Hearth Record

San Juan Regional Medical Center Inc.

An acute care hospital in Farmington, New Mexico 87401

801 West Maple Street, Farmington, New Mexico 87401. (505) 609-2000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 18, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 17, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • On Call Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 845 words

    “ON CALL PHYSICIANS CFR(s): 489.20(r)(2) and 489.24(j)(1-2) §489.20(r)(2) [The hospital (including both the transferring and receiving hospitals), must maintain] a list of physicians who are on call for duty after the initial examination to provide further evaluation and/or treatment necessary to stabilize an individual with an emergency medical condition. §489.24(j)(1) Each hospital must maintain an on-call list of physicians on its medical staff in a manner that best meets the needs of the hospital’s patients who are receiving services required under this section in accordance with the resources available to the hospital, including the availability of on-call physicians. §489.24(j)(2)(i) The hospital must have written policies and procedures in place to respond to situations in which a particular specialty is not available or the on-call physician cannot respond because of circumstances beyond the physician’s control. §489.24(j)(2)(ii) The hospital must have written policies and procedures in place to provide that emergency services are available to meet the needs of patients with emergency medical conditions if it elects to permit on-call physicians to schedule elective surgery during the time that they are on call or to permit on-call physicians to have simultaneous on-call duties. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47302 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have written policies in place for when there is no provider available to be scheduled for call coverage. This deficient practice could possibly lead to all patients not receiving the care they need when presenting to the emergency department. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s Medical Staff Bylaws dated 11/2023 on page 6 under, “ ...Obligations of Active Status [active member of the medical staff of the hospital]” stated, “Each member of the Active Staff shall: ... (d) serve on the on-call roster for the purpose of assignment to service or charity patients and for providing backup specialty coverage in the ER [Emergency Room] ...” No evidence was found on what the facility will do if there is no provider available to be scheduled for call coverage. B. Record review of the facility’s Medical Staff Rules and Regulations dated 11/2023 on page 4, Article 2 stated, “Unless specifically exempted by the medical executive committee for good cause shown, each member of the Active and Active Non-Admitting Staff [medical staff that do not have admitting privileges at the hospital], except full time. . . physicians will be assigned in rotation to a back-up call schedule for the Emergency Department. Fulfillment of this assignment shall be a prerequisite to Staff appointment and re-appointment. The establishment of ad hoc specialty [specialty when needed] and subspecialty [specialty that is part of a larger specialty] call schedules is encouraged as a means to provide proper back-up to the emergency department. However, in the event of a conflict, the doctor on the formal ER back-up call schedule is responsible for providing or arranging for appropriate care for the patient requiring inpatient care - either in this hospital or another facility capable of caring for the patient. If there is a conflict with the published schedule, it is the staff member’s responsibility to notify the applicable department chairman and the emergency room director at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled rotation.” No evidence was found on what the facility will do if there is no provider available to be scheduled for call coverage. C. Record review of the facility’s policy titled, “EMTALA [Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act] - Rules for Emergency Department Call Coverage” dated 01/25/2021 stated, “The ED [Emergency Department] is staffed by emergency physicians with whom Hospital has entered into a contract for continuous physician coverage of the ED on a twenty-four hour a day, seven day a week basis. An ED Unassigned Call Schedule (“Unassigned Call Schedule”) has also been established for the purpose of providing specialty coverage for emergency patients in accordance with federal law and the EMTALA policy; and to offer emergency treatment to patients beyond that which can be provided by the ED physicians.” This policy included what to do if a physician on-call does not respond to a call or is not available, it did not provide a written process on what to do if a specialty is not available due to lack of available providers. D. Record review of the facility’s document titled “Transfer Log” from 10/1/2024 through 10/15/2024, revealed there were 20 patients denied for transfer into the facility because there was no provider available for call coverage for services normally offered by the hospital like Gastrointestinal (GI, intestinal tract), ENT (Ear, Nose, Throat), Plastic surgery (offered for reconstruction after an injury), and Neurology (brain and nervous system). E. During an interview on 10/17/2024 at 11:40 AM with S(Staff)1, non-clinical, S1 confirmed that the hospital did not have a written process for when there is no provider available to be scheduled for call coverage. S1 explained that the hospital will not accept transfer patients when a specialty physician in not available. This facility was not able to provide any other documentation such as contracts to clarify on-call requirements.”

    Rule A2404. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Feb 22, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 436 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47480 Based on observation and record review the facility failed to protect the patient from exposure to disease causing pathogens (microorganisms that cause disease) for 1 (P (Patient) P6) of 11(P1-P11) patients. This deficient practice could likely cause infection, sepsis (a very serious life-threatening medical emergency), or death of all patients in the facility. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s policy “Hand Hygiene” “Effective Date: 11/08/2022” revealed: 1. “Hands will be decontaminated by using an alcohol-based hand cleanser ...or soap and water in the following clinical situation: After contact with body fluids or excretions (waste materials like urine or feces) ...wound dressings.” B. During an observation on 02/22/2024, at 1:00 pm of a dressing change performed on P6 by Staff (S)11, Registered Nurse (RN). S11 applied hand sanitizer before entering the room and putting on gloves. S11 placed the open clean dressing packages directly on the patient’s sheet without a barrier (an underpad or disposable sheet used to protect items that are placed on top, like dressings, from what may be on the sheets or bed, like stool). S11 then removed a dressing from a 2 centimeter (cm) (a measure of length) by 2 cm unstageable pressure wound (a type of pressure wound that has a full-thickness skin and muscle loss with dead tissue covering the wound bed preventing the assessment of the true depth of the wound) on the left knee, applied (a brand name wound gel made from honey) with a finger, and placed the new dressing over the wound. S11 then removed the dressing from a 1.5 cm by 1.5 cm P6’s right heel, applied (a brand name wound gel made from honey) with the same finger, and placed a new dressing over the wound. S11 did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene between the dressing changes on the two sites potentially cross-contaminating the right heel wound with pathogens from the left knee wound by using the same gloved finger to apply (a brand name wound gel made from honey). It was later observed that there was stool (feces) leaked from P6 colostomy (an opening in the belly that connects the colon to the skin to empty stool to the outside of the body into a bag) on the sheet where the clean dressing packages were placed potentially contaminating the dressings with stool. Contamination of wounds with pathogens and/or stool could cause infection, sepsis, or death as a result of sepsis.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 6 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 18, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 17, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 3, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 9, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 17, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Feb 22, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 7.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (381 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 53% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), worse than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11%, heart failure 13.6%, pneumonia 16.7%, COPD 13.4%, stroke 12.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.4%, heart failure 20.8%, pneumonia 16.1%, COPD 19.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 190 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 7% left before being seen.
  • 41% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.98 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 18 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 80% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Shandra Smith (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jason Rounds (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jason Rounds (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in San Juan County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Northern Navajo Medical Center3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.