Hearth Record

Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington

An acute care hospital in Burlington, Massachusetts 01803

41 & 45 Mall Road, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803. (781) 744-5100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 20, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 13, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 1,178 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41143 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Hospital failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA regulations as an appropriate medical screening examination was never provided to one Patient (#1) who presented to the Hospital Emergency Department out of a total sample of 30 patients. Patient #1 presented to the Hospital’s Emergency Department on 12/3/23 with a head injury and bleeding and left the Hospital premises before being evaluated by a qualified staff member following a physical altercation with a Hospital security officer (SO #1) Findings include: Review of the Hospital policy titled “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act Transfer of Patient from the Hospital to another Health Care Facility”, dated 5/6/21, indicated the following: -The Hospital shall provide an appropriate medical screening examination, by qualified medical personnel, within its capacity to determine whether an emergency medical condition exists. -The medical screening examination will be provided to all patients who present to the emergency department seeking treatment of a medical condition or who present elsewhere in the hospital or hospital property seeking examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition or there is reason to believe that the patient has an emergency medical condition. Patient #1 presented to the Hospital Emergency Department on 12/3/23 around 11:00 P.M with belligerent behaviors and visible blood covering his/her face. Review of the Hospital’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) failed to indicate any documentation entered for Patient #1 on 12/3/23. Review of the Hospital’s incident report for Patient #1 dated 12/3/23 indicated SO #1 witnessed Patient #1 with blood covering his/her face yelling at his/her family members and destroying hospital property in front of the Emergency Department. Patient #1 entered the triage area with his/her family members; Patient #1’s family members informed security staff that Patient #1 was intoxicated and had been in physical altercation prior to arriving at the Hospital. Patient #1 continued to be belligerent and could not be checked in. Patient #1 began to walk out and screamed at other patients in the waiting area. SO #1 documented he used verbal de-escalation strategies in an attempt to de-escalate Patient #1. Patient #1 approached SO #1 and began yelling in his face in an aggressive manner. SO #1 utilized a modified middle block to control Patient #1 and push him/her back. Patient #1 began to violently resist and SO #1 utilized two closed fist strikes to Patient #1’s face and Patient #1 was brought to a supine position on the ground. The local police responded to the incident. Patient #1 and his/her family went to another hospital for evaluation. Patient #1 never had a physician or nurse assigned to his/her care. Review of the follow-up/investigation to Patient #1’s incident on 12/3/23 indicated SO #1’s actions did not match the training and expected conduct of the Hospital’s security team. Excessive force was used by SO #1 against Patient #1. SO #1 was placed on leave (currently no longer with the Hospital as he resigned following his placement on administrative leave). Patient #1 was not triaged or seen by any Emergency Department team members. Patient #1 went to another hospital’s emergency department following the incident at the Hospital. Patient #1 was loud and abrasive at the second hospital’s emergency department, however, the Patient was evaluated and reported being in a motor vehicle accident and having head pain; he/she also reported alcohol use. Patient #1 received pain medications, tetanus injection, and laceration repair with stitches to a deep laceration above his/her right eyebrow. Patient #1 was discharged from the second hospital’s emergency department. The surveyor observed the security footage of the incident involving Patient #1 on 12/3/23. Patient #1 was in the emergency department waiting area at the registration desk. Patient #1 had blood covering almost half of his/her face. SO #1 was standing behind Patient #1. Patient #1 was yelling at the staff at the registration desk and walked away from the desk. SO #1 spoke to Patient #1, Patient #1 turned to SO #1 and was yelling at him and walking towards him. SO #1 pushed his forearm into Patient #1’s chest and pushed him/her back several feet through the waiting room doorway and struck Patient #1 in the face. Patient #1 never re-entered the waiting room. No nursing or medical staff were observed in the video recording of the event. During an interview with the Director of Emergency Nursing on 12/13/23 at 10:44 A.M., she said patient registration for the emergency department is performed at the desk in the emergency department waiting room. She said triage of patients presenting to the emergency department is performed by a Registered Nurse (RN) and the RN performing triage is located behind the waiting room/registration desk. She said all patients are triaged and assigned an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) based on acuity when patients present to the emergency department. She said all medical screening evaluations take place within the emergency department after a patient has been triaged and called into the emergency department from the waiting room. She said if a patient is having behaviors (aggressive, belligerent, violent, etc ...) in the emergency department waiting room, security staff are generally called/notified for assistance in de-escalation of the patient. She said a RN or clinician should also be involved in de-escalation of a patient exhibiting behaviors and should also begin assessing the patient as well. She was not aware of the event involving Patient #1 on 12/3/23. During an interview with Risk Manager #1 on 12/13/23 at 12:50 P.M., she said no medical or nursing staff were involved during the incident with Patient #1 on 12/3/23. She said Patient #1 entered the emergency department registration area/waiting room and was taken out of the waiting room by security staff. During an interview with Registration Staff #1 on 12/14/23 at 8:57 A.M., he said Patient #1 came into the emergency department waiting room on 12/3/23 with a head bleed and had a laceration on his/her head. He said the females accompanying Patient #1 were attempting to convince him/her to complete the registration process. He said the females with Patient #1 said he/she had been in a motor vehicle accident. He said his colleague was attempting to register Patient #1, however, he/she was yelling at her and making insensitive comments towards her; she called for additional security at that time. He said an RN was working in triage at the time. He said after the physical altercation between Patient #1 and SO #1, he called 911. He said at that point, Patient #1 was outside, and he did not see the Patient again; he was leaving at that time as his shift was ending. The Hospital failed to ensure compliance with EMTALA regulations as Patient #1 never received a medical screening examination despite presenting to the emergency department on the Hospital’s premises with a laceration/injury and his/her family members reporting the Patient had been intoxicated and had sustained trauma.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical Screening Exam

    The inspectors’ words, 1,840 words

    “MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM CFR(s): 489.24(a) & 489.24(c) (a) Applicability of provisions of this section. (1) In the case of a hospital that has an emergency department, if an individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits and regardless of ability to pay) “comes to the emergency department”, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the hospital must- (i) Provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. The examination must be conducted by an individual(s) who is determined qualified by hospital bylaws or rules and regulations and who meets the requirements of §482.55 of this chapter concerning emergency services personnel and direction; and (ii) If an emergency medical condition is determined to exist, provide any necessary stabilizing treatment, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, or an appropriate transfer as defined in paragraph (e) of this section. If the hospital admits the individual as an inpatient for further treatment, the hospital’s obligation under this section ends, as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2)(i) When a waiver has been issued in accordance with section 1135 of the Act that includes a waiver under section 1135(b)(3) of the Act, sanctions under this section for an inappropriate transfer or for the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location do not apply to a hospital with a dedicated emergency department if the following conditions are met: (A) The transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period. (B) The direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location is pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan or, in the case of a public health emergency that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan. (C) The hospital does not discriminate on the basis of an individual’s source of payment or ability to pay. (D) The hospital is located in an emergency area during an emergency period, as those terms are defined in section 1135(g)(1) of the Act. (E) There has been a determination that a waiver of sanctions is necessary. (ii) A waiver of these sanctions is limited to a 72-hour period beginning upon the implementation of a hospital disaster protocol, except that, if a public health emergency involves a pandemic infectious disease (such as pandemic influenza), the waiver will continue in effect until the termination of the applicable declaration of a public health emergency, as provided under section 1135(e)(1)(B) of the Act. (c) Use of dedicated emergency department for nonemergency services. If an individual comes to a hospital’s dedicated emergency department and a request is made on his or her behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, but the nature of the request makes it clear that the medical condition is not of an emergency nature, the hospital is required only to perform such screening as would be appropriate for any individual presenting in that manner, to determine that the individual does not have an emergency medical condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41143 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Hospital failed to ensure an appropriate medical screening examination was provided to one Patient (#1) who presented to the Hospital Emergency Department out of a total sample of 30 patients. Patient #1 presented to the Hospital’s Emergency Department on 12/3/23 with a head injury and bleeding and left the Hospital premises before being evaluated by a qualified staff member following a physical altercation with a Hospital security officer (SO #1) Findings include: Review of the Hospital policy titled “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act Transfer of Patient from the Hospital to another Health Care Facility”, dated 5/6/21, indicated the following: -The Hospital shall provide an appropriate medical screening examination, by qualified medical personnel, within its capacity to determine whether an emergency medical condition exists. -The medical screening examination will be provided to all patients who present to the emergency department seeking treatment of a medical condition or who present elsewhere in the hospital or hospital property seeking examination or treatment for an emergency medical condition or there is reason to believe that the patient has an emergency medical condition. Review of the Hospital policy titled “Assessment and Reassessment of Patients-Emergency Department Policy”, dated 10/20/23, indicated the following: -Rapid Triage by Registered Nurse: Patients will be seen in order of arrival or by severity of chief complaint and/or presenting symptoms. The triage nurse will conduct a visual assessment evaluating the patient’s general appearance for any problems that will require immediate attention. Patient #1 presented to the Hospital Emergency Department on 12/3/23 around 11:00 P.M with belligerent behaviors and visible blood covering his/her face. Review of the Hospital’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) failed to indicate any documentation entered for Patient #1 on 12/3/23. Review of the Hospital’s incident report for Patient #1 dated 12/3/23 indicated SO #1 witnessed Patient #1 with blood covering his/her face yelling at his/her family members and destroying hospital property in front of the Emergency Department. Patient #1 entered the triage area with his/her family members; Patient #1’s family members informed security staff that Patient #1 was intoxicated and had been in physical altercation prior to arriving at the Hospital. Patient #1 continued to be belligerent and could not be checked in. Patient #1 began to walk out and screamed at other patients in the waiting area. SO #1 documented he used verbal de-escalation strategies in an attempt to de-escalate Patient #1. Patient #1 approached SO #1 and began yelling in his face in an aggressive manner. SO #1 utilized a modified middle block to control Patient #1 and push him/her back. Patient #1 began to violently resist and SO #1 utilized two closed fist strikes to Patient #1’s face and Patient #1 was brought to a supine position on the ground. The local police responded to the incident. Patient #1 and his/her family went to another hospital for evaluation. Patient #1 never had a physician or nurse assigned to his/her care. Review of the follow-up/investigation to Patient #1’s incident on 12/3/23 indicated SO #1’s actions did not match the training and expected conduct of the Hospital’s security team. Excessive force was used by SO #1 against Patient #1. SO #1 was placed on leave (currently no longer with the Hospital as he resigned following his placement on administrative leave). Patient #1 was not triaged or seen by any Emergency Department team members. Patient #1 went to another hospital’s emergency department following the incident at the Hospital. Patient #1 was loud and abrasive at the second hospital’s emergency department, however, the Patient was evaluated and reported being in a motor vehicle accident and having head pain; he/she also reported alcohol use. Patient #1 received pain medications, tetanus injection, and laceration repair with stitches to a deep laceration above his/her right eyebrow. Patient #1 was discharged from the second hospital’s emergency department. The surveyor observed the security footage of the incident involving Patient #1 on 12/3/23. Patient #1 was in the emergency department waiting area at the registration desk. Patient #1 had blood covering almost half of his/her face. SO #1 was standing behind Patient #1. Patient #1 was yelling at the staff at the registration desk and walked away from the desk. SO #1 spoke to Patient #1, Patient #1 turned to SO #1 and was yelling at him and walking towards him. SO #1 pushed his forearm into Patient #1’s chest and pushed him/her back several feet through the waiting room doorway and struck Patient #1 in the face. Patient #1 never re-entered the waiting room. No nursing or medical staff were observed in the video recording of the event. During an interview with the Director of Emergency Nursing on 12/13/23 at 10:44 A.M., she said patient registration for the emergency department is performed at the desk in the emergency department waiting room. She said triage of patients presenting to the emergency department is performed by a Registered Nurse (RN) and the RN performing triage is located behind the waiting room/registration desk. She said all patients are triaged and assigned an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) based on acuity when patients present to the emergency department. She said all medical screening evaluations take place within the emergency department after a patient has been triaged and called into the emergency department from the waiting room. She said if a patient is having behaviors (aggressive, belligerent, violent, etc ...) in the emergency department waiting room, security staff are generally called/notified for assistance in de-escalation of the patient. She said a RN or clinician should also be involved in de-escalation of a patient exhibiting behaviors and should also begin assessing the patient as well. She was not aware of the event involving Patient #1 on 12/3/23. During an interview with Risk Manager #1 on 12/13/23 at 12:50 P.M., she said no medical or nursing staff were involved during the incident with Patient #1 on 12/3/23. She said Patient #1 entered the emergency department registration area/waiting room and was taken out of the waiting room by security staff. During an interview with the Security Operations Manager on 12/13/23 at 1:30 P.M., he said the actions of SO #1 were outside of the expected practice of security staff. He said while striking techniques can be used by security staff in self-defense, they were not appropriately utilized during the incident with Patient #1. He said while attempting to de-escalate a patient, security staff should continue to use verbal interventions with a behavioral patient, while stepping back from a patient before engaging a patient physically. He said Patient #1 never registered with the emergency department and was not cooperative while speaking with the registration staff. During an interview with Registration Staff #1 on 12/14/23 at 8:57 A.M., he said Patient #1 came into the emergency department waiting room on 12/3/23 with a head bleed and had a laceration on his/her head. He said the females accompanying Patient #1 were attempting to convince him/her to complete the registration process. He said the females with Patient #1 said he/she had been in a motor vehicle accident. He said his colleague was attempting to register Patient #1, however, he/she was yelling at her and making insensitive comments towards her; she called for additional security at that time. He said an RN was working in triage at the time. He said after the physical altercation between Patient #1 and SO #1, he called 911. He said at that point, Patient #1 was outside, and he did not see the Patient again; he was leaving at that time as his shift was ending. The Hospital failed to ensure Patient #1 received a medical screening examination despite presenting to the emergency department on the Hospital’s premises with a laceration/injury and his/her family members reporting the Patient had been intoxicated and had sustained trauma.”

    Rule A2406. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 20, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 10, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 13, 2023Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 2 better and 0 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (2,376 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.8%, heart failure 8.9%, pneumonia 14.1%, COPD 7.1%, stroke 11.4%, heart bypass surgery 2.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.5%, heart failure 21.6%, pneumonia 17.1%, COPD 18.5%, heart bypass surgery 10.4%, hip or knee replacement 4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, better than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 226 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 5% left before being seen.
  • 49% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.97 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Nov 24, 1980.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 99% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. owns an unstated share directly since Mar 1, 2019.
  • Lahey Clinic Hospital Inc. runs it.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Jamie Katz (corporate officer, 100%); Kevin M Tabb (corporate officer, 100%); Mary Reynold (corporate director, 100%); Paul Alexander (corporate director, 100%); Jane C Edmonds (corporate director, 100%); Pamela Decoste (corporate officer); Johana Fink (corporate officer); William Ho (corporate officer); Shannon Robins (corporate officer); Praveen Mekala (corporate officer); Praveen Mekala (managing employee (on the payroll)); Susan D Moffatt Bruce (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Jan 24, 1995.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directlyMar 1, 2019
Lahey Clinic Hospital Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Aug 18, 1980

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospitals CMS lists in Middlesex County, 10 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.