Hearth Record

Oswego Hospital

An acute care hospital in Oswego, New York 13069

110 West Sixth Street, Oswego, New York 13069. (315) 349-5511.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 24, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 20, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Nursing Care Plan

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “NURSING CARE PLAN CFR(s): 482.23(b)(4) The hospital must ensure that the nursing staff develops, and keeps current, a nursing care plan for each patient that reflects the patient’s goals and the nursing care to be provided to meet the patient’s needs. The nursing care plan may be part of an interdisciplinary care plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 21072 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review, and interview, Patient #1’s MR lacked documentation that they received a nutritional supplement as ordered. This could lead to patients having adverse outcomes. Findings include: -- Review of Patient #1’s MR revealed on 11/29/2024, a physician ordered Pro-Stat (a nutritional supplement) 30 milliliters to be administered to Patient #1 four times a day. -- The MR lacked documentation indicating that nursing staff provided the Pro-Stat to Patient #1 as ordered. -- Review of the facility’s policies and procedures (P&P) revealed that there was no nurisng P&P for the administration of the nutritional supplement Pro-Stat. -- Per interview of Staff A, Nurse Practioner (NP) on 3/19/2025 at 12:45 pm, there is no facility P&P on the administration of Pro-Stat. -- Per interview of Staff B, NP on 3/20/2025 at 10:00 am, the facility does not have a P&P on the administration of Pro-Stat. -- Per interview of Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) on 3/19/2025 at 1:30 pm, there is no P&P on Pro-Stat, and it would be helpful for nursing to reference if there was one. -- During interview of Staff D, Director of Nursing, on 3/19/2025 at 4:00 pm, they confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule A0396. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 899 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49512 Based on medical record (MR) review, document review and interview, Patient #1 developed a pressure injury during hospitalization and the facility policy and procedure (P&P) was not followed. Specifically, a wound consult was not ordered, wound measurements were not documented and there was no provider documention of the wound. This could lead to patients having adverse outcomes. Findings include: -- Per review of the facility’s P&P titled “Skin Assessment Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Assessment,” (revised 10/2024), “every patient admitted will be assessed daily for risk of pressure ulcers, using the Braden Scale for predicting pressure ulcers. A score of 14 points or below will receive a skin care consult for potential areas of concern during any part of the patients stay. ... the provider will be notified for all pressure ulcers stage 2 through 4. ... measurements will be taken on any reddened, pink, bruised, scratches, skin tears, open sores or pressure ulcers. Length (head to toe) x width (hip to hip) x depth (tunneling/undermining).” -- Per MR review, Patient #1 was admitted to the hospital on 11/26/2024 with the diagnosis of a left hip fracture and left shoulder fracture. The nursing admission assessment documentation noted that skin was intact with no deviations from normal. A skin risk scale noted a total Braden scale score of 14 (severe risk - less than or equal to 9, high risk - 10-12, moderate risk - 13-14, and mild risk - 15-18). Risks pertaining to Patient #1 included bedfast, confined to a bed, very limited mobility, occasionally moist skin, and potential for friction and shearing of skin. On 11/29/2024, Patient #1 had hip surgery. Skin risk assessment remained at a total score of 14. On 11/30/2024, nursing documentation noted a skin tear to the right buttock which is documented as appearing pink and reddened. Allevyn (highly absorbent foam dressing) was applied to the site. A skin risk assessment remained at a score of 14. On 12/1/2024, nursing documentation noted a right buttock skin tear which appeared pink and reddened with an Allevyn dressing placed. Provider documentation noted a stage 1 skin tear to the right buttock, and an Allevyn dressing placed. On 12/2/2024 nursing documentation noted a right buttock skin tear which appeared pink and reddened with an Allevyn dressing applied. On 12/4/2024 nursing documentation noted a right buttock skin tear which appeared pink and reddened with an Allevyn dressing placed. New orders were placed which included application of Magic Butt Paste (protective ointment) to be applied to macerated skin areas of the skin tear on the buttocks and covering with an Allevyn dressing to be changed daily. On 12/7/2024 nursing documentation noted a stage 2 decubitus to the coccyx, with an Allevyn dressing placed and Magic Butt Paste applied to surrounding macerated (softening and breakdown of skin due to prolonged exposure to moisture) skin. Nursing documentation also noted a lesion to the left upper back with an Allevyn dressing placed. Lastly, nursing documentation noted a right buttock skin tear which appeared pink and reddened with an Allevyn dressing placed On 12/8/2024 - 12/10/2024 nursing documentation noted a hard and warm to the touch area to the left buttock, appearing pink with erythema (redness of skin) present. A lesion to the upper left back with an Allevyn dressing placed is documented. A stage 2 pressure ulcer to the coccyx with an Allevyn dressing and Magic Butt Paste applied. A possible right buttock boil/abscess is documented. On 12/11/2024 the discharge summary documented “a skin tear to the left and right buttock stage 2 decubitus coccyx from a shearing injury and upper back disrupted blisters.” -- Per interview of Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN) on 3/19/2025 at 2:30 pm, if a skin tear or pressure injury were found, they would reach out to the wound care service. If the wound care service was unavailable to see the patient that day, the process is then to reach out to a general surgeon to see the patient. -- Per interview of Staff F, RN on 3/19/2025 at 3:30 pm, they would notify the provider right away if a new skin wound were identified. -- Per interview of Staff G, General Surgeon on 3/20/2025 at 9:45 am, they cover for the wound care service, when the wound care provider is unavailable. When a consultation is requested, they usually speak to the ordering provider to get a sense of the situation. The facility has a secure photo system through the electronic MR to view photos. Staff G indicated that they will see the patient in person if deemed necessary. -- Per interview of Staff B, Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 3/20/2025 at 10:00 am, they will reach out to the wound care service when a skin injury is identified. Orders are obtained and sometimes an in-person consultation is performed. -- During interview of Staff D, Director of Nursing, on 3/19/2025 at 4:00 pm, they acknowledged the above findings.”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 24, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 20, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Apr 24, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 20, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 1 worse of 4; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (395 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 13%, pneumonia 18.1%, COPD 7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 22.1%, pneumonia 18.6%, COPD 20.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 204 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 8% left before being seen.
  • 50% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 76% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Oswego Hospital runs it.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Timothy R Barnhart (corporate director); Scott Vangorder (corporate director); William Clark (corporate director); Ron Tascarella (corporate director); Victoria Furlong (corporate director); Duane F Tull (corporate director); Michael Backus (corporate officer); Michael Backus (corporate director); Michael Backus (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mark Slayton (corporate director); Ellen Holst (corporate director); Elizabeth W Bozeman (corporate director); Marie Eggert (corporate director); Paloma Sarkar (corporate director); Daniel E Dorsey (corporate director); Adam Gagas (corporate director); Peter Cullinan (corporate director); Eric T Campbell (managing employee (on the payroll)); Atom Avery (corporate director); Ed Alberts (corporate officer); Ed Alberts (corporate director); Katie Toomey (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Oswego County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.