Hearth Record

Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital Plymouth

An acute care hospital in Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360

275 Sandwich Street, Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360. (508) 746-2000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 7, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 7, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 40928 The Hospital was out of compliance for the Condition of Participation for Nursing Services. Findings included: Based on record review and interviews, the Hospital failed to ensure physician orders (medication administration) were followed for one Patient (#1) out of a total sample of ten patients. Cross Reference: 482.23(c) - Standard: Preparation and Administration of Drugs (405)”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 874 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 40928 Based on records reviewed and interviews, the Hospital failed to ensure intravenous (IV) Levophed (a vasoconstrictive medication used to manage low blood pressure) was administered as ordered for 1 Patient (#1) out of a total sample of 10 patients. Findings included: Review of the Hospital policy titled “Medication Use (Ordering, Transcription, and Administration of Medications), revised 1/2024, indicated: -Verify the five rights of medication (right patient, medication, dose, route, and frequency) administration against the electronic medication administration record (e-MAR). -Scan medications and administer, assisting the patient as necessary. -If the medication was omitted, held for parameters or refused, document the reason it was not given on the e-MAR prior to saving. Notify the provider if the patient is refusing the medication. Patient #1 was admitted to the Hospital on 3/11/25 for weakness, difficulty ambulating and abnormal labs. Review of Patient #1 ’ s medical record indicated that on 3/31/25, Patient #1 had a Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP- an imaging test used to diagnose problems with the liver, pancreas, gallbladder, pancreatic ducts and bile ducts) which identified large volume ascites (a condition in which fluid collects in abdominal spaces), and a mass at the pancreatic tail concerning for primary malignancy with additional hepatic lesions suspected to be metastatic disease burden. On 4/7/25, Patient #1 was observed to have bradycardia (low heart rate) and a rapid response was called. During the rapid response, Patient #1 became pulseless, was not responsive and compressions were started. Patient #1 was intubated and after four rounds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved. Patient #1 was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and on 4/8/25, Patient #1 ’ s code status was changed to Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) with no further escalation of care. On 4/8/25, Patient #1 was ordered to receive continuous intravenous (IV) Norepinephrine (Levophed- a vasoconstrictive medication used to treat life threatening low blood pressure) 8 milligrams (mg)/ 250 milliliters (ml) at a rate of 50.1 ml/hour. Review of Patient #1 ’ s Medication Administration Report (MAR) indicated that on 4/12/25 at 7:37 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN)#1 hung a new 250ml bag of Levophed at a rate of 50.1ml/hour. Further review of Patient #1 ’ s medical record indicated no additional bags of Levophed were administered after the bag at 7:37 P.M. was hung. On 4/13/25 at 1:00 A.M., Patient #1 ’ s blood pressure was 42/16 and his/her pulse was 42. On 4/13/25, at 1:26 A.M., Patient #1 was pronounced dead. During an interview on 5/2/25 at 11:30 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #1 said that she cared for Patient #1 during the overnight shift on 4/12/25-4/13/25. RN#1 said that Patient #1 began to decompensate around midnight on 4/13/25 and would have runs of ventricular tachycardia (an abnormal heart rhythm) and then revert to normal sinus rhythm. She said she notified the Nurse Practitioner of this and said another nurse came into Patient #1 ’ s room to assist her during this time. RN #1 said she was in the room with Patient #1 continuously after he/she started to decompensate until Patient #1 expired. She said that she couldn ’ t remember hanging the bag of Levophed or how often the bag was changed during her shift. RN#1 said a 250ml bag would last for about 5 hours at a rate of 50.1 ml/hour. RN#1 said the medical record documentation shows Patient #1 ’ s Levophed bag ran dry, but said she didn ’ t recall the bag running dry while she was in the room. RN#1 said that when an IV bag is hung, the nurse will scan the patient ’ s identification band and then the bag and it will automatically populate in the patient ’ s record with the date and time the medication was hung. RN #1 said medications should be administered as ordered and if a medication isn ’ t administered, it should be documented in the medical record with the reason why it wasn ’ t administered. During an interview on 5/2/25 at 1:28 P.M., the Chief Nursing Officer said that the Hospital investigation into this event was ongoing but indicated that Patient #1 ’ s Levophed would have run dry at 12:36 A.M. on 4/13/25 and that Registered Nurse (RN) #1 did not hang another bag in accordance with physician orders. The Hospital failed to ensure IV Levophed was administered to Patient #1 as ordered.”

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 12, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 43882 The Condition of Participation: Nursing Services Findings included: Based on record review and interviews the Hospital failed to ensure Morphine Sulfate (an opioid pain medication) was administered correctly and per Hospital policy, resulting in an adverse drug event requiring naloxone (a medication used for the emergent treatment of known or suspected over dose) administration for one patient, Patient #10, out of a sample of 10 patients. Cross reference TAG: A-0405.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 720 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43882 Based on record review and interviews the Hospital failed to ensure Morphine Sulfate (an opioid pain medication) was administered correctly and per Hospital policy, resulting in an adverse drug event requiring naloxone (a medication used for the emergent treatment of known or suspected over dose) administration for one patient, Patient #10, out of a sample of 10 patients. Findings include: The Hospital Policy titled, “Medication Use (Ordering, Transcription and Administration of Medications)”, revision date January 2024 included the following: -All inpatients will have a completed computer-generated Medication Reconciliation Record. -Medication reconciliation must occur when a patient is transferred from one level of care to another. -Verify the five rights of medication, (right patient, medication, dose, route and frequency) administration against the e-MAR. Patient #10 was admitted to the Hospital on 1/30/24 with diagnoses including, dementia, diabetes, hypertension, and a history of falls. Review of Patient #10 ’ s medical record indicated Patient #10 presented to the Hospital ’ s Emergency Department (ED) from an Assisted Living Memory Unity with a concern for increased falls. Medical record further indicated Patient #10 had multiple falls with a head strike and daughter brought Patient #10 into the ED for care. Medical records also indicated Patient #10 was disenrolled from hospice services on 1/30/24 by Patient #10 ’ s daughter, who was requesting workup for traumatic injuries and an evaluation for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). A medication reconciliation was completed on admission on 1/30/24 at 4:35 P.M. and included Morphine 20 milligrams (mgs) by mouth (PO) every 4 hours and Lorazepam 0.5 mgs tab PO every 4 hours and indicated medications were obtained from a list from outside facility. A Physician ordered Patient #10 ’ s medication per the medication reconciliation per Hospital protocol. A medication list from the outside facility indicated morphine 20mg/ml concentrate 0.25-0.5 milliliters (mls) orally every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for pain/air hunger. The list also indicated Lorazepam 0.5 mgs tablet PO every 4 hours PRN for anxiety/agitation. Review of Patient #10 ’ s Medication Administration Report indicated on 1/30/24 at 11:47 P.M., Patient # 10 received 20 mgs of Morphine PO and Lorazepam 0.5 mgs. Further review indicated on 1/31/24 at 3:09 A.M., Patient #10 received 20 mgs of Morphine PO. On 1/31/24 at 8:10 A.M., indicated Patient #10 received Naloxone 2 mgs via nostril. Review of the medication/fluid event incident report dated 2/1/24 indicated on 12/30/24 Patient #10 ’ s home medications were updated by a Registered Nurse (RN) #2 and Morphine was entered as 20 mgs PO every 4 hours. The medications were reconciled, ordered, and verified. Two doses of morphine were administered, and the patient required Narcan (an emergency medication used to reverse opioid) on 1/31/24 at 8:47 A.M. The incident report failed to indicate corrective actions were fully investigated or implemented. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 12:01 P.M., Emergency Department (ED) Nurse Manager said the medication error event occurred due to a home medication list that was incorrectly put into the medical record. The ED Nurse Manager recalled Patient #10 ’ s medication error incident but does not have any documentation to support that staff education was implemented following the adverse event. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 2:48 P.M., RN #2 said she input Patient #10 ’ s medications into the electronic medical record incorrectly and said she was new to the process of medication reconciliation. RN #2 said she remembers some discussion about the incident but received no written education/follow up.”

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 7, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jul 12, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 3 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,166 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 61% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.5%, heart failure 7.5%, pneumonia 11.5%, COPD 6.6%, stroke 12.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.8%, heart failure 21.7%, pneumonia 18%, COPD 20.3%, hip or knee replacement 6.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 237 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 38% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.96 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 92% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2019.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Jamie Katz (corporate director); Kevin M Tabb (corporate director); Jeffrey H Kapell (corporate director); Julia A Kenniston (corporate director); Nicole Marie Mulkern (corporate officer); Sheilah Rangaviz (corporate officer); Sheilah Rangaviz (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Nate Horwitz-Willis (corporate director); Mary Dwyer (corporate officer); Charles Hewitt (corporate director); Kristina L. Mcgill (corporate director); Catherine Grey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Raymond Blair (corporate director); Harvey J Kowaloff (corporate director); Anna Marini (corporate director); David M Kelly (corporate director); Alison Gilmore Carr (corporate director); Jon Mcgrath (corporate director); Kevin B Coughlin (corporate officer); Kevin B Coughlin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Erin E Burns (corporate director); Catherine Mckenna (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2019

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospitals CMS lists in Plymouth County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.