Hearth Record

Parkview Whitley Hospital

An acute care hospital in Columbia City, Indiana 46725

1260 E SR 205, Columbia City, Indiana 46725. (260) 248-9301.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 11, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 11, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32952 Based on document review and interview, it was determined that in 1 (Patient #1) of 20 medical records (MR) reviewed of patients who presented to the hospital requesting emergency services, the facility failed to ensure compliance with 489.24 in that the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer. Findings Include: 1. See findings cited at 42 CFR 489.24 (e) (1)-(2) Appropriate Transfer.”

    Rule A2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Appropriate Transfer

    The inspectors’ words, 1,279 words

    “APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32952 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed follow their policy to ensure an appropriate transfer was completed for 1 of 20 patients’ medical records reviewed. (Patient #1) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled “COBRA EMTALA - Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act”, PolicyStat 14791143, last revised 12/2023 indicated During an EMR downtime, Form #766 Certificate of Transfer should be utilized. c. The transfer must be an appropriate transfer. 3. Appropriate Transfer: For a Transfer to be appropriate, the Hospital must: a. Provide medical treatment within the Hospital’s Capability and Capacity that minimize the risks to the individual’s health. b. Obtain agreement from a receiving facility that the receiving facility has the Capability and Capacity to treat the individual and that it will accept the Transfer and provide appropriate medical treatment. c. Use qualified personnel and transportation equipment as required to effect the Transfer safely. d. Send to the receiving facility copies of all available medical records related to the Emergency Medical Condition. In the alternative, Form #766 may be used. As soon as practicable after the Transfer, send by facsimile copies of any records not available at time of Transfer. Records to be sent include any available history, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, result of diagnostic tests or telephone reports of test results, and treatment provided.” 2. Review of Patient #1’s medical record lacked completed Form #766, Certificate of Transfer, during an EMR (Electronic Medical Record) downtime transfer. Patient #1 MR lacked documentation of an agreement from the receiving facility that the receiving facility has the Capability and Capacity to treat the individual and that it will accept the Transfer and provide appropriate medical treatment. Patient #1 MR lacked documentation of copies of all available medical records related to the Emergency Medical Condition being sent to the receiving facility. 3. During an interview with A6 (Emergency Department Manager) on 6/7/24 at 11:30 a.m., (he/she) verified the medical record information for Patient #1. 4. During an interview with A6 on 6/7/24 at 12:45 p.m., (he/she) verified that they did not think that it was an issue as it was a transfer and MD1 (Doctor of Medicine/Emergency Medicine) called and notified Facility #2’s ED (Emergency Department) physician on call and let them know about the systems being down at the facility and notification of Patient #1 coming to their ED. 5. During a phone interview with N1 (Registered Nurse/Emergency Department) on 6/10/24 at 12:21 p.m., (he/she) verified that MD1 explained that the patient was going to leave and go to another facility and MD1 was going to call the other facility as a courtesy to tell them that Patient #1 was on her way there N1 verified that MD1 never said that Patient #1 was a transfer, but that the patient was going to another facility of their own free will. N1 verified that (he/she) did not observe and/or overhear MD1 contact the other facility. N1 verified that (he/she) did not think that Patient #1 was considered a transfer, because N1 would have filled out EMTALA paperwork as well. So N1 did not think it was a transfer. 6. During a phone interview with Patient #1 on 6/11/24 at 11:42 a.m., Patient #1 verified that the ED Physician at Facility #1 told them “I cannot tell you to go to another hospital but I recommend that you go to another hospital.” Patient #1 verified that the ED physician told them they had no phone service but would use (his/her) personal phone to call (Facility #2) to let them know (he/she) was on their way to the facility and the circumstances. Patient #1 verified that (he/she) was at Facility #1’s ED approximately 5-10 minutes at the most. Patient #1 verified that (he/she) went to Facility #2’s ED, which is an hour from Facility #1 and was admitted and discharged two days later. 7. During a phone interview with MD3 (Doctor of Osteopathy, DO/Emergency Medicine) on 6/11/24 at 2:02 p.m., MD3 verified that an ED physician did contact (him/her) from Facility #1 on 4/10/24 and let me know that there was a patient that was going to be coming to Facility #2’s ED. MD3 verified that if it was a formal transfer, I would have stated this patient transferred from another facility in Patient #1’s medical record at Facility #2.”

    Rule A2409. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 11, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 4.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (330 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 12%, pneumonia 13.1%, COPD 7.2%, stroke 10.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 20.9%, pneumonia 15.9%, COPD 19.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 120 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 84% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.89 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 87% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Parkview Health System Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 28, 1995.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: James Heuer (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Cindy Baker (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Jessica Lee-Hansen (corporate officer); Jessica Lee-Hansen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Svetlana V Hagan (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Dj Sigler (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Shannon Perry (managing employee (on the payroll)); Torrey Bauer (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Alan Grossnickle (other role (CMS gives no detail)); David E Reinhard (corporate officer); Richard Haddad (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Robin Wright (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Scott Gabriel (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rick Henvey (corporate officer, 0%); Christopher Mckeand (corporate officer); Angela Gakstatter-Tom (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Scott Wiley (corporate officer); Mark Johnson (other role (CMS gives no detail)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Parkview Health System Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 28, 1995

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Whitley County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.