Forrest General Hospital
An acute care hospital in Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39401
6051 Us Highway 49, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39401. (601) 288-7000.
- Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 537 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jun 11, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 8, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Quality Improvement Activities
The inspectors’ words, 1,333 words
“QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES CFR(s): 482.21(b)(2)(ii), (c)(1), (c)(3) (b) Program Data (2) [The hospital must use the data collected to - .....] (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement and changes that will lead to improvement. (c) Program Activities (1) The hospital must set priorities for its performance improvement activities that-- (i) Focus on high-risk, high-volume, or problem-prone areas; (ii) Consider the incidence, prevalence, and severity of problems in those areas; and (iii) Affect health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care. (3) The hospital must take actions aimed at performance improvement and, after implementing those actions, the hospital must measure its success, and track performance to ensure that improvements are sustained. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45467 Based on interview, document review and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of an effective corrective action plan which included monitoring to ensure corrective actions/improvements are sustained for one (1) of one (1) patient adverse event reviewed; Patient #1. This adverse event has the potential to affect all patients on telemetry monitors. Findings Include: An interview on 01/05/2026 at 1:17 p.m. with the Director of Risk Management/Patient Advocate (DORM) confirmed no knowledge of the telemetry incident with Patient #1 on telemetry with leads off on 12/09/2025 resulting in a patient who was found not breathing and pulseless. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 3:16 p.m. with the Director of Quality (DOQ) the surveyor requested Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation for the telemetry incident on 12/09/2025. Facility QAPI documents for the telemetry incident on 12/09/2025 were not made available for review. An interview on 01/06/2025 at 10:12 a.m. with Patient Care Manager (PCM) #1 confirms in addition to the termination of MT #1 and #2, re-evaluation of Monitor Room process was completed and re-education on job descriptions, patient’s rights, policy and procedure for Centralized Monitoring Process and included employee reevaluations for all Central Monitor Room (CMR) staff began on 12/22/2025 and was completed on 01/01/2026. No Corrective Action Plan presented for review to indicate the facility’s plan to ensure corrective actions/improvements will be sustained. Review of attendance record for re-education for CMR protocols for staff dated 12/22/2025 confirm education was provided to sixteen employees working in the CMR. No other documentation presented for corrective actions. Review of Patient #1’s medical record, “flowsheet,” dated 12/09/2025 at 1:57 a.m. reveals the call light and overbed table within reach, bed in lowest position and wheels locked, side rails at three quarters high (¾), with chest rising and falling and eyes closed, repositioned to a supine position with head of bed (HOB) at 30 degrees, and heels elevated. Patient #1’s vital signs were documented as temperature 98.1 Fahrenheit, blood pressure 113/85, pulse 107, respirations 18, patient in sitting position, weight 183 pounds 3.2 ounces (83.1 kilograms). Review of Patient #1’s medical record “Nurse Daily Cares/Safety documentation” dated 12/09/2025 at 3:15 a.m. reveals patient awake and staff assisting patient with a coke. Further review of medical record documentation reveals patient was found not breathing and pulseless and a “Code Blue” was called at 3:55 a.m. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and Bag valve mask ventilations were in progress upon arrival of family nurse practitioner (FNP) and initial cardiac rhythm of Pulseless Electrical Activity (PEA). Time of death called at 4:10 a.m. Review of Code Note dated 12/09/2025 by Medical Doctor (MD) #1, reveals being called for a Code Blue, patient was asystole, continued CPR and giving epinephrine every three minutes, a total of 2 bicarbonate’s were administered, and one ampule of calcium gluconate, patient was intubated with a 7.5 endotracheal tube (ETT), with continued resuscitation and the patient last time seen active was about 30 minutes prior to code and actually do not know exactly how long the patient was in cardiopulmonary arrest. Facility was unable to reach family member until 2:35 p.m. Patient #1 was discharged to the morgue on 12/09/2025 at 4:30 a.m. with discharge disposition of expired. Review of a Human Resource email “Termination Request” for MT #1 and #2 with a summary of the investigation on the email document, dated 12/19/2025 at 11:06 a.m., to Human Resources reveals Monitor Technician (MT) #1 was assigned responsibility for Patient #1’s continuous telemetry surveillance and immediate notification to nursing staff of critical alarms or loss of leads. The investigation revealed MT #1 assumed responsibility for scanning paperwork for multiple technicians which required approximately three and one half (3.5) hours which resulted in prolonged absence from assigned monitors, then left for meal break at 2:23 a.m. to 3:02 a.m. Video footage reveals MT #1 was not at monitor at 2:44 a.m. when leads became disconnected. MT #1 alleges calling floor about leads prior to leaving for meal break. No call log found which documents a call from the Monitor Room at or around 2:44 a.m. and multiple nurses confirm no call was received. MT #1 also states she called nurse’s station around 3:35 a.m. which is the first documented call. The report also reveals MT #2 was responsible to monitor both his and MR #1’s monitors while MT #1 was scanning reports and at meal break. Camera footage reveals MT #2 was not actively monitoring either his assigned telemetry monitors or MT #1’s monitors during this time but engaged in personal cell phone use and social interaction with coworkers failing to recognize or respond to Patient #1’s loss of telemetry for approximately one (1) hour. MT #1 and #2 were terminated for Patient Abuse/Neglect, Cell phone use on unit, Leaving assigned work area during working time, Job performance, and Patient Safety. Video footage for Central Monitor Room (CMR) on 12/08/2025 from 11:48 p.m. to 12/09/2025 at 3:39 a.m. reviewed with Patient Care Manager (PCM) #1, confirmed MT #1 standing in the CMR at the scanner from 11:48 p.m. to 2:23 a.m. then leaving the CMR from 2:23 a.m. to 2:58 a.m. returning to the scanner 2:58 a.m. to 3:36 a.m. MT #1 returns to the telemetry monitors and removes her coat, then exits the CMR at 3:37 a.m. and returns to CMR at 3:44 a.m. sits down looks at the monitors and places a phone call at 3:45 a.m. Video footage review from 11:48 p.m. to 3:39 a.m. reveals MT #2 is sitting at the monitor stations talking with coworkers and engaging on a cellular device but not actively monitoring the telemetry monitors. Video footage at 3:39 a.m. reveals MT #2 looking at his monitors. Review of the facility’s “Performance Improvement Plan” policy, effective date 08/22/2023, last review date 07/18/2024 revealed “ ... ...Performance measurement is ...part of each initiative and is used to drive next steps ...Lessons learned are communicated extensively ...all patient occurrences ranging from “no-harm” to “near misses” to sentinel events ...The aim ...is to prevent and reduce risk, errors and harm to patients ...accomplished by detecting and preventing adverse events, acting accordingly to improve processes through corrective/preventative action and monitoring the effectiveness of those actions ...detection ...preventative and corrective action ...defined process to reduce risk ...implementation of action plans and on-going measurement to ensure action effectiveness ...Management review of patient adverse events and other data analysis ... Any Manager/Director receiving a report of a possible sentinel event or near miss sentinel event will assure that the Risk Manager, Administrator on call, or Patient Care Supervisor are promptly notified to determine the status of the event ...The Risk Manager in consultation with the President will determine if the event is reportable ...The root cause analysis findings and action plan should be completed no more than 30 days after determination that a sentinel event has occurred ...The Risk Manager will retain the only copy of the accident/event analysis and related documented action with other secured confidential files ...”. The Exit conference was completed on 01/08/2026 at 12:30 p.m. with Executive Director of Nursing Services, Medical Nursing Director, Executive Director of Quality Operations, Patient Care Manager #1, Director of Quality Management, Director of Risk Management, and Chief Operations Officer. No additional information was presented for review.”
-
Freedom From Abuse, Neglect, And Exploitation
The inspectors’ words, 1,443 words
“FREEDOM FROM ABUSE, NEGLECT, AND EXPLOITATION CFR(s): §482.58(b)(3) Freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation (§483.12(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), (a)(4), (b)(1), (b)(2), (c)) • §483.12(a)(1): The facility must (1) Not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion. • §483.12(a)(2): Ensure that the resident is free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms. When the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints. • §483.12(a)(3)(i): Not employ or otherwise engage individuals who (i) Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. • §483.12(a)(3)(ii): Have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property. • §483.12(a)(4): Report to the State nurse aide registry or licensing authorities any knowledge it has of actions by a court of law against an employee, which would indicate unfitness for service as a nurse aide or other facility staff. • §483.12(b)(1): The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that: (1)Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property. • §483.12(b)(2): Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations. • §483.12(c): In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: (1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. (2) Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated (3) Prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. (4) Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45467 Based on review of Patient #1’s medical record, interviews with Patient Care Manager #1, review of employee handbook, review of human resource documents of termination of Monitor Technician (MT) #1 and Monitor Technician #2, and review of facility policy Vulnerable Adult Abuse/Neglect, the facility failed to report an incident of neglect resulting in death of Patient #1 to the State Department of Health and Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Attorney General’s office for one (1) of one (1) Patient adverse event reviewed; Patient #1 Findings Include An interview on 01/05/2026 at 1:17 p.m. with the Director of Risk Management/Patient Advocate (DORM) confirmed no knowledge of the telemetry incident with Patient #1 on telemetry with leads off on 12/09/2025 resulting in a patient found not breathing and pulseless. During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 3:16 p.m. with the Director of Quality (DOQ) the surveyor requested Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation for the telemetry incident on 12/09/2025. Facility QAPI documents for the telemetry incident on 12/09/2025 was not made available for review. An interview on 01/06/2025 at 10:12 a.m. with Patient Care Manager (PCM) #1 confirms in addition to the termination of MT #1 and #2, re-evaluation of Monitor Room process was completed and re-education on job descriptions, patient’s rights, policy and procedure for Centralized Monitoring Process and included employee reevaluations for all Central Monitor Room (CMR) staff began on 12/22/2025 and was completed on 01/01/2026. No documentation presented for monitoring to ensure corrective actions/improvements will be sustained. During an interview on 01/06/2026 at 10:17 a.m. with Patient Care Manager (PCM) #1 confirms documentation of termination email to Human Resources, dated 12/19/2025 at 11:06 a.m. confirms Monitor Technician (MT) #1 was terminated due to “ ...Her actions constitute patient neglect and a serious breach of patient safety responsibilities, directly contributing to delayed clinical response ...failed to maintain continuous telemetry surveillance, use approved workflows, ensure timely notification of nursing staff, provide accurate and consistent statements during investigation ...” During an interview on 01/06/2026 at 10:20 a.m. PCM #1 confirmed documentation of termination email to Human Resources, dated 12/19/2025 at 11:06 a.m. confirms MT #2 was terminated based on “ ...His inaction represents failure to exercise reasonable care in a high-risk patient monitoring role, ...maintain active surveillance of assigned monitors, escalate unsafe workload conditions, ensure critical telemetry alerts were addressed, intervene when MT #2 abandoned monitoring station. Facility’s Employee Handbook, not dated, no revision date, section 6-11, “ ...Your Job Performance ...Achieving and maintaining excellence in job performance requires continuous evaluation and adjustment ...You are encouraged to evaluate and adjust your own performance ...From time to time, your supervisor may speak with you regarding performance improvement process, and you are asked to accept it in the same spirit in which it is offered ...If you do not improve your job performance according to your supervisor’s expectations, you may be subject to corrective action up to including termination of employment ...6-17 Leaving The Facility Or Your Work Area During Working Time ...Your supervisor depends on you to be in your assigned work area performing your job duties ...Failure to meet this requirement may be considered job abandonment and subject you to corrective action up to and including termination of employment ...6-29 Cell Phones And Other Mobile Devices ...use of your cell phone or other device is generally prohibited while at work ...Failure to adhere to this expectation may subject violators to corrective action up to and including termination of employment ...6-32 Patient Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation ...The hospital prohibits any abuse, neglect, or exploitation of patients ...If an investigation reveals that an employee has violated this policy in any manner, he or she will be subject to corrective action up to and including termination of employment ...”. Facility’s Termination Meeting Summary dated 12/22/2025 at 10:30 a.m. for MT #1, Monitor Technician, document confirms the employee termination date of 12/23/2025, based on failure to provide continuous monitoring, failure to actively monitor, and failure to timely escalate patient safety concerns. The Corrective Action document dated 12/22/2025 confirmed employee termination. Facility’s Termination Meeting Summary dated 12/22/2025 at 10:00 a.m. for MT #2, Monitor Technician, document confirms the employee termination date of 12/23/2025, based on Policy Violation, failure to provide continuous active-monitoring, particularly in a life-sustaining monitoring role, constitutes a serious violation of hospital policy and patient safety standards. The Corrective Action document dated 12/22/2025 confirmed employee termination. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Medical Social Services Department, Vulnerable Adult Abuse/Neglect in Health Care Facility,” effective date 07/23/2024 reveals “ ...persons ...who have knowledge of or reasonably suspect or observe adult abuse/neglect or exploitation in their professional capacity or within the scope of their employment to report such suspected instances of abuse to the Medical Social Services Department ...The Medical Social Worker will notify the Patient Advocate ...After complete investigation, the Medical Social Worker will be responsible for ...reporting telephonically and in writing to the Mississippi State Department of Health and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit of the Attorney General’s office ...”. Facility’s Termination Meeting Summary dated 12/22/2025 at 10:30 a.m. for MT #1, Monitor Technician, document confirms the employee termination date of 12/23/2025, based on failure to provide continuous monitoring, failure to actively monitor, and failure to timely escalate patient safety concerns. The Corrective Action document dated 12/22/2025 confirmed employee termination. Facility’s Termination Meeting Summary dated 12/22/2025 at 10:00 a.m. for MT #2, Monitor Technician, document confirms the employee termination date of 12/23/2025, based on Policy Violation, failure to provide continuous active-monitoring, particularly in a life-sustaining monitoring role, constitutes a serious violation of hospital policy and patient safety standards. The Corrective Action document dated 12/22/2025 confirmed employee termination. Cross Reference to A-0263/482.21(c)(3) for additional information. The Exit conference was completed on 01/08/2026 at 12:30 p.m. with Executive Director of Nursing Services, Medical Nursing Director, Executive Director of Quality Operations, Patient Care Manager #1, Director of Quality Management, Director of Risk Management, and Chief Operations Officer. No additional information was presented for review.”
All 5 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 19, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 8, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Nov 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 2 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 2 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 1 worse of 8; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,811 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.8%, heart failure 13.7%, pneumonia 19.2%, COPD 10.9%, stroke 11.6%, heart bypass surgery 2.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.4%, heart failure 21.6%, pneumonia 17.9%, COPD 21.2%, heart bypass surgery 11.9%, hip or knee replacement 5.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 224 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 66% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jun 29, 1989.
- Ownership: government - local.
- It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 20 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Government - Local.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program) | Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments |
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 34% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Forrest County Board of Superviors owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 1966; Forrest County General Hospital owns an unstated share directly since Jul 15, 1952.
- 10 owners or officers are people: Evan S Dillard (corporate director, 0%); James Lynn Cartlidge (corporate director); Richard Andy Woodard (corporate director, 0%); Richard Andy Woodard (managing employee (on the payroll)); John M Keene (corporate director); Ben R Hester (corporate director, 0%); Ben R Hester (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Marcus L Hogan (corporate director); Richard W Preusch (corporate officer); Richard W Preusch (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forrest County Board of Superviors | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jan 1, 1966 |
| Forrest County General Hospital | Owns 5% or more directly | Jul 15, 1952 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Forrest County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.