Hearth Record

Frederick Health Hospital

An acute care hospital in Frederick, Maryland 21701

400 West Seventh St, Frederick, Maryland 21701. (240) 566-3300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 15, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 15, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42332 Based on review of facility documents, medical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the hospital failed to comply with the requirements of 42 CFR 489.24, resulting in a condition-level noncompliance with the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Specifically, the facility failed to accept an appropriate transfer of an individual with an emergency medical condition. This systemic failure reflects a breakdown in the hospital’s processes to ensure appropriate emergency medical screening, treatment, and transfers in accordance with EMTALA requirements. Cross-reference: Tag A-2411 - Recipient Hospital Responsibilities”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Recipient Hospital Responsibilities

    The inspectors’ words, 590 words

    “RECIPIENT HOSPITAL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 489.24(f) A participating hospital that has specialized capabilities or facilities (including, but not limited to, facilities such as burn units, shock-trauma units, neonatal intensive care units, or (with respect to rural areas) regional referral centers, which, for purposes of this subpart, means hospitals meeting the requirements of referral centers found at §412.96 of this chapter) may not refuse to accept from a referring hospital within the boundaries of the United States an appropriate transfer of an individual who requires such specialized capabilities or facilities if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the individual. This requirement applies to any participating hospital with specialized capabilities, regardless of whether the hospital has a dedicated emergency department. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42332 Based on medical record review, document review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to accept an appropriate transfer of a patient with an unstabilized emergency medical condition when the facility had the capability and capacity to provide care. Findings Include: Review of facility document titled “Reminder Regarding Outside Facility Transfer Requests for ENT Care and Treatment” dated April 15, 2025, revealed Otolaryngologist (ENT)providers should redirect all external calls to the ED. There was no documented evidence provided indicating the facility had implemented this plan. The hospital provided a legal advisement document dated June 3, 2024, which advised that Hospital B’s ENT physicians were under no obligation to respond to consultative calls from Hospital A and could reasonably refuse such calls if uncomfortable. This advisement contributed to a practice of declining transfers based on the referring hospital rather than the clinical needs of the patient. Medical record review from Hospital A revealed that Hospital A contacted the ENT at Hospital B regarding the need to transfer Patient #1 (P1) related to a potentially serious head and neck infection with risk of airway compromise. Hospital A sought to transfer P1 to Hospital B, the nearest facility with ENT coverage as Hospital A did not have an ENT on-call service at the time. The ED provider contacted Hospital B’s on-call ENT specialist directly in accordance with their usual transfer process for specialty care. Review of Patient 1 ’ s medical record from Hospital A revealed the on-call ENT provider at Hospital B declined to accept the transfer, stating he/she does not see patients from Hospital A and does not provide call coverage for that hospital. The specialist did not allow the referring physician to fully present the patient’s clinical information, nor did he/she request documentation or inquire about thefacility’s capacity. The refusal was made without evaluating the patient’s clinical condition or Hospital B’s ability to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. In an interview on April 15, 2025, at 12:00 p.m., EMP #1 confirmed that their standard practice was not to accept or evaluate patients unless first seen in Hospital B’s ED, and further stated they had not received any written guidance from Hospital B on how to respond to interfacility transfer requests or calls from outside hospitals. In a separate interview on April 14, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., with EMP #2 and EMP #3 (hospital leadership), EMP #2 stated that Hospital A was expected to route transfer requests through Hospital B ’ s ED physician. However, EMP #3 acknowledged that the hospital had no standardized or consistently applied protocol to ensure this occurred. EMP #3 explained that callers could ask to speak directly with an on-call specialist, and there were no safeguards in place to route such calls through the ED provider.”

    Rule A2411. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 15, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,209 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 60% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 59% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, better than the national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.8%, heart failure 10.9%, pneumonia 15.8%, COPD 8.1%, stroke 11.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.9%, heart failure 19.9%, pneumonia 16.5%, COPD 19%, hip or knee replacement 6.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 230 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 6% left before being seen.
  • 82% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program gives no payment result for it: “Maryland hospitals are waived from receiving payment adjustments under the Program.”
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 2 of 5.
  • 97% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 25 owners or officers are people: Jason Lee (corporate director, 0%); George Littrell III (corporate director, 0%); Holly Sanders (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Richard Ohnmacht (corporate director, 0%); Jesse J Irwin (corporate director); Shavonda L Logan (corporate officer); Shavonda L Logan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shuchi Sharma (corporate director, 0%); David Brinkley (corporate director); Gordon M Cooley (corporate director, 0%); James Plamondon (corporate director, 0%); Pierre Reed (corporate director); Arthur W Sagoskin (corporate director, 0%); Nicolette Moberly (corporate director, 0%); Maria Roat (corporate director); Daryl Boffman (corporate director, 0%); Cheryl Cioffi (corporate officer); Andrea Vaughan (corporate director); Eric Phillips (corporate director); Hannah Jacobs (corporate officer); Michele A Ghim (corporate director, 0%); Lisa Coblentz (corporate director); Thomas Lynch III (corporate director); John Tisdale (corporate director); Maurice A Smith (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Frederick County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.