Hearth Record

North Valley Health Center

A critical access hospital in Warren, Minnesota 56762

300 West Good Samaritan Drive, Warren, Minnesota 56762. (218) 745-4211.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2025: a complaint inspection.

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 18, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Posting Of Signs

    The inspectors’ words, 369 words

    “POSTING OF SIGNS CFR(s): 489.20(q) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to post conspicuously in any emergency department or in a place or places likely to be noticed by all individuals entering the emergency department, as well as those individuals waiting for examination and treatment in areas other than traditional emergency departments (that is, entrance, admitting area, waiting room, treatment area) a sign (in a form specified by the Secretary) specifying the rights of individuals under section 1867 of the Act with respect to examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor; and to post conspicuously (in a form specified by the Secretary) information indicating whether or not the hospital or rural primary care hospital (e.g., critical access hospital) participates in the Medicaid program under a State plan approved under Title XIX. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 27955 Based on observation, interview, and document review, the critical access hospital (CAH) failed to ensure signage pertaining to the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was posted in all areas likely to be noticed by patients entering the Emergency Department (ED). This had the potential to affect all patients presenting to the ED seeking care and treatment via the ambulance entrance and patient entrance. Findings include: On 9/16/25 at 9:30 a.m., a tour of the emergency department (ED) was conducted with registered nurse (RN)-A. During the tour, RN-A identified an entrance where most patients who arrived via ambulance or other vehicle, entered the facility. This area lacked posted EMTALA signage RN-A acknowledged there was no signage posted in this area. On 9/17/25 at 11:006 a.m., a tour with RN-B of the entrances that a patient might gain access to the ED revealed there were no signs posted in the ambulance bay entrance or the ED entrance. RN-B acknowledge there was no signage posted in those areas. A facility policy ER EMTALA Transfer Policy and Procedure, dated August 2011, identified an information sign is posted the Emergency Room entrance indicating the rights of all individuals to examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and labor, and to inform them that NVHC does participate in the Medicaid Program.”

    Rule C2402. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Aug 21, 2024: standard inspection11 deficiencies
  • Life Safety From Fire

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40948 Based on observation, interview and document review, the critical access hospital (CAH) was found to be out of compliance with Life Safety Code requirements. These findings have the potential to affect all patients in the hospital. Findings include: Please refer to the Life Safety Code inspection tags: K321, 5372, K761, K901, K 912, K918, K923 for additional information.”

    Rule C0930. Standard-level.

  • Ep Program Patient Population

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “EP Program Patient Population CFR(s): §403.748(a)(3), §416.54(a)(3), §418.113(a)(3), §441.184(a)(3), §460.84(a)(3), §482.15(a)(3), §483.73(a)(3), §483.475(a)(3), §484.102(a)(3), §485.68(a)(3), §485.542(a)(3), §485.625(a)(3), §485.727(a)(3), §485.920(a)(3), §491.12(a)(3), §494.62(a)(3). [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (3) Address [patient/client] population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the type of services the [facility] has the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans.** *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do all of the following: (3) Address resident population, including, but not limited to, persons at-risk; the type of services the LTC facility has the ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans. *NOTE: [“Persons at risk” does not apply to: ASC, hospice, PACE, HHA, CORF, CMCH, RHC/FQHC, or ESRD facilities.] This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40948 Based on interview and document review, the facility Emergency Management Plan (EMP) undated, failed to address the patient population including, but not limited to, patients most at-risk; the type of services the facility has the ability to provide in an emergency and continuity of operations that could be provided to those patients most at risk. This had the potential to affect all patients residing in the hospital service area. Findings include: During an interview on 8/21/24 at 2:00 p.m., the director of nursing identified the EMP did not identify the patient population they served. Review of the facility Emergency Management Plan policy dated 4/2022, lacked identification of the patient population the facility served.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Roles Under A Waiver Declared By Secretary

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Roles Under a Waiver Declared by Secretary CFR(s): §403.748(b)(8), §416.54(b)(6), §418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv), §441.184(b)(8), §460.84(b)(9), §482.15(b)(8), §483.73(b)(8), §483.475(b)(8), §485.542(b)(7), §485.625(b)(8), §485.920(b)(7), §494.62(b)(7). [(b) Policies and procedures. The [facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (8) [(6), (6)(C)(iv), (7), or (9)] The role of the [facility] under a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the Act, in the provision of care and treatment at an alternate care site identified by emergency management officials. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(b):] Policies and procedures. (8) The role of the RNHCI under a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of Act, in the provision of care at an alternative care site identified by emergency management officials. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40948 Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure their emergency preparedness plan (EPP) included policies and procedures to address and identify the facility’s role under a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the Social Security Act (Act), in the provision of care and treatment at an alternate care site identified by emergency management officials during an emergency. This had the potential to affect all patients residing in the critical access hospital (CAH). Findings include: During an interview on 8/21/24 at 2 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated she was not aware of the availability of a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the ACT. The facility’s Emergency Management Plan policy dated 4/2022, lacked any reference to the availability of a waiver as needed declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the Act.”

    Rule E0026. Standard-level.

  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 359 words

    “FIRE SAFETY An annual Life Safety recertification survey was conducted by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, State Fire Marshal Division on 08/21/2024. At the time of this survey, North Valley Health Center was found not in compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a), Life Safety from Fire, and the 2012 edition of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Life Safety Code (LSC), Chapter 19 Existing Health Care and the 2012 edition of NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code. THE FACILITY’S POC WILL SERVE AS YOUR ALLEGATION OF COMPLIANCE UPON THE DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE. YOUR SIGNATURE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE CMS-2567 FORM WILL BE USED AS VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. UPON RECEIPT OF AN ACCEPTABLE POC, AN ONSITE REVISIT OF YOUR FACILITY MAY BE CONDUCTED TO VALIDATE THAT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS HAS BEEN ATTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR VERIFICATION. PLEASE RETURN THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR THE FIRE SAFETY DEFICIENCIES (K-TAGS) TO: IF PARTICIPATING IN THE E-POC PROCESS, A PAPER COPY OF THE PLAN OF CORRECTION IS NOT REQUIRED. Healthcare Fire Inspections State Fire Marshal Division 445 Minnesota St., Suite 145 St. Paul, MN 55101-5145, OR By email to: FM.HC.Inspections@state.mn.us THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR EACH DEFICIENCY MUST INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. A detailed description of the corrective action taken or planned to correct the deficiency. 2. Address the measures that will be put in place to ensure the deficiency does not reoccur. 3. Indicate how the facility plans to monitor future performance to ensure solutions are sustained. 4. Identify who is responsible for the corrective actions and monitoring of compliance. 5. The actual or proposed date for completion of the remedy. 02 main building 2013, 1-story, no basement Type II (000) Fully sprinkler protected. Manuel fire alarm system with corridor smoke detection and smoke detection in sleeping rooms. 2-Hour fire barrier between hospital and connecting link to Good Samaritan Society Center. The facility has a capacity of 24 beds and had a census of 3 at the time of the survey. The requirements at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a), are NOT MET as evidenced by:”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Hazardous Areas - Enclosure

    The inspectors’ words, 274 words

    “Hazardous Areas - Enclosure CFR(s): NFPA 101 Hazardous Areas - Enclosure Hazardous areas are protected by a fire barrier having 1-hour fire resistance rating (with 3/4 hour fire rated doors) or an automatic fire extinguishing system in accordance with 8.7.1 or 19.3.5.9. When the approved automatic fire extinguishing system option is used, the areas shall be separated from other spaces by smoke resisting partitions and doors in accordance with 8.4. Doors shall be self-closing or automatic-closing and permitted to have nonrated or field-applied protective plates that do not exceed 48 inches from the bottom of the door. Describe the floor and zone locations of hazardous areas that are deficient in REMARKS. 19.3.2.1, 19.3.5.9 Area Automatic Sprinkler Separation N/A a. Boiler and Fuel-Fired Heater Rooms b. Laundries (larger than 100 square feet) c. Repair, Maintenance, and Paint Shops d. Soiled Linen Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) e. Trash Collection Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) f. Combustible Storage Rooms/Spaces (over 50 square feet) g. Laboratories (if classified as Severe Hazard - see K322) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain their smoke barrier per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, sections 19.3.7.3, 8.5.6.5 and 8.5.6.2. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by observation that there was a hold-open device on the fire doors leading out of the Procedure Entrance. This device defeats the self-closing device on the Fire Wall Doors. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0321. Standard-level.

  • Subdivision Of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie CFR(s): NFPA 101 Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrier Construction 2012 EXISTING Smoke barriers shall be constructed to a 1/2-hour fire resistance rating per 8.5. Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall. Smoke dampers are not required in duct penetrations in fully ducted HVAC systems where an approved sprinkler system is installed for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. 19.3.7.3, 8.6.7.1(1) Describe any mechanical smoke control system in REMARKS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain their smoke barrier per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, sections 19.3.7.1, 19.3.7.3, 8.5.2.2, and 8.5.6.5. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by observation that there was a penetration running from one smoke compartment to another above doors in the following areas; 1) Above doors to link 2) Above doors area E to Area F 3) Above doors by room F113 Imaging waiting area 4) Above doors at Emergency Room entrance 5) Above doors at entrance to Patient Therapy An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0372. Standard-level.

  • Maintenance, Inspection And Testing - Doors

    The inspectors’ words, 312 words

    “Maintenance, Inspection & Testing - Doors CFR(s): Maintenance, Inspection & Testing - Doors Fire doors assemblies are inspected and tested annually in accordance with NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives. Non-rated doors, including corridor doors to patient rooms and smoke barrier doors, are routinely inspected as part of the facility maintenance program. Individuals performing the door inspections and testing possess knowledge, training or experience that demonstrates ability. Written records of inspection and testing are maintained and are available for review. 19.7.6, 8.3.3.1 (LSC) 5.2, 5.2.3 (2010 NFPA 80) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to inspect fire doors per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code section 8.3.3.1, and NFPA 80 (2010 edition), Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, section 5.2.1. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by review of available documentation the required annual door inspection documentation was not available at the time of the survey. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery. Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to inspect fire doors per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code section 8.3.3.1, and NFPA 80 (2010 edition), Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, section 5.2.1. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by observation that the following fire doors and/or fire door frames were missing or painted over door rating tags. 1) Fire doors leading to Physical Therapy area. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0761. Standard-level.

  • Fundamentals - Building System Categories

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Fundamentals - Building System Categories CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fundamentals - Building System Categories Building systems are designed to meet Category 1 through 4 requirements as detailed in NFPA 99. Categories are determined by a formal and documented risk assessment procedure performed by qualified personnel. Chapter 4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility has failed to provide a complete facility Risk Assessment per NFPA 99 (2012 edition), Health Care Facilities Code, section 4.1. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, It was revealed during documentation review and an interview with the Environmental Services that the utility risk assessment document could not be provided at the time of the survey. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0901. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Receptacles

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Electrical Systems - Receptacles CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Receptacles Power receptacles have at least one, separate, highly dependable grounding pole capable of maintaining low-contact resistance with its mating plug. In pediatric locations, receptacles in patient rooms, bathrooms, play rooms, and activity rooms, other than nurseries, are listed tamper-resistant or employ a listed cover. If used in patient care room, ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) are listed. 6.3.2.2.6.2 (F), 6.3.2.2.4.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the electrical system per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, section 9.1.2, and NFPA 70 (2011 edition), National Electrical Code, section 406.6. This deficient finding could have an isolated impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by observation that there was a missing cover on an electrical junction box in the ceiling near the Visitors Lounge. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0912. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste

    The inspectors’ words, 360 words

    “Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing The generator or other alternate power source and associated equipment is capable of supplying service within 10 seconds. If the 10-second criterion is not met during the monthly test, a process shall be provided to annually confirm this capability for the life safety and critical branches. Maintenance and testing of the generator and transfer switches are performed in accordance with NFPA 110. Generator sets are inspected weekly, exercised under load 30 minutes 12 times a year in 20-40 day intervals, and exercised once every 36 months for 4 continuous hours. Scheduled test under load conditions include a complete simulated cold start and automatic or manual transfer of all EES loads, and are conducted by competent personnel. Maintenance and testing of stored energy power sources (Type 3 EES) are in accordance with NFPA 111. Main and feeder circuit breakers are inspected annually, and a program for periodically exercising the components is established according to manufacturer requirements. Written records of maintenance and testing are maintained and readily available. EES electrical panels and circuits are marked, readily identifiable, and separate from normal power circuits. Minimizing the possibility of damage of the emergency power source is a design consideration for new installations. 6.4.4, 6.5.4, 6.6.4 (NFPA 99), NFPA 110, NFPA 111, 700.10 (NFPA 70) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to install and maintain generators per NFPA 99 (2012 edition), Health Care Facilities Code, section 6.4.4.1.1.3, 6.4.1.1.16.2 and 6.4.1.1.17, and NFPA 110 (2010 edition), Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, sections 8.4.9, 8.4.9.1, 8.4.9.2 and 8.4.9.5.1. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by a review of available documentation of the emergency generator maintenance and testing that the facility could not provide documentation that a 36 month four (4) hour load bank test had been performed. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0918. Standard-level.

  • Gas Equipment - Cylinder And Container Storag

    The inspectors’ words, 354 words

    “Gas Equipment - Cylinder and Container Storag CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas Equipment - Cylinder and Container Storage Greater than or equal to 3,000 cubic feet Storage locations are designed, constructed, and ventilated in accordance with 5.1.3.3.2 and 5.1.3.3.3. >300 but <3,000 cubic feet Storage locations are outdoors in an enclosure or within an enclosed interior space of non- or limited- combustible construction, with door (or gates outdoors) that can be secured. Oxidizing gases are not stored with flammables, and are separated from combustibles by 20 feet (5 feet if sprinklered) or enclosed in a cabinet of noncombustible construction having a minimum 1/2 hr. fire protection rating. Less than or equal to 300 cubic feet In a single smoke compartment, individual cylinders available for immediate use in patient care areas with an aggregate volume of less than or equal to 300 cubic feet are not required to be stored in an enclosure. Cylinders must be handled with precautions as specified in 11.6.2. A precautionary sign readable from 5 feet is on each door or gate of a cylinder storage room, where the sign includes the wording as a minimum “CAUTION: OXIDIZING GAS(ES) STORED WITHIN NO SMOKING.” Storage is planned so cylinders are used in order of which they are received from the supplier. Empty cylinders are segregated from full cylinders. When facility employs cylinders with integral pressure gauge, a threshold pressure considered empty is established. Empty cylinders are marked to avoid confusion. Cylinders stored in the open are protected from weather. 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 11.3.3, 11.3.4, 11.6.5 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45748 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store oxygen cylinders per Health Care Facilities Code NFPA 99 (2012 Edition), sections 11.3.2.3, 11.6.5.2 and 11.6.5.3. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 08/21/2024, between 0800am and 12:00pm, it was revealed by observation that T size oxygen cylinders stored in the Ambulance Bay that are not in a approved fir rated enclosure. An interview with the Maintenance Manager verified these deficient findings at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0923. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 18, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Aug 21, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited
Aug 21, 2024Standard inspection8 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • CMS gives no : “Results are not available for this reporting period.”
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 16.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 16.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 114 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Apr 3, 2002.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 76% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Warren Community Hospital Inc. runs it.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Darlene Dvorak (corporate director); Shari Swanson (corporate director); Mitchell Kotrba (corporate officer, 0%); Mitchell Kotrba (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Mitchell Kotrba (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Jason Boman (corporate director); Jon E Linnell (corporate officer, 0%); Jon E Linnell (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jon E Linnell (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); James Widner (corporate director, 0%); Jeff Hanson (corporate director); Mallory Craik (corporate director); Mark Yutrzenka (corporate director); Ron Leverington (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Warren Community Hospital Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Nov 20, 2013

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Marshall County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.