Hearth Record

Punxsutawney Area Hospital

An acute care hospital in Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania 15767

81 Hillcrest Drive, Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania 15767. (814) 938-1800.

  • Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 14, 2024: a standard inspection.

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 14, 2024: standard inspection14 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “Facility ID #163701 Component 01 Main Building Based on a Recertification Survey completed on March 14, 2024, it was determined that Punxsutawney Area Hospital was not in compliance with the following requirements of the Life Safety Code for an existing health care occupancy. This is a one-story, Type II (000), unprotected, non-combustible building, with a small mechanical/boiler basement, that is fully sprinklered.”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Building Rehabilitation

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “Building Rehabilitation CFR(s): NFPA 101 Building Rehabilitation Repair, Renovation, Modification, or Reconstruction Any building undergoing repair, renovation, modification, or reconstruction complies with both of the following: * Requirements of Chapter 18 and 19 * Requirements of the applicable Sections 43.3, 43.4, 43.5, and 43.6 18.1.1.4.3, 19.1.1.4.3, 43.1.2.1 Change of Use or Change of Occupancy Any building undergoing change of use or change of occupancy classification complies with the requirements of Section 43.7, unless permitted by 18.1.1.4.2 or 19.1.1.4.2 18.1.1.4.2 (4.6.7 and 4.6.11), 19.1.1.4.2 (4.6.7 and 4.6.11), 43.1.2.2 (43.7) Additions Any building undergoing an addition shall comply with the requirements of Section 43.8. If the building has a common wall with a nonconforming building, the common wall is a fire barrier having at least a 2-hour fire resistance rating constructed of materials as required for the addition. Communicating openings occur only in corridors and are protected by approved self-closing fire doors with at least a 1-1/2-hour fire resistance rating. Additions comply with the requirements of Section 43.8. 18.1.1.4.1 (4.6.7 and 4.6.11), 18.1.1.4.1.1 (8.3), 18.1.1.4.1.2, 18.1.1.4.1.3, 19.1.1.4.1 (4.6.7 and 4.6.11), 19.1.1.4.1.1 (8.3), 19.1.1.4.1.2, 19.1.1.4.1.3, 43.1.2.3(43.8) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42642 Based on observation and interview, the facilty failed to meet building rehabilitation requirements for one of one generator. Findings include: Interview on March 14, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., revealed the facility upgraded the generator control and annunciator panel in October 2023. No state plan approval was submitted prior to the upgrade, nor was an occupancy inspection granted by the Division of Life Safety. The facility is currently waiting on engineer drawings for the project. Interview with the facilities director on March 14, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., confirmed the unapproved upgrades.”

    Rule K0111. Standard-level.

  • Means Of Egress - General

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Means of Egress - General CFR(s): NFPA 101 Means of Egress - General Aisles, passageways, corridors, exit discharges, exit locations, and accesses are in accordance with Chapter 7, and the means of egress is continuously maintained free of all obstructions to full use in case of emergency, unless modified by 18/19.2.2 through 18/19.2.11. 18.2.1, 19.2.1, 7.1.10.1 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42642 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed means of egress requirements for one of over five exits. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 10:11 a.m., revealed the emergency exit next to the MRI was blocked by contruction barriers. Interview with the director of facilities on March 14, 2024, at 10:11 a.m., confirmed the emergency exit was blocked.”

    Rule K0211. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Lighting

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Emergency Lighting Emergency lighting of at least 1-1/2-hour duration is provided automatically in accordance with 7.9. 18.2.9.1, 19.2.9.1 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain emergency lighting, affecting one of three building components. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 11:41 a.m., revealed the battery back-up emergency light in the sterile processing room did not illuminate when the test button was pushed. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 11:41 a.m., confirmed the emergency light deficiency.”

    Rule K0291. Standard-level.

  • Exit Signage

    The inspectors’ words, 203 words

    “Exit Signage CFR(s): NFPA 101 Exit Signage 2012 EXISTING Exit and directional signs are displayed in accordance with 7.10 with continuous illumination also served by the emergency lighting system. 19.2.10.1 (Indicate N/A in one-story existing occupancies with less than 30 occupants where the line of exit travel is obvious.) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain exit signs for five of over twenty emergency exits. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, between 10:00 a.m. and 11:10 a.m., revealed the following exit sign deficiencies: A. (10:00 a.m.) Main floor, two doors out of three leading to enclosed courtyards failed to display “No Exit” signs; B. (10:32 a.m.) Main floor, purchasing room B-112 discharge door failed to display an exit sign; C. (11:07 a.m.) Main floor, conflicting directional signage was posted at rear interior entrance to the emergency room; D. (11:10 a.m.) Main floor, exit sign was visually obscured on the exit path near the radiology entrance; E. (11:43 a.m.) Main floor, fire doors were missing an exit sign near the house instrumentation pick-up room. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 11:43 a.m., confirmed the exit sign deficiencies.”

    Rule K0293. Standard-level.

  • Alcohol Based Hand Rub Dispenser (Abhr)

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “Alcohol Based Hand Rub Dispenser (ABHR) CFR(s): NFPA 101 Alcohol Based Hand Rub Dispenser (ABHR) ABHRs are protected in accordance with 8.7.3.1, unless all conditions are met: * Corridor is at least 6 feet wide * Maximum individual dispenser capacity is 0.32 gallons (0.53 gallons in suites) of fluid and 18 ounces of Level 1 aerosols * Dispensers shall have a minimum of 4-foot horizontal spacing * Not more than an aggregate of 10 gallons of fluid or 135 ounces aerosol are used in a single smoke compartment outside a storage cabinet, excluding one individual dispenser per room * Storage in a single smoke compartment greater than 5 gallons complies with NFPA 30 * Dispensers are not installed within 1 inch of an ignition source * Dispensers over carpeted floors are in sprinklered smoke compartments * ABHR does not exceed 95 percent alcohol * Operation of the dispenser shall comply with Section 18.3.2.6(11) or 19.3.2.6(11) * ABHR is protected against inappropriate access 18.3.2.6, 19.3.2.6, 42 CFR Parts 403, 418, 460, 482, 483, and 485 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42642 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to meet alcohol-based hand rub dispenser (ABHR) requirements in one of over twenty exam rooms. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 10:44 a.m., revealed the second floor suite 2300 had an ABHR mounted directly over an electrical outlet. Interview with the director of facilities on March 14, 2024 at 10:44 a.m., confirmed the deficiency.”

    Rule K0325. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Testing And Maintenance

    The inspectors’ words, 251 words

    “Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance A fire alarm system is tested and maintained in accordance with an approved program complying with the requirements of NFPA 70, National Electric Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. Records of system acceptance, maintenance and testing are readily available. 9.6.1.3, 9.6.1.5, NFPA 70, NFPA 72 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42642 1. Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to meet fire alarm system testing and maintenance requirements for one of one system. Findings include: Document review on March 14, 2024, at 9:20 a.m., revealed the facility fire alarm system inspection, completed July 27, 2023, lacked the inspection of over 17 components, which included pull stations, smoke detectors, and duct detectors. The facility was unable to provide documentation that these components were tested within the last year. Interview with the director of facilities on March 14, 2024, at 9:20 a.m., confirmed the deficiency existed. 2. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain fire alarm systems in one of twelve smoke compartments. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 10.32 a.m., revealed the fire alarm pull station notification device was obstructed by a cart in the purchasing room located by the exit discharge door. Device obstruction could delay manual alarm system activation. An interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 10.32 a.m., confirmed the fire alarm device was obstructed.”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the sprinkler system in one of twelve smoke compartments. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 11:59 a.m., revealed the first-floor kitchen storage room had a loose escutcheon plate that created an opening in the ceiling, potentially causing a delay in sprinkler activation. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 11:59 a.m., confirmed the sprinkler escutcheon plate was not properly installed.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Portable Fire Extinguishers

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Portable Fire Extinguishers CFR(s): NFPA 101 Portable Fire Extinguishers Portable fire extinguishers are selected, installed, inspected, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers. 18.3.5.12, 19.3.5.12, NFPA 10 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide portable fire extinguishers in two of over fifty rooms. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 10:10 a.m. and 10:32 a.m., revealed the following discrepancies: A. (10:10 a.m.) Main floor respiratory department had no portable fire extinguisher installed. Ref: NFPA 10 -6.2.1.2 B. (10:32 a.m.) Main floor purchasing room fire extinguisher was not readily accessible, visually obstructed by staged boxes and a cart. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 10:10 a.m., confirmed the deficiencies.”

    Rule K0355. Standard-level.

  • Subdivision Of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie

    The inspectors’ words, 221 words

    “Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie CFR(s): NFPA 101 Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrier Construction 2012 EXISTING Smoke barriers shall be constructed to a 1/2-hour fire resistance rating per 8.5. Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall. Smoke dampers are not required in duct penetrations in fully ducted HVAC systems where an approved sprinkler system is installed for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. 19.3.7.3, 8.6.7.1(1) Describe any mechanical smoke control system in REMARKS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain smoke barrier requirements on one of one building level. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, between 10:05 a.m., and 12:06 p.m., revealed the following deficiencies: A. (10:05 a.m.-12:06 p.m.) Main floor smoke and fire dampers could not be identified from the underside of the ceiling tiles. Ref: NFPA 90A -6.3.1.2; B. (10:05 a.m.-12:06 p.m.) Main floor ceiling tiles lacked maintenance, with loose, misaligned, broken, and missing tiles present, which would allow smoke passage throughout the facility. C. (11:50 a.m.) Main floor, above the double doors near the house instrumentation pick-up room, revealed a penetration through the wall not sealed with fire caulk. Interview with the maintenance supervisor on February 29, 2024, at 10:52 a.m., confirmed the smoke barrier deficiency.”

    Rule K0372. Standard-level.

  • Soiled Linen And Trash Containers

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Soiled Linen and Trash Containers CFR(s): NFPA 101 Soiled Linen and Trash Containers Soiled linen or trash collection receptacles shall not exceed 32 gallons in capacity. The average density of container capacity in a room or space shall not exceed 0.5 gallons/square feet. A total container capacity of 32 gallons shall not be exceeded within any 64 square feet area. Mobile soiled linen or trash collection receptacles with capacities greater than 32 gallons shall be located in a room protected as a hazardous area when not attended. Containers used solely for recycling are permitted to be excluded from the above requirements where each container is less than or equal to 96 gallons unless attended, and containers for combustibles are labeled and listed as meeting FM Approval Standard 6921 or equivalent. 18.7.5.7, 19.7.5.7 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain soiled linen/trash quantities in one of more than ten soiled linen/trash rooms. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 11:01 a.m., revealed soiled linen/trash on the floor, creating a fire hazard. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 12:02 p.m., confirmed the deficiency.”

    Rule K0754. Standard-level.

  • Gas And Vacuum Piped Systems - Inspection And

    The inspectors’ words, 285 words

    “Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Inspection and CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Inspection and Testing Operations The gas and vacuum systems are inspected and tested as part of a maintenance program and include the required elements. Records of the inspections and testing are maintained as required. 5.1.14.2.3, B.5.2, 5.2.13, 5.3.13, 5.3.13.4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42642 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to meet gas and vacuum-piped system requirements for one of one system. Findings include: Document review on March 14, 2024, between 9:50 a.m. and 10:01 a.m., revealed the following system deficiencies, documented on the March 9, 2023 inspection report, lacked corrective documentation: A. (9:50 a.m.) Outdoor bulk pad lacked a demand pressure switch; B. (9:51 a.m.) Outdoor bulk pad emergency 02 connection was not present; C. (9:51 a.m.) Outdoor bulk pad main line gaug wase not present; D. (9:52 a.m.) Mechanical room carbon monoxide monitor was not accurate; E. (9:53 a.m.) Mechanical room had no main line vacuum switch or gauge present; F. (9:54 a.m.) Mechanical room source valve was not tagged and discharge piping was not labeled; G. (9:56 a.m.) Mechanical room exhaust was not turn down screened or protected; H. (9:56 a.m.) Manifold room pigtails were out of date; I. (9:56 a.m.) Manifold room manifold was obsolete; J. (9:56 a.m.) Manifold location was non-compliant; K. (9:57 a.m.) Manifold room had no demand check on pressure switch; L (10:01 a.m.) Floor 1C nurse station panel model was not compliant and needed replaced. Interview with the facilities director on March 14, 2024, at 10:01 a.m., confirmed the deficiencies did not have corrective documentation at the time of the survey.”

    Rule K0908. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Other

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Electrical Systems - Other CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Other List in the REMARKS section any NFPA 99 Chapter 6 Electrical Systems requirements that are not addressed by the provided K-Tags, but are deficient. This information, along with the applicable Life Safety Code or NFPA standard citation, should be included on Form CMS-2567. Chapter 6 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain electrical systems for one of over five electrical rooms. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, at 11:01 a.m., revealed the emergency room storage had boxes in front of the electrical panels, preventing access. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 11:10 a.m., confirmed the items were blocking the electrical panels at the time of the survey.”

    Rule K0911. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Receptacles

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “Electrical Systems - Receptacles CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Receptacles Power receptacles have at least one, separate, highly dependable grounding pole capable of maintaining low-contact resistance with its mating plug. In pediatric locations, receptacles in patient rooms, bathrooms, play rooms, and activity rooms, other than nurseries, are listed tamper-resistant or employ a listed cover. If used in patient care room, ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) are listed. 6.3.2.2.6.2 (F), 6.3.2.2.4.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49939 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain electrical receptacles on one of two building levels. Findings include: Observation on March 14, 2024, between 10:27 a.m. and 12:05 a.m., revealed the facility failed to ensure ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection within six feet of sinks and water sources in the following locations: A. (10:27 a.m.) Main floor kitchen, women’s restroom; B. (10:37 a.m.) Main floor operating room, break room; C. (10:48 a.m.) Main floor histology room, workstation strip multi outlets; D. (10:53 a.m.) Main floor laboratory, workstation strip outlets; E. (10:58 a.m.) Main floor laboratory, cleaning sink; F. (11:13 a.m.) Main floor x-ray room 3; G. (11:15 a.m.) Main floor x-ray room 1; H (11:20 a.m.) Main floor SPU, nurses station; I. (11:24 a.m.) Main floor SPU, recovery room, bed 11; J. (11:26 a.m.) Main floor sterile utility, hopper room; K. (11:29 a.m.) Main floor emergency room, men’s locker room; L. (11:58 a.m.) Main floor emergency room, soiled laundry room; M. (12:00 p.m.) Main floor soiled utility room, across from room C-122; N (12:05 p.m.) Main floor ICU department, nourishment room, ice machine. Interview with the maintenance technician on March 14, 2024, at 12:05 p.m., confirmed the electrical deficiencies.”

    Rule K0912. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 14, 2024Standard inspection14 deficiencies cited
Mar 8, 2024Standard inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 7.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (327 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 11.7%, pneumonia 19%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.9%, pneumonia 16.5%, COPD 19.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 136 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 60% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.95 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

On record, newest first
DateWhatDetail
Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program)Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 70% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Michael F Ickowski Sr (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); April L Miller (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); James R Martin (corporate officer, 0%); Christina Lubold (corporate officer, 0%); Mary Krauland (corporate officer, 0%); Nathan Kovalchick (corporate officer, 0%); Wendell S Davis (corporate officer, 0%); Laurie Kuzneski (corporate officer, 0%); T Clark Simpson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Frank Roberts (corporate officer, 0%); Todd Brice (corporate officer, 0%); Rebecca Stapleton (corporate officer, 0%); Chad R Shaffer (corporate officer, 0%); Hilliary Creely (corporate officer, 0%); Kyle A Lingenfelter (corporate officer); Russell A Drozdiak (corporate officer, 0%); David Reed (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Jefferson County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Penn Highlands Brookville4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.