Mercy Hospital Carthage
A critical access hospital in Carthage, Missouri 64836
3125 Dr Russell Smith Way, Carthage, Missouri 64836. (417) 358-8121.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 25 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 22, 2024: a standard inspection.
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 22, 2024: standard inspection8 deficiencies
-
Emergency Services
The inspectors’ words, 172 words
“EMERGENCY SERVICES CFR(s): The CAH provides emergency care necessary to meet the needs of its inpatients and outpatients. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 46554 Based on policy review, review of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS), observation, and interview, the hospital failed to ensure the required life-saving medication was readily accessible when administering Succinylcholine (a muscle relaxant/paralytic) in the Emergency Department (ED) or the Operating Room (OR). The facility census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients, and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. The severity and cumulative effects of these failed practices resulted in the hospital’s non-compliance with §42 CFR 485.618 CoP of Emergency Services. Please refer to C-0884 for details”
-
Provision Of Services
The inspectors’ words, 180 words
“PROVISION OF SERVICES CFR(s): §485.635 Condition of Participation: Provision of Services This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 46554 Based on policy review, observation, interview, review of the manufacture operation manual, and review of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter 797, the facility failed to: - Ensure pharmacy staff followed the hospital’s policy and the infection prevention standards for compounded sterile preparations. (C-1016) - Ensure pharmacy staff followed the hospital’s policy for proper Narcotic inventory and tracking. (C-1016) The facility census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients, and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. The cumulative effect of these failures resulted in non-compliance with §42 CFR 485.635 Condition of Participation: Provision of Services - related to Pharmacy Services. Please refer to C-1016 for details”
-
Equipment, Supplies, And Medication
The inspectors’ words, 663 words
“EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES, AND MEDICATION CFR(s): Equipment, supplies, and medication used in treating emergency cases are kept at the CAH and are readily available for treating emergency cases. The items available must include the following: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46554 Based on policy review, review of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS), observation and interview, the hospital failed to ensure required life-saving medication was readily accessible when administering Succinylcholine (a muscle relaxant/paralytic) in the Emergency Department (ED) or the Operating Room (OR). The facility census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients, and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Malignant Hyperthermia,” dated 10/10/2023, showed “All facilities” where Malignant Hyperthermia triggering anesthetics and depolarizing muscle relaxants are administered will have a Malignant Hyperthermia cart/kit and supplies necessary to treat Malignant Hyperthermia reactions as recommended by the MHAUS. 2. Review of the MHAUS recommendations, dated 2016, showed: - When patients were given Succinylcholine, the only antidote used to reverse the reaction was the medication Dantrolene (effective antidote medication used to treat and prevent Malignant Hyperthermia). - The current MHAUS recommendations for Dantrolene is 36 vials of 20mg doses. 3. Observation on 05/21/24 beginning at 1:00 PM, showed: - The Malignant Hyperthermia box was in a locked medication room in the surgical recovery area. - The Inventory list for the Malignant Hyperthermia cart listed Dantrolene 36 vials. - The inventory list documented it was “Filled by” Staff U, Pharmacy Technician, but failed to include documentation of the date it was last inspected and who completed the inspection. - The Malignant Hyperthermia cart contained 24 vials of Dantrolene 20mg, 12 less than the MHAUS recommendation. 4. During an interview on 05/21/24 at 12:50 PM, Staff J, Director of Nursing, stated ED physicians utilized the medication Succinylcholine when patients in the ED required intubation (insertion of a tube into a person’s trachea [windpipe] for ventilation when a person is unable to breath on their own). Staff J stated the hospital’s Malignant Hyperthermia Cart was located in the OR’s Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). 5. During an interview on 05/21/24 at approximately 1:30 PM, Staff S, Director of Surgical Services, stated the Malignant Hyperthermia cart was located in the locked anesthesia room. Staff S stated they believed the Emergency Department had an additional Malignant Hyperthermia Cart and the 12 vials might be stored in that cart, making the hospital’s total inventory 36. 6. During an interview on 05/21/24 at 2:32 PM, Staff V, Registered Nurse (RN), ED Nurse, stated the ED had a Malignant Hyperthermia resource book, however, Staff V was unsure if the hospital had a Malignant Hyperthermia Cart/Kit and if the hospital did have one, Staff V did not know where it was located. 7. During an interview on 05/21/24 at 3:35 PM, Staff I, RN, ED Charge Nurse, stated: - Some ED physicians administered Succinylcholine medication when a patient presented to the ED and required intubation. - Staff I acknowledged the ED did not have a Malignant Hyperthermia Cart located in the ED. - The facility’s Malignant Hyperthermia Cart was located in the OR’s PACU. - ED staff could access the Malignant Hyperthermia Cart in the OR’s PACU per ED staffs’ ID badge. - Staff I stated to staff’s knowledge the ED had not performed mock Malignant Hyperthermia drills for staff. 8. During an interview on 05/21/24 at approximately 4:00 PM, Staff B, Director of Pharmacy, stated the required number of unexpired Dantrolene doses were not available to complete the Malignant Hyperthermia cart inventory. The pharmacy technician is responsible for inventory of the Malignant Hyperthermia cart monthly. 18018”
-
Patient Care Policies
The inspectors’ words, 1,193 words
“PATIENT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): [The policies include the following:] (iv) Rules for the storage, handling, dispensation, and administration of drugs and biologicals. These rules must provide that there is a drug storage area that is administered in accordance with accepted professional principles, that current and accurate records are kept of the receipt and disposition of all scheduled drugs, and that outdated, mislabeled, or otherwise unusable drugs are not available for patient use. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46554 Based on policy review, observation, interview, review of the manufacture operation manual, and review of the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) Chapter 797, the facility failed to: - Ensure proper documentation of tracking the narcotic inventory. - Ensure medication safety when staff failed to ensure refrigerated narcotics were stored in a locked area of the pharmacy. - Ensure Pharmacy staff provided a segregated compounding area (SCA, a separate area designated for drug compounding) free of paper (particle shedding products with the potential for contamination). - Ensure pharmacy staff followed the hospital’s policy and the infection prevention standards for compounded sterile preparations. These practices failed to provide safe and effective medication storage and tracking that potentially damaged the medication integrity and/or quality for all patients at the hospital and had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination and increased the risk of harm to all patients that received compounded medications. The facility census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients, and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. Findings included: Controlled Narcotic Medications 1. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Controlled substance policy,” dated 10/25/2021, showed: - “DEA registrants must maintain complete accurate, up-to-date records for every controlled substance purchased, received, stored, distributed, dispensed, disposed of or otherwise managed under their DEA license.” - Any reports of theft or significant loss (DEA form 106) must be kept for a minimum of two years. 2. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Narcotic Ordering, Receiving, Storing, Dispensing and Record Keeping,” dated 04/2024, showed in part “all CII through C5 narcotics will be stored in locked cabinets, drawers or in the safe within the pharmacy. The cabinets, drawers and the safe will remain locked when not under the direct supervision of the pharmacist.” 3. Observation with interview on 05/21/2024 at 9:10 AM in the locked pharmacy showed: - An unlocked medication refrigerator located in an unlocked supply room in the pharmacy where refrigerated narcotic medications were being stored. - Tussionex oral suspension (Hydrocodone/Chlorpheniramine Polistirex, liquid narcotic medication taken for cough and cold symptoms) 10/88 mg/ml with no documented open date and a quantity of 300 ML. - The narcotic log for the Tussionex showed a quantity remaining should be 393ml. - Staff A, Pharmacy Technician, stated the amount in the bottle was approximately 300ml and the discrepancy was related to the amount of wasted medication when dispensing an individual dose. 4. During an interview on 05/21/2024 at 10:50 AM, Staff B, Director of Pharmacy, stated narcotic medications in the pharmacy only require a single lock, on the floor they require a double lock. They stated the Tussionex has a pudding like consistency and there is significant waste of the medication when repackaging it for single dose for the floor. The expectation is that staff correct the count to reflect the amount of medication wasted weekly. The count log should be perpetual with each dose. They do not expect staff to date multidose oral medications with the date they are opened, only that the single doses be labeled with a BUD (beyond use date) of 6 months or the manufacture expiration date. Sterile Medication Compounding 5. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “MW PHA Hazardous Sterile Medication Compounding Policy,” dated 03/29/2023, showed prior to placing materials into any pass through chamber all items must be wiped with and EPA registered disinfectant, sterile IPA or sporicidal agent (cleaning products to kill any bacteria). 6. Review of the manufacture operation manual, dated 05/2020, for the CAI (compounding aseptic isolator) hood showed Use standard pharmacy gown, perform hand hygiene and don (put on) sterile, powder free gloves. 7. Observation on 05/21/2024 at 8:34 AM, showed Staff A, Pharmacy Technician, - Prepared IV infusion medication for immediate-use per sterile compound method utilizing the CAI, admixture was a 0.5 NS (normal saline) out of bag to dilute 4 vials of Benlysta (medication used to treat Lupus an autoimmune disorder) mixture. - No line of demarcation (separation) in front of the CAI. - Applied non-sterile gloves and collected supplies for medication mixture. - Failed to wipe down the medication or supplies used for medication mixture prior to placing supplies in the ante chamber. - Performed hand hygiene, and applied non-sterile gloves, placed arms in the CAI sleeves, put on non-sterile gloves inside the CAI and opened the inner airlock chamber, retrieved the supplies and medication, placed it in the inner airlock chamber and closed the outer airlock chamber door. - Failed to wear proper PPE (personal protective equipment), a gown and sterile gloves. - Completed medication mixture and opened the inner airlock chamber placed medication and supplies in ante chamber and removed non-sterile gloves. - Removed arms from the CAI sleeves and collected medication and supplies from the ante chamber. - Labeled, dated and logged the medication for immediate use. - Disposed of supplies used during the admixture process. 8. During an interview on 05/21/2024 at 9:01 AM, Staff A, Pharmacy Technician, stated they do not wear PPE for the CAI and never have. Also, there has never been a line of demarcation and staff only wiped supplies after placing them in the ante chamber. Sterile Ante Chamber and Compounding Areas 9. Observation on 05/21/2024 at 9:20 AM, in the sterile ante chamber and compounding areas: - Entered the Ante room before the line of demarcation with the BSC (Biological Safety Cabinet) room on the right and the LAFW (Laminar Airflow Workbench) on the left. - Paper towels were not non-particle shedding. - BSC (hazard mixing room) had a bio-hazard disposal box had 3 labels peeled with adhesive exposed allowing an area for bacteria growth. 10. During an interview on 05/21/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff A, Pharmacy Technician stated: - They do not step over the line as putting the booties on therefore they are wearing dirty booties into the sterile area. - They also do not wipe supplies prior to the pass throughs from the clean area to the sterile area. They wipe it down prior to placing supplies in the hoods. 11. During an interview on 05/21/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff B, Staff B, Director of Pharmacy, stated they will check in to ordering the non-particle shedding paper towels from materials management. 12. Review of the USP, Chapter 797, dated 2013, showed particle shedding objects (pencils, corrugated cardboard, paper towels, and cotton items) were prohibited in the SCA.”
-
Infection Prevent Surveil & Control Of Hais
The inspectors’ words, 1,369 words
“INFECTION PREVENT SURVEIL & CONTROL OF HAIs CFR(s): The infection prevention and control includes surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs, including maintaining a clean and sanitary environment to avoid sources and transmission of infection, and that the program also addresses any infection control issues identified by public health authorities; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 18018 Based on policy review, review of the Missouri Food Code Chapter 6, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control policies and infection prevention standards when staff failed to: - Change gloves and perform hand hygiene when indicated during medication administration for three out of four observations conducted of staff administrating medications to patients (#21, #23 and #25). - Remove rust (reddish brown bacteria that may contribute to hospital-associated infections), dirt and oil build up from the kitchen area. - Remove expired and/or outdated food items from the kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to expose all patients, visitors, and staff to cross- contamination and increased the potential to spread infection. The facility census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients, and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. Findings included: MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION 1. Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Hand Hygiene Policy,” dated 02/14/24, showed staff directives: Hand Hygiene - Hand Hygiene is the act of cleaning for the purpose of removing soil, dirt, and microorganisms. Hand hygiene is considered the single most effective method of infection prevention by reducing the transmission of microorganisms in a healthcare setting. -Indications for Hand Hygiene are based on the World Health Organization 5 Moments for hand hygiene and include: -1- Before touching a patient; -2- Before clean/aseptic procedure; -3- After body fluid exposure risk; -4- After touching a patient; and -5- After touching patient surroundings. - Moment between the patient and healthcare zones is required for moments #1, #4 and #5. - Patient Zone: Includes the patient and area immediately surrounding the patient when care is given. This area is likely to be contaminated with the patient’s own germs. - Healthcare Zone: Includes the area outside the patient zone that is likely to be contaminated with germs from many patients, visitors, and co-workers. Glove Use - Per Standard Precautions, gloves should be worn when it can be reasonable anticipated that contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, potentially contaminated skin, or contaminated equipment could occur. - If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves, before touching the patient or the patient environment. - Perform hand hygiene immediately after removing gloves. - Change gloves and perform hand hygiene during patient care if gloves become damaged, gloves become visibly soiled with blood or body fluids following a task, or when moving from work on a contaminated body site to another body site on the same patient (including non-intact skin, mucous membranes, or medical device) or if another clinical indication for hand hygiene occurs. 2. Observation on 05/21/24 at 8:23 AM, showed Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN), on the Medical-Surgical Unit prepared and administered medication to Patient #25: - Staff O performed hand hygiene and gloved upon entry into the patient’s room. - Staff O removed the barcode scanner from the computer workstation and scanned the patient’s identification (ID) band. - After Staff O scanned the patient’s ID band, staff removed gloves and re-gloved, however, staff failed to perform hand hygiene before staff re-gloved. - Staff O scanned each medications’ barcode and wearing the same gloves, staff removed the medications from their package, placed each medication into a plastic medication cup and handed the plastic medication cup to the patient. - Staff O while providing care to Patient #25, removed gloves three times, however, staff failed to perform hand hygiene before staff re-gloved. 3. Observation on 05/21/24 at 8:45 AM, showed Staff P, RN, on the Medical-Surgical Unit prepared and administered medication to Patient #21: - Staff P performed hand hygiene and gloved upon entry into the patient’s room. - Staff P removed the barcode scanner from the computer workstation and scanned the patient’s ID band. - Wearing the same gloves, Staff P scanned each medications’ barcode. - After Staff P scanned the medications’ barcode, wearing the same gloves, staff removed the medications from their package, placed each medication into a plastic medication cup and handed the plastic medication cup to the patient. 4. Observation on 05/22/24 at 8:15 AM, showed Staff Q, RN, on the Medical-Surgical Unit prepared and administered medication to Patient #23: - Staff Q performed hand hygiene upon entry into the patient’s room. - Without gloves, Staff Q scanned the patient’s ID band. - After Staff Q scanned the patient’s ID band, staff applied gloves, however, Staff Q failed to perform hand hygiene before staff gloved. - Staff Q scanned each medications’ barcode and wearing the same gloves, staff removed the medications from their package, placed each medication into a plastic medication cup and handed the plastic medication cup to the patient. - Wearing the same gloves, Staff Q scanned the barcode on a package of normal saline flush used to flush the patient’s intravenous catheter (IV - small flexible tube inserted into a vein through the skin, used to administer medications and/or fluids into the bloodstream). - Wearing the same gloves, Staff Q cleansed the IV port and flushed the patient’s IV. Staffs’ failure to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after using the scanner to scan patients’ ID bands and medications’ barcodes and perform hand hygiene and re-glove between task increased the risk for cross-contamination during medication administration and providing care, services and treatments for patients. 5. During an interview on 05/22/24 at 3:15 PM, Staff K, RN, Medical-Surgical Nurse Manager, stated, the expectation of staff was to: - Change gloves and perform hand hygiene after using the scanner to scan patients’ ID band and barcodes of medications. - Perform hand hygiene before gloving and after glove removal. - Follow the facility’s hand hygiene policy. Kitchen 6. Review of the Missouri Food Code for the Food Establishments of the State of Missouri, dated 06/03/13, chapter 6, showed surface characteristics of floors, walls and ceiling surfaces should be smooth, durable, and easily cleanable for areas where food establishment operations were conducted and nonabsorbent for areas subject to moisture such as food preparation areas, walk-in-refrigerators, washing areas, toilet rooms, mobile food establishment servicing areas, and areas subject to flushing or spray cleaning methods. 7. Observation on 05/20/2024 at 3:55 PM, in the kitchen, showed: - Multiple areas of corrosion and a leaking water line on the dishwasher. - Large amount of dust on the air duct above the grill freezer. - Dirty door handles on multiple freezers and refrigerators. - Rust on several sheet pans, a can opener, a toaster oven, the drain for the food steamer. - Dirt/grease on the trim, door frame and door from the kitchen to the café. - Three packages of tortilla wraps that expired 12/16/2023, a container with pancakes expired 05/19/2024, two orange juice containers expired 12/31/2023, one case of pureed freezer meals expired 02/18/2023. - Multiple dents in the stainless-steel grill top where the stainless top was broken. - Grease build up in the two convection ovens. - grease and dirt build up on the outside of the food/tray warmer. - Dirty and dust on the plastic used to line the shelf in front of the walk in refrigerator. - Kitchen staff with large dangling earrings. 8. During an interview on 05/21/2024 at 2:50 PM, Staff C, Manager of Food Services, stated they have reported any repairs needed to maintenance. Staff are expected to only wear studded earrings, no watches, and only flat band rings. Staff are also expected to check expiration dates on new deliveries and when putting food away. All expired food has been thrown away and that is the expectation for any expired foods.”
-
Qapi
The inspectors’ words, 186 words
“QAPI CFR(s): (b) Standard: QAPI Program Design and scope. The CAH’s QAPI program must: (2) Be ongoing and comprehensive. (3) Involve all departments of the CAH and services (including those services furnished under contract or arrangement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 16639 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure contracted services were reviewed for quality of services. The hospital census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed (Swing Beds - Medicare program in which a patient can receive acute care, then if needed, Skilled Nursing Care at the same facility) patients and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 05/22/24 at 1:10 PM Staff T, Manager of Quality, stated there is no review of the quality of contracted services. There was a list of contracted services. 2. Review of the facility list of contracted services showed 10 kinds of services provided by contract.”
-
Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation
“An on-site, unannounced survey was conducted from 05/20/24 to 05/22/24. The facility was found to not be in compliance with applicable provisions of the 2012 Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and related documents pursuant to 485.623(d), Life Safety from Fire for Critical Access Hospitals. The facility was protected by an automatic sprinkler system.”
-
Gas And Vacuum Piped Systems - Central Supply
The inspectors’ words, 351 words
“Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Central Supply CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Central Supply System Operations Adaptors or conversion fittings are prohibited. Cylinders are handled in accordance with 11.6.2. Only cylinders, reusable shipping containers, and their accessories are stored in rooms containing central supply systems or cylinders. No flammable materials are stored with cylinders. Cryogenic liquid storage units intended to supply the facility are not used to transfill. Cylinders are kept away from sources of heat. Valve protection caps are secured in place, if supplied, unless cylinder is in use. Cylinders are not stored in tightly closed spaces. Cylinders in use and storage are prevented from exceeding 130 degrees Fahrenheit, and nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide cylinders are prevented from reaching temperatures lower than manufacture recommendations or 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Full or empty cylinders, when not connected, are stored in locations complying with 5.1.3.3.2 through 5.1.3.3.3, and are not stored in enclosures containing motor-driven machinery, unless for instrument air reserve headers. 5.1.3.2, 5.1.3.3.17, 5.1.3.3.1.8, 5.1.3.3.4, 5.2.3.2, 5.2.3.3, 5.3.6.20.4, 5.6.20.5, 5.3.6.20.7, 5.3.6.20.8, 5.3.6.20.9 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 16639 Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure compressed medical gasses were secured to prevent falling. The hospital census was eight Acute Care patients, six Swing Bed patients and three Observation (Observation - outpatient services provided to a patient while the patient’s physician decides whether to admit the patient to Acute Care services or discharge the patient) patients for a total census of 17. Findings included: 1. Observation on 05/21/24 at 11:00 AM in the medical gas storage room showed two large tanks and three smaller tanks unsecured. During an interview upons observation Staff H, Manager of Facilities, confirmed the tanks in the med gas room were not secure from falling. 2. Observation at 4:00 PM showed 12 large tanks in an outdoor storage area secured by only one strap which showed fraying along the length of the strap. 3. On 05/22/24 at 8:10 AM Staff H confirmed the tanks in the outdoor storage area were not reliably secured from falling.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2024 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
| May 22, 2024 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (174 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 13.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.4%, pneumonia 16.6%, COPD 20.9%, hip or knee replacement 5.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 92 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Feb 5, 2015.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 95% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Mercy Health Southwest Missouri Kansas Communities owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2012.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Jamie Wilke (corporate officer, 0%); Shannon Sock (corporate director, 0%); John M Mohart (corporate director, 0%); Jeremy S Drinkwitz (corporate officer, 0%); Jeffrey Peter Ciaramita (corporate director, 0%); Belinda Farmer (corporate director, 0%); Stacie Farnam (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sherry Clouse Day (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Day (corporate officer, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercy Health Southwest Missouri Kansas Communities | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Aug 1, 2012 |
| Mercy Health | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Nov 2, 2009 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 3 hospitals CMS lists in Jasper County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Mercy Hospital Joplin | 1 |
| Freeman Health System - Freeman West | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.