Hearth Record

Nicholas H Noyes Memorial Hospital

An acute care hospital in Dansville, New York 14437

111 Clara Barton Street, Dansville, New York 14437. (585) 335-6001.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 29, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Radiologic Services

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “RADIOLOGIC SERVICES CFR(s): 482.26 The hospital must maintain, or have available, diagnostic radiological services. If therapeutic services are also provided, they, as well as the diagnostic services, must meet professionally approved standards for safety and personnel qualifications. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 49420 Based on policy review, medical record review, document review, and interview, in one of two Nuclear Medicine/PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Technologist’s, the facility failed to meet professionally approved standards for safety and personnel qualifications as evidenced by lack of required certification, and the lack of facility policy consistent with state laws and establishing criteria governing designation and the qualifications for personnel that perform PET/CT scans (Staff (A). Reference: 482.26(c)(2): Qualified Staff.”

    Rule A0528. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Qualified Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 1,601 words

    “QUALIFIED STAFF CFR(s): 482.26(c)(2) Only personnel designated as qualified by the medical staff may use the radiologic equipment and administer procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49420 Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, document review, and interview, in one of two nuclear medicine technologists (Staff (A)) were performing PET/CT scans (Positron Emission Tomography [a medical imaging test that uses radioactive tracers to create detailed images of the inside of the body, showing how well organs and tissues are functioning]) without required certification. There is no clinical policy consistent with state laws and established criteria governing designation and the qualifications for staff that perform PET/CT scans. Findings Include: Review of “Plan for Providing Diagnostic Imaging Services and Staffing”, last revised 07/01/23, revealed the qualifications and scope of practice for each role. The policy does not include the qualification and scope of practice for PET/CT technicians. Review of the job description for “Nuclear Medicine PET Technologist”, last reviewed August 2024, revealed the education needed to be qualified for the position included, “bachelor’s degree or certification in nuclear medicine technology; New York State Department of Health license in the practice of nuclear medicine; nuclear medicine computed tomography registry certification and NMTCB/ARRT (Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board/American Registry of Radiologic Technologists) must be obtained within six months of hire. “ Review of Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist’s license and certifications revealed Staff (A) is licensed until 05/14/28 as a nuclear medicine technologist with the New York State Department of Health and is certified with the ARRT through May 2025 for nuclear medicine technology. Staff (A) lacks certification of nuclear medicine CT registry certification for NMTCB. Review of Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, leased employee contract signed on 08/26/24, revealed Staff (A) was leased from another hospital within the hospital system to help perform and administer PET/CT studies to increase patient access. The start date of the contract was 09/09/24 and the contract has been extended through 05/31/25. Review of the PET/CT meeting on 08/20/24, revealed Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, Staff (E), Vice President of Operations, and Staff (M), Regional Imaging Administrator, were present for the meeting. The meeting included a discussion that Staff (A) was not certified in computed tomography and would require Staff (B) to “push the computed tomography scan button” if Staff (A) was scanning the patient. Review of Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, timecards revealed that Staff (B) did not work on 11/15/24 and 02/07/25 when PET/CT scans were performed. Review of the PET/CT patient log revealed on 11/15/24 there were three PET/CT scans completed by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist when Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist was not present and on 02/07/25 there were four PET/CT scans completed by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist when Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist was not present. In 3 out of 13 patient medical records reviewed Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, completed PET/CT scans out of their scope of practice. (Patient #1, #2, and #3). The medical record for Patient #1, dated 01/03/25, revealed the following: -At 08:00 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #1’s PET/CT scan was started by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. -At 09:50 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #1’s PET/CT scan was completed by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. The medical record for Patient #2, dated 01/07/25, revealed the following: -At 09:30 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #2’s PET/CT scan was started by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. -At 11:55 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #2’s PET/CT scan was completed by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. The medical record for Patient #3, dated 03/05/25, revealed the following: -At 09:30 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #2’s PET/CT scan was started by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. -At 11:10 AM, the imaging exam information flowsheet, revealed that Patient #2’s PET/CT scan was completed by Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. Interview on 04/28/25 at 11:50 AM with Staff (G), Director of Imaging and Rehab Services, revealed the hospital has two Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologists that perform PET/CT scans Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist and Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist. If there is a call off, the facility would cancel all scheduled PET/CT scans. PET/CT scans are performed Tuesday, Wednesday and Fridays, with an average of 30 completed per week. To be able to perform a PET/CT scan the employee would need to be licensed in New York State in nuclear medicine and would need to take a credentialing exam to perform the PET/CT scans. Staff (A) can only administer the nuclear pharmaceuticals (a type of medication that uses radioactive materials for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes in nuclear medicine) and Staff (B) can perform the entire PET/CT scan. Interview on 04/28/25 at 12:06 PM with Staff (J), Vice President of Human Resources, revealed when they hire a new employee, they use the job description to ensure the employee is licensed and credentialed for that position. Interview on 04/28/25 at 02:30 PM with Staff (K), Computed Tomography Technician, revealed Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist would need someone in the room with them when completing the scans for the PET/CT, as Staff (A) is only licensed as a nuclear medicine technologist. Staff (K) revealed they cannot perform the scans for a PET/CT due to not being trained or credentialed to do so. Interview on 04/28/25 at 03:00 PM with Staff (H), Radiologist and Radiation Safety Officer, revealed they oversee the nuclear pharmaceuticals at the hospital and are one of the radiologists onsite at the hospital while PET/CT scans are completed. If Staff (H) is not at the hospital while PET/CT scans are completed there is another radiologist at the hospital available if there are any issues. For an individual to be qualified to perform PET/CT scans they must possess a license as a computed tomography technologist to run the procedure as well as a license in nuclear medicine to administer the nuclear pharmaceuticals. For the PET/CT scan procedure there are either two staff members involved which include one with the nuclear medicine license and one with the computed tomography technologist license or one staff member that has both licenses. Staff (H) has worked with both Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist and Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist and has not had any issues while they have performed PET/CT scans. Staff (H) revealed Staff (A), and Staff (B) have never worked alone while completing PET/CT scans and are both qualified to perform PET/CT scans. Staff (H) revealed they were aware Staff (A) did not have their computed tomography license but was under the impression they never worked alone when performing PET/CT scans. Interview on 04/29/25 at 09:02 AM with Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, revealed they were a leased employee on a contract to assist with PET/CT scans. There was a backlog of patients that needed PET/CT scans completed and Staff (A) volunteered to assist with the procedures to increase patient access. Staff (A) started training with Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, in October 2024. Staff (A) would do the prepping including administering the nuclear pharmaceuticals. When the patient is ready to be scanned, Staff (A) assists the patient onto the scanner. When asked if Staff (A) performed PET/CT scans independently, Staff (A) responded there was two days when staff (B) was not working, and they completed the scans. Staff (A) revealed they do not have the Nuclear Medicine Technology Certification Board (NMTCB) computed tomography certification needed to complete the PET/CT scans. Staff (A) revealed on 04/10/25 they started to track diagnostic computed tomography scans they have completed. To meet the NMTCB criteria to take the exam for the computed tomography certification Staff (A) must complete 50 diagnostic computed tomography studies. Interview on 04/29/25 at 09:50 am with staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET, revealed at the time of opening the PET/CT scan in April 2021 they were the only employee certified to complete the scans. The hospital could only perform six procedures per day and other imaging centers had patients waiting a long time be able to get the scan completed. There was a PET/CT meeting on 08/20/24 with Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, Staff (E) Vice President of Operations, and Staff (M), Regional Imaging Administrator, to increase patient volume to enable patients to get their scans completed in a timely manner. At the meeting, Staff (B) was told Staff (A) was only nuclear medicine certified and could not do the PET/CT scanning portion of the exam. Staff (B) or other qualified staff member would need to perform the computed tomography portion of the exam for the PET/CT scan when Staff (A) was working. Staff (B) revealed there were two days where they were not on the schedule and Staff (A) worked without them. Interview on 04/29/25 at 10:27 AM with Staff (E), Vice President of Operations, revealed Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, has a limited license for PET/CT scans and could only perform the nuclear medicine aspect of the procedure. Staff (A) was aware they needed to have a PET/CT certified technician to assist them. Staff (E) stated Staff (A) worked without Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, on two different days. Interview on 04/29/25 at 05:00 PM with Staff (G), Director of Imaging and Rehab Services, verified Staff (A), Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, worked alone on two separate days (11/15/24 and 02/07/25) as Staff (B), Supervisor Nuclear Medicine/PET Technologist, had planned time off per their timecard.”

    Rule A0547. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 29, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (425 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 65% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 11.5%, pneumonia 18.1%, COPD 9.9%, stroke 12.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 22.3%, pneumonia 16.9%, COPD 20.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 202 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 5% left before being seen.
  • 58% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.83 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 84% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 22 owners or officers are people: Steven I Goldstein (corporate director); Frank Barbero (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marilyn Moore (corporate director); Ahsen Sheikh (corporate director); Richard Rizzieri (corporate director); Gregory D Bump (corporate officer); Mark Prunoske (corporate officer); Matthew E Cole (corporate director); Brian C Foresman (corporate director); Brian C Foresman (managing employee (on the payroll)); Laura J Lane (corporate officer); Domenick J Martello (corporate director); James Culbertson (corporate director); John Quinlan (corporate director); John C Teeters (corporate officer); Angelique Cohen (corporate director); Lindsay Quintilone (corporate director); Richard Schulick (corporate director); Steve Harrison (corporate director); Barbara Frazer (corporate director); Joan Flender (corporate director); Bernard P Sweeney (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Livingston County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.