Hearth Record

Down East Community Hospital

A critical access hospital in Machias, Maine 04654

11 Hospital Drive, Machias, Maine 04654. (207) 255-3356.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 visits on record, nothing cited. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 10, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 visits on record, nothing cited. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

0 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 8, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 804 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46424 Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to ensure compliance with 42 CFR 489.24, by failing to ensure its policy and procedure regarding EMTALA was followed. Findings include: Patient #1 contacted her Obstetrician on 10/14/2023 at approximately 9:30 PM, to advise that her membrane had ruptured, and she was being taken to the agreed upon hospital that had a neonatal intensive care unit. The obstetrician contacted the Labor and Delivery (L&D) nurse at Down East Community Hospital (DECH) to advise of the plan with the patient. Patient #1 was contacted by the L&D Nurse at DECH after the L&D Nurse consulted with both the obstetrician and nurse midwife regarding this case. Patient #1was reminded that she could stop at DECH if she wanted, on her way to the agreed upon hospital, to be assessed by the L&D Nurse. Patient #1 did stop at DECH to be assessed on 10/14/23 at approximately 10:11 PM. The L&D Nurse conducted an assessment and reportedly again consulted with the obstetrician who was enroute to the hospital. The obstetrician determined the patient was safe to be discharged home and continue to the agreed upon hospital. Hospital Policy, “EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act), (Previously Named “Transfer to Acute Care Policy”)” last reviewed 06/2023 states in part ... “C. If an Emergency Medical Condition Exists: If an Emergency Medical Condition is determined to exist as a result of the medical screening examination, a physician must either: 1. Stabilize the patient in accordance with the requirements of this Policy; 2. Admit the patient in accordance with the requirements of this Policy; or 3. Arrange for an appropriate transfer of the patient to another facility in accordance with the requirements of this Policy.” And “G. Transfers: In the event that the patient has an Emergency Medical Condition that has not been stabilized, a physician will not transfer the patient unless the transfer meets all of the following requirements: 1. Qualified Clinical Staff have provided medical treatment within the hospital’s capacity that minimizes the risks to the patient’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child. 2. DECH clinical staff have contacted the receiving facility and ascertained and documented that the receiving facility: i. Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the patient; and ii. Has agreed to accept the transfer of the patient and to provide appropriate medical treatment.” On 11/08/2023 an interview was conducted with the hospital’s obstetrician who was on-call for obstetrical coverage on the night of 10/14/2023. This physician reported DECH does not have the capacity to safely treat preterm infants. The obstetrician reported that he had initially spoken to Patient #1 at home before she left for the agreed upon hospital, and the obstetrician reported that Patient #1 did not want an ambulance to transport her to the agreed upon hospital. He reported Patient #1 stopped at DECH enroute to the agreed upon hospital and was seen by the L&D nurse. The L&D nurse conducted a sterile vaginal examination and concluded Patient #1 was not in active labor. The obstetrician also stated that the L&D nurse had contacted him after Patient #1 reported she wanted to leave the hospital and continue to the agreed upon hospital. The L&D nurse was questioning if Patient #1 needed to be discharged Against Medical Advice. The obstetrician reported that he was on his way in to physically see Patient #1 however, Patient #1 did not want to wait for the obstetrician to come in and was on her way to the agreed upon hospital as it had been determined the delivery should take place in a hospital with a NICU (Neo-Natal Intensive Care Unit). The L&D Nurse reportedly contacted the nursing supervisor at the agreed upon hospital and had given report. Transfer of the patient was never arranged, and the medical record indicated Patient #1 was “discharged home for her to follow-up in a hospital that has a NICU”. The obstetrician stated he did not call the agreed upon hospital because Patient #1 was already on her way. The obstetrician then further stated “that was not done,” regarding calling the agreed upon hospital. Additionally, the obstetrician stated, “we dropped the ball on calling [the agreed upon hospital]” and stated it was his responsibility to call the agreed upon hospital. On 11/08/2023 at approximately 10:15 AM, the attending obstetrician confirmed that he did not adhere to the provision of the policy to, contact the receiving facility, ascertain if the facility has available space and necessary staff to treat the patent, and had agreed to accept the patient.”

    Rule C2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 1,169 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1-2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46424 Based on document review and interviews, it was determined that the hospital failed to complete an appropriate transfer of an obstetrical patient. Findings include: - On 10/14/2023, a 30-year-old pregnant patient was seen at Down East Community Hospital (DECH) Labor & Delivery for observation at 35 weeks 6 days for possible rupture of membranes and was assessed to have preterm premature rupture of membranes. The patient’s cervix was 1 cm dilated and she had irregular contractions. The patient’s history & physical from DECH dated 10/14/2023, states: “Patient informed of the diagnosis of preterm membrane (sic), not in active labor. Patient is stable. Patient agreed to be discharged home for her to follow-up in a hospital that has a NICU [Neonatal Intensive Care Unit]. Patient was at discharge (sic). Patient to call with any concerns.” - On 10/15/2023 at approximately 12:30 AM, this patient presented to the receiving hospital’s Emergency Department via a private vehicle. The receiving hospital’s Labor & Delivery unit charge nurse reported that she did receive a call from DECH’s Labor & Delivery department about a patient that had “left” the hospital and was told that the patient was steroid complete, grossly ruptured, and 1 cm dilated. There was not any mention that the baby was in a breech position. No other calls were made by DECH to the receiving hospital or the receiving hospital’s transfer center which assists with the transfer of patients. - The hospital policy “EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (Previously Named “Transfer to Acute Care Policy”)” dated 6/2023 states in part the following requirements of a patient transfer: “DECH clinical staff have contacted the receiving facility and ascertained and documented that the receiving facility has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the patient; and has agreed to accept the transfer of the patient and to provide appropriate medical care.” - In an interview on 11/8/2923 at 8:30 AM, the Down East Community Hospital Compliance Officer (CO #1) confirmed that the patient’s obstetrician did not see the patient but was contacted by phone at 10:22 PM on 10/14/2023. The patient was seen by an OB nurse (RN #1), consistent with hospital policy, and was discharged at 10:35 PM. The Compliance Officer stated that she did not find any documentation of the hospital notifying the receiving hospital about the patient. - In an interview on 11/8/2023 at 9:45 AM, the patient’s obstetrician (MD #1) at DECH confirmed that he had been providing prenatal care to the patient and stated that the hospital does not have the capacity for preterm deliveries. He reported that he was on his way into the hospital on the evening of 10/14/2023 to see the patient but was informed by a nursing supervisor that the patient said she wanted to go to the receiving hospital on her own and did not want to wait to see him. The obstetrician stated that the treatment for a ruptured membrane is delivery at a hospital with a NICU. In this case, the obstetrician felt that the patient made the decision to leave the hospital. He acknowledged that there was no communication with the receiving hospital. He stated, “We dropped the ball. This was not our standard of care.” - In a telephone interview with the DECH Chief Nursing Officer Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) (RN #2) on 11/8/2023 at 10:30 AM, the CNO confirmed that there was no documentation of anyone from DECH contacting the receiving hospital about this patient and acknowledged that a patient needing a higher level of care such as this situation makes this a transfer with the requirement of communication to the receiving hospital about the transfer.”

    Rule C2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 10 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 15, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 26, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 15, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 3, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 25, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 27, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 28, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 9, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 8, 2023Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 3.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 62% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 63% would definitely recommend it.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 16.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.4%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 19.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 195 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 5% left before being seen.
  • 48% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Aug 1, 2005.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 98% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 18 owners or officers are people: Judd Bragg (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kathryn M Land (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Ian Pratt (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lisa M Carlisle (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John M Corrigan (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lynnette Parr (corporate officer); Lynnette Parr (corporate director); Gwen C Jones (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Rita F Ten (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Vicki J Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Steve L Lail (corporate director); Jacqueline M O’clair (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Rose M St. Louis (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Corey K Schwinn (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Betty J Marshall (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christian I Inegbeniji (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Nate J Martell (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brandy L Wood (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Washington County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Calais Community HospitalNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.