Hearth Record

Integris Miami Hospital

An acute care hospital in Miami, Oklahoma 74355

200 Second Avenue Southwest, Miami, Oklahoma 74355. (918) 542-6611.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 26, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 3 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 26, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39648 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure treatment within its capability for one (Patient #10) of 20 patients. This failed practice had the likelihood to result in delayed care. (See 2407) Based on record review and interview the hospital failed to restrict transfer for 1 (Patient #10) out of 20 records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to result in delayed care and possible deterioration of health. (See 2409)”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Stabilizing Treatment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,244 words

    “STABILIZING TREATMENT CFR(s): 489.24(d)(1-3) (1) General. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section, if any individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits) comes to a hospital and the hospital determines that the individual has an emergency medical condition, the hospital must provide either- (i) within the capabilities of the staff and facilities available at the hospital, for further medical examination and treatment as required to stabilize the medical condition. (ii) For for transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. (2) Exception: Application to inpatients. (i) If a hospital has screened an individual under paragraph (a) of this section and found the individual to have an emergency medical condition, and admits that individual as an inpatient in good faith in order to stabilize the emergency medical condition, the hospital has satisfied its special responsibilities under this section with respect to that individual (ii) This section is not applicable to an inpatient who was admitted for elective (nonemergency) diagnosis or treatment. (iii) A hospital is required by the conditions of participation for hospitals under Part 482 of this chapter to provide care to its inpatients in accordance with those conditions of participation. (3) Refusal to consent to treatment. A hospital meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section with respect to an individual if the hospital offers the individual the further medical examination and treatment described in that paragraph and informs the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) of the risks and benefits to the individual of the examination and treatment, but the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) does not consent to the examination or treatment. The medical record must contain a description of the examination, treatment, or both if applicable, that was refused by or on behalf of the individual. The hospital must take all reasonable steps to secure the individual’s written informed refusal (or that of the person acting on his or her behalf). The written document should indicate that the person has been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination or treatment, or both. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42140 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure treatment within its capability for one (Patient #10) of 20 patients. This failed practice had the likelihood to result in delayed care. Findings: Patient #10 Review of the clinical record showed the patient presented to Integris Miami ED department on 09/07/24 at 7:25 PM with extensive wounds/pressure ulcers. Review of the ED Flowsheet dated 09/07/24 at 8:56 PM read in part, “Skin Integrity ...multiple sites of breakdown ...Location scattered.” Review of a document titled “ED Provider Note” dated 09/07/24 read in part: 1. “The patient presents to the ED by EMS for a chief complaint of wounds.” 2. “The wounds are located on ...bilateral lower legs, sacral region, complete upper and lower back. There is no obvious purulent drainage from these wounds. There is a large amount of associated cellulitis.” 3. “Per chart review [the patient] has come in frequently for these wounds and been admitted to this hospital.” 4. “Due to lack of wound care at this facility ...the patient has been accepted at Mercy Joplin ...will be transferred to their facility.” Review of an internal document dated 09/07/24 showed the summarization of recorded transfer center phone call conversations for Request #176412 and showed they occurred on 09/07/24 from approximately 9:30 PM to 10:31 PM. Review of a recorded phone call “[omitted] 9.7.24 4.wav” between Staff J and the receiving physician showed the following was stated: 1. Staff J: “[the patient has] chronic venous stasis ulcers and decubitus ulcers. All ...decubitus ulcers are just Stage 1, super erythematous. I don’t see any purulent drainage. They proceed all the way up [the patient’s] back.” 2. Receiving physician: “We don’t have wound care over the weekend.” 3. Staff J: “We actually don’t have wound care over the weekend or during the week.” 4. Staff J: “We don’t have wound care during the week, it doesn’t sound like.” 5. Receiving physician: “Do you want to check if you have wound care in the hospital?” 6. Staff J: “I know for sure we don’t.” Review of a document titled “Wound Care Guideline” read in part, “Wound Care Guidelines are meant as a starting point for treatment based on wound bed characteristics. As a wound evolves, treatment modalities may change.” The document provided pictures and descriptions of wound depths and drainage. The document provided the following instructions: 1. “Shallow & Dry/Lightly Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply TheraHoney Gel, cover with Curad Oil Emulsion Gauze then Optifoam Gentle. change Q 3 days and prn. 2. Shallow & Wet/Heavily Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... for moderate drainage, cover with Optifoam Gentle, apply directly to wound. Change q 3 days and prn. For heavy drainage, use Qwidk or Opticel AG* and cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change q 3 days and prn. 3. Deep & Lightly Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply Silvasorb Gel to gauze and loosley fill depth of wound. Cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change Q 3 days and prn. 4. Deep & Wet/Heavily Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Place Qwick or Opticel Ag* to fill wound. Cover with Optfoam EX. Change Q 3 days and prn. 5. Necrotic Tissue. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply TheraHoney Gel to wound bed. Cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change Q 3 days and prn.” A review of the “Wound Classification Guide National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP)” list the following wounds with definition: 1. “Deep Tissue Pressure Injury... 2. Stage 1 Pressure Injury... 3. Stage 2 Pressure Injury... 4. Stage 3 Pressure Injury... 5. Stage 4 Pressure Injury... 6. Unstageable Pressure Injury... Skin Tears 7. Type 1: No skin loss... 8. Type 2: Partial flap Loss... 9. Type 3: Total Flap Loss...” On 01/16/25 from 11:34 AM to 11:52 AM, Staff K stated: 1. Floor staff could float to work in the ED. 2. On 09/07/24, an ICU nurse floated down to work in the ED. 3. It was the practice of their hospital nurses to provide wound care according to the wound care protocol and algorithm which was approved by the hospital’s medical staff and put in place a few years ago. On 01/16/25 at 12:21 PM, Staff M stated: 1. ED providers were taught the wound care algorithm as part of their onboarding. On 01/16/25 at 2:16 PM, Staff K stated: 1. The patient had received wound care at their facility during a previous hospital admission. 2. The nursing staff were last educated on the wound care algorithm in the fall of 2024. On 01/16/25 at 3:06 PM, Staff L stated the wound care algorithm is directed toward inpatient care and is posted in areas in the emergency department. On 01/16/25 at 2:53 PM, Staff K stated no wound care was documented for Patient #10 and the wound care protocol and algorithm was not followed. On 01/16/25 at 3:10 PM, Staff L stated [the receiving facility] had a dedicated wound care team and a more dedicated infectious disease service, but he or she was not sure that was established, and the ED provider’s note did not document that [the receiving facility] had a dedicated wound care team.”

    Rule A2407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 1,241 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39648 Based on record review and interview the hospital failed to restrict transfer for 1 (Patient #10) out of 20 records reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to result in delayed care and possible deterioration of health. Findings: Patient #10 A review of the clinical record showed the patient presented to Integris Miami ED department on 09/07/24 at 7:25 pm with extensive wounds/pressure ulcers (bilateral lower legs, sacral region, upper and lower back). Documentation showed the physician documented that due to lack of wound care at the facility, the facility reached out to Integris transfer center and discussed case with the transfer center at Joplin Mercy. Patient was accepted at Joplin Mercy, transferred in stable condition. Review of a document titled “Wound Care Guideline” read in part, “Wound Care Guidelines are meant as a starting point for treatment based on wound bed characteristics. As a wound evolves, treatment modalities may change.” The document provided pictures and descriptions of wound depths and drainage. The document provided the following instructions: 1. “Shallow & Dry/Lightly Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply TheraHoney Gel, cover with Curad Oil Emulsion Gauze then Optifoam Gentle. change Q 3 days and prn. 2. Shallow & Wet/Heavily Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... for moderate drainage, cover with Optifoam Gentle, apply directly to wound. Change q 3 days and prn. For heavy drainage, use Qwidk or Opticel AG* and cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change q 3 days and prn. 3. Deep & Lightly Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply Silvasorb Gel to gauze and loosley fill depth of wound. Cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change Q 3 days and prn. 4. Deep & Wet/Heavily Draining. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Place Qwick or Opticel Ag* to fill wound. Cover with Optfoam EX. Change Q 3 days and prn. 5. Necrotic Tissue. Cleanse with Skintegrity Wound Cleanser or normal saline... Apply TheraHoney Gel to wound bed. Cover with Optifoam Gentle. Change Q 3 days and prn.” A review of the “Wound Classification Guide National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP)” list the following wounds with definition: 1. “Deep Tissue Pressure Injury... 2. Stage 1 Pressure Injury... 3. Stage 2 Pressure Injury... 4. Stage 3 Pressure Injury... 5. Stage 4 Pressure Injury... 6. Unstageable Pressure Injury... Skin Tears 7. Type 1: No skin loss... 8. Type 2: Partial flap Loss... 9. Type 3: Total Flap Loss...” On 09/26/24 at 10:20 am, Staff C stated: 1. “We have a wound clinic on 4th South that is open Monday - Friday and is available at times for consults. 2. Nurses on the floor can provide ordered wound care for admitted patients. 3. The ED nurses can provide ordered wound care in the ED. Patients can be referred to the wound clinic when discharged from the hospital or ED.” On 09/26/24 at 10:20 am, Staff H stated: 1. A nurse or physician can perform wound care. 2. Different wounds have a protocol for wound care. 3. Nursing staff complete quarterly training and once a year wound training in person. On 01/16/25 from 11:34 AM to 11:52 AM, Staff K stated: 1. Floor staff could float to work in the ED. 2. On 09/07/24, an ICU nurse floated down to work in the ED. 3. It was the practice of their hospital nurses to provide wound care according to the wound care protocol and algorithm which was approved by the hospital’s medical staff and put in place a few years ago. On 01/16/25 at 12:21 PM, Staff M stated: 1. ED providers were taught the wound care algorithm as part of their onboarding. On 01/16/25 at 2:16 PM, Staff K stated: 1. The patient had received wound care at their facility during a previous hospital admission. 2. The nursing staff were last educated on the wound care algorithm in the fall of 2024. On 01/16/25 at 3:06 PM, Staff L stated the wound care algorithm is directed toward inpatient care and is posted in areas in the emergency department.”

    Rule A2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 26, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (141 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 12.3%, pneumonia 15.5%, COPD 9.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.8%, pneumonia 16.5%, COPD 19.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 92 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 45% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.95 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Oct 1, 1978.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - other.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Other.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 82% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Integris Health Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 1995; Integris Rural Health Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 14, 1994.
  • Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma LLC and Integris Rural Health Inc. run it.
  • 21 owners or officers are people: James D Rutter (corporate director, 0%); John Hampton (corporate director, 0%); Suzanne Knott (corporate director, 0%); Michael L Weed (corporate officer, 0%); Michael L Weed (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Casey Ahlden (corporate director, 0%); Casey Ahlden (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Charles A Neal (corporate director, 0%); Justin Lee Mitchell (corporate director, 0%); James Perryman (corporate director, 0%); Jonas Rabel (corporate officer); Jonas Rabel (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Caleb Goldner (corporate director, 0%); Sue H Sly (corporate director); Grant Kernan (corporate director, 0%); David R Frazier (corporate director, 0%); Fredrick J Neill (corporate director, 0%); Lynn Pagels (corporate director, 0%); Christianna Wright (corporate director, 0%); Patrick Jurgensmeyer (corporate director); Kyle J Schauf (corporate director, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Integris Health Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 1995
Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jun 22, 1994
Integris Rural Health Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 14, 1994
Integris Rural Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Feb 14, 1994

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Ottawa County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.