Hearth Record

Cheshire Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Keene, New Hampshire 03431

580 Court Street, Keene, New Hampshire 03431. (603) 354-5400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a complaint inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 16, 2024: complaint inspection6 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 26364 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure safe and appropriate chemical and physical hold restraint usage (refer to A167 Patient Rights: Restraint or Seclusion); failed to have a physicians order for the use of restraints (refer to A168 Patient Rights: Restraint or Seclusion); failed to specify in the hospital policy the training requirements for physicians and other licensed practitioners (refer to A176 Patient Rights: Restriant or Seclusion); failed to conduct a face-to-face evaluation by a qualified practitioner within 1 hour after the initiation of a restraint (refer to A178 Patient Rights: Restraint or Seclusion); and failed to have training and competencies in the safe application of a restraints for staff, contracted staff, and physicians (refer to A196 Patient Rights: Restrains or Seclusion). 43002 47129”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(4)(ii) [The use of restraint or seclusion must be--] (ii) implemented in accordance with safe and appropriate restraint and seclusion techniques as determined by hospital policy in accordance with State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26364 Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure safe and appropriate chemical and physical hold restraint usage for 2 of 11 patients reviewed for restraints. Findings include: Patient #1 Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s nursing progress note dated 12/31/24 at 4:25 a.m. revealed: “...visualized [patient] on floor with many security and medical staff assisting with physical hold after reported immediate physical threat...” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s physician order revealed that there was no physicians order for this physical hold. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 1:25 p.m. with Staff C (Emergency Department Supervisor) confirmed the above. Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s Patient Care Timeline revealed that he/she arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) on 12/26/23 at 6:58 a.m. for altered mental status. Further review revealed a nursing note at 1:00 p.m. for “Behavior Issue Restraint” and Restraint Type listed as: “locked restraining left and right wrists and ankles.” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s nursing progress note dated 12/31/24 at 1:31 a.m. revealed “...Violent restraint order provided and initiated at [1:00 a.m.].” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s physician’s order revealed an order dated 12/31/24 at 1:03 a.m. for “Violent and Self-Destructive Patient Restraints”. Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s provider notes written by Staff S (Medical Doctor) dated 12/31/23 revealed there was no documentation that a face-to-face evaluation was conducted for the above physical restraint. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m. Staff C (Emergency Department Supervisor) confirmed the above. Patient #11 Review on 5/9/24 of Patient#11’s Patient Care Timeline revealed that he/she arrived to the ED on 2/22/24 at 4:41 p.m. with a chief complaint of Aggressive Behavior. Further review revealed on 2/25/24 at 8:38 p.m. there was a nursing note that read, “Physical hold utilized while administering IM [Intramuscular] Lorazepam as patient began hitting [pronoun omitted] head off [pronoun omitted] mattress and was cursing and threatening to kill [pronoun omitted] and staff after [pronoun omitted] father left for the night. Attempts at verbal deescalation were met with screaming profanities from the patient. Four staff members were utilized to hold each limb for [less than] 5 [minutes]...”. Review on 5/9/24 of Patient #11’s physician’s notes written by Staff R (Medical Doctor) on 2/25/24 at 3:07 p.m. revealed: “No medical or behavior concerns on the prior shift” and at 11:05 p.m; “Care turned over to [provider name omitted]”. There was no documentation by Staff R regarding the above physical hold, including that a face-to-face evaluation was conducted. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m. with Staff C confirmed the above. Review on 5/10/24 of the facility’s policy Restraints Policy approved on 9/30/22 revealed, “...A... Restraints or seclusion must be ordered by an [Authorized Licensed Provider] upon the use of restraint or seclusion prior to, or during/immediately following restraint application... An ALP [Authorized Licensed Provider] performs a face-to-face evauation of the patient within one (1) hour after the intitial restraint application or placement in seclusion...” 43002 47129”

    Rule A0167. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 349 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(5) §§482.13(e)(5) - The use of restraint or seclusion must be in accordance with the order of a physician or other licensed practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient and authorized to order restraint or seclusion by hospital policy in accordance with State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43002 Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a physicians order for the use of restraints for 1 of 11 patients reviewed for restraints (Patient Identifier is Patient #1). Findings include: Patient #1 Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s nursing progress note dated 12/31/24 at 4:25 a.m. revealed: “...visualized [patient] on floor with many security and medical staff assisting with physical hold after reported immediate physical threat...” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s physician order revealed that there was no physicians order for this physical hold. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 1:25 p.m. with Staff C (Emergency Department Supervisor) confirmed the above. Review on 5/10/24 of the facility’s policy “Restraints Policy”, approved on 9/30/22 revealed: “...To establish standardized decision-making criteria and practical procedures for the use and discontinuation of restraint... to protect the patient’s health and safety and the safety of others, as well as to preserve the patient’s dignity, rights, and well-being... A. Restraints or seclusion must be ordered by an [Authorized Licensed Provider] upon the use of restraint or seclusion prior to, or during/immediately following restraint application...” Review on 5/15/24 of the Title XI: Hospitals and Sanitaria, Chapter 151, Residential Care and Health Facility Licensing, Patients’ Bill of Rights, Section: 151:21IX, “The patient shall be free from chemical and physical restraints except when they are authorized in writing by a physician for a specific and limited time necessary to protect the patient or others from injury. In an emergency, restraints may be authorized by the designated professional staff member in order to protect the patient or others from injury. The staff member must promptly report such action to the physician and document same in the medical records.” 47129”

    Rule A0168. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(11) Physician and other licensed independent practitioner training requirements must be specified in hospital policy. At a minimum, physicians and other licensed practitioners authorized to order restraint or seclusion by hospital policy in accordance with State law must have a working knowledge of hospital policy regarding the use of restraint or seclusion. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43002 Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the hospital failed to specify in the hospital policy the training requirements for physicians and other licensed practitioners. Findings include: Review on 5/10/24 of the facility’s policy titled “Restraint - Policy”, approval date 12/23/2022, revealed no training requirements for physicians and other licensed practitioners. Interview on 5/10/24 at 2:00 p.m. with Staff L (Senior Director of Quality and Patient Safety) revealed that the above policy was the current facility policy. 47129”

    Rule A0176. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 547 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(12) When restraint or seclusion is used for the management of violent or self-destructive behavior that jeopardizes the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member, or others, the patient must be seen face-to-face within 1-hour after the initiation of the intervention -- o By a-- - Physician or other licensed practitioner; or - Registered nurse who has been trained in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraph (f) of this section. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26364 Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a face-to-face evaluation by a qualified practitioner within 1 hour after the initiation of a restraint used for management of violent or self-destructive behaviors for 2 of 11 patients reviewed for restraints (Patient Identifiers are #1 and #11). Findings include: Patient #1 Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s Patient Care Timeline revealed that he/she arrived to the Emergency Department (ED) on 12/26/23 at 6:58 a.m. for altered mental status. Further review revealed a nursing note at 1:00 a.m. for “Behavior Issue Restraint” and Restraint Type listed as: “locked restraining left and right wrists and ankles.” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s nursing progress note dated 12/31/24 at 1:31 a.m. revealed “...Violent restraint order provided and initiated at [1:00 a.m.].” Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s physician’s order revealed an order dated 12/31/24 at 1:03 a.m. for “Violent and Self-Destructive Patient Restraints”. Review on 5/10/24 of Patient #1’s provider notes written by Staff S (Medical Doctor) dated 12/31/23 revealed there was no documentation that a face-to-face evaluation was conducted for the above physical restraint. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m. Staff C (Emergency Department Supervisor) confirmed the above. Patient #11 Review on 5/9/24 of Patient#11’s Patient Care Timeline revealed that he/she arrived to the ED on 2/22/24 at 4:41 p.m. with a chief complaint of Aggressive Behavior. Further review revealed on 2/25/24 at 8:38 p.m. there was a nursing note that read, “Physical hold utilized while administering IM [Intramuscular] Lorazepam as patient began hitting [pronoun omitted] head off [pronoun omitted] mattress and was cursing and threatening to kill [pronoun omitted] and staff after [pronoun omitted] father left for the night. Attempts at verbal deescalation were met with screaming profanities from the patient. Four staff members were utilized to hold each limb for [less than] 5 [minutes]...”. Review on 5/9/24 of Patient #11’s physician’s notes written by Staff R (Medical Doctor) on 2/25/24 at 3:07 p.m. revealed: “No medical or behavior concerns on the prior shift” and at 11:05 p.m; “Care turned over to [provider name omitted]”. There was no documentation by Staff R regarding the above physical hold, including that a face-to-face evaluation was conducted. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 12:15 p.m. with Staff C confirmed the above. Review on 5/10/24 of the facility’s policy “Restraints Policy,” approved on 9/30/22, revealed: “...To establish standardized decision-making criteria and practical procedures for the use and discontinuation of restraint... to protect the patient’s health and safety and the safety of others, as well as to preserve the patient’s dignity, rights, and well-being... A... An [Authorized Licensed Provider] performs a face-to-face evaluation of the patient within one (1) hour after initial restraint application or placement in seclusion...” 47129 43002”

    Rule A0178. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(f)(1) Training intervals. Staff must be trained and able to demonstrate competency in the application of restraints, implementation of seclusion, monitoring, assessment, and providing care for a patient in restraint or seclusion- (i) Before performing any of the actions specified in this paragraph; (ii) As part of orientation; and (iii) Subsequently on a periodic basis consistent with hospital policy. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47129 26364 Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to have training and competencies for the safe application of restraints for staff, contracted staff, and physicians for 4 of 9 staff and 7 of 7 providers reviewed. Findings include: Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 10:00 a.m. with Staff N (Medical Staff Coordinator) revealed that the facility does not provide restrain training to providers. Interview on 5/10/24 at approximately 10:30 a.m. with Staff D (Director of Emergency Department (ED)) revealed that Staff O (Registered Nurse (RN)) received a one hour on line restraint modular training but had no hands on competency demonstration. Interview on 5/10/24 at 11:00 a.m. with Staff E (ED Provider) revealed that none of the providers that work in the ED have had any restraint training. Review on 5/13/24 of the online training provided by the facility revealed that there was no documentation that restraint training had been completed for Staff K (Paramedic), Staff O, and Staff V (RN). Interview via phone call on 5/15/24 at 8:30 a.m. with Staff A (Accreditation and Regulatory Compliance Manager) revealed that the facility does not require training for providers on restraints and that there was no documented records of restraint training completed for Staff O and Staff K. Review on 5/13/24 of the facility’s policy “Restraints Policy”, approved on 9/30/22 revealed that the policy did not address training and competency in the application of restraints, implementation of seclusion, monitoring, assessment, and providing care for a patient in restraint. 43002”

    Rule A0196. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Complaint inspection6 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 5; readmission, 1 better and 2 worse of 8.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (443 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 64% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.2%, heart failure 11.5%, pneumonia 18.3%, COPD 8.4%, stroke 14.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 22.1%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 20%, hip or knee replacement 5.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 214 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 3% left before being seen.
  • 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.97 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 24 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 22 owners or officers are people: David Byung Min (corporate officer); Elizabeth A Cotter (corporate officer); Mark Bodin (corporate officer); Todd Roberts (corporate director); Todd Roberts (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Chelstowski (corporate officer); Andrew G Tremblay (corporate director); Joseph L Perras (corporate officer); Sally Malay (corporate officer); Mark Gavin (corporate director); Deborah Scribner (corporate officer); Gary P Wood (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Gary P Wood (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Patricia Drew (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Wendy Fielding (corporate director); Paige Walker (corporate officer); Michael Waters (corporate officer); Gina O’brien (corporate officer); Alan Kintisch (corporate officer); Barbara Duckett (corporate officer); Barbara Moore (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Serena R Shomody (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Cheshire County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.