Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc.
An acute care hospital in Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
4801 Ambassador Caffery Parkway, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. (337) 470-2000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 344 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 2, 2026: a complaint inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 15, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Medical Staff - Accountability
The inspectors’ words, 1,044 words
“MEDICAL STAFF - ACCOUNTABILITY CFR(s): 482.12(a)(5) [The governing body must] ensure that the medical staff is accountable to the governing body for the quality of care provided to patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50453 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure accountability of the medical staff for the quality of care provided to patients. This deficient practice is evidenced by failure of the provider to document changes in the diagnosis and care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1-#3) patient records reviewed. Findings: Review of the hospital “Bylaws, Rules and Regulations of the Medical Staff,” last revised 03/11/2025, revealed in part: “Rules and Regulations: F. Attending Practitioner Requirements: All patients who are admitted to the Hospital will be duly informed by their attending Practitioner as to their diagnosis and care plan. G. Medical Records: The attending Practitioner shall be responsible for the preparation of a complete medical record for each of his/her patients. The medical record shall include unique patient identification data; admission and discharge dates; complete history and physical examination; provisional admitting diagnosis and final diagnosis; medical staff orders; progress notes; nursing documentation and care plans; a record of all medications, medical care and treatments; discharge summary; clinical laboratory, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiology and diagnostic reports; consultation reports, if applicable; pre-anesthesia note, anesthesia record and post-anesthesia note, if applicable; operative report, if applicable; autopsy report if applicable; discharge plan; consents; and any other reports pertaining to the patient’s care.” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted on 01/16/2025. Review of Patient #1’s admit History and Physical revealed in part: Patient arrived for ICU services for respiratory failure. 60 year old male with PMH of CVA with hemorrhagic conversion s/p craniotomy in 2022, chronic RLE DVT, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Ventricular Tachycardia. Patient was intubated and had reported seizure activity prior to arrival. Patient started on levophed drip. Assessment/Plan: Principal Problem: Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia Active Problems: Shock Circulatory, Chronic DVT, Morbid Obesity, Seizures, Acute CHF Full Code Physical Exam: Skin: Warm and dry, no rashes. A review of Nurse Assessment documentation for Patient #1 revealed in part, the following skin and pressure Injury documentation: 01/16/2025 5:50 PM- Skin Condition: Warm; Dry. Foam Dressing to Sacrum. 01/17/2025 8:30 AM- Incontinence Protective Devices: Absorbent pad. Skin Care: Foam dressing to sacrum. 01/29/2025 8:00 AM- Wound Pressure Injury Left Buttock. Pressure Injury Stage: Deep Tissue; Wound Bed Description: Maroon/Purple area of intact skin; Wound Color: Purple; Peri-wound Assessment: Dry, Intact, Blanchable; Wound Bed Edges: Attached edges. 02/05/2025 2:58 PM- Wound Pressure Injury Left Buttock. Pressure Injury Stage: Deep Tissue; Wound Bed Description: Maroon/Purple area of intact skin; Wound Color: Maroon, Purple; Treatments: Cleansed with warm water; Dressing: Bordered Foam. Education on pressure injury prevention complete? Answer: Yes with wife. 02/11/2025 8:00 PM- Wound Pressure Injury Left Buttock. Pressure Injury Stage: Unstageable; Wound Bed Description: Eschar; Wound Color: Black; Peri-wound Assessment: Blanchable; Treatments: Zinc-Oxide paste; Dressing: Open to air. A review of Patient #1’s wound care consult from 02/11/2025 at 9:00 AM revealed in part: Consult Orders: Inpatient consult to wound care nurse ordered by S5MD at 02/11/2025 at 3:26 AM. Wound care consult received for pressure injury. Patient noted laying in bed, intubated. Wife at bedside. Head-to-toe skin assessment completed. Wound care provided. Patient tolerated well. Report and recommendations given to patients nurse. Wound Care Recommendations: Wound care 2 times daily and PRN, First occurrence on Tuesday 02/11/2025 at 10:51 AM. Incontinent patient Instructions: Remove Pressure Ulcer Prevention (PUP) dressing if present because of contraindication, Apply Zinc oxide cream to sacrum, buttock, perianal area, and bilateral groin. For Prevention and Treatment: For use in skin folds, sacrum, buttocks, perianal area, groin. For treatment of pressure injury to left buttock: Apply zinc oxide paste BID and PRN to area due to fecal incontinence. Skin area instructions: Use a wedge for support and alignment of wound area, Heel lift boots on at all times. Continue use of bariatric bed, Turn Q2 hours, use wedge, float heals, use protective ointment in skin folds for erythema/rashes, Protective ointment to sacrum/buttocks if incontinent. Pressure Injury Buttocks Left: Pressure Injury Stage: Unstageable; Wound Bed Description: Eschar, Drainage; Drainage Amount/Description: Scant, Serosanguineous; Wound Color: Red/Black; Peri-wound Assessment: Blanchable, Excoriated; Wound Bed Edges: Attached edges; Wound Length/Width (cm): 9cm/9cm; Treatments: Cleansed, Zinc-oxide paste; Cleansed With: Soap and water. Pressure Injury Prevention Education: Yes. Review of Patient #1’s Discharge Summary revealed in part: Discharge Date: 02/19/2025 Primary Discharge Diagnosis: Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia Secondary Discharge Diagnosis: Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, Chronic DVT, Shock Circulatory, Morbid obesity, Seizures, Acute CHF, Atrial Fibrillation Resolved Problems: No resolved hospital problems Discharge Condition: Stable Discharge Disposition: Home-Self Care Details of Hospital Stay Presenting Problem: Acute Respiratory Failure Hospital Course: 60 year old male with history of CVA requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy in 2022 left in a chronically dependent and poorly responsive state admitted with acute hypoxic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation initially secondary to pneumonia. Unable to wean from mechanical ventilation no status post tracheostomy. Doing well with nocturnal volume ventilator support via tracheostomy and minimal supplemental O2 throughout the day. Stable for discharge home with all necessary equipment to continue current level of respiratory support in the home setting. Complications: None Activity Instructions: Normal activity as tolerated Other Instructions: Call MD for worsening symptoms, Follow-up with PCP as needed. Things you need to do: Follow-up with PCP as needed No future appointments. Time Spent for discharge: less than 30 minutes. Further review of discharge summary failed to reveal documentation related to pressure injuries. Review of provider progress notes for Patient #1 failed to reveal a documented assessment of the pressure injury to the left buttock. Further review of provider progress notes failed to reveal that the pressure injury to the left buttock was added to the provider’s ongoing diagnosis or in the provider’s care plan. In an interview on 04/14/2025 at 2:03 PM, S1DOQ and S3DPSR confirmed there was no documented assessment of the pressure injury to the left buttock by a provider in Patient #1’s medical record. S3DPSR confirmed the provider did not include the pressure injury to the left buttock in their diagnosis or care plan.”
-
Patient Rights: Exercise Of Rights
The inspectors’ words, 493 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: EXERCISE OF RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13(b) Patient Rights: Exercise of Rights This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50453 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure that the exercise of Patient Rights requirement was met. This deficiency is evidenced by failure of the hospital to provide the patient representative with treatment options, risks, and benefits through treatment plan review following a change in patient condition for 1 (#1) of 3 (#1-#3) patient records reviewed. Findings: A review of hospital form #83986 titled, “Patient’s Bill of Rights,” last revised 10/16, revealed in part: “ The patient has a right to be informed by the attending physician and other providers of health care services about any continuing healthcare requirements after his/her discharge from the hospital. The patient shall also have the right to receive assistance from the physician and hospital staff in arranging for required follow-up care after discharge.” Review of the hospital “Bylaws, Rules and Regulations of the Medical Staff,” last revised 03/11/2025, revealed in part: “Rules and Regulations: F. Attending Practitioner Requirements: All patients who are admitted to the Hospital will be duly informed by their attending Practitioner as to their diagnosis and care plan.” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted to ICU on 01/16/2025 with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia. A review of Nurse Assessment documentation for Patient #1 revealed in part, the following skin and pressure Injury documentation: 01/16/2025 5:50 PM- Skin Condition: Warm; Dry. Foam Dressing to Sacrum. A review of Patient #1’s wound care consult from 02/11/2025 at 9:00 AM revealed in part: Pressure Injury Buttocks Left: Pressure Injury Stage: Unstageable; Wound Bed Description: Eschar, Drainage; Drainage Amount/Description: Scant, Serosanguineous; Wound Color: Red/Black; Peri-wound Assessment: Blanchable, Excoriated; Wound Bed Edges: Attached edges; Wound Length/Width (cm): 9cm/9cm; Treatments: Cleansed, Zinc-oxide paste; Cleansed With: Soap and water. Review of Patient #1’s Discharge Summary revealed in part: Discharge Date: 02/19/2025 Discharge Condition: Stable Discharge Disposition: Home-Self Care Presenting Problem: Acute Respiratory Failure Activity Instructions: Normal activity as tolerated Other Instructions: Call MD for worsening symptoms, Follow-up with PCP as needed. Things you need to do: Follow-up with PCP as needed No future appointments. Further review of the discharge summary failed to reveal documentation related to pressure injuries. Review of Patient #1’s medical record failed to reveal documentation that the attending physician informed the patient representative of treatment options, risks, and benefits following the hospital acquired pressure injury to the left buttock. Further review of Patient #1’s medical record failed to reveal follow-up wound care after discharge for the pressure injury to the left buttock. In an interview on 04/14/2025 at 12:55 PM, S1SDOQ and S3DPSR confirmed there was no documentation that the physician discussed pressure injury treatment options with the patient representative. S3DPSR also confirmed that there was no documentation that Patient #1 received follow-up wound care for the pressure injury to the left buttock.”
-
Discharge Planning Evaluation
The inspectors’ words, 877 words
“DISCHARGE PLANNING EVALUATION CFR(s): The discharge planning evaluation must be included in the patient’s medical record for use in establishing an appropriate discharge plan and the results of the evaluation must be discussed with the patient (or the patient’s representative). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50453 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to establish an appropriate discharge plan for each patient. This deficient practice was evidenced by failing to assist/provide Patient #1 with a discharge plan that included discharge instructions/education for wound care. Findings: A review of hospital policy number PCS-111 titled, “Plan for the Delivery of Care & Discharge Planning,” last revision date 09/2021, revealed in part: “POLICY: 2. All members of the health care team who are involved in direct patient care will participate in the collection of assessment/reassessment data. 3. This assessment process will determine the need for care and/or treatment, the type of care to be provided and the on-going care to be provided through the continuum of care. 4. The goal of assessment/reassessment process is to ensure effective communication among all members of the health care team and to provide the patient the best plan of care and treatment possible. 5. Care and/or treatment provided by all health-care professionals will be based on each patient’s specific needs. 8. Discharge Planning and Educational needs are assessed and identified upon admission and continuously reassessed throughout the patient stay. C. Discharge teaching will be communicated to the patient/significant other, and will include information about: self-care after discharge; treatment plan; recommended lifestyle changes; managing continuing care, signs and symptoms of complications. D. Education will include instruction in specific knowledge and/or skills needed by the patient/significant other to meet the patient’s ongoing health care needs, and discharge teaching needs including appropriate: diagnosis, disease concepts, and related treatments; safe and effective use of medication and other treatments; safe and effective use of medical equipment; rehabilitative therapies; available hospital and community resources and education programs for health promotion and disease related care; continuity of care; signs and symptoms of potential physical and psychosocial responses related to disease/treatment; diagnostic testing; psychosocial strategies to facilitate adaptation to disease/treatment (and those symptoms which should be reported to a health care professional).” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted to ICU on 01/16/2025 with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia. A review of Patient #1’s wound care consult from 02/11/2025 at 9:00 AM revealed in part: Wound care consult received for pressure injury. Wound Care Recommendations: Wound care 2 times daily and PRN, First occurrence on Tuesday 02/11/2025 at 10:51 AM. For treatment of pressure injury to left buttock: Apply zinc oxide paste BID and PRN to area due to fecal incontinence. Skin area instructions: Use a wedge for support and alignment of wound area, Heel lift boots on at all times. Continue use of bariatric bed, Turn Q2 hours, use wedge, float heals, use protective ointment in skin folds for erythema/rashes, Protective ointment to sacrum/buttocks if incontinent. Pressure Injury Buttocks Left: Pressure Injury Stage: Unstageable; Wound Bed Description: Eschar, Drainage; Drainage Amount/Description: Scant, Serosanguineous; Wound Color: Red/Black; Peri-wound Assessment: Blanchable, Excoriated; Wound Bed Edges: Attached edges; Wound Length/Width (cm): 9cm/9cm; Treatments: Cleansed, Zinc-oxide paste; Cleansed With: Soap and water. Review of Patient #1’s After Visit Summary Discharge Instructions dated 02/19/2025 revealed in part: Instructions: Your medications have changed. Start taking: Calcium Carbonate, Sennosides-Docusate Sodium. Change how you take: Sotalol. Stop taking: Methylprednisolone. Review your updated medication list below. Your Nest Steps: Read these Attachments: After a Stroke: Your Self-Care Plan: Video (English) Activity Instructions: Normal activity as tolerated. Diet Instructions: Return to Previous Diet Other Instructions: Call MD for worsening symptoms; Discharge Condition: Stable; Follow-up with PCP as needed Ask your doctor where to pick up these medications: Calcium Carbonate, Sennosides-Docusate Sodium, Sotalol. Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescription Information: Apixaban (Eliquis). Review of Patient #1’s Discharge Summary revealed in part: Discharge Date: 02/19/2025 Primary Discharge Diagnosis: Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia Secondary Discharge Diagnosis: Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, Chronic DVT, Shock Circulatory, Morbid obesity, Seizures, Acute CHF, Atrial Fibrillation Resolved Problems: No resolved hospital problems Discharge Condition: Stable Discharge Disposition: Home-Self Care Details of Hospital Stay Presenting Problem: Acute Respiratory Failure Hospital Course: 60 year old male with history of CVA requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy in 2022 left in a chronically dependent and poorly responsive state admitted with acute hypoxic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation initially secondary to pneumonia. Unable to wean from mechanical ventilation no status post tracheostomy. Doing well with nocturnal volume ventilator support via tracheostomy and minimal supplemental O2 throughout the day. Stable for discharge home with all necessary equipment to continue current level of respiratory support in the home setting. Complications: None Activity Instructions: Normal activity as tolerated Other Instructions: Call MD for worsening symptoms, Follow-up with PCP as needed. Things you need to do: Follow-up with PCP as needed No future appointments. Time Spent for discharge: less than 30 minutes. Review of Patient #1’s medical record failed to reveal discharge instructions that addressed education for wound care needs, related to the left buttock pressure injury. In an interview on 04/14/2025 at 12:38 PM, S3DPSR confirmed the above mentioned findings.”
Jul 8, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44763 Based on observation and interview, the hospital failed to ensure patients received care in a safe setting. This deficient practice was evidenced by non-functioning nurse call buttons on the hand rails of patient beds for 32 of 32 beds located in the inpatient unit at the offsite location. This failure had the potential to delay or prevent assistance from the nursing staff if the patient pressed the nurse call button on the bed hand rail rather than the hand held call light. Findings: In an observation on 07/02/2024 at 3:56 p.m. of the inpatient unit at the offsite location revealed the patient beds in rooms ‘a’ and ‘b’ had non-functioning nurse call buttons on the hand rails. In an interview during the observation S3SDN verified all 32 patient beds had non-functioning nurse call buttons on the hand rails.”
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 753 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44763 Based on record reviews and interviews, the hospital failed to ensure a nurse supervised and evaluated the nursing care for each patient. This deficient practice was evidenced by failure to document a complete IV assessment per hospital policy on 3 of 3 (#1, #2, #3) patients reviewed. Findings: Review of the hospital’s policy titled “Insertion, Maintenance, & Discontinuation of IV therapy for all lines in adults (18Y or older) Peripheral IV, Midline, Medi port, PICC, Central Lines, and Art lines, Intraosseous Access” revision date 07/2023, revealed in part, Peripheral IV policy: 2.) Assess site every 4 hours and document phlebitis scale, infiltration scale. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed an admission date of 06/28/2024. Further review revealed Patient #1 had a left wrist 20 gauge IV that was placed on 06/28/2024 at 12:50 p.m. and removed on 07/02/2024 at 3:00 p.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessments: 07/02/2024 at 8:00 a.m. 07/02/2024 at 12:00 p.m. Patient #2 Review of Patient #2’s medical record revealed an admission date of 05/14/2024. Further review revealed Patient #2 had a right foreman 20 gauge IV that was placed on 05/14/2024 at 7:07 p.m. and removed on 05/16/2024 at 3:24 p.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessments: 05/15/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/15/2024 at 3:39 a.m. 05/15/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/16/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/16/2024 at 4:00 a.m. Patient #2 had a left forearm 22 gauge IV that was placed on 05/14/2024 at 9:32 p.m. and removed on 05/16/2024 at 3:26 p.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessments: 05/15/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/15/2024 at 3:39 a.m. 05/15/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/16/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/16/2024 at 4:00 a.m. Patient #2 had a left hand 22 gauge IV that was placed on 05/16/2024 at 3:25 p.m. and removed on 05/22/2024 at 3:24 p.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessments: 05/16/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 4:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 8:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 12:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 4:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/18/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/18/2024 at 4:00 a.m. 05/18/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/18/2024 at 11:49 p.m. 05/19/2024 at 3:28 a.m. 05/19/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/19/2024 at 11:18 p.m. 05/20/2024 at 3:40 a.m. Further review revealed there was no documentation of an IV assessment every 4 hours on 05/19/2024 from 8:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. and on 05/20/2024 from 3:40 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Patient #2 had a right hand 22 gauge IV that was placed on 05/16/2024 at 3:25 p.m. and removed on 05/22/2024 at 3:24 p.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessments: 05/16/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 4:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 8:00 a.m. 05/17/2024 at 12:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 4:00 p.m. 05/17/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/18/2024 at 12:00 a.m. 05/18/2024 at 4:00 a.m. 05/18/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/18/2024 at 11:49 p.m. 05/19/2024 at 3:29 a.m. 05/19/2024 at 8:00 p.m. 05/19/2024 at 11:18 p.m. 05/20/2024 at 3:40 a.m. Further review revealed there was no documentation of an IV assessment every 4 hours on 05/19/2024 from 8:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. and on 05/20/2024 from 3:40 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Patient #3 Review of Patient #3’s medical record revealed an admission date of 07/02/2024. Further review revealed Patient #3 had a right hand 20 gauge IV that was placed on 07/02/2024 at 1:38 a.m. and removed on 07/04/2024 at 11:40 a.m. Review of the IV assessments revealed there was no documentation of the phlebitis scale or the infiltration scale on the following assessment: 07/04/2024 at 8:00 a.m. Further review revealed there was no documentation of an IV assessment every 4 hours on 07/02/2024 from 1:39 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. In an interview on 07/08/2024 at 2:12 p.m. S2DR verified IV assessments should be documented every 4 hours. S2DR verified the nurse should have documented the phlebitis scale and infiltration scale every 4 hours according to hospital policy.”
All 5 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 15, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Jul 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 1 worse of 8; safety of care, 2 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 10.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (803 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.4%, heart failure 11.4%, pneumonia 18%, COPD 9.6%, stroke 14.2%, heart bypass surgery 3.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 15.8%, heart failure 21.5%, pneumonia 18.3%, COPD 21.4%, heart bypass surgery 11.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 140 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 69% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.04 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Feb 8, 1967.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 78% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc. owns an unstated share directly since Dec 21, 1984.
- Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc. runs it.
- 6 owners or officers are people: Christi G Pierce (corporate officer); Alwyn G Meaux (corporate director); Alwyn G Meaux (managing employee (on the payroll)); Richard Vath (corporate officer); Jeremy Rogers (corporate officer); Stephanie Manson (corporate officer).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | Dec 21, 1984 | |
| Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Dec 21, 1984 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 8 hospitals CMS lists in Lafayette Parish, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 3 rated 3 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Park Place Surgical Hospital | Not given |
| Lafayette Surgical Specialty Hospital | Not given |
| Compass Behavioral Center of Lafayette | Not given |
| Ochsner Lafayette General Medical Center | 3 |
| Ochsner University Hospital and Clinics | 3 |
| Vermilion Behavioral Health Systems | Not given |
| Oceans Hospital of Broussard | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.