions are met: (A) The transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period. (B) The direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location is pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan or, in the case of a public health emergency that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan. (C) The hospital does not discriminate on the basis of an individual’s source of payment or ability to pay. (D) The hospital is located in an emergency area during an emergency period, as those terms are defined in section 1135(g)(1) of the Act. (E) There has been a determination that a waiver of sanctions is necessary. (ii) A waiver of these sanctions is limited to a 72-hour period beginning upon the implementation of a hospital disaster protocol, except that, if a public health emergency involves a pandemic infectious disease (such as pandemic influenza), the waiver will continue in effect until the termination of the applicable declaration of a public health emergency, as provided under section 1135(e)(1)(B) of the Act. (c) Use of dedicated emergency department for nonemergency services. If an individual comes to a hospital’s dedicated emergency department and a request is made on his or her behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, but the nature of the request makes it clear that the medical condition is not of an emergency nature, the hospital is required only to perform such screening as would be appropriate for any individual presenting in that manner, to determine that the individual does not have an emergency medical condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35244 Based on policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) for medical treatment, then leaving before a medical screening examination (MSE) was completed, were advised of the risks prior to leaving the ED for 1 of 2 (Patient #6) sampled patients that left the ED before being medically screened. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility’s “Medical Screening Examination” policy (reviewed 2/7/2024) revealed, “...Refusal of Screening Exam...If a patient withdraws his or her request for examination or treatment or refused further examination or treatment, an appropriately trained individual from the Emergency Department staff will discuss the medical issues related to a voluntary withdrawal. In the discussion, the Emergency Department staff member will... inform the patient of the benefits of the examination and treatment, and of the risks of withdrawal prior to receiving the examination and treatment... take all reasonable steps to secure the individual’s written informed refusal of such examination and treatment... If the patient refuses to sign the form, the written document should indicate that the person has been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination and/or treatment but refused to sign the form...” Review of the facility’s “LEAVING THE EMERGENCY ROOM LEFT WITHOUT BEING SEEN (LWBS) or AGAINST MEDICAL ADVICE (AMA)” policy (reviewed April 2025) revealed, “... If patient leaves without notice (no opportunity to discuss risks/benefits), document attempt to locate patient and document when in process patient was determined to have departed... If a patient notifies a staff member of their desire to leave before being seen by a provider, a nurse or provider should discuss risks and benefits of leaving prior to treatment. Ask patient to remain in the department to discuss situation with the provider...If the patient refuses to wait for treatment or if, after the discussion of risks and benefits, they still desire to leave the patient is requested to sign a Left Without Being Seen form...If patient refused to sign LWBS form, notate patient’s refusal of signature on the form...If patient refuses to discuss risks and benefits document: Attempted to explain risks and benefits of leaving prior to treatment. Patient refuses to discuss or listen to risks and benefits and departed, and declined to sign LWBS form...” 2. Medical record review revealed Patient #6 presented to the ED on 4/7/2025 at 10:57 PM with chief complaint of mouth, lungs and and head pain. Patient #6 reported head and chest pain where she had basal cell carcinoma (a type of skin cancer) lesions, gum pain from gum disease, Histoplasmosis (lung infection caused by inhaling spores from the fungus Histoplasma capsulatum) lung pain, chronic cough from Covid (Coronavirus-disease caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus) and a headache from coughing. Review of an Account Representative (registration clerk) note dated 4/7/2025 at 11:25 PM revealed, “Patient did not want to sign consent form at the time of registration. Patient requested to speak with billing and I told her it was a M-F [Monday through Friday] 8-5 [8:00 AM through 5:00 PM] and to call back up. She then proceeded to get upset that we could not help her and wanted the email to [Risk Manager] and I gave her [ED patient access manager] email just in case because the questions that the patient was asking are out of my realm”. Review of an Account Representative note dated 4/8/2025 at 1:23 AM revealed, “Patient refused to sign the consent form due to it saying something about paying. Patient also refused to sign the consent form in the booth with me and wanted to take it with her. I offered a copy, that was not good enough. The patient then spoke with the nursing supervisor and essentially decided that she did not want to be seen. I asked the supervisor to get the consent form from the patient and the supervisor said well she is not being seen so it does not matter that she is not signing. Patient refused to sign and left with out speaking to anyone”. Review of “Discharge Plan” dated 4/8/2025 at 1:41 AM revealed Patient #6’s disposition was documented as Left Without Being Seen. There was no documentation a LWBS form was completed; and no documentation Patient #6 refused to sign the LWBS form as per facility policy. There was no documentation the ED staff attempted to locate Patient #6 to discuss the risks of leaving the ED without being seen by a provider for medical screening examination. In an interview on 5/13/2025 at 9:01 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was asked how patients leaving the ED without being seen for medical screening examinations were handled. RN #1 stated there was a form the patient had to sign and explain why they (patients) were leaving. RN #1 stated the form acknowledged the patient had been told the reasons they (patient) needed to stay for examination. RN #1 stated before you designated a patient LWBS, you gave them a couple chances to show up when you call their (patient) name. RN #1 stated the ED staff asked the registration staff if they had seen the patient and if they (registration staff) also checked the bathrooms (for Patient #6). RN #1 verified she would document on the LWBS form if a patient refused to sign the form. In an interview on 5/13/2025 at 12:45 PM, Nurse Supervisor #1 verified Patient #6 refused to be seen and refused to sign the LWBS form. Nurse Supervisor #1 stated she did not document the Patient’s refusal to sign the form. Nurse Supervisor #1 stated, “...down front [registration] does that...””
All 10 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 12, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 9, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 3, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 20, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 14, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 30, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 29, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 28, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 5 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 3 better and 0 worse of 8.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (734 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 77% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11%, heart failure 14%, pneumonia 14.3%, COPD 8.1%, stroke 11.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13%, heart failure 19.1%, pneumonia 17%, COPD 20.8%, hip or knee replacement 6.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 190 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 72% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.02 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: government - hospital district or authority.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Government - Hospital District or Authority.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 73% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Williamson County Hospital District owns 100% directly since Oct 7, 2014.
- 2 owners or officers are people: Terry Leon Fowler (corporate officer, 100%); Phillip J Mazzuca (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Williamson County Hospital District | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 7, 2014 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Williamson County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Rolling Hills Psychiatric Hospital | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.