Hearth Record

Sanford Wheaton Medical Center

A critical access hospital in Wheaton, Minnesota 56296

401 12th Street North, Wheaton, Minnesota 56296. (320) 563-8226.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2024: a standard inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 5, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Life Safety From Fire

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48583 Based on observation, interview and document review, the critical access hospital (CAH) was found to be out of compliance with Life Safety Code requirements. These findings have the potential to affect all patients in the hospital. Findings include: Please refer to the Life Safety Code inspection tags: F345, F353, F712, F901, and F918 for additional information.”

    Rule C0930. Standard-level.

Jun 4, 2024: standard inspection6 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 493 words

    “A Life Safety Code survey was conducted by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, State Fire Marshal Division on 06/04/2024. At the time of this survey, Sanford Wheaton Medical Center was found not in compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a), Life Safety from Fire, and the 2012 edition of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Life Safety Code (LSC), Chapter 19 Existing Health Care and the 2012 edition of NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code. THE FACILITY’S POC WILL SERVE AS YOUR ALLEGATION OF COMPLIANCE UPON THE DEPARTMENT’S ACCEPTANCE. YOUR SIGNATURE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE FIRST PAGE OF THE CMS-2567 FORM WILL BE USED AS VERIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE. UPON RECEIPT OF AN ACCEPTABLE POC, AN ONSITE REVISIT OF YOUR FACILITY MAY BE CONDUCTED TO VALIDATE THAT SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS HAS BEEN ATTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH YOUR VERIFICATION. PLEASE RETURN THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR THE FIRE SAFETY DEFICIENCIES (K-TAGS) TO: IF PARTICIPATING IN THE E-POC PROCESS, A PAPER COPY OF THE PLAN OF CORRECTION IS NOT REQUIRED. Healthcare Fire Inspections State Fire Marshal Division 445 Minnesota St., Suite 145 St. Paul, MN 55101-5145, OR By email to: FM.HC.Inspections@state.mn.us THE PLAN OF CORRECTION FOR EACH DEFICIENCY MUST INCLUDE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1. A detailed description of the corrective action taken or planned to correct the deficiency. 2. Address the measures that will be put in place to ensure the deficiency does not reoccur. 3. Indicate how the facility plans to monitor future performance to ensure solutions are sustained. 4. Identify who is responsible for the corrective actions and monitoring of compliance. 5. The actual or proposed date for completion of the remedy. Sanford Wheaton Medical Center is licensed as a Critical Access Hospital and is a 1 story building with a partial basement. The building was constructed at 4 different times. The original building was constructed in 1949 and was determined to be of Type II(111) construction. In 1979 a Clinic was added on to the northeast. In 1981 an addition was added to the southwest that was determined to be of Type II(111) construction which was protected by a fire sprinkler system. In 2002/2003 a new addition was added to the south that was determined to be of Type II(111) which is also protected by a fire sprinkler system. During this last construction the south half of the 1949 building was also protected by the fire sprinkler system. Because the original building and the additions meet the construction type allowed for existing buildings, the facility was surveyed as one building. The building is protected by a fire sprinkler system. The facility has a fire alarm system with smoke detection that is monitored for automatic fire department notification. The facility has a capacity of 25 certified beds and had a census of 4 at the time of the survey. The requirement at 42 CFR, Subpart 483.70(a) is NOT MET as evidenced by:”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Testing And Maintenance

    The inspectors’ words, 183 words

    “Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance A fire alarm system is tested and maintained in accordance with an approved program complying with the requirements of NFPA 70, National Electric Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. Records of system acceptance, maintenance and testing are readily available. 9.6.1.3, 9.6.1.5, NFPA 70, NFPA 72 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49715 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to test and inspect the fire alarm system per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, section 9.6.1.3, and NFPA 72 (2010 edition), National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, section 14.4.5. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by a review of available documentation that the fire alarm system was overdue for an annual inspection. The last annual inspection occurred on 05/24/2023. An interview with the Maintenance Director verified this deficient finding at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 257 words

    “Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49715 Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the fire sprinkler system per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code, section 9.7.5, and NFPA 25 (2011 edition), Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, sections 5.2.1.1, and 5.4.1.4.2. These deficient findings could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: 1. On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by observation that an escutcheon plate was missing from a sprinkler head in the hallway by the Acillary Services Manager Office. Violation was corrected at the time of discovery. 2. On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by observation that several sprinkler heads were being stored unsecured in the sprinkler cabinet in the sprinkler riser room. An interview with the Executive Director and Maintenance Director verified this deficient finding at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills

    The inspectors’ words, 215 words

    “Fire Drills CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Drills Fire drills include the transmission of a fire alarm signal and simulation of emergency fire conditions. Fire drills are held at expected and unexpected times under varying conditions, at least quarterly on each shift. The staff is familiar with procedures and is aware that drills are part of established routine. Where drills are conducted between 9:00 PM and 6:00 AM, a coded announcement may be used instead of audible alarms. 19.7.1.4 through 19.7.1.7 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49715 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to conduct fire drills per NFPA 101 (2012 edition), Life Safety Code section 19.7.1.6. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by a review of available documentation that at the time of the survey the facility could not provide documentation showing that fire drills were conducted during the second shift of the first quarter of 2024, and the 3rd and 4th quarter of 2023. Drills were also not conducted on the 3rd shift during the second quarter of 2023. An interview with the Maintenance Director verified this deficient finding at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

  • Fundamentals - Building System Categories

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Fundamentals - Building System Categories CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fundamentals - Building System Categories Building systems are designed to meet Category 1 through 4 requirements as detailed in NFPA 99. Categories are determined by a formal and documented risk assessment procedure performed by qualified personnel. Chapter 4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49715 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Risk Assessment per NFPA 99 (2012 edition), Health Care Facilities Code, section 4.2. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by a review of available documentation that the facility could not provide a NFPA 99 Risk Assessment for Chapters 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 at the time of the survey. An interview with the Maintenance Director verified this deficient finding at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0901. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste

    The inspectors’ words, 366 words

    “Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing The generator or other alternate power source and associated equipment is capable of supplying service within 10 seconds. If the 10-second criterion is not met during the monthly test, a process shall be provided to annually confirm this capability for the life safety and critical branches. Maintenance and testing of the generator and transfer switches are performed in accordance with NFPA 110. Generator sets are inspected weekly, exercised under load 30 minutes 12 times a year in 20-40 day intervals, and exercised once every 36 months for 4 continuous hours. Scheduled test under load conditions include a complete simulated cold start and automatic or manual transfer of all EES loads, and are conducted by competent personnel. Maintenance and testing of stored energy power sources (Type 3 EES) are in accordance with NFPA 111. Main and feeder circuit breakers are inspected annually, and a program for periodically exercising the components is established according to manufacturer requirements. Written records of maintenance and testing are maintained and readily available. EES electrical panels and circuits are marked, readily identifiable, and separate from normal power circuits. Minimizing the possibility of damage of the emergency power source is a design consideration for new installations. 6.4.4, 6.5.4, 6.6.4 (NFPA 99), NFPA 110, NFPA 111, 700.10 (NFPA 70) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49715 Based on a review of available documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the emergency generator per NFPA 99 (2012 edition), Health Care Facilities Code, section 6.4.4.1.1.3, and NFPA 110 (2010 edition), Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, sections 8.4.9, 8.4.9.1, 8.4.9.2, and 8.4.9.7. This deficient finding could have a widespread impact on the residents within the facility. Findings include: On 06/04/2024 between 9:15 and 11:45 AM, it was revealed by a review of available documentation that at the time of the survey the facility could not provide documentation showing a four (4) hour load bank test has been completed within the last 36 months for the 250 kw diesel generator. An interview with the Maintenance Director verified this deficient finding at the time of discovery.”

    Rule K0918. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 5, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited
Jun 4, 2024Standard inspection6 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 103 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Jul 1, 2000.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 88% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Sanford North owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2011.
  • Sanford runs it.
  • 27 owners or officers are people: Mark Allen Lundeen (corporate director); Marnie Lynn Ventling-Herrmann (corporate officer); Marnie Lynn Ventling-Herrmann (corporate director); Tony Lee Morrison (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brent Gerard Teiken (corporate director); Susan Drake Jarvis (corporate officer); Susan Drake Jarvis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristin Kaye Herrmann (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jolyn Joy Munson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana James Dykhouse (corporate director); Andrew Stewart North (corporate officer); Andrew Stewart North (corporate director); Stephanie Marie Herseth Sandlin (corporate director); William Joseph Gassen (corporate officer); William Joseph Gassen (corporate director); Douglas Marlin Griffin (managing employee (on the payroll)); George Joseph Brown (corporate officer); George Joseph Brown (corporate director); Wesley Owen Engbrecht (corporate director); Maureen Patricia Mccausland (corporate director); Thomas Richard Wenzel (corporate director); David Jonathan Shulkin (corporate director); Neil Leslie Gulsvig (corporate director); Kevin Victor Schieffer (corporate director); Lauris Nelson Molbert (corporate officer); Lauris Nelson Molbert (corporate director); Nicholas Wayne Olson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership, the latest on Jul 1, 2011.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
SanfordOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2010
Sanford NorthOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2011
SanfordRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jan 1, 2017

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Traverse County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.