Mymichigan Medical Center Alpena
An acute care hospital in Alpena, Michigan 49707
1501 W Chisholm St, Alpena, Michigan 49707. (989) 356-7390.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 150 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 8, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 4, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With 489.24
The inspectors’ words, 119 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48030 Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 489.24 [special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases], specifically the failure to provide an appropriate transfer to another facility for 1 patient (P-1) of 6 patients reviewed for transfers from a total sample of 20 patients, resulting in the potential for less than optimal outcomes for all patients requiring transfer from the facility’s Emergency Department. Findings include: See tag 2409: Failure to provide an appropriate transfer.”
-
Appropriate Transfer
The inspectors’ words, 1,904 words
“APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48030 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer to another facility for 1 (P-1) of 6 patients reviewed for transfer from a total of 20 patients, resulting in the potential for less than optimal outcomes for all patients requiring transfer to another facility. Findings include: On 12/4/2024 at 0800 record review from Facility-A was conducted and revealed P-1 arrived in the Obstetrics Department (OB) on 10/19/2024 at 0941. A procedure note dated 10/19/2024 at 1120 from the on-call OB/GYN (Staff S) revealed P-1 was pregnant and 34 weeks/3 days gestation who presented with leaking vaginal fluid, which began on 10/19/2024 at 0830. P-1 was evaluated by Staff S who recommended transfer to Facility-B due to the early gestation and documentation reveals under “Orders received to: Discharge home (Pt going by private car to (Facility-B) for treatment.” A note from the OB nurse (Staff P) under procedures reveals, “Pt seen in triage and checked. Grossly ruptured and leaking clear fluid. Cx (cervical) exam: Posterior 1 cm/50%-2. Pt given IV fluid and repositioned with good Fetal tracing noted after that.” A note from Staff P dated 10/19/2024 at 1100 reveals, “Pt and spouse aware of need to transfer to a level 2 nursery for delivery of less than 35 weeks. Mother denies further contractions, states only felt mild cramping before. (Staff S) is agreeable to discharge patient and for her to go by private car to (Facility-B). IV discontinued and patient discharged via wheelchair.” Review of the After Visit Summary from Facility-A dated 10/19/2024 reveals under Instructions, “Go to (Facility-B) immediately!” and a signed document that reveals, “I have read or had the instructions reviewed with me and understand the instructions given to me by my caregivers” on 10/19/2024 at 1150. Review of the entire Facility-A record for P-1 did not reveal any documentation of EMTALA transfer requirements or conversations with either Facility-B’s Emergency Department or Obstetrics Department providers. During record review on 12/5/2024 at 1530 of the receiving facilities (Facility-B) medical record for P-1, the History and Physical with dated 10/19/2024 at 1556 reveals P-1 had “presented to the hospital (Facility-A) and was diagnosed with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) and was checked. She was then sent via private vehicle to (Facility-B). She reports minimal cramping prior to PPROM; however, while driving here she reports worsening contractions occurring about every 5 minutes.” On 12/4/2024 at 0952 an interview with the Obstetrics (OB) nurse (Staff P) that provided care for P-1 at Facility-A was conducted. Staff P explained she worked at the facility in the OB Department for 20 years and remembers P-1 and that “her water had broke” at 34 weeks. Staff P revealed the facility transfers all patients that are less than 35 weeks gestation to a higher level of care. Staff P explained the locum OB physician (Staff S) checked P-1 and determined she was “remote from delivery” but needed to be transferred to a higher level of care. Staff P revealed the locum OB/GYN (Staff S) that was on call does not normally work at the facility, so she was assisting with the transfer. Staff S revealed P-1 did not want to be transferred by ambulance and requested to go by private vehicle and Staff S agreed this would be acceptable since P-1 had previously had a c-section and had never been in labor before and which made it more likely that she would have enough time to get to the facility, which was 2.5 hours away. Staff P explained she copied the clinical notes to bring with her and told her to go to Facility-B immediately. When queried what the process for transferring a patient to another facility by ambulance, Staff P revealed the staff would normally call report and get an accepting provider and fill out transfer paperwork. When queried if she had done this for P-1, Staff P replied, “I didn ’ t call report, I thought she would go to the ER” and transfer paperwork was not completed. On 12/3/2024 at 1628 an interview with Obstetrics (OB) Department Manager (Staff N) revealed she was aware of P-1 and had been asked to investigate the circumstances behind the transfer when she received a call from a Case Reviewer from Facility-B. Staff N explained when P-1 arrived to the OB Department, a Locum (temporary) OB/GYN was covering call for the department and this provider had never covered at the facility prior to that weekend and has not been back since. Staff N explained when she reviewed the case, she found that P-1 declined transfer by ambulance and requested to go to Facility-B by private vehicle with her husband due to the expense of an ambulance. Staff N explained based on her record review and an interview conducted with the OB nurse (Staff P) that was present for the decision to transfer, P-1 was stable to be transferred but did not want to go by ambulance. When queried if it was standard practice for patients that require a higher level of care to go by private vehicle, Staff N responded that “was not a normal practice”. When queried if patients that are transferred to another facility and decide to go by private vehicle should have transfer paperwork completed and for the sending facility to call report and get an accepting provider to the receiving facility is still required, Staff N responded, “Nursing and/or the provider should have called report and completed better documentation of the incident”. During an interview with the Obstetrics Department Chair (Staff R) on 12/4/2024 at 1215 it was revealed he had “heard about the case” involving P-1 and the transfer. Staff R explained it is standard practice for a provider to call a receiving facility prior to transfer and get an accepting provider and discuss the reason for transfer. Staff R revealed this did not occur with P-1 and that the OB physician was a locum OB/GYN that was covering the facility for the weekend. Staff R explained the provider had never worked at the facility before and has not been back since. Staff R revealed when a transfer occurs by ambulance or private vehicle the transfer paperwork should always be completed and signed and report should be called to notify the facility that the patient will be coming via private vehicle. Staff R revealed that they could not find the required transfer paperwork or evidence of report being called to the receiving facility after reviewing P-1’s records. On 12/4/2024 at 0924 an interview with the System Director for Maternal Child Health (Staff O) was conducted. Staff O explained she oversees all of the OB Departments within the Healthcare Facility Network and was notified by Staff N (OB Manager) about the transfer for P-1. Staff O revealed this case was “different because it was a locum” but that the provider should have called the receiving facility and given report that P-1 was coming and completed the transfer paperwork. On 12/4/2024 at 1730 review of policy #17102042, Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) Policy and Procedure, last revised on 11/2024 was conducted and revealed, “Patients 20 weeks or greater with pregnancy related signs/symptoms or issues will be seen in the OB department and receive an OB MSE when directed by OB provider”. Paragraph II. Patient Transfers to a Medical Facility, Section A, reveals, “1. after being informed of the risks of transfer and of the Medical Center’s treatment obligations, the individual requests to be transferred - complete form ER-074” and “2. based on the information available at the time of transfer, the physician determines that the medical benefits to be received at another medical facility outweigh the risk to the patient of being transferred (including, in the case of a woman in labor, the risks to the unborn child) and a certification to this effect is signed by the physician-complete form ER-074.” and Section E, reveals, “In all cases of patient transfer, consent of the receiving Medical Center must be obtained and documented in the patient’s medical record before the transfer.””
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 4, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Jun 26, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 9.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (633 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 15.6%, pneumonia 16.3%, COPD 9%, stroke 11.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 20.2%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 18.7%, hip or knee replacement 6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 229 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 5% left before being seen.
- 59% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.97 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Aug 8, 1973.
- Ownership: proprietary.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 22 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Proprietary.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
- 76% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Mymichigan Health owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2016.
- 11 owners or officers are people: Blake A Wilson (corporate officer, 0%); Ann Burton (corporate officer, 0%); Sarah James (corporate officer); Samantha Hunter (managing employee (on the payroll)); Alison Debra-Ann Bracken (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Erickson (corporate officer, 0%); Jamie Anschuetz-Gohlke (corporate officer, 0%); Gary Dawley (corporate officer, 0%); Bernard Lamp (corporate officer, 0%); Tricia Gorde (corporate director); Lynn Wilson (corporate officer, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mymichigan Health | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Apr 1, 2016 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Alpena County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.