Hearth Record

Essentia Health Deer River

A critical access hospital in Deer River, Minnesota 56636

115 10th Avenue Northeast, Deer River, Minnesota 56636. (218) 246-4200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 14, 2025: a complaint inspection.

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 27, 2024: complaint and standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Life Safety From Fire

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27955 Based on observation, interview and document review, the critical access hospital (CAH) was found to be out of compliance with Life Safety Code requirements. These findings have the potential to affect all patients in the hospital. Findings include: Please refer to the Life Safety Code inspection tags: F321, F324, F353, F702, and F920 for additional information.”

    Rule C0930. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Care Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “PATIENT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): (1) The CAH’s health care services are furnished in accordance with appropriate written policies that are consistent with applicable State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27955 Based on interview and document review, the critical access hospital (CAH) failed to ensure policies and procedures in the nursing department were reviewed every two years. In addition, the facility failed to ensure policies were reviewed for clinical records and radiology biannually. Findings include: Review of clinical record policies and radiology policies revealed the following were not reviewed biannually: Clinical Records Policies -Access, Use, and Disclosure of Protected Health Information last review date 6/14/2022. -Electronic Signatures last review date 2/14/2022. -Retention of Non-Electronic Medical Records last review date 9/10/2019. -Physician Orders-Telephone, Verbal Order last review date 11/17/2021. Radiology Policy -Radiation Safety (ALARA) last review dated 2/9/2021. 42587 Review of nursing policies and procedures revealed the following: NURSING -Reportable Events-Adverse Health Events and TJC Sentinel Events last review date 5/22/22. -Employee Orientation last review date 2/27/22. -Staff Competence last review date 10/23/20 During an interview on 6/25/24 at 10:05 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated clinical policies were reviewed internally every two years however any policies which were administrative were not part of this review process. The DON verified the above policies had not been reviewed in the two year time frame. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 8:25 a.m., the administrator verified the above policies were not part of the every two year review process.”

    Rule C1006. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Records System

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “RECORDS SYSTEM CFR(s): For each patient receiving health care services, the CAH maintains a record that includes, as applicable-- (i) Identification and social data, evidence of properly executed informed consent forms, pertinent medical history, assessment of the health status and health care needs of the patient, and a brief summary of the episode, disposition, and instructions to the patient; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42587 Based on interview and medical record review, the hospital failed to ensure patients received the Important Message from Medicare (IMM) for 4 of 6 (P1, P6, P9, P13) patients who were admitted to inpatient status or swing bed status. Findings include: A review of medical records and interview was completed on 6/27/24 at 12:00 p.m. with registered nurse (RN)-A and administrator present. The review revealed the following: P1 was admitted on 6/23/24, as an inpatient with weakness and fever. A review of the medical record with RN-A and with the administrator revealed the IMM was not found in P1’s medical record. Administrator verified the record lacked an IMM. P6 was admitted on 4/12/24, in a swing bed status for wound care. A review of the medical record with RN-A and with the administrator revealed the IMM was not found in P6’s medical record. Administrator verified the record lacked an IMM. P9 was admitted on 5/8/24, as an inpatient for urinary tract infection with an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of the medical record with RN-A and with the administrator revealed the IMM was not found in P9’s medical record. Administrator verified the record lacked an IMM. P13 was admitted on 6/26/24, as an inpatient for upper gastrointestinal bleed. A review of the medical record with RN-A and with the administrator revealed the IMM was not found in P13’s medical record. Administrator verified the record lacked an IMM. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid, “Hospitals are required to deliver the Important Message from Medicare (IM), formerly CMS-R-193 and now CMS-10065, to all Medicare beneficiaries (Original Medicare beneficiaries and Medicare Advantage plan enrollees) who are hospital inpatients. The IM informs hospitalized inpatient beneficiaries of their hospital discharge appeal rights.””

    Rule C1110. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jun 25, 2024: standard inspection6 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 548 words

    “FIRE SAFETY An annual Life Safety recertification survey was conducted by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, State Fire Marshal Division on 06/25/2024. At the time of this survey, Deer River Healthcare Center - Building 01 was found not in compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a), Life Safety from Fire, and the 2012 edition of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Life Safety Code (LSC), Chapter 19 Existing Health Care and the 2012 edition of NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code. THE FACILITY’S POC WILL SERVE AS YOUR ALLEGATION OF COMPLIANCE UPON THE DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE. YOUR SIGNATURE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE CMS-2567 FORM WILL BE USED AS VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. UPON RECEIPT OF AN ACCEPTABLE POC, AN ONSITE REVISIT OF YOUR FACILITY MAY BE CONDUCTED TO VALIDATE THAT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS HAS BEEN ATTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR VERIFICATION. PLEASE RETURN THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR THE FIRE SAFETY DEFICIENCIES (K-TAGS) TO: IF PARTICIPATING IN THE E-POC PROCESS, A PAPER COPY OF THE PLAN OF CORRECTION IS NOT REQUIRED. Healthcare Fire Inspections State Fire Marshal Division 445 Minnesota St., Suite 145 St. Paul, MN 55101-5145, OR By email to: FM.HC.Inspections@state.mn.us THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR EACH DEFICIENCY MUST INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. A detailed description of the corrective action taken or planned to correct the deficiency. 2. Address the measures that will be put in place to ensure the deficiency does not reoccur. 3. Indicate how the facility plans to monitor future performance to ensure solutions are sustained. 4. Identify who is responsible for the corrective actions and monitoring of compliance. 5. The actual or proposed date for completion of the remedy. Deer River Healthcare (Hospital) was built at various times. The Main building consists of the original construction was in 1960 which is 1-story, no basement and determined to be Type II (111) construction. In 1973 additions to that building were constructed, are 1-story, no basement and Type II (000) construction with a partial fire sprinkler system. In 1984 an addition that is 1-story has a partial basement, was determined to be Type II (222) and fully sprinkler protected was constructed. The 1994 ambulance garage/ clinic additions were added, are 1-story, with a basement and Type II (111) with a full fire sprinkler system. In 2000 a corridor addition connecting the clinic and the hospital was built, it is 1-story, no basement and Type II (111) construction with a full fire sprinkler system. The 2008 building is 1-story, has a partial basement and Type II (000) construction with a complete fire sprinkler system and is separated with 2-hour fire barriers from the existing hospital and clinic. The hospital is separated from the Homestead Nursing Home to the north with 2- hour fire rated construction. Essentia Health Grand Rapids Clinic is a suite of rooms on the main level in the southeast corner of this professional office building was constructed in 2000 is 1-story building with a partial basement and was determined to be Type II (000) constructed. The facility has a capacity of 16 beds and had a census of 0 at the time of the survey. The requirements at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a), are NOT MET as evidenced by:”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Hazardous Areas - Enclosure

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Hazardous Areas - Enclosure CFR(s): NFPA 101 Hazardous Areas - Enclosure Hazardous areas are protected by a fire barrier having 1-hour fire resistance rating (with 3/4 hour fire rated doors) or an automatic fire extinguishing system in accordance with 8.7.1 or 19.3.5.9. When the approved automatic fire extinguishing system option is used, the areas shall be separated from other spaces by smoke resisting partitions and doors in accordance with 8.4. Doors shall be self-closing or automatic-closing and permitted to have nonrated or field-applied protective plates that do not exceed 48 inches from the bottom of the door. Describe the floor and zone locations of hazardous areas that are deficient in REMARKS. 19.3.2.1, 19.3.5.9 Area Automatic Sprinkler Separation N/A a. Boiler and Fuel-Fired Heater Rooms b. Laundries (larger than 100 square feet) c. Repair, Maintenance, and Paint Shops d. Soiled Linen Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) e. Trash Collection Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) f. Combustible Storage Rooms/Spaces (over 50 square feet) g. Laboratories (if classified as Severe Hazard - see K322) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain hazardous storage rooms per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, sections 19.3.2.1.3 and 7.2.1.8.1. These deficient finding could have a patterned impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/2024 between 10:00am and 2:00pm, it was revealed by observation that storage room / office areas that require self closers did not have a self-closing device in the following areas: 1) ER142 Room 2) ER144 Room 3) W118 Room 4) Decontamination storage room 5) CL141B Lab Door An interview with the Director of Maintenance verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0321. Standard-level.

  • Cooking Facilities

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “Cooking Facilities CFR(s): NFPA 101 Cooking Facilities Cooking equipment is protected in accordance with NFPA 96, Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations, unless: * residential cooking equipment (i.e., small appliances such as microwaves, hot plates, toasters) are used for food warming or limited cooking in accordance with 18.3.2.5.2, 19.3.2.5.2 * cooking facilities open to the corridor in smoke compartments with 30 or fewer patients comply with the conditions under 18.3.2.5.3, 19.3.2.5.3, or * cooking facilities in smoke compartments with 30 or fewer patients comply with conditions under 18.3.2.5.4, 19.3.2.5.4. Cooking facilities protected according to NFPA 96 per 9.2.3 are not required to be enclosed as hazardous areas, but shall not be open to the corridor. 18.3.2.5.1 through 18.3.2.5.4, 19.3.2.5.1 through 19.3.2.5.5, 9.2.3, TIA 12-2 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation, a review of available documentation, and staff interview, the facility failed to install the required safety features for cooking equipment per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, sections 19.3.2.5.3 (9) and 19.3.2.5.4. This deficient finding could have an isolated impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/2024 between 10:00am and 2:00pm, it was revealed by observation that the residential stove located in physical therapy was not equipped with a lock-out switch and was not on a timer, not exceeding a 120-minute capacity, that automatically deactivates the cook-top or range, independent of staff action. An interview with the Director of Maintenance verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0324. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain spacing between storage and the sprinkler system per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, Section 9.7.5, NFPA 25 (2011 edition), Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, Section 5.2.1.2, and NFPA 13 (2010 edition), Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, Sections 8.6.5.3.2 and 8.15.9. These deficient findings could a patterned impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/2024 between 10:00am and 2:00pm, it was revealed by observation that storage materials had been placed on a storage rack, bringing the storage materials within the required 18 inch clearance area under the sprinkler heads. These obstructions were found in: An interview with the Director of Maintenance verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Subdivision Of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie CFR(s): NFPA 101 Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrier Construction 2012 EXISTING Smoke barriers shall be constructed to a 1/2-hour fire resistance rating per 8.5. Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall. Smoke dampers are not required in duct penetrations in fully ducted HVAC systems where an approved sprinkler system is installed for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. 19.3.7.3, 8.6.7.1(1) Describe any mechanical smoke control system in REMARKS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain their smoke barrier per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, sections 19.3.7.1, 19.3.7.3, 8.5.2.2, and 8.5.6.5. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/2024 between 10:00am and 2:00pm, it was revealed by observation that there was a penetration running from one smoke compartment to another on the Lower Level mechanical room. An interview with the Director of Maintenance verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0372. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Equipment - Power Cords And Extens

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Electrical Equipment - Power Cords and Extens CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Equipment - Power Cords and Extension Cords Power strips in a patient care vicinity are only used for components of movable patient-care-related electrical equipment (PCREE) assembles that have been assembled by qualified personnel and meet the conditions of 10.2.3.6. Power strips in the patient care vicinity may not be used for non-PCREE (e.g., personal electronics), except in long-term care resident rooms that do not use PCREE. Power strips for PCREE meet UL 1363A or UL 60601-1. Power strips for non-PCREE in the patient care rooms (outside of vicinity) meet UL 1363. In non-patient care rooms, power strips meet other UL standards. All power strips are used with general precautions. Extension cords are not used as a substitute for fixed wiring of a structure. Extension cords used temporarily are removed immediately upon completion of the purpose for which it was installed and meets the conditions of 10.2.4. 10.2.3.6 (NFPA 99), 10.2.4 (NFPA 99), 400-8 (NFPA 70), 590.3(D) (NFPA 70), TIA 12-5 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the usage of electrical adaptive devices per NFPA 99 (2012 edition), Health Care Facilities Code, sections 10.5.2.3.1 and 10.2.4.2.1, NFPA 70, (2011 edition), National Electrical Code, sections 400-8, and UL 1363. This deficient finding could have an isolated impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/2024 between 10:00am and 2:00pm, it was revealed by observation that there were several electrical appliances plugged into a power strip in the following areas: 1) Maintenance room L011 2) Scheduling Office in surgery area An interview with the Director of Maintenance verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0920. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 14, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 20, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 27, 2024Complaint and standard inspection3 deficiencies cited
Jun 25, 2024Standard inspection6 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 4.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 91 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 75% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Dec 1, 2004.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 49% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Essentia Health owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2025.
  • St Marys Duluth Clinic Health System runs it.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Krista Skorupa (corporate officer); Amy Bergstrom (corporate director); Anthony Sertich (corporate officer, 0%); George Loban (corporate director); Amanda Reed (managing employee (on the payroll)); Adam Bachand (corporate director); Thomas Jamar (corporate director); Rebecca Urbanski (corporate director); Anthony Yung (corporate director); Justin Terch (corporate director); Kevin Boren (corporate officer, 0%); Kevin Boren (managing employee (on the payroll)); Troy Duininck (corporate director); Michael Watters (corporate officer); Bruce Smith (corporate director); Nancy Aronson Norr (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Essentia HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2025
St Marys Duluth Clinic Health SystemRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Sep 1, 2012

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospitals CMS lists in Itasca County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

2 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital4
Bigfork Valley HospitalNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.