Hearth Record

SSM Health St Anthony Hospital - Midwest

An acute care hospital in Midwest City, Oklahoma 73110

2825 Parklawn Drive, Midwest City, Oklahoma 73110. (405) 610-4411.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 10, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 1, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42140 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure evaluation of skin alteration for one (Patient #14) of 17 patent records reviewed. Findings: Review of policy titled “Documentation Standards Guideline” read in part, “Nursing Documentation Guidelines ...nursing documentation will include assessment findings WDL, with additional documentation focused solely on exceptions or deviations from the expected outcomes.” Review of policy titled “Skin Care for Adults” read in part, “assessment and documentation of all wounds will be completed every shift, and with every dressing change, including status/integrity of dressings if present.” PATIENT #14 Review of the medical record showed the patient came to the ED on 02/11/25 with a wound and did not show documentation of a nursing assessment to enable the monitoring of wound characteristics such as location, size, color of wound bed, presence or description of drainage or odor. Specifically: On 02/11/25 at 11:34 AM, the patient arrived to the ED with a chief complaint of right leg pain related to a wound. Nursing documentation related to the wound read in part, “pain to wound on [the patient’s] incision on right leg ...dressing cover applied to wound.” On 03/31/25 from 8:33 AM to 8:57 AM, Staff M reviewed the medical record and stated: 1. Documentation in the skin assessment flowsheet was expected to be done and was not. 2. Documentation of the supplies used to dress a wound was expected to be done and was not.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Emergency Services Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 498 words

    “EMERGENCY SERVICES POLICIES CFR(s): 482.55(a)(3) [If emergency services are provided at the hospital --] (3) The policies and procedures governing medical care provided in the emergency service or department are established by and are a continuing responsibility of the medical staff. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42140 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure adherence to policy for two (Patients #1 and #16) of 17 patient records reviewed. Findings: PATIENT #1 Review of Attachment F of policy titled “Required Elements of Daily Assessment/Reassessment” read in part, “ADULT ...VITAL SIGNS ...At time of triage and then at a minimum of every 2 hours on medical patients with an ESI of 1-3.” Review of the medical record showed an approximately three and a half hour ED visit and did not show documentation of vital signs every two hours. Specifically: On 02/11/25 at 12:04 PM, the patient arrived to the ED with a chief complaint of allergic reaction. Triage began at 12:09 PM and the patient was given an emergency severity index (ESI) of 3. Vital signs were obtained at 12:11 PM and at time of discharge at 3:34 PM ( more than 1 hour 15 minutes past due). On 03/31/25 at approximately 1:05 PM, Staff M reviewed the medical record and stated: 1. More than two hours lapsed between vital signs. 2. Vital signs were due every two hours. 3. The risk to the patient was unrecognized decompensation or anaphylaxis. PATIENT #16 Review of policy titled “Emergency Department Arrivals, Triage, and Waiting Population” read in part, “Persons who are deemed appropriate to wait may be returned to the lobby when the ED is at capacity ...The waiting population will be reassessed by direct visualization at a minimum of every 2 hours.” Review of policy titled “Patient Leaving Against Medical Advice, Leaving Before Being Evaluated or Discharged, Patient Elopement and Abduction” read in part, “Patient Left Without Being Evaluated ...If the patient left without notifying staff ...or was not visualized leaving: Attempt to locate the patient at least three times before discharging the patient from the system. Attempts will be documented with in the electronic health record.” Review of the medical record showed an approximately four hour ED visit after triage with a disposition of ’’left without being evaluated’ and showed no documentation of visualization every two hours. Specifically: On 02/10/25 at 10:09 AM, the patient arrived to the ED with a chief complaint of dizziness. Triage was completed at 10:15 AM with an ESI of 3. At 2:05 PM, a patient disposition and comment was documented as “LWBE (Left without being evaluated) Pt left without being evaluated after triage.” On 03/31/25 at approximately 9:11 AM, Staff M reviewed the medical record and stated: 1. There was no documentation anyone ever looked for the patient to make sure the patient had not passed out somewhere. 2. Not visualizing the patient every 2 hours after triage posed a risk of a fall, stroke or death.”

    Rule A1104. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 1, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (719 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 65% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), worse than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.5%, heart failure 9.8%, pneumonia 15.3%, COPD 9.2%, stroke 13.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.8%, heart failure 22.3%, pneumonia 18.9%, COPD 20.9%, hip or knee replacement 6.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 150 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 55% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 69% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • SSM Health Care Corporation owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2021.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Shasta R Manuel (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joe M Hodges (corporate officer, 0%); Stacy Coleman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Laura Kaiser (corporate officer, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership, the latest on Apr 1, 2021.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
SSM Health Care CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 1, 2021

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 23 hospitals CMS lists in Oklahoma County, 11 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 4 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.