St Lukes Hospital
An acute care hospital in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015. (484) 526-4000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 5of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 817 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 6, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 visit on record, nothing cited. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 6, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Surgical Services
The inspectors’ words, 851 words
“SURGICAL SERVICES CFR(s): 482.51 If the hospital provides surgical services, the services must be well organized and provided in accordance with acceptable standards of practice. If outpatient surgical services are offered the services must be consistent in quality with inpatient care in accordance with the complexity of services offered. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 46816 Based on the seriousness of the non-compliance and the effect on patient outcome, the facility failed to substantially comply with this condition by failing to provide safe patient care during a procedure in which a fire ignited in the Operating Room (OR). Findings include: Review on November 1, 2023, of facility policy and procedures, “Fire Prevention and Patient Fire Risk Assessment and Attachment,” OR Manual, reviewed October 2022 revealed, A fire risk assessment (attachment 1) will be performed by the surgical team and be documented in the electronic medical record (EMR) as part of the Time Out prior to each surgical or other invasive procedure. The purpose of the fire risk assessment is to: Identify possible fire hazards ... Reduce the risk from these hazards to an acceptable level ... Identify actions needed for patient safety. Further review of the “Fire Prevention and Patient Fire Risk Assessment Attachment,” revealed the following strategies to manage the risks of oxygen ... Configure surgical drapes to allow sufficient venting of oxygen delivered to the patient via mask or nasal cannula ... Deliver 5L to 10L/min of air under the surgical drapes to flush out excess oxygen via a separate administration system, if oxygen is being administered via mask or nasal cannula. ... Titrate oxygen to the lowest percentage necessary to support the patient’s physiological needs. ... Stop supplemental oxygen for one minute before using electrosurgery, electrocautery or laser for head, neck or upper chest procedures ... Used cuffed endotracheal tubes when possible.” Review on November 1, 2023, of MR1 revealed the patient was admitted as an outpatient at the Saint Luke’s Hospital of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania on October 9, 2023, for excision of a lipoma at the posterior of the skull and was transferred to a higher level of care due to electrical burns that resulted during procedure. Further review of MR1 revealed the procedure was documented as a Fire Assessment Moderate Risk 2 - 3. Review on November 1, 2023, of facility document “Screen Shot” revealed an example of the Fire Risk Assessment Tool for 2 - 3 Moderate Risk of Fire that included check off boxes for interventions and did not include strategies to manage the risks of oxygen. Review on November 1, 2023, of Anesthesia Provider documentation for MR1 dated October 9, 2023, revealed the patient had normal cardiovascular and pulmonary exams and received General Anesthesia with monitors with 4L of oxygen during the procedure. Further review of MR1 revealed no Anesthesia provider documentation for managing the strategies for the use of oxygen. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 11:00 AM, with employee (EMP1), confirmed the patient suffered burns to face, left hand and left wrist during an elective procedure at the facility on October 9, 2023. Further interview confirmed the internal investigation revealed the electrocautery device (Bovie) may have sparked and ignited the oxygen that was pooling under the surgical drape on the head of the patient. Further confirmed it is the anesthesiologists’ responsibility to monitor oxygen use on patients during procedures. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 11:30 AM, with employee (EMP1), confirmed the “Fire Risk Assessment Tool “ does not list strategies to address, manage and decrease the fire risk, while utilizing oxygen on patients during a procedure. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 11:30 AM, with employee (EMP1), confirmed the facility has not had the employee Fire Safety and Prevention computer based annual training this year. The last employee training is dated October 2022. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 12:00 PM, with employee (EMP8), confirmed the facility did not have an Operating Room (OR) specific fire drill this year. A fire drill occurred in the OR hallway on August 31, 2023, which was not OR specific. Review of the Fire Drill attendance sheet revealed, four of fourteen OR staff attended the fire drill. EMP8 confirmed that only 4 of the 14 OR staff members were in attendance during the fire drill. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 2:51 PM, with employee (EMP11), confirmed the cause of the fire was “multifactorial”. The patient was positioned on their right side, patient had an oxygen mask with 100% FIO2 source, the surgical drape on the patients’ face trapped oxygen under the drape and the electrocautery sparked the fire. We need to be more vigilant during the “Time Out” procedure with an emphasis on the Fire Risk assessment and mitigation. The Fire Risk Assessment Tool does not address direct Oxygen (O2) delivery and the risk when procedure is performed above the xiphoid, with proximity to the airway. A discussion took place with the survey team and the facility’s administrative staff (EMP1, EMP2, EMP3, EMP4, EMP8, EMP11) regarding the survey team’s concerns related to Surgical Services on November 1, 2023, at approximately 2:24 pm.”
-
Fire Control Plans
The inspectors’ words, 560 words
“FIRE CONTROL PLANS CFR(s): 482.41(b)(7) (5) The hospital must have written fire control plans that contain provisions for prompt reporting of fires; extinguishing fires; protection of patients, personnel and guests; evacuation; and cooperation with fire fighting authorities. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46816 Based on review of facility policy and procedures, review of facility documents, review of the medical record (MR) and interview with staff (EMP), it was determined the facility failed to ensure all members of the perioperative team responsible for preventing fires in the surgical environment participated in the annual fire education safety program and failed to ensure the Fire Drill was specific to the Operating Room (OR). Findings include: Review on November 1, 2023, of facility policy, “Fire Prevention and Patient Fire Risk Assessment,” Operating Room Manual, reviewed October 2022 revealed, “ ... II. Policy: Members of the perioperative team are responsible for preventing fires in the surgical environment and for participating in annual departmental fire safety education. Fire safety education will occur for staff annually and may include but not limited to participating in department mock drills, identification of evacuation routes, participation in fire extinguishing techniques, and identification of medical gas and electrical panel shut-off. Review on November 1, 2023, of facility documents, “Fire Drill Signature Page,” for the OR Fire Drill conducted on August 31, 2023, revealed documentation of attendance of four OR staff. Continued review of the Fire Drill Signature Page revealed the remainder of the attendees at the OR fire drill were from other departments of the facility. Review on November 1, 2023, of “Case Information” for MR1 revealed the four OR staff and two providers were in attendance during the procedure for MR1. There was no documentation for these staff and providers of attendance for the OR Fire Drill on August 31, 2023, or a subsequent OR Fire Drill. Review on November 1, 2023, of facility documents “Fire Drill Effectiveness Evaluation,” and “Supplementary Fire Drill/Alarm Evaluations”dated August 31, 2023, for the OR fire drill, revealed the fire drill was not specific to the OR. Review on November 1, 2023 of online facility education revealed “2022 OR Fire Safety” the last education was completed in October 2022. Interview on November 1, 2023, at 12:00 PM, with employee (EMP8), confirmed the facility did not have an OR specific fire drill this year. A fire drill occurred in the OR hallway on August 31, 2023, which was not OR specific. Review of the Fire Drill attendance sheet revealed, four of fourteen OR staff attended the fire drill. EMP8 confirmed that only 4 of the 14 OR staff members were in attendance during the fire drill. Further interview with EMP8 on November 1, 2023, at 12:00 PM confirmed the staffing for the OR included 4 -surgical techs and 2 surgical tech per diem, 7- RNs along with 1 RN part time and 2 RN per diem. Further interview with EMP8 confirmed four of the 16 members of the OR staff were in attendance at the OR Fire Drill conducted on August 31, 2023, due to the fact the remainder of the staff were involved in other cases at the time of the drill at 11:10 AM. EMP8 also confirmed the last OR Fire Safety Education was completed in October 2022 and the OR Fire Safety Education for 2023 has not yet been completed.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 5 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 5 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (2,011 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: better than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.8%, heart failure 8.4%, pneumonia 12.3%, COPD 7.8%, stroke 9.3%, heart bypass surgery 1.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.5%, heart failure 24.4%, pneumonia 18.4%, COPD 19.3%, heart bypass surgery 11.1%, hip or knee replacement 6.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 132 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 85% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.97 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 58 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 97% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- St Luke’s Health Network Inc. owns 100% directly since May 29, 1966.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Richard Anderson (corporate officer, 100%); Richard Anderson (corporate director, 100%); Richard Anderson (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Robert L Wax (corporate officer, 0%); Robert L Wax (corporate director); Robert L Wax (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Scott Wolfe (corporate director, 0%); Scott Wolfe (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| St Luke’s Health Network Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | May 29, 1966 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Northampton County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| St Luke’s Hospital - Easton Campus | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.