Hearth Record

Centura St. Catherine-Dodge City

An acute care hospital in Dodge City, Kansas 67801

3001 Avenue A, Dodge City, Kansas 67801. (620) 225-8400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 16, 2025: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 31, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Discharge Planning-D/C Planning List

    The inspectors’ words, 736 words

    “DISCHARGE PLANNING-D/C PLANNING LIST CFR(s): [The hospital must] include the discharge planning a list of HHA’s, SNF’s, IRF’s, or LTCH’s that are available to the patient, that are participating in the Medicare program, and that serve the geographic area(as defined by the HHA) in which the patient resides, or in the case of a SNF, IRF, or LTCH, in the geographic area requested by the patient. HHAs must request to be listed by the hospital as available. (i) The list must only be presented to patients for whom home health care post hospital extended care services, SNF, IRF, or LTCH services are indicated and appropriate as determined by the discharge planning evaluation. (ii) For patients enrolled in managed care organizations, the hospital must make the patient aware of the need to verify with their managed care organization which practitioners, providers or certified suppliers are in the network of the patient’s managed care organization, it must share this with the patient or the patient’s representative. (iii) [The hospital must] document in the patient’s medical record that the list was presented to the patient or to the patient’s representative.…. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45841 Based on record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide 3 (Patients 1, 2, and 3) of 6 sampled patients with a resource list of post-acute agencies prior to discharge. Failure to provide a list of post-acute agencies prior to discharge place patients at risk for not making inform decisions for post-acute care. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, “Case Management & Discharge Planning,” with a publication date of 08/30/2022, revealed, “Stage Three: Development of a Discharge Plan 1. The CM/SW [case manager/social worker] presents all viable options to patient/family/designated caregiver, when applicable, to allow the patient/family/designated caregiver to make informed decisions and choices for care along the continuum. Patient/families/designated caregivers will be given a resource list of post-acute agencies. This choice is documented on the CM/SW Choice form and in the CM/SW notes in the electronic health record and indicates consent for an outside agency to evaluate patient, including medical record indicated.” Per the policy, “b. This list must only be presented to patients whom home health care post-hospital extended services, SNF [skilled nursing facility], IRF [inpatient rehabilitation facility], or LTCH [long-term care hospital] services are indicated and appropriate as determined by the discharge planning evaluation.” Patient 1 A review of Patient 1’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 12/15/23, with a diagnosis to include history of right total hip replacement. A review of Patient 1’s social worker encounter note dated 12/18/23 at 1:51 PM, revealed Patient 1 expected to be discharged to a SNF. There was no evidence to indicate the patient was presented a resource list of post-acute agencies or documentation of the CM/SW choice form. Patient 2 A review of Patient 2’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 11/09/23, with a chief complaint of fall and facial swelling. A review of Patient 2’s social worker encounter note dated 11/10/23 at 2:51 PM, revealed Patient 2 expected to be discharged to a SNF. There was no evidence to indicate the patient was presented a resource list of post-acute agencies or documentation of the CM/SW choice form. Patient 3 A review of Patient 3’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 12/23/23 with a chief complaint of fall. A review of Patient 3’s social worker encounter note dated 12/26/23 at 3:27 PM, revealed Patient 3 expected to be discharged to an acute rehabilitation unit. There was no evidence to indicate the patient was presented a resource list of post-acute agencies or documentation of the CM/SW choice form. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 10:40 AM, the SW stated that patients were verbally informed of post-acute options during the discharge process. The SW acknowledged the facility did not have a choice form as specified in the facility’s policy. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 10:51 AM, the Patient Safety Program Manager confirmed the choice forms were unable to be found for Patient 1 and Patient 3. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 11:44 AM, the CM stated that the choice form previously given to patients and/or their families was no longer applicable after the name of facility changed. The CM stated a new form had not been developed. Per the CM, the patients were verbally informed of post-acute options.”

    Rule A0815. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Organization Of Rehabilitation Services

    The inspectors’ words, 469 words

    “ORGANIZATION OF REHABILITATION SERVICES CFR(s): 482.56(a) The organization of the service must be appropriate to the scope of the services offered. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45841 Based on record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a physical therapist to provide physical therapy services to 2 (Patients 3 and Patient 4) of 6 sampled patients as ordered by the physician and directed by the patient’s physical therapy plan. Failure to ensure there was a physical therapist to provide physical therapy place patients at risk for delayed progress in healing. Findings Include: A review of the facility physical therapy policy titled, “Standard Operating Procedure,” dated 10/01/19, revealed, “Physical therapy services provided to all patients will be in accordance with all state and federal regulations and the standards of practice as established by the American Physical Therapy Association.” A review of Patient 3’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 12/23/23 with a chief complaint of fall. A review of Patient 3’s physician orders, revealed an order dated 12/24/23 for physical therapy to evaluate and treat the patient. A review of Patient 3’s “Physical Therapy Evaluation,” dated 12/26/23, revealed the plan to treat Patient 3 was twice a day. A review of Patient 3’s physical therapy documentation, revealed the patient was not seen on 12/24/23 or 12/25/23. Per the Facesheet, the facility discharged Patient 3 on 12/27/23. A review of Patient 4’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 11/07/23, with a diagnosis to include displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (hip fracture). A review of Patient 4’s physician orders, revealed an order dated 11/07/23 for physical therapy to evaluate and treat the patient. A review of Patient 4’s “Physical Therapy Evaluation,” dated 11/08/23, revealed the plan to treat Patient 4 was twice a day. A review of Patient 4’s physical therapy documentation, revealed the patient was seen only once by PT staff on 11/09/23 and 11/10/23 and the patient was not seen by PT staff on 11/11/23 or 11/12/23. Per the Facesheet, the facility discharged Patient 4 on 11/13/23. During an interview on 01/30/24 at 3:57 PM, the Director of Quality stated that there was one person who staffed the physical therapy department during the week and that staff person was a physical therapy assistant. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 9:47 AM, the Director of Physical Therapy stated that the physical therapy department was staffed with a physical therapy assistant Mondays through Thursday for inpatient coverage. Per the Director of Physical Therapy, an outpatient physical therapy assistant provided therapy coverage on Fridays. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 2:15 PM, the Physical Therapist stated that the physical therapy department was not staffed with a physical therapist every day of the week and there was no weekend coverage.”

    Rule A1124. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Delivery Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 426 words

    “DELIVERY OF SERVICES CFR(s): 482.56(b)(2) The provision of care and the personnel qualifications must be in accordance with national acceptable standards of practice and must also meet the requirements of §409.17 of this chapter. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45841 Based on record reviews, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Patient 3 and Patient 4) of 6 sampled patients received physical therapy as ordered by the physician and specified in the patient’s physical therapy plan. Failure to implement and provide physical therapy as ordered places the patients at risk for delayed progress in healing. Findings Include: A review of the facility physical therapy policy titled, “Standard Operating Procedure,” dated 10/01/2019, revealed, “As prescribed by the physician or non-physician practitioner, the physical therapist will complete an evaluation. Based on the evaluation findings, a treatment plan will be established consisting of the type, amount, frequency, and duration of physical therapy. The plan will also indicate the patient’s diagnosis and anticipated goals. Therapists will operate at the level of their competency.” Patient 3 A review of Patient 3’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 12/23/23 with a chief complaint of fall. A review of Patient 3’s physician orders, revealed an order dated 12/24/23 for physical therapy to evaluate and treat the patient. A review of Patient 3’s “Physical Therapy Evaluation,” dated 12/26/23, revealed the plan to treat Patient 3 was twice a day. A review of Patient 3’s physical therapy documentation, revealed the patient was not seen on 12/24/23 or 12/25/23. Per the Facesheet, the facility discharged Patient 3 on 12/27/23. Patient 4 A review of Patient 4’s “Facesheet” revealed the facility admitted the patient on 11/07/23, with a diagnosis to include displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur (hip fracture). A review of Patient 4’s physician orders, revealed an order dated 11/07/23 for physical therapy to evaluate and treat the patient. A review of Patient 4’s “Physical Therapy Evaluation,” dated 11/08/23, revealed the plan to treat Patient 4 was twice a day. A review of Patient 4’s physical therapy documentation, revealed the patient was seen only once by PT staff on 11/09/23 and 11/10/23 and the patient was not seen by PT staff on 11/11/23 or 11/12/23. Per the Facesheet, the facility discharged Patient 4 on 11/13/23. On 01/31/24 at 2:05 PM, the Director of Quality performed a chart review with the survey team and confirmed Patient 3 and Patient 4 were not provided physical therapy as ordered by the physician and directed by the patient’s physical therapy plan.”

    Rule A1134. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 5 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 16, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 15, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 20, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 31, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
Jan 30, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (102 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 63% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.5%, heart failure 13.3%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 10.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.9%, heart failure 20.6%, pneumonia 17.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 114 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 71% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.95 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Dec 27, 1976.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Commonspirit Health owns 100% directly since Apr 28, 2022.
  • Commonspirit Mountain Region runs it.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: Shawna Rene Roark (corporate officer, 0%); Shawna Rene Roark (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Fred Dierksen (corporate director, 0%); Zeferino J Arroyo (corporate director); Darrin Figgins (corporate director, 0%); P-Jay Patel (corporate director, 0%); Mitch Melfi (corporate director); Tadd Richert (corporate officer, 0%); Tadd Richert (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Peter Paul Powers (corporate director); Janice Thome (corporate director, 0%); Jason A Justus (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sheri Shapiro (corporate director, 0%); Katherine Brooks (corporate officer, 0%); Katherine Brooks (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Andrew Gaasch (corporate officer); Andrew Gaasch (corporate director); Merrill Ray Conant (corporate officer, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Commonspirit HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 28, 2022
Commonspirit Mountain RegionRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 28, 2022

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Ford County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Minneola District HospitalNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.