Hearth Record

Southwest Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Liberal, Kansas 67901

315 West 15th Street, Liberal, Kansas 67901. (620) 624-1651.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 24, 2025: a complaint inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 12, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 47233 Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the Hospital failed to ensure it met the requirements for Patient Rights Condition of Participation when the hospital failed to protect and promote each patient’s rights. Findings Include: 1. The hospital failed to ensure the monitoring for 1 of 2 patient in restraints as required per hospital policy. (Refer to Tag A0175) 2. The hospital failed to ensure that a physician or other licensed practitioner performed a face-to-face evaluation within one hour after the initiation of restraint when used for the management of violent behavior for 2 of 2 sampled patient in restraints. (Refer to Tag A0178)”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 1,692 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(10) The condition of the patient who is restrained or secluded must be monitored by a physician, other licensed practitioner or trained staff that have completed the training criteria specified in paragraph (f) of this section at an interval determined by hospital policy. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47233 Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the Hospital failed to ensure the condition of a patient in restraints was monitored at intervals required by hospital policy for 1 of 2 (Patient 1) patients reviewed with restraints. This deficient practice places any patient in restraints at risk for injury and harm. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled, “Safety Needs: Fall Prevention and Restraint Use,” revised 08/2024 showed, “ ...To guide the staff in using alternative / non-physical interventions to restraints to prevent or minimize the use of restraints. To guide the staff in decision making about least-restrictive methods of restraint use. To establish guidelines to validate and ensure the safe application and removal of restraints by competent staff. To establish guidelines to protect the patient’s health and safety and preserve their dignity, rights and well-being when restraints are in use. To establish guidelines for assessing/collecting data on the patient’s needs for the use or continued use of restraints to facilitate discontinuation as soon as possible. To establish guidelines for monitoring the patient during the use of restraints and meeting their safety and personal needs, including vulnerable patient populations, such as pediatric, emergency, and cognitively or physically limited patients. To establish guidelines for the appropriate ordering of restraints. To establish guidelines for the medical record documentation when restraints are used ... Soft Limb Restraint(s): a. At least every 2 hours, and as needed, the restraint(s) will be loosened/removed to: i. Perform ROM exercise. ii. Monitor skin temperature and color; and to massage skin under restraint. iii. Monitor neurovascular status (cap refill, pulse(s) and movement). b. At least every 2 hours, and as needed: i. Monitor the clinical justification for continued use of the restraint, and for patient readiness from release from restraint. ii. Re-enforce patient and/or family restraint education as needed iii. Monitor effectiveness of restraint and document the type of restraint in use. iv. Attend to the patient’s needs, i.e. toileting, nutrition and hydration, and positioning. v. Monitor the patient’s level of consciousness / mental status. vi. Assure that restraints are applied correctly. vii. Assure the patient call-light is in reach and that patient rights and dignity are maintained viii. Due to the risk associated with restraint use in vulnerable patient populations such as pediatric, and cognitively or physically impaired patients, additional monitoring may be required ...” Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s 08/14/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 12:24 PM by EMS and police. Chief complaint “ ...Patient arrives from [home] with c/o aggression. Per EMS, patient became aggressive towards staff and PD [police department] had to be notified. Upon arrival to the ED, patient was extremely aggressive and attempting to hit staff. Patient is screaming “no” repeatedly. Patient has abrasions noted to his nose. Per staff, patient was hitting his head on a van.” Past medical history includes: Intellectual Disability Diagnosis (IDD) (learning disability); Edentulous (toothless); Xerostomia (dry mouth); Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (pattern of unwanted thoughts and fears known as obsessions); Hypertension (elevated blood pressure); and Diabetes (increased blood sugar). Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/15/24 at 11:10 AM showed, “Chief complaint: Altered Mental Status Time Seen by Provider: 08/14/24 13:40 [1:40 PM] ... male who lives in supervised group home facility ...brought to emergency department by EMS and police department because of acute change of mental status and aggressive behavior according to EMS and facility patient has aggressive behavior towards staff. He was very agitated and loud on arrival required both chemical and physical restraint. Patient given Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] 5 mg IM [intramuscular]. Patient has history of similar behavior in the past and he had multiple visits to emergency department for aggressive behavior. No fall or trauma reported by facility. Patient has history of manic depressive disorder. ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/14/24 at 2:14 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/14/24 14:22 [2:22 PM]. Complete 08/14/24 15:11 [3:11 PM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/14/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/14/24 12:20 [12:20 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/14/24 -Time Initiated 12:20 ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/14/24 -Time Restraint Removed 15:10 [3:10 PM] ...” Documentation showed restraints were initiated approximately two hours prior to restraint order. Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/14/24 at 5:32 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/14/24 17:32 [5:32 PM]. Complete 08/14/24 23:28 [11:28 PM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/14/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/14/24 17:32 [5:32 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/14/24 -Time Initiated 17:32 [5:32 PM] ...08/14/24 19:00 [7:00 PM] -Patient Response to Restraints remains agitated and restless ...” From 08/14/24 at 7:00 PM through 08/14/24 at 11:28 PM when patient discharged, Patient 1’s medical record failed to show documentation of every two hour restraint monitoring as required per policy. Review of Patient 1’s 08/19/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 12:50 PM by private vehicle. Chief complaint “ ...[Staff] His behavior has been getting worse, He is hitting and scratching people. He was trying to wrap the seatbelt around his neck today. We want to get him evaluated ...” Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/19/24 at 3:53 PM showed, “Chief complaint: Mental Health Emergency Time Seen by Provider: 08/19/24 13:15 [1:15 PM] ...male with history of intellectual deficiency and behavior disorder brought to emergency department severe agitation screaming and yelling emergency department. Patient require physical and chemical restraint ...Patient agitation become under control with total 10 mg Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] IM [intramuscular] ...I requested screening with Healthsource and patient signed out to night shift physician on shift change apparently patient apparently screen and discharge ...” Review of a document titled “ED Notes” dated 08/19/24 at 1:19 PM showed, “Pt [sic] assisted in to bed with by x5 asst. [sic] Soft wrist restraints applied per [Staff I] and Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] 5 mg IM [intramuscular] given in left: deltoid. Pt [sic] continues to holler out. Lights dimmed to try to help the patient rest.” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/19/24 at 2:19 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/19/24 13:00 [1:00 PM]. Complete 08/20/24 02:49 [2:49 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints risk of falling cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/19/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/19/24 13:19 [1:19 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/19/24 -Time Initiated 13:19 [1:19 PM] ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/20/24 -Time Restraint Removed 02:50 [2:50 AM] ...” From 08/19/24 at 1:19 PM through 08/19/24 at 7:00 PM Patient 1’s medical record failed to show documentation of every two hour restraint monitoring as required per policy. Review of Patient 1’s 08/28/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 5:46 PM by EMS. Chief complaint [community housing] staff brought patient in to for aggression. Patient has a history of these episode [community housing]wishes to have a mental health evaluation. ...” Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/29/24 at 2:56 AM showed, “Chief complaint: Mental Health Emergency Time Seen by Provider: 08/28/24 18:26 [6:26 PM] ... 57-year-old male with past medical history inclusive of intellectual disability, type 2 diabetes BPH, seizure disorder intermittent explosive disorder urinary incontinence hypertension recurrent behavioral disturbance who presents from [community housing]facility with request for behavioral health evaluation in the setting of increasingly aggressive behavior with patient attempting to assault staff both at his facility and on arrival in the emergency department. Patient without medical complaint but is found to be uncooperative with evaluation. By report patient has history of these violent outbursts ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/28/24 at 6:15 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/28/24 18:15 [6:15 PM]. Complete 08/29/24 03:22 [3:22 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/28/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/28/24 18:15 [6:15 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/28/24 -Time Initiated 18:15 [6:15 PM] ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/29/24 -Time Restraint Removed 03:22 [3:22 AM] Patient 1’s medical record failed to show documentation of every two hour restraint monitoring as required per policy from 08/28/24 at 6:15 PM through 08/28/24 at 11:00 PM. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:48 AM Staff B, CNO stated, “ ...we use paper charting on the floor so that there is no time stamp...” During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:15 AM Staff B, CNO, Staff A, RN, and Staff D, RN acknowledged Patient 1’s medical record was missing every two-hour documentation. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:15 AM Staff B, CNO, Staff E, RN, and Staff D, RN acknowledged facility policy does not differentiate violent verse non-violent restraints. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 9:30 AM Patient Representative (PR) 1 stated, “I had my staff verify that they did not take the restraints off at all at any point when he was there so they just left him in the bed and kept giving [Patient 1] medication to sedate [Patient 1] ...””

    Rule A0175. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 1,859 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(12) When restraint or seclusion is used for the management of violent or self-destructive behavior that jeopardizes the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member, or others, the patient must be seen face-to-face within 1-hour after the initiation of the intervention -- o By a-- - Physician or other licensed practitioner; or - Registered nurse who has been trained in accordance with the requirements specified in paragraph (f) of this section. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47233 Based on document review, policy review, and security video review, the Hospital failed to ensure a patient in restraints received a face-to-face assessment within one hour of initiating the restraints physician or other licensed practitioner as required for 2 of 2 (Patient 1 and 21) patient reviewed with restraints. This deficient practice places any patient receiving services at this hospital at risk for serious injury and harm. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled, “Safety Needs: Fall Prevention and Restraint Use,” revised 08/2024 failed to address one hour face to face by a physician or other licensed practitioner after the initiation of restraints as required by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s 08/14/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 12:24 PM by EMS and police. Chief complaint “ ...Patient arrives from [home] with c/o aggression. Per EMS, patient became aggressive towards staff and PD [police department] had to be notified. Upon arrival to the ED, patient was extremely aggressive and attempting to hit staff. Patient is screaming “no” repeatedly. Patient has abrasions noted to his nose. Per staff, patient was hitting his head on a van.” Past medical history includes: Intellectual Disability Diagnosis (IDD) (learning disability); Edentulous (toothless); Xerostomia (dry mouth); Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (pattern of unwanted thoughts and fears known as obsessions); Hypertension (elevated blood pressure); and Diabetes (increased blood sugar). Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/15/24 at 11:10 AM showed, “Chief complaint: Altered Mental Status Time Seen by Provider: 08/14/24 13:40 [1:40 PM] ... male who lives in supervised group home facility ...brought to emergency department by EMS and police department because of acute change of mental status and aggressive behavior according to EMS and facility patient has aggressive behavior towards staff. He was very agitated and loud on arrival required both chemical and physical restraint. Patient given Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] 5 mg IM [intramuscular]. Patient has history of similar behavior in the past and he had multiple visits to emergency department for aggressive behavior. No fall or trauma reported by facility. Patient has history of manic depressive disorder. ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/14/24 at 2:14 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/14/24 14:22 [2:22 PM]. Complete 08/14/24 15:11 [3:11 PM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/14/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/14/24 12:20 [12:20 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/14/24 -Time Initiated 12:20 ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/14/24 -Time Restraint Removed 15:10 [3:10 PM] ...” Documentation showed restraints were initiated approximately two hours prior to restraint order. Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/14/24 at 5:32 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/14/24 17:32 [5:32 PM]. Complete 08/14/24 23:28 [11:28 PM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/14/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/14/24 17:32 [5:32 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/14/24 -Time Initiated 17:32 [5:32 PM] ...08/14/24 19:00 [7:00 PM] -Patient Response to Restraints remains agitated and restless ...” Patient 1 was in restraints from 08/14/24 at 7:00 PM through 08/14/24 at 11:28 PM when patient discharged. The medical record failed to show Patient 1 received a one hour face to face assessment by the physician or licensed practitioner on 08/14/24. Review of Patient 1’s 08/19/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 12:50 PM by private vehicle. Patient 1 was triaged at an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 2 (Patients are very ill and at high risk. The need for care is immediate and an appropriate bed needs to be found. Usually, rather move to the next patient, the triage nurse determines that the charge nurse or staff in the patient care area should be immediately alerted that they have an ESI level 2). Chief complaint “ ...[Staff] His behavior has been getting worse, He is hitting and scratching people. He was trying to wrap the seatbelt around his neck today. We want to get him evaluated ...” Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/19/24 at 3:53 PM showed, “Chief complaint: Mental Health Emergency Time Seen by Provider: 08/19/24 13:15 [1:15 PM] ...male with history of intellectual deficiency and behavior disorder brought to emergency department severe agitation screaming and yelling emergency department. Patient require physical and chemical restraint ...Patient agitation become under control with total 10 mg Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] IM [intramuscular] ...I requested screening with Healthsource and patient signed out to night shift physician on shift change apparently patient apparently screen and discharge ...” Review of a document titled “ED Notes” dated 08/19/24 at 1:19 PM showed, “Pt [sic] assisted in to bed with (sic) by x5 asst. [sic] Soft wrist restraints applied per [Staff I]...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/19/24 at 2:19 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/19/24 13:00 [1:00 PM]. Complete 08/20/24 02:49 [2:49 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints risk of falling cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/19/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/19/24 13:19 [1:19 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/19/24 -Time Initiated 13:19 [1:19 PM] ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/20/24 -Time Restraint Removed 02:50 [2:50 AM] ...” Patient 1 was in restraints from 08/19/24 at 1:19 PM through 08/19/24 at 7:00 PM when patient discharged. The medical record failed to show Patient 1 received a one hour face to face assessment by the physician or licensed practitioner on 08/19/24. Review of Patient 1’s 08/28/24 medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at 5:46 PM by EMS. Patient 1 was triaged at an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 2 (Patients are very ill and at high risk. The need for care is immediate and an appropriate bed needs to be found. Usually, rather move to the next patient, the triage nurse determines that the charge nurse or staff in the patient care area should be immediately alerted that they have an ESI level 2). Chief complaint [community housing] staff brought patient in to for aggression. Patient has a history of these episode [community housing] wishes to have a mental health evaluation. ...” Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/29/24 at 2:56 AM showed, “Chief complaint: Mental Health Emergency Time Seen by Provider: 08/28/24 18:26 [6:26 PM] ... 57-year-old male with past medical history inclusive of intellectual disability, type 2 diabetes BPH, seizure disorder intermittent explosive disorder urinary incontinence hypertension recurrent behavioral disturbance who presents from [community housing] facility with request for behavioral health evaluation in the setting of increasingly aggressive behavior with patient attempting to assault staff both at his facility and on arrival in the emergency department. Patient without medical complaint but is found to be uncooperative with evaluation. By report patient has history of these violent outbursts ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 08/28/24 at 6:15 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 08/28/24 18:15 [6:15 PM]. Complete 08/29/24 03:22 [3:22 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Care Assessments” dated 08/28/24 showed, “Restraints: Initiate/Monitor 08/28/24 18:15 [6:15 PM] ... -Date Initiated 08/28/24 -Time Initiated 18:15 [6:15 PM] ... -Date Restraint Removed 08/29/24 -Time Restraint Removed 03:22 [3:22 AM]. Patient 1 was in restraints from 08/28/24 at 6:15 PM through 08/28/24 at 6:15 PM when patient discharged. The medical record failed to show Patient 1 received a one hour face to face assessment by the physician or licensed practitioner on 08/28/24. Patient 21 Review of Patient 21’s medical record showed, a 26-year old, presented to the ED on 07/06/24 at 7:38 PM via Emergency Medical Services. Patient 21 presented with a chief complaint “ ...Seizures x 2 then combative ...” Past medical history includes: Seizures. Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 07/06/24 at 7:47 PM showed, “Chief complaint: Seizure ...Patient arrived after having a seizure via EMS Patient was combative with EMS and the police had to help with transfer per. Patient is unable answer questions. Patient did move to the gurney from the EMS cot. Patient is sane letter words without making since ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 07/06/24 at 8:48 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 07/06/24 20:48 [8:48 PM]. Stop Request 07/07/24 00:14 [12:14 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Patient Order Summary” dated 07/06/24 at 10:46 PM, showed, “Order Restraints: Initiate/Renewal ...Start 07/06/24 22:46 [10:46 PM]. Complete 07/08/24 10:15 [10:15 AM] ... Intervention Text *Reassesses patient every 2 hours ... Behavior requiring non-violent restraints cognitive disorder Non-violent restraint type foam/soft limb ...” Review of a document titled “Physician Order for Restraint” dated 07/07/24 at 00:00 [12:00 AM], showed, “Clinical Justification for use of Restraint To Promote Safety/Healing ...To Prevent Patient Injury ...Type of Restraint Soft Limb Restraint-Right Wrist Soft Limb Restraint- Left Wrist Soft Limb Restraint - Right Ankle Soft Limb Restraint - Left Ankle 3. Patient to be Restraint for 24 hours ...” Electronically signed by physician 08/01/24 at 2:31 PM 25 days, 14 hours, 31 minutes after restraints applied. Review of a document titled “Physician Order for Restraint” dated 07/08/24 at 00:00 [12:00 AM], showed, “Clinical Justification for use of Restraint To Promote Safety/Healing ...To Prevent Patient Injury ...Type of Restraint Soft Limb Restraint-Right Wrist Soft Limb Restraint- Left Wrist 3. Patient to be Restraint for 24 hours ...” Electronically signed by physician 08/01/24 at 2:31 PM 24 days, 14 hours, 31 minutes after restraints applied. Review of the medical record failed to show a one-hour face to face was completed for Patient 21. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:48 AM Staff B, CNO stated, “ ...we use paper charting on the floor so that there is no time stamp...” During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:15 AM Staff B, CNO, Staff E, RN, and Staff D, RN acknowledged missing one hour face-to-face in facility policy.”

    Rule A0178. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Sep 11, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47233 Based on document review, record review, policy review and interview the Hospital failed to ensure the emergency medical treatment and labor act (EMTALA) requirements were met by failing to provide stabilizing treatment to a patient who presented to the emergency department seeking medical care for an emergency medical condition (EMC). Failure to provide stabilizing treatment places patients at risk for unidentified emergency medical conditions resulting harm and injury up to an including death. Findings Include: The hospital failed to provide stabilizing treatment for 1 of 20 patients (Patient 1) who presented to the emergency department seeking emergency medical care. (Refer to tag A2407)”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Stabilizing Treatment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,993 words

    “STABILIZING TREATMENT CFR(s): 489.24(d)(1-3) (1) General. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section, if any individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits) comes to a hospital and the hospital determines that the individual has an emergency medical condition, the hospital must provide either- (i) within the capabilities of the staff and facilities available at the hospital, for further medical examination and treatment as required to stabilize the medical condition. (ii) For for transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section. (2) Exception: Application to inpatients. (i) If a hospital has screened an individual under paragraph (a) of this section and found the individual to have an emergency medical condition, and admits that individual as an inpatient in good faith in order to stabilize the emergency medical condition, the hospital has satisfied its special responsibilities under this section with respect to that individual (ii) This section is not applicable to an inpatient who was admitted for elective (nonemergency) diagnosis or treatment. (iii) A hospital is required by the conditions of participation for hospitals under Part 482 of this chapter to provide care to its inpatients in accordance with those conditions of participation. (3) Refusal to consent to treatment. A hospital meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section with respect to an individual if the hospital offers the individual the further medical examination and treatment described in that paragraph and informs the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) of the risks and benefits to the individual of the examination and treatment, but the individual (or a person acting on the individual’s behalf) does not consent to the examination or treatment. The medical record must contain a description of the examination, treatment, or both if applicable, that was refused by or on behalf of the individual. The hospital must take all reasonable steps to secure the individual’s written informed refusal (or that of the person acting on his or her behalf). The written document should indicate that the person has been informed of the risks and benefits of the examination or treatment, or both. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47233 Based on record review, document review and interview the Hospital failed to provide stabilizing treatment for 1 of 20 patients (Patient 1) who presented to the emergency department seeking medical care. Failure to provide stabilizing treatment has the potential to place patients at risk for deterioration of the emergency medical condition (EMC) causing harm or injury up to and including death. Findings Include: Review of a document titled, “Medical Staff Rules and Regulations” revised on 04/14/2011 showed, “ ...Patients discharged from the ER will be provided with discharge instructions and, as needed, advised to obtain follow-up care with their primary care physician. If the patient does not have a primary care physician, the patient will be referred to the on-call physician. The patient shall be advised that, if he or she cannot obtain follow-up care or his or her condition worsens, the patient may return to the Emergency Room for care ...Emotionally ill / alcohol abuse / drug abuse patients shall receive: i. Medical Screening ii. Evaluation by Southwest Guidance Center or a Psychiatric consult, as ordered ...” Review of a hospital policy titled, “EMTALA” revised 11/2022 showed, “ ...To Stabilize” or “Stabilize” or “Stabilized” means: 1. With respect to an emergency medical condition, that no material deterioration of the condition is likely, within reasonable medical probability, to result from or occur during the transfer or discharge of the individual from the Hospital ... 2. The hospital will: (a) provide to an individual who is determined to have an emergency medical condition such further medical examination and treatment as is required to stabilize the emergency medical condition, or (b) arrange for transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with the procedures set forth below ...E. Individuals Who Have An Emergency Medical Condition 1. If, after a medical screening examination, it is determined that an individual has an emergency medical condition, the Hospital must a. Within the capability and capacity of the staff and facilities available at the hospital (including coverage available through the hospital’s on-call roster), provide treatment necessary to stabilize the individual, at which time the individual may be discharged; or b. Admit the individual to the hospital in order to stabilize the individual; or c. If stabilization of the individual is beyond the capabilities or capacity of the hospital, arrange for appropriate transfer of the individual to another medical facility in accordance with this policy ...” Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s, medical record showed, a 57-year-old, presented to the Emergency Department (ED) on 08/19/24 at 12:50 PM by private vehicle. Patient 1 was triaged at an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) 2 (Patients are very ill and at high risk. The need for care is immediate and an appropriate bed needs to be found. Usually, rather move to the next patient, the triage nurse determines that the charge nurse or staff in the patient care area should be immediately alerted that they have an ESI level 2). Chief complaint “ ...[Staff] His behavior has been getting worse, He is hitting and scratching people. He was trying to wrap the seatbelt around his neck today. We want to get him evaluated ...” Review of a document titled, “Emergency Department Physician Documentation” dated 08/19/24 at 3:53 PM showed, “Chief complaint: Mental Health Emergency Time Seen by Provider: 08/19/24 13:15 [1:15 PM] ...male with history of intellectual deficiency and behavior disorder brought to emergency department severe agitation screaming and yelling emergency department. Patient require physical and chemical restraint ...Patient agitation become under control with total 10 mg Zyprexa IM [intramuscular] ...I requested screening with [Community Mental Health agency] and patient signed out to night shift physician on shift change apparently patient apparently screen and discharge ...” Review of a document titled “ED Notes” dated 08/19/24 at 1:19 PM showed, “Pt [sic] assisted in to bed with by x5 asst. [sic] Soft wrist restraints applied per [Staff I] and Zyprexa [atypical antipsychotic that may be used to treat adults and adolescents aged 13 and older with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder] 5 mg IM given in left: deltoid. Pt [sic] continues to holler out. Lights dimmed to try to help the patient rest.” Review of a document titled “ED Notes” dated 08/20/24 at 4:03 PM showed, “ ... Patient was screened by [Community Mental Health agency] and a safetly [sic] plan was made. This nurse went to speak with the [Patient Representative] about the patient and his safetly [sic] plan...[Patient Representative] explained that they couldn’t take him back due to him being a safety risk to himself and safe [sic]. This nurse explained to the worker that this was understood but placement to [Mental Health Hospital] would not be appropriate due to his IDD [Intellectual disability] diagnoses per [Community Mental Health agency]. [Patient Representative] stated “[Mental Health Hospital] said that we were not to take him back until his mental health needs were met.” This nurse explained to [Patient Representative] that this was not a mental health facility and that we have done everything we can to the best of our ability ...” Review of a document titled “Mental Health Screening Form” dated 08/20/24 at 4:25 PM showed “ ...III. Presenting Problem. Client is a 57-year-old male who was brought to the ED yesterday for physical aggression and self-abusive behavior. At the ED, client had to be chemically and physically restraint. Client was seen in the ED on 08/14/24 for verbal and physical aggression and self-abusive behavior and also required restraint however for a shorter duration. He was diverted back to [home] with a safety plan. Client has been unable to maintain with a safety plan. Yesterday, client wrapped a seat belt around his neck. Client has superficial abrasions on his face due to his self-abusive behavior. He scratched and hit staff members and hospital workers. Client has been throwing items and has been destructive to property. Client’s current presentation is a change in his baseline level of functioning ...” Further review of the “Mental Health Screening Form” showed, “ ... both reports a significant change in clients functioning and symptoms. Client’s current behaviors are outside of his baseline level of functioning. They expressed significant concern about the ability to maintain client safety and the safety of others. A safety plan has not been successful in maintaining client at a lower level of care. Client does meet criteria for inpatient hospitalization as client presents as current risk of harm to self, current risk of harm to others, and current destruction of property. Client does pose an imminent risk of harm to self or others as evidenced by clients acting out, physically aggressive behaviors directed towards self and others. Client will be referred for involuntary inpatient hospitalization as client lacks capacity to make an informed decision regarding care and treatment and is likely to cause harm to themselves or others in the foreseeable future. Written report will be provided to the ED for their records ...” Review of a document titled, “State Hospital Application for Emergency Admission (for Observation and Treatment)” dated 08/20/24 at 4:25 PM showed, “ ...I will file a petition seeking involuntary commitment of this person with the District Court of no later than close of business day on 08/21/24. I believe this patient to be a mentally ill person subject to involuntary commitment for care and treatment as defined in KSA 59-2946 (F) and is likely to cause harm to self or others if not immediately detained ...” During an interview on 09/10/24 at 4:30 PM Staff B, CNO stated, “ ...I wasn’t aware of the court hold. Our gap here is we didn’t read the paperwork from the Mental Health screener, and patient was already discharged ...” During an interview on 09/10/24 at 6:25 PM Patient Representative (PR) 2, Licensed Masters Social Worker (LMSW) stated, “ ...I had pulled a safety plan from a previous chart in case we were going to go that way just to be prepared to and that’s not the way we went so the safety plan wasn’t used ... and the last I knew we were waiting for placement at [Mental Health Hospital] the form was sent to the County Attorney and the County Attorney decided not to file the because [Patient 1] had been released back to his home ... the hospital didn’t want to keep him there while they waited placement because it was a pretty long wait list ...the evaluation was faxed to the hospital at 5:34 PM ...” During an interview on 09/11/24 at 9:30 AM PR 1, stated, “ ...the client was in active psychosis not at baseline he was being very aggressive violent verbally explosive and so his provider recommended that we send him to the emergency room for evaluation so that they could get him into [Mental Health Hospital] so we did that we took him to the emergency room and they sedated him with medication he was sedated with medication and also physically restrained in four point restraints ... so he was sedated couldn’t answer questions for the screener ... we were told that there was a waiting list and [Mental Health Hospital] confirmed that they received the referral and that he was 13th on the list and the emergency room told us we had to come get him so they discharged him ...” Although there was significant concern about Patient 1’s ability to maintain safety and the safety of others, safety plan had not been successful in maintaining at a lower level of care and Patient 1 met criteria for inpatient hospitalization as he posed an imminent risk of harm to self or others as evidenced by acting out, physically aggressive behaviors directed towards self and others, Patient 1 was discharged home on 08/20/24 at 5:53 PM.”

    Rule A2407. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 6 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 24, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 12, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
Sep 11, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Feb 15, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 14, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 16, 2023Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 1 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 1 better and 1 worse of 4; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 7.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (232 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 57% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 14%, pneumonia 16.4%, COPD 8.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 20.1%, pneumonia 17.8%, COPD 19.7%, hip or knee replacement 6.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 142 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 61% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.92 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: government - local.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Government - Local.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 93% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Keeley R Moree (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ivanhoe Love (corporate director); Maria Lauralynn Noblejas (corporate director); Dennis L Knudsen (corporate director); Sandra Cain (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jose Lara (corporate director); Mark Cowan (managing employee (on the payroll)); John West (corporate director); Amber Williams (corporate director); Amber Williams (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tony Mckee (corporate director); Dennis Sander (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Seward County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.