Taylor Regional Hospital
An acute care hospital in Campbellsville, Kentucky 42718
1700 Old Lebanon Road, Campbellsville, Kentucky 42718. (270) 465-3561.
- Medicare payments cut under the HAC Reduction Program (fiscal year 2026)
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 90 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 30, 2026: a complaint inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 30, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 1,121 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47852 Based on interview, record review, review of the facility investigation, and review of the facility’s policies, it was determined the facility failed to ensure patients received adequate nursing supervision to provide a safe environment for one of 12 sampled patients, Patient (P) 10. P10 was not provided adequate nursing supervision when she was brought to the Emergency Department (ED) on 03/05/2026 who assessed a blood pressure reading of 134/120 millimeters mercury (mmHg) at 9:11 AM as well as a pain level of 10 out of 10. Additionally, the facility failed to document any further blood pressure readings between 9:11 AM and P10’s discharge on 03/05/2026 at 4:50 PM, when the facility documented a blood pressure reading of 134/120 mmHg. The findings include: Review of the facility’s policy, “Patient Rights and Responsibilities,” revised May 2024, revealed patient rights included all patients had the right to safe and respectable care which included the right to considerate, respectful care given by competent personnel in a safe environment free from all forms of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Further review revealed the patient had the right to receive care in a safe and secure environment which incorporated current standards of practice for patient care, environmental safety, infection control, and security. Continued review revealed the patient had a right to expect reasonable timeliness for services. Review of the facility’s policy, “Emergency Department Operations,” revised March 2025, revealed the Department Director was responsible for the coordination of the Emergency Department and the Emergency Department Nursing Staff. Further review revealed the Department Director/designee was responsible for assigning, instructing, and orienting the staff nurses to the Department. Continued review revealed if it was determined that an individual had an emergency medication condition, further medical examination and treatment within the capabilities of the staff and facilities available at the facility that was necessary to stabilize the medication condition would be provided to the patient or the patient would be transferred to another facility. Review of P10’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) run sheet, dated 03/05/2026, revealed the EMS services were in the Central Time Zone while the facility was in the Eastern Time Zone. Further review revealed EMS was dispatched at 7:07 AM (8:07 AM EST) and arrived at P10’s home at 7:23 AM for complaints of P10 falling with a possible seizure. Continued review revealed EMS arrived at the facility at 8:05 AM and transferred patient care at 8:22 AM (9:22 AM EST) to Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Additionally, EMS assessed P10 to have bilateral ankle pain of eight out of 10 following a fall on 03/05/2026. EMS noted P10 had previous ankle injuries which had caused the fall. Further review revealed EMS assessed P10’s blood pressure to be 135/105 mmHg on 03/05/2026 at 8:05 AM. Review of P10’s Patient Information form revealed the facility admitted the patient to the Emergency Department (ED) on 03/05/2026 with diagnoses which included fall and bilateral ankle pain. Review of P10’s Nursing Summary, dated 03/05/2026 at 9:11 AM by RN1, revealed the facility assessed the patient to have had a fall that date with bilateral ankle fractures two weeks prior to that date. Further review revealed the facility assessed P10’s blood pressure to be 134/120 mmHg with a constant pain level of 10 out of 10. Continued review revealed the facility assessed P10’s temperature to be 99.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Review of P10’s ED Physician Documentation, dated 03/05/2026 at 9:40 AM by ED Physician 1, revealed P10 presented with a chief complaint of falls and ankle pain. Further review revealed she described her ankle pain as severe and not well-managed with her current pain medications. Review of P10’s Attestation Statement, dated 03/05/2026 by ED Physician 1, revealed diagnoses which included: pain in right ankle and joints of right foot; fracture of right lower leg, subsequent for closed fracture with malunion; fracture of left lower leg, subsequent for closed fracture with malunion; and fall on same level, subsequent encounter. Review of P10’s Medical Record revealed no nursing documentation on 03/05/2026 from the triage note at 9:11 AM until the discharge note at 4:50 PM. Further review revealed the same vital signs were charged at discharge as the triage vital signs, including the blood pressure of 134/120 mmHg and temperature of 99.5 degrees F. Continued review revealed no documentation of repeat vital signs nor reassessment of pain during P10’s visit. Additionally, there was no documentation P10 received any medication or radiology services during the visit. During an interview, on 07/30/2026 at 9:45 AM, ED Physician 1 stated that P10 had no major complaints of pain on 03/05/2026 and her main concern was about mobility. He further stated he worked throughout the day to try to expedite an in-patient rehabilitation for P10. He continued to state patients were generally placed on a monitor in the ED that automatically checked P10’s vital signs periodically, and he believed P10’s vital signs were probably normal during her ED visit. Additionally, he stated it was his expectation that vital signs were charted throughout the visit. During an interview, on 07/30/2026 at 10:41 AM, RN1 stated he could not remember if he was the triage nurse or the primary nurse for P10 on 03/05/2026. He further stated he would connect the patient to the vital signs monitoring system with an automated blood pressure cuff that would periodically check the patient’s blood pressure. He continued to state he would reassess a patient’s pain after pain medication was given but was not sure when pain would be reassessed if pain medication was not given. Additionally, he stated “most times” when a patient had pain of 10 out of 10, pain medications were ordered. During an interview, on 07/29/2026 at 3:08 PM, RN2 stated if a patient had a blood pressure of 134/120 mmHg, she would recheck the blood pressure immediately because it could be a stroke level blood pressure. She further stated she would look at the blood pressure cuff to determine if it was the correct size and would perform a patient assessment. During an interview, on 07/29/2026 at 4:50 PM, ED Physician 2 stated that he was aware of a patient’s blood pressure reading of 134/120 mmHg, he would ask staff to repeat a manual blood pressure reading because he did not believe it was an accurate reading. He further stated for a patient complaining of pain 10 out of 10, the patient might need intravenous (IV) pain medication for pain control. He continued to state the patient might also need repeat X-rays following a fall where the patient already had bilateral ankle fractures.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Sep 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Sep 19, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 2 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 8.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (250 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 71% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 68% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 12.1%, pneumonia 14.1%, COPD 12%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 20.4%, pneumonia 16%, COPD 20.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 138 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 48% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.09 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Dec 1, 1968.
- Ownership: government - hospital district or authority.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Government - Hospital District or Authority.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS cut its Medicare payments by 1% for fiscal year 2026 under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, which does so for the quarter of hospitals that fare worst on conditions patients get in hospital.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Medicare payment reduction (HAC Reduction Program) | Fiscal year 2026: 1% of Medicare payments |
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 93% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 13 owners or officers are people: Shirley Buckner (corporate officer); Shirley Buckner (corporate director); James Sabo (owns 5% or more directly); James Sabo (managing employee (on the payroll)); Damarco Richardson (corporate director); Ben Cox (corporate director); Dawn Webster (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joseph G Hugar (corporate officer); Joseph G Hugar (corporate director); Karen Patton (corporate director); John Chowning (corporate officer); John Chowning (corporate director); Paul Phillips (corporate officer).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Taylor County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.