Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
An acute care hospital in Englewood, New Jersey 07631
350 Engle St, Englewood, New Jersey 07631. (201) 894-3000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 517 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 29, 2025: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 13, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Nursing Care Plan
The inspectors’ words, 379 words
“NURSING CARE PLAN CFR(s): 482.23(b)(4) The hospital must ensure that the nursing staff develops, and keeps current, a nursing care plan for each patient that reflects the patient’s goals and the nursing care to be provided to meet the patient’s needs. The nursing care plan may be part of an interdisciplinary care plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51555 Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure patient care plans are updated appropriately to follow patient goals and nursing care to meet patient’s needs in one of six medical records reviewed for wound care (Medical Record [MR] 1). Findings include: On 2/13/2025, a review of Patient (P)1’s medical record was reviewed in the presence of Staff (S) 1, Senior Director of Nursing, Nursing Operations, and Adult Inpatient Services, S2, Director of Quality, Patient Safety, and Risk Management, S3, Patient Safety and Risk Management, S6, Coordinator Academic Partnerships and Nurse Residency and revealed the following: P1 was admitted to the facility on 9/10/2024, for a scheduled surgery to remove a gangrenous right leg. P1 had a right below the knee amputation (BKA) on 9/10/2024. On 9/11/2024 at 5:14 AM, a consult for “Wound/RN [Registered Nurse]/Ostomy care” was placed by Staff (S) 18, Registered Nurse (RN). Reason for consult states, “sacral PI [Pressure Injury].” At 8:14 AM, a consult with S13, Wound Care Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) was completed. The wound evaluation documentation states, “... Assessment: ... Skin characteristics: sacral area with dry flakey [sic] skin. There is an area of hypopigmented skin over this area from previously [sic] wounds, now healed and resolved. [He/she] has been using triad paste as protective coating ... Pressure Injury: No” On 9/22/2024 at 12:05 AM, S21, RN, documented in the Wound Pressure Injury Assessment, stating, “... Pressure Injury Stage: Stage 2.” P1’s MR lacked evidence of a wound care plan. On 2/13/2025 at 2:30 PM, when asked the process of care planning, S6, Coordinator of Academic Partnerships and Nurse Residency stated, if there is a new or worsening wound, nursing is supposed to consult wound care and update the care plan. At 2:36 PM, S6 navigated through P1’s MR and confirmed the MR lacked evidence of an updated care plan for wound care.”
-
Supervision Of Contract Staff
The inspectors’ words, 1,041 words
“SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51555 Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy and procedure review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff implemented policies and procedures for skin integrity in one of six medical records reviewed for wound care (Medical Record [MR] 1). Findings include: Protocol titled, “Alteration in Skin Integrity Protocol,” reviewed on 12/2024, states, “... Prevention:... Maintain the following on all patients with a risk score of < [less than or equal to] 18 on Braden Scale... Reposition patient every 2 hours... Stage 2 Management: ... Contact CWOCN-APN [Certified Wound Ostomy Continence Nurse-Advanced Practice Nurse] for consultation ...Nutrition Management ... Discuss with MD [Medical Doctor]/RD [Registered Dietician] the need for Nutrition Support Consultation for all patients with pressure injuries ... Reportable conditions: Report to CWOCN-APN ... deterioration of wound ... evaluate progress at least weekly and determine if modification in the treatment plan is indicated. Notify CWOCN-APN for consultation.” A review of Patient (P)1’s medical record in the presence of the Staff (S)1, Senior Director of Nursing, Nursing Operations, and Adult Inpatient Services, S2, Director of Quality, Patient Safety, and Risk Management, S3, Patient Safety and Risk Management, S6, Coordinator Academic Partnerships and Nurse Residency and revealed the following: On 9/10/2024, P1 was admitted to the facility for a scheduled surgery to remove a gangrenous right leg. P1 had a right below the knee amputation (BKA) on 9/10/2024. On admission and throughout the hospitalization, P1’s Braden Score was documented as a score of 13. A Braden Score is a standardized assessment tool to assess a patient’s risk for developing a pressure injury, with a range of 6 to 23; a lower score indicates a higher risk for pressure injury. Braden Scale ranges as follows: 18 or higher: Low Risk; 15-17: Moderate Risk; 13-14: High Risk; 12 or lower: Very High Risk. On 9/11/2024 at 5:14 AM, an initial wound care consult was placed by S18, Registered Nurse (RN) for “sacral PI [pressure injury].” At 8:14 AM, P1 was seen by S13, Wound Care Advanced Nurse Practitioner (APN). S13 documented, “... Assessment: ... Skin characteristics: sacral area with dry flakey [sic] skin. There is an area of hypopigmented skin over this area from previously wounds, now healed and resolved.” On 9/15/2024 at 7:37 PM, S20, RN, documented a “Wound Pressure Injury Assessment.” Wound Pressure Injury Assessment states, “Pressure Injury Properties: Date First assessed: 9/15/2024, Time First Assessed: 7:30 PM, Primary Wound Type: Pressure Injury... Location: Sacrum.” On 9/17/2024 at 11:45 AM, a Nutrition Note was entered by S15, Registered Dietician (RD), and states the following: “... Skin Integrity:... Sacral area with dry flaky skin. There is an area of hypopigmented skin over this area from previously wounds, now healed and resolved.” On 9/22/2024 at 12:05 AM, S21, RN, documented in the Wound Pressure Injury Assessment stating, “... Pressure Injury Stage: Stage 2.” P1’s MR lacked evidence of a consultation for the Wound Care APN after deterioration of the wound. P1’s MR lacked evidence of notification of the wound, to Wound Care APN. Throughout P1’s medical record from 9/11/2024 to 9/26/2024, there was documentation of patient repositioning every 2 hours, however, from 9/11/2024 to 9/26/2024, P1’s position was documented consistently as “Semi Fowlers, Pillow Support,” with inconsistent documentation of turning to the left or right side. On 2/13/2025 at 2:49 PM, S6, Coordinator Academic Partnerships and Nurse Residency navigated through P1’s MR and confirmed that the Wound Care APN was not reconsulted. S6 confirmed that the Wound Care APN should have been notified and reconsulted for the worsening wound, and nursing staff should not have staged the wound. S6 also confirmed that it “looked like” P1 was not turned every 2 hours from Semi Fowlers position for multiple days. At 3:08 PM, S1, Senior Director of Nursing, Nursing Operations, and Adult Inpatient Services and S2, Director of Quality, Patient Safety, and Risk Management confirmed nursing staff is not allowed to stage wounds. S1 explained, new or worsening wounds must be staged by the Wound Care APN. On 2/13/2025 at 2:15 PM, an interview was conducted with S1. When asked how often nursing is educated on wound care, S1 explained, nursing is trained at orientation and when there are changes in protocols, but the wound care training is not in the nursing yearly competencies. On 2/13/2025 at 2:18 PM, S6 reported that staff are educated to all protocols, including the “Alteration in Skin Integrity Protocol,” during orientation and with any changes in the protocol. S6 further explained that unit educators continuously reinforce protocols at the unit level. On 2/13/2025 at 2:20 PM, S14, Director of Nursing, Critical Care and Stepdown, explained that the “Alteration in Skin Integrity Protocol” is triggered when the nurse documents a patient’s wound or an alteration in skin integrity, poor nutrition, or a Braden score less than 18. According to S14, turning and repositioning the patient every two hours is included in this protocol. S14 explained that the nurses can see that this protocol is ordered for the patients in EPIC (electronic health record software used to manage patient records, workflows, and clinical decision making). On 2/13/2025 at 2:36 PM, S1 explained when the Skin Integrity Protocol is initiated, the nursing staff only needs to document, once a shift, that the protocol is being maintained, and that the nurses are supposed to “chart by exception.” When asked if repositioning documentation is required, S1 confirmed that the staff nurses are not required to chart patient repositioning every two hours. When asked what the process for nursing and staging of wounds, S1 explained, staff nurses cannot stage wounds, the wound care nurse stages wounds. S1 explained that staff are instructed per protocol to notify the wound care nurse and/or the doctor when a pressure injury develops or worsens.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 22, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 25, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 2 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,986 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: better than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12%, heart failure 10.1%, pneumonia 14.3%, COPD 7.6%, stroke 9.5%, heart bypass surgery 1.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.4%, heart failure 21.3%, pneumonia 19.6%, COPD 18.9%, heart bypass surgery 8.6%, hip or knee replacement 5.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 183 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 84% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.05 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 97% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Warren Geller (corporate officer); Warren Geller (managing employee (on the payroll)); Anthony Orlando (corporate officer); Shani Newell (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 7 hospitals CMS lists in Bergen County, 5 have an overall star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Hackensack University Medical Center | 5 |
| Holy Name Medical Center | 5 |
| Valley Hospital | 4 |
| Bergen New Bridge Medical Center | Not given |
| Hackensack Meridian Health Pascack Valley Medical | 5 |
| Ramapo Ridge Behavioral Health Hospital | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.