Nyack Hospital
An acute care hospital in Nyack, New York 10960
160 North Midland Avenue, Nyack, New York 10960. (845) 348-2000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 375 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 9, 2024: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 9, 2024: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 35161 . Based on medical record review, document review, video footage review and staff interview, in two (2) of six (6) medical records reviewed, the facility failed to assess, identify, and implement protective measures for patients who are at risk for elopement (Patient #1 and Patient #2). See Tag A0144 .”
-
Nursing Services
“NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 35161 . Based on medical record review, document review, and interview, nursing staff failed to assess, identify, establish a plan of care, and implement provider’s order for observation of patients at risk for elopement. See Tag: A0396 .”
-
Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting
The inspectors’ words, 900 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35161 . Based on medical record review, document review, staff interview, in two (2) of six (6) medical records reviewed, the facility failed to assess, identify, and implement protective measures for patients who are at risk for elopement. Findings include: (1) Review of the medical record for Patient #1 identified the following: Nursing Triage notes on 01/19/2024 at 11:30 AM, indicated the patient was evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED) for shortness of breath. The patient’s medical history was significant for Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and she was oxygen dependent. ED Physician on 01/19/2024 at 06:44 PM documented the patient was admitted to an inpatient unit for medical management. Nurse Practitioner notes on 01/20/2024 at 04:48 PM, Nurse Practitioner documented that patient is not being compliant with oxygen therapy and is saturating at 70 percent (Normal oxygen saturation levels are 95% and higher); and that the patient is upset and angry. On 01/20/2024, at 04:48 PM, Nurse Practitioner documented an order to place the patient on enhanced observation and issued a request for Psychiatric consultation citing, “Pt with underlying dementia, lacks capacity...” Review of facility’s policy titled “Constant Observation and Enhanced Observation (ED and Medical Inpatients)” revised 04/2022) stated, “The patient(s) remain within the same vicinity as the employee conducting the observation...If a patient must leave the unit for diagnostic procedures and/or testing, the employee performing the enhanced observation must accompany and remain with the patient during the procedure/test ...” There was no documentation found that indicated the patient was placed on enhanced observation as ordered by the Nurse Practitioner. An addendum notes by the ED provider on 01/21/2024 at 05:41 AM documented, “Writer was informed by nursing supervisor that local police authorities found the patient approximately a block away from the hospital and quite unfortunately was found unresponsive and pronounced dead at the scene...” Review of facility’s video footage on 01/31/2024 at 1:00 PM revealed that on 01/21/2024, at 03:47 AM, the patient dressed in street clothing exited the inpatient unit at 03:48 AM. At 03:50 AM, patient walked down the stairway and was seen at the hospital parking lot at 04:01 AM. The patient walked across a road at 04:05 AM. On 02/01/2024, at 02:09 PM, during an interview with Staff R (Patient’s Day nurse from 7AM to 7 PM), she stated the patient was not monitored because she was not aware the provider had written an order for enhanced observation. On 02/02/2024, at 10:10 AM, during an interview with Staff U (Patient’s Night nurse from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM), stated that she was not informed by Staff R that the patient was on enhanced observation, “I learned about it after the fact,”. During her shift in the early morning, she observed that the patient was not in her room. The patient was not found after a facility wide search. (2) ED physician notes on 11/23/2023 at 4:06 PM, indicated Patient #2 presented with family concerns about wandering and disorientation. The patient was admitted with an impression of cognitive changes. ED physician on 11/23/2023 at 4:34 PM documented an order for enhanced observation. The patient was admitted to an inpatient unit on 11/24/2023 at 12:00 AM. The neurologist evaluated the patient on 11/24/2023 at 8:02 AM for an acute onset of confusion. He documented that the patient’s memory, attention, and concentration ranged from moderate to severely impaired. On 11/24/2023 at 2:36 AM, nursing noted that the patient was on 1:1 for safety as he is a wanderer. At 7:04 PM, nurse documented the patient verbalized that he wants to go home and he is being observed for safety. Nursing documentation shows that the patient was on 1:1 observation for safety from 11/24/2023 to 11/27/2023. Nursing notes on 11/28/2023 at 4:50 AM indicated that the patient is confused and that the 2:1 observation is in place. Nursing documented on 11/28/2023 at 4:17 PM that the patient had eloped. During interview with Staff C (AVP Compliance) on 2/7/2024, she stated that on 11/28/2023 at 1:30 PM, Patient Care Technician (PCA) was observing Patient #2 and his roommate when Patient #2 went to the bathroom and eloped while the PCA was attending to the other patient. Staff C added that the patient was later found at home and returned to the facility on 11/28/23 at 4:55 PM. An Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified on 02/08/2024 at 01:23 PM due to facility failure to assess, identify, and protect patients at risk for elopement. The facility provided an IJ Removal Plan on 02/08/2024 at 10:30 PM. The plan included the following: - Revised policy for enhanced and constant observation that indicated that observer may not leave the patients unattended at any time, and documentation of patient’s behavior every hour. - The Missing Patients/ Elopement policy was revised to include elopement screening, identification of patients at risk for elopement, and assignment of staff to elopement watch stations. IJ was removed on 02/09/2024 at 04:12 PM based on onsite verification of revised policies and procedures, staff interviews, and verification of staff education to revised policies and procedures. 100% of staff interviewed on 02/09/2024 received education on the IJ removal plan and verbalized knowledge of elopement screening, observation of patients, and staff responsibilities regarding an eloped patient. .”
-
Nursing Care Plan
The inspectors’ words, 732 words
“NURSING CARE PLAN CFR(s): 482.23(b)(4) The hospital must ensure that the nursing staff develops, and keeps current, a nursing care plan for each patient that reflects the patient’s goals and the nursing care to be provided to meet the patient’s needs. The nursing care plan may be part of an interdisciplinary care plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35161 . Based on medical record review, document review, and interview, it was verified that nursing staff failed to assess, identify, establish a plan of care, and implement provider’s order for enhanced observation for patients at risk for elopement. Findings include: Nursing Triage notes on 01/19/2024 at 11:30 AM, indicated the patient was evaluated in the Emergency Department (ED) for shortness of breath. The patient’s medical history was significant for Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease and was oxygen dependent. ED Physician on 01/19/2024 at 06:44 PM documented the patient was admitted to an inpatient unit for medical management. There was no documentation found that indicated the patient was assessed for elopement risk. Nurse Practitioner notes on 01/20/2024, at 04:48 PM, documented that patient is not compliant with oxygen therapy and she is saturating at 70 percent (Normal oxygen saturation levels - 95% and higher); and that the patient is upset and angry. On 01/20/2024 at 04:48 PM, Nurse Practitioner documented an order to place the patient on enhanced observation and issued a request for Psychiatric consult citing, “Pt with underlying dementia, lacks capacity...” Review of facility’s policy titled “Constant Observation and Enhanced Observation (ED and Medical Inpatients)” revised 04/2022 stated, “The patient(s) remain within the same vicinity as the employee conducting the observation...If a patient must leave the unit for diagnostic procedures and/or testing, the employee performing the enhanced observation must accompany and remain with the patient during the procedure/test ...” There was no documentation found that indicated the patient was placed on enhanced observation by the nurse as per Nurse Practitioner’s order on 01/20/2024 at 04:48 PM. Review of Code Gray (Code for security assistance) report dated 01/20/2024 revealed that at 05:06 PM, the patient was dressed in street clothing and attempted to elope, she was agitated, loud and refused to take her medication. There was no documented evidence that a nursing care plan was developed to maintain the patient’s safety. ED provider on 01/21/2024 at 05:41 AM documented “Writer was informed by nursing supervisor that local police found the patient approximately a block away from the hospital and quite unfortunately was found unresponsive and pronounced dead at the scene...” On 02/01/2024, at 02:09 PM, during an interview with Staff R (Patient’s Day nurse from 7AM to 7 PM), she stated the patient was not monitored because she was not aware the provider had written an order for enhanced observation. On 02/02/2024, at 10:10 AM, during an interview with Staff U (Patient’s Night nurse from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM), stated that she was not informed by Staff R that the patient was on enhanced observation, “I learned about it after the fact,”. During her shift in the early morning, she observed that the patient was not in her room. The patient was not found after a facility wide search. An Immediate Jeopardy situation was identified on 02/08/2024 at 01:23 PM due to facility failure to assess, identify, develop a safety care plan, and implement physician order for enhanced observation for patients at risk for elopement. The facility provided an IJ Removal Plan on 02/08/2024 at 10:30 PM. The plan included the following: - Revised policy for enhanced and constant observation that indicated that observer may not leave the patients unattended at any time, and documentation of patient’s behavior every hour. - The Missing Patients/ Elopement policy was revised to include elopement screening, identification of patients at risk for elopement, and assignment of staff to elopement watch stations - Process change initiated that includes acknowledgement and handoff report of Providers Orders including Enhanced Observation orders in the electronic medical record. - Implementation safety measures for patients with confusion, substance use disorder, suicide, and delirium in the Nursing Plan of Care. IJ was removed on 02/09/2024 at 04:12 PM based on onsite verification of revised policies and procedures, staff interviews, and verification of staff education to revised policies and procedures. 100% of staff interviewed on 02/09/2024 received education on the IJ removal plan and verbalized knowledge of new and revised policies and procedures.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 2 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 10.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,080 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 60% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 58% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.1%, heart failure 8.6%, pneumonia 14.6%, COPD 7.4%, stroke 10.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.2%, heart failure 22.5%, pneumonia 17.5%, COPD 20.5%, hip or knee replacement 5.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 239 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 3% left before being seen.
- 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.08 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Nov 21, 1989.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
- 69% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 5 owners or officers are people: Mark E Geller (corporate officer, 100%); Mark E Geller (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Adlher Rodriguez (corporate director); Mark Jacobs (corporate officer); Thom Kleiner (corporate officer).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 5 hospitals CMS lists in Rockland County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Hospital of Suffern | 3 |
| Helen Hayes Hospital | Not given |
| Rockland Psych Ctr | Not given |
| Rockland Children’s Psychiatric Center | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.