Northeast Hospital Corporation
An acute care hospital in Beverly, Massachusetts 01915
85 Herrick Street, Beverly, Massachusetts 01915. (978) 922-3000.
- Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 283 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 20, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 23, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 41143 The Condition of Participation: Patient Rights was out of compliance. Findings included: Based on record review and interviews, the Hospital failed to ensure on Patient’s (#1) representative and legal guardian had the right to make informed decisions for his/her care; Patient #1 was discharged from the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) with his/her mother without his/her legal guardian’s knowledge and was missing for three days without access to his/her medications (including antipsychotic medication). Cross Reference: 482.13(b)(2)- Informed Consent (A0131)”
-
Patient Rights: Informed Consent
The inspectors’ words, 1,843 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: INFORMED CONSENT CFR(s): 482.13(b)(2) The patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law) has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care. The patient’s rights include being informed of his or her health status, being involved in care planning and treatment, and being able to request or refuse treatment. This right must not be construed as a mechanism to demand the provision of treatment or services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41143 Based on record review and interviews, the Hospital failed to ensure on Patient’s (#1) representative and legal guardian had the right to make informed decisions for his/her care; Patient #1 was discharged from the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) with his/her mother without his/her legal guardian’s knowledge and was missing for three days without access to his/her medications (including antipsychotic medication). Findings include: The Hospital Policy titled “Advance Directives, Healthcare Proxy, and Designation of a Health Care Agent”, dated 4/26/23, indicated the following: -At the time of patient registration, each adult patient is asked whether or not he/she has made provision for medical advance directives through a health care proxy and designation of a health care agent. -The Access Services Representative will confirm that the information is still current and update it if needed. If Access Services Representative receives a copy of the document, he/she scans the document into the electronic medical record. The Hospital Policy titled “Patients’ Rights and Responsibilities”, dated 6/23/22, indicated the following: -The Patient’s who are unable to make decisions of physical or mental limitations or because they are minors are protected by the patient’s guardian, health care agent or legal representative. -To have an advance directive and expect the hospital to honor the intent of that directive to the extent permitted by law and Hospital policy. Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital Emergency Department accompanied by his/her group home staff on 11/24/23 at 8:58 P.M. for a behavioral health evaluation after making suicidal statements and a history of schizophrenia. Review of Patient #1’s medical record indicated the Patient was triaged on 11/24/23 at 9:01 P.M. by RN #1; Patient #1 denied suicidal/homicidal ideation but reported being assaulted at his/her group home. Physician Assistant (PA) #1 evaluated Patient #1 in the Emergency Department. Patient #1 told PA #1 he/she was stuck and pushed by a group home staff member, denied suicidal ideation or homicidal ideation, and did not have any injuries on examination. The group home staff member accompanying Patient #1 told PA #1 the Patient’s mother has told the Patient to say he/she was suicidal before. Patient #1 was evaluated by the Psychiatric Services Social Worker (SW) #2 on 11/25/2023 for a behavioral health consult and evaluation of suicidal ideation. Patient #1 was evaluated to be low risk for suicide and could continue treatment outside of the Hospital. Patient #1’s mother was consulted, and she stated she and the group home shared legal guardianship of Patient #1, and she wanted to seek a different facility for the Patient to reside at following the alleged assault at his/her current group home. It was recommended to have Hospital care management/social work follow up with Patient #1 and discharge Patient #1 to his/her mother when available. SW #1 reviewed Patient #1’s medical record and determined no advance directives were on file for the Patient and Patient #1 was offered to complete a Health Care Proxy; no paperwork was scanned into Patient #1’s record indicating the Patient was under legal guardianship. The plan was confirmed to discharge Patient #1 home with his/her mother. Patient #1 discharged from the Hospital Emergency Department with his/her mother on 11/25/23 in the evening. Further review of Patient #1’s medical record indicated the Patient returned to the Hospital Emergency Department on 11/28/23 at 5:33 P.M. with Emergency Medical Services (EMS). EMS reported to Physician #1 that Patient #1 was kidnapped by his/her mother. Physician #1 documented Patient #1 was reportedly released to his/her mother, who was not his/her legal guardian; there was a concern about where the Patient and he/she was brought in for evaluation. Patient #1 had not taken his/her medications in four days. Nursing documentation indicated a detective also arrived with Patient #1; the Patient’s mother turned him/her into the police on 11/28/23. Further investigation by psychiatric services Licensed Mental Health Counciler indicated Patient #1 has a legal guardian, who is not the Patient’s mother, and the Patient’s mother was removed from his/her guardianship in 2015. During an interview with SW #1 on 1/22/24 at 12:44 P.M., she said she reviewed the record for Patient #1’s discharge but did not meet with the Patient. She said Patient #1 had alleged abuse at his/her group home and was cleared psychiatrically by psychiatric services. She said there was no documentation in Patient #1’s record to support his/her mother’s claim of having legal guardianship over the Patient, however, due to the allegation of abuse at the Patient’s group home and it was a safe discharge plan to send the Patient home with his/her mother. During an interview with RN #1 on 1/22/24 at 2:54 P.M., she said works in triage in the Emergency Department. She said she did not recall Patient #1. She said Access (registration) staff meet with patients when they arrive to the Emergency Department. She said medical staff reconcile medication lists for patients. She said advance directives, health care proxies, and guardianships are reconciled by either access staff or the Emergency Department primary nurse but was not sure. She said the triage nurse does not determine if a patient has a representative or advance directive. During an interview with PA #1 on 1/23/24 at 7:30 A.M., she said Patient #1 did not have any visible injuries during evaluation. She said Patient #1 had flat affect, answered her questions, but did not seem reliable as a historian. She said the staff member from the Patient’s group home had a binder with the Patient’s information in it, but she did not review it. She said she was told by psychiatric services that Patient #1’s mother had joint custody/guardianship over him/her. She said verification of advance directives would be performed with review of paperwork from a facility transferring a Patient to the Emergency Department. She said social services/ psychiatric services confirm advance directives/guardianships for Patients in the emergency department. During an interview with SW#2 on 11/23/24 at 8:00 A.M., she said she evaluated Patient #1 for a behavior health crisis concerns. She said Patient #1 was anxious/nervous, provided limited history, and was adamant on not returning to his/her group home. She said the group home staff member accompanying Patient #1 was unable to answer most of her questions. She spoke with Patient #1’s nurse who did not have much information regarding the Patient. She asked Patient #1 for an emergency contact, and he/she provided her with his/her mother’s phone number and said she was his/her guardian. She said she spoke with Patient #1’s mother who told her she was the Patient’s co-guardian of Patient #1 along with his/her group home. She said she spoke to staff at Patient #1’s group home who confirmed an event did occur with Patient #1 and another staff member, however, she did not get confirmation of who was the legal guardian for Patient #1. She said she was not sure whose responsibility it is to confirm guardianship of patients in the Emergency Department. During an interview with the Patient Access Manager on 1/23/24 at 9:00 A.M., she said access staff meet with all patients arriving at the Emergency Department for registration. She said initially access staff will obtain basic information such as name, date of birth, and address, and print an ID band for a patient. Once the Patient is moved to an Emergency Department bed, the access staff completes the registration process including gathering insurance, consents, demographics, and other information. She said access staff do not typically look for, collect, or ask for advance directive, health care proxy, or guardianship information. During an interview with PA#2 on 1/23/24 at 9:30 A.M., she said she saw Patient #1 the morning of 11/25/23 prior to his discharge. She said medical staff only verify guardianship if there is a need related to medical care/decision making. She said social services/case management typically verify advance directives of patients. She said on arrival to the Emergency Department, the RN assigned to a patient will usually confirm guardianship/ health care proxy/advance directives from the patients and any available paperwork with a patient. She said Patient #1 was medically stable, social work and psychiatric services informed the discharge disposition was for him/her to go home with his/her mother, and she felt the Patient was safe to discharge with that plan. During an interview with RN #2 on 1/23/24 at 12:15 P.M., she said she did not recall Patient #1. She said if a patient presents to the Emergency Department with a guardianship, access staff will confirm that guardianship. She said once a patient is brought into the Emergency Department and safe, the staff will reach out to the patient’s guardian to inform them the patient is in the Emergency Department and that information is generally available in a patient’s electronic medical record. During an interview with RN #3 on 1/23/24 at 12:30 P.M., she said she took over Patient #1’s care on 11/25/23. She said Patient #1’s binder included a face sheet indicating his/her mother was a co-guardian with Patient #1’s actual guardian. She said Patient #1’s binder did not contain a copy of the actual guardianship to be available for review. She said the group home staff who was originally with Patient #1 at the Emergency Department was aware of the plan to discharge the Patent with his/her mother. She said another staff member from the group home arrived at the Emergency Department and was upset the Patient was going to be discharged with his/her mother but did not stay in the Emergency Department. She said Patient #1 was discharged with his/her mother with a safety plan from the Emergency Department. During an interview with the Associate Clinical Nursing Officer of Emergency Services on 1/23/24 at 1:15 P.M., she said access staff meet with patients coming into the Emergency Department for registration. She said part of the registration process includes entering if the patient has a responsible party, health care proxy, or legal guardian and scanning any documentation provided into the electronic medical record. She said if there are discrepancies regarding the advance directive status, health care proxy, or guardianship of a patient, social services/case management could obtain documentation for verification. The Hospital failed to ensure Patient #1’s legal guardian was contacted after arriving at the Emergency Department on 11/24/23 to allow for informed decisions to be made regarding his/her care; the Patient was discharged with his/her mother without the legal guardian’s knowledge or consent resulting in the Patient missing several days of his/her medications, search for the Patient by law enforcement, and return to the Hospital Emergency Department for Patient #1.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 19, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Aug 27, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 23, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 2 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 10.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,336 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.3%, heart failure 7.8%, pneumonia 12%, COPD 6.2%, stroke 10.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.5%, heart failure 21.7%, pneumonia 17.5%, COPD 22.5%, hip or knee replacement 6.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 190 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 46% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.98 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program) | Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments |
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 99% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2019.
- 24 owners or officers are people: Paul Lundberg (corporate director, 100%); Tommy Lee Sands (corporate officer, 100%); Jamie Katz (corporate officer, 100%); Kevin M Tabb (corporate officer, 100%); Kevin M Tabb (corporate director, 100%); Adrienne W Bradley (corporate director, 100%); Charles Furlong (corporate director, 100%); Bruce F Nardella (corporate director, 100%); Cindy Rios (corporate director); Amy Thammalangsy (managing employee (on the payroll)); Robert Irwin (corporate director); Mary C Boyd (corporate director); Hugh M O’flynn (corporate director); Caroline Trujillo (corporate director); Alexander Doumas (corporate director); Michael T Rowan (corporate director); Gregory Beaumier (corporate officer); Gregory Beaumier (corporate director); Maryjane O’neill (corporate director); Christopher George (corporate director); Karen Bell (corporate director); Jeffrey Heit (corporate director); Hugh M Taylor (corporate officer); Jonathan Payson (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 1, 2019 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 6 hospitals CMS lists in Essex County, 5 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Merrimack Health Lawrence Hospital | 2 |
| Anna Jaques Hospital | 3 |
| North Shore Medical Center - | 5 |
| Holy Family Hospital | 2 |
| Whittier Pavilion | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.