Hearth Record

Mh St Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital

An acute care hospital in Youngstown, Ohio 44501

1044 Belmont Avenue, Youngstown, Ohio 44501. (330) 480-3022.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 3, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 44810 Based on observation, review of facility security camera footage, staff interviews, record reviews, review of facility policy, and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the emergency department unit (Section G) used to monitor the safety of patients with psychiatric concerns, including suicidal and homicidal ideations, was free hazards of firearms. (A-0144)”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 1,578 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44810 Based on observation, review of facility security camera footage, staff interviews, record reviews, review of facility policy, and National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the emergency department unit (Section G) used to monitor the safety of patients with psychiatric concerns, including suicidal and homicidal ideations, was free hazards of firearms. This affected four (Patients #6, #7, #8, and #9) of four patients placed on Section G who were in a psychiatric emergency. The hospital census was 297. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Patient #6 revealed he arrived at the emergency department on 08/28/25 at 8:26 A.M. via ambulance with auditory hallucinations. Patient #6 had a past medical history of bipolar disorder. Review of the triage and physician notes revealed Patient #6 was denying suicidal and homicidal ideations. Review of the telepsychiatry note dated 08/28/25 at 9:48 A.M. revealed the patient was hallucinating he was talking to God. Patient #6 reported he went on a long walk and ended up a town over. He got scared because he was seeing signs and hearing God, so he called the police. Patient #6 was diagnosed with severe manic bipolar disorder with psychotic behavior and recommended hospital admission once medically cleared. Patient #6 was placed in Section G Bed 26 of the emergency department. Patient #6 then had laboratory (lab) work drawn, an electrocardiogram, and a urine test. Patient #6’s lab results and test results were all within normal limits. Review of the nursing note dated 08/28/25 at 11:26 A.M. revealed Patient #6 was transported to the trauma bay with the registered nurse (RN) doing chest compressions. A note at 11:32 A.M. documented the patient had a projectile through the head, all the way through, and was having pulsatile bleeding on the right. Patient #6 pronounced dead at 1:26 P.M. The discharge summary documents the patient was able to get ahold of a gun of an officer and shot himself in the head. Review of the medical record for Patient #7 revealed he came to the emergency department on 08/28/25 with suicidal ideations. The patient was placed in the secure Section G in the emergency department. Review of the medical record for Patient #8 revealed she came to the emergency department on 08/28/25 with suicidal ideations. The patient was placed in the secure Section G in the emergency department. Review of the medical record for Patient #9 revealed arrival in the emergency department on 08/28/25 with homicidal ideations. The patient was placed in the secure Section G in the emergency department. Observations during a tour of the emergency department on 09/02/25 at 10:33 A.M. revealed Section G to be a small locked area for psychiatric patients with five cots being separated by curtains. The curtains had a quick release hook at the ceiling. The bathroom inside the room had a brown paper bag for garbage. There was a telephone available for patient use with a short cord. At the front of the room was a nurse’s station with staff present. The door was locked from the inside and outside and required a badge to enter or exit. On the outside of the door in the main emergency room hallway had a note posted elopement risk. Interview on 09/02/25 at 10:35 A.M. with Emergency Room Nurse Manager Staff H confirmed an incident with Patient #6 happened in Section G. Interview on 09/02/25 at 2:33 P.M. with Staff B revealed a shooting happened on the unit. The police officer immediately called for back up to secure his weapon. The nurse manager heard the gun shot and immediately called for assistance. Patient #6 was transported immediately to the trauma bay. Interview on 09/03/25 at 8:10 A.M. with Director of System Protective Services Staff L reported on 08/28/25 his officer entered the locked Section G area of the emergency department to complete his rounds. He stopped at the nurse’s desk to speak to staff and check emails on his phone. The officer’s arms were raised on the counter exposing his gun in its holster on his right hip. The officer had a level three holster on his right hip holding his weapon. This holster requires the strap be removed, the gun rocked at a certain angle, and a button be pressed before it will release the gun from the holster. Patient #6 came up behind the officer, removed the gun and immediately shot himself in the head. Staff L reported there was no struggle to remove the gun and by the time the officer turned around Patient #6 was already falling to the ground. Interview on 09/03/25 at 8:30 A.M. Staff A, Staff B, and Staff C stated the police are not to bring their weapons onto the psychiatric units in the hospital, but Section G was not a dedicated psychiatric area. They confirmed the area was modified for patient safety and used for patients when they are assessed at risk for self harm, harm to others, or elopement. They do place medical patients in that room. Interview on 09/03/25 at 8:44 A.M. with RN Staff M confirmed she was caring for Patient #6 during his stay in the emergency department. She reported Patient #6 was in Bed 26. He only got up once from his bed and attempted to open the door to the room but went back to bed when he realized it was locked. Staff M reported the officer came into the room to do rounds, as they frequently do, and was standing at the nurse’s desk with his back to the patients in the room talking to the technicians. She reported she had just sat down at the desk when she saw Patient #6 get up from the bed, walk behind the officer, and reach for the officer’s gun. Staff M reported she screamed “Your gun” but by the time she screamed Patient #6 had shot himself in the head and was on the ground. Staff M reported she immediately ensured the other three patients in the room were safe. Review of the security camera footage on 09/03/25 at 9:40 A.M. of the 08/28/25 incident involving Patient #6 revealed the officer came onto the Section G unit and stopped at the nursing desk speaking to staff sitting at the desk. He placed his arms on the desk, with his back to the patient beds, and began scrolling on his phone while talking to the staff member. His gun belt was exposed. The officer stood in this position for greater than two minutes with his arms resting on the counter scrolling on his phone. Patient #6 jumped up from the bed, approaching the officer from behind on the left side, went to the officer’s right side, grabbed the gun out of the holster, and immediately placed the gun to his head and pulled the trigger. Patient #6 fell to the ground, the officer turned around and immediately grabbed his weapon, which had flown five feet from Patient #6. The whole incident took less than five seconds before Patient #6 was on the ground. Additional interview on 09/03/25 at 12:44 P.M. with Staff A, Staff B, and Staff C revealed while the locked unit Section G in the emergency department was not a designated psychiatric area it is a quiet locked area they prefer to have psychiatric patients go to. They reported the police round hourly, but they are not given report on the patient’s in this unit to alert them if any of the patients are psychiatric patients with suicidal or homicidal ideations, or just medical patients. All staff members confirmed at the time of the incident on 08/28/25 all patients in the room were psychiatric patients and two had suicidal ideations. They also confirmed the only way in and out of Section G was with a badge. Staff C reported the policy for weapons on the psychiatric unit does not apply to this emergency department room as it is not a designated psychiatric patient only area. Staff also reported the police do not have a specific rounding policy and the expectation is if they are not responding to a call they are to be patrolling their environment. Review of National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention document titled “Recommended Standard Care for People with Suicide Risk: Making Health Care Suicide Safe” (2018) https://theactionalliance.org/sites/default/files/actionalliancerecommendedstandardcarefinal.pdf revealed lethal means reduction is a crucial part of safety planning. It involves identifying means of self-harm that are available to the individual, especially ones that may have been considered, such as use of a weapon or overdosing on medications, and reducing access by taking specific steps such as self-storage. Reducing access to lethal means has repeatedly been shown effective community-wide prevention and has been cited as a crucial factor in success of the prevention efforts. Emergency departments identify suicide risk among patients who have harmed/injured themselves or have mental illness or substance use disorder. Emergency rooms must provide a space for the patients that is safe, monitored, and clear of items the patient could use to harm themselves or others. Review of the facility policy titled “Firearms Policy,” approved 05/20/20, revealed all department issued firearms will be given to all police officers. Officers firearm is to always remain in their holster except when cleaning the gun or on the psychiatric unit.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Feb 20, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 401 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31597 Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse evaluated the nursing care for one of 10 patients reviewed (Patient #5). The census was 296. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Nursing Documentation Requirements, (Revision 6, Effective Date 02/06/24), revealed documentation in the clinical record should be timely, detailed, accurate, and reflect the care or services provided. Review of Patient #5’s medical record revealed she arrived to the emergency department (ED) on 01/14/24 at 1:40 PM and was transferred to an inpatient room on 01/15/24 at 4:13 PM. The medical record of Patient #5 did not contain documentation of incontinence care while the patient was in the emergency department. Staff D was interviewed on 02/20/24 at 8:53 AM. Staff D reported Patient #5 was moved from the hall bed to room 22 because of frequent toileting. Staff W was interviewed on 02/20/24 at 9:51 AM. Staff W reported he assisted an orientee with changing Patient #5 in the ED. Staff W reported the orientee took the Patient #5 to a trauma bay to clean the patient up. Patient #5 had three loose stools for Staff W. Staff W reported having the facility patient satisfaction staff member and Staff Y cleaning up Patient #5, too. Staff W confirmed that incontinence care was not frequently documented in the ED. Staff Y was interviewed on 02/20/24 at 9:57 AM. Staff Y reported Patient #5 had been incontinent and Staff Y put a PureWick on Patient #5, and then the patient had another accident. Staff W and Staff Z went in and cleaned Patient #5. “We were on her frequently throughout the day”. She started having diarrhea and two float nurses cleaned her up. Staff P reported to Staff Y that Patient #5 only asked once to be cleaned up and that Staff P cleaned her up. Staff Y reported “we are to document any interventions that we do.” Staff N was interviewed on 02/20/24 at 12:16 PM. Staff N was unable to recall Patient #5. Staff N reported the ED was not floor nursing and that he/she probably would not document in the medical record each time he/she provided incontinence care for emergency department patients.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 8 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 21, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 18, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 3, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Aug 7, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 18, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 5, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 6, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 20, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 1 worse of 6; readmission, 1 better and 2 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,055 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 57% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 54% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.5%, heart failure 11.7%, pneumonia 18.1%, COPD 8.2%, stroke 9.6%, heart bypass surgery 2.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 24%, pneumonia 19.9%, COPD 21.7%, heart bypass surgery 10.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 205 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 44% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.03 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - church.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Church.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 80% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2020.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Germaine G Bennett (corporate director); Martha Bushey (corporate director); Carla Baldwin (corporate director); Michelle Crawford (corporate officer); Michelle Crawford (corporate director); Michelle Crawford (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mildred Ely (corporate director); Joseph L Mosca (corporate director); John Starcher (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lewis Macklin (corporate director); John Luellen (corporate director); Juan Santiago (corporate director); Rachel Hrbolich (corporate director); Jessica Simon (corporate director); Erin Bishop (corporate director); Edward Novosel (corporate director); Kimberly M Ralston (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2020

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 hospitals CMS lists in Mahoning County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.