Hearth Record

Reid Health

An acute care hospital in Richmond, Indiana 47374

1100 Reid Pkwy, Richmond, Indiana 47374. (765) 983-3000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 8, 2025: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 8, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting for 1 of 10 patients (Patient 1) and failed to verbally report an inpatient suicide within 24 hours of occurrence in 1 of 1 (Patient 1). The cumulative effort of this systemic problem resulted in the hospitals inability to promote Patient Rights in a safe setting.”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 568 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting for 2 of 10 patients (Patients 1 and 4) medical records reviewed and the facility failed to verbally report an inpatient suicide within 24 hours of occurrence in 1 of 1 (Patient 1) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled, Patient Bill of Rights, Policy #149, approval date 04/18/2025, under V. Procedure, 6. Provision of care in a safe setting. 2. Facility policy titled Contraband Search, Policy #: PM2-177, approved 08/03/2016, under II. Definitions, 4. Contraband search must be completed by ED staff prior to bringing the patient into any inpatient unit. Under III. Procedure Contraband Search - Body and Personal Adult Psychiatric Unit, under 4. Ask or assist patient to remove all clothing., under 9. Search personal items: A. Clothing examples: shoes, socks, belts, hems, waistbands, pockets, soles, heels, and lining. 3. Facility policy titled Patient Observation Levels, Policy #: PM2-522, approved 04/09/2025, under IV. Procedure, 7. The patient’s room door must remain open at all times unless safety concerns or isolation precautions require otherwise. 4. Review of Patient 1’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the Emergency Room (ER) on 04/19/2025 for possible suicide attempt and the patient was placed on suicide precautions in the ER; medical record lacked documentation of a contraband search. b. On 04/19/2025, the patient was admitted to the psychiatric unit at 4:40 p.m. and at 6:59 p.m., the patient was found in the patient’s bathroom with a self-inflicted injury by hanging. 5. Review of Patient 4’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the ER on 04/14/2025 for suicidal ideations and the patient was placed on suicide precautions. b. Medical record lacked documentation of a contraband search in the ER. 6. Review of Incident Report of event dated 04/19/2025 for patient 1 indicated the charge nurse entered the patient bathroom, found patient hanging by string and patient was unresponsive. The incident report indicated the patient suffered from an anoxic brain injury, terminally weaned, and passed on April 24, 2025. 7. Video observation on 05/08/2025 at approximately 11:20 a.m of 04/19/2025 indicated patient 1’s window blind remained closed from approximately 4:36 p.m. to approximately 6:57 p.m. and the room door did not remain open at all times during the same time period. 8. Interview with N1 (Registered Nurse) on 05/07/2025 at approximately 12:38 p.m. confirmed they were assigned patient 1 on 04/19/2025 in the ER. N1 confirmed patient 1 was not asked to remove their gym shorts under the paper scrubs and the gym shorts remained on the patient when they were transferred to the psychiatric unit. 9. Interview with A2 (Risk Management Director) on 05/07/2025 at approximately 1:02 p.m. confirmed the facility did not verbally report the patient’s death to the state department of health. 10. Interview with N2 (Registerd Nurse) on 05/07/2025 at approximately 4:00 p.m. confirmed patient 1 had black underwear/shorts on under their paper scrubs and indicated the shorts were not removed and remained on the patient. 11. Interview with A3 (Senior Director of Nursing) on 05/08/2025 at approximately 10:40 a.m. confirmed patients 1 and 4’s MR lacked documentation of the contraband search.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 341 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to obtain provider orders for 1:1 observation for 5 of 10 (Patients 1, 6, 7, 8, and 10) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Patient Observations Levels, Policy #: PM2-522, approved 04/09/2025, under IV. Procedure, 2. Provider order is required for initiation of observation. 2. Review of Patient 1’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the Emergency Room (ER) on 04/19/2025 and the patient was placed on 1:1 observation by nursing at 1:45 p.m. b. Medical record lacked documentation of a provider order for 1:1 observation. 3. Review of Patient 6’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the ER on 04/14/2025 and the patient was placed on 1:1 observation by nursing at 5:00 p.m. b. Medical record lacked documentation of a provider order for 1:1 observation. 4. Review of Patient 7’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the ER on 04/12/025 and the patient was placed on 1:1 observation by nursing at 12:07 a.m. b. Medical record lacked documentation of a provider order for 1:1 observation. 5. Review of Patient 8’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the ER on 04/30/25 and the patient was placed on 1:1 observation by nursing at 2:30 p.m. b. Medical record lacked documentation of provider order for 1:1 observation. 6. Review of Patient 10’s medical record indicated the following: a. The patient presented to the ER on 04/25/25 for suicidal ideations and the patient was placed on 1:1 observation by nursing at 10:45 p.m. b. Medical record lacked documentation of provider order for 1:1 observation. 7. Interview with A3 (Senior Director of Nursing) on 05/08/2025 at approximately 10:40 a.m. confirmed that patients 1, 6, 7, 8, and 10’s MR lacked documentation of the provider order for 1:1 observation.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 6, 2025: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting for 1 of 10 patient (Patient 2) medical records reviewed. The cumulative effect of this systemic problem resulted in the facility’s inability to ensure that Patient Rights were promoted.”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting for 1 of 10 patient (Patient 2) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility Policy titled, Patient Bill of Rights, Policy #149, last approved 10/01/2024, indicated under V. Procedure, Patient Bill of Rights address the following: 6. The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. 2. Review of Patient 2’s medical record on 11/22/2024 at 11:48 a.m. in the provider note, patient 2 reported wakening to find another patient in their room naked from the waist down and a possible assault. 3. Review of Patient 3’s medical record on 11/22/2024 at 5:40 a.m. indicated patient was found in another patient’s room naked from the waist down attempting to sexually assault patient. 4. Review of Incident Report dated 11/22/2024 indicated the following: a. S2 (Security Associate) falsified charting in 15-minute observation checks in patient 2’s medical record. The 15-minute observation checks were not completed as documented during the time of the incident. b. Video surveillance indicated patient 3 went into patient 2’s room and was in patient 2’s room for approximately 20 minutes before staff found patient 3 assaulting patient 2. 5. Interview with A2 (Director of Nursing Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Urgent Care) and A6 (Clinical Manager of Adult Psychiatric Unit) on 01/02/2025 at approximately 4:00 p.m. confirmed the above information related to the assault on patient 2 on 11/22/2024.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 465 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to monitor patient resulting in an assault for 1 of 10 patient (Patient 2) medical records reviewed; and failed to obtain and/or document 1:1 observation orders for 1 of 10 patient (Patient 3) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Facility Policy titled, Patient Observation Levels, Policy #: PM2 - 522, last approved 06/30/2022, indicated under III. Procedure, 1. Physician order may be placed for 1:1, eye sight, or Q15 observation level for patients that present with but not limited to: Suicidal Ideation with or without a plan (*NOTE: please refer to policies Suicide identification and management and Psychiatric services policy Suicide Risk assessment reassessment observation and interventions for psychiatric patients and Assault Precautions Policy), Exit seeking behaviors, Aggressive behaviors, Acute confusion, High fall risk. NOTE: An RN can initiate an observation level order but only a physician can discontinue or decrease an order. 2. Review of Patient 2’s medical record on 11/22/2024 at 11:48 a.m. in the provider note, patient 2 reported wakening to find another patient in their room naked from the waist down and a possible assault. 3. Review of Patient 3’s medical record indicated the following: a. On 11/22/2024 at 5:40 a.m. indicated patient was found in another patient’s room naked from the waist down attempting to sexually assault patient. b. Medical record lacked order for 1:1 observation. c. Nursing note on 11/22/2024 at 7:19 a.m. indicated patient was on 1:1 observation. d. Provider note on 11/23/2024 indicated to continue 1:1 supervision with sitter for patient’s safety. 4. Review of Incident Report dated 11/22/2024 indicated the following: a. S2 (Security Associate) falsified charting in 15-minute observation checks in patient 2’s medical record. The 15-minute observation checks were not completed as documented during the time of the incident. b. Video surveillance indicated patient 3 went into patient 2’s room and was in patient 2’s room for approximately 20 minutes before staff found patient 3 assaulting patient 2. 5. Interview with A2 (Director of Nursing Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Urgent Care) on 01/02/2025 at approximately 11:35 a.m. confirmed in interview with S2, S2 confirmed they falsified the documenation regarding the 15-minute observation checks for patient 2 during the time of the incident, the 15-minute checks were not completed, and patient 2 was assaulted during this time. 6. A6 (Clinical Manager of Adult Psychiatric Unit) on 01/02/2025 at approximately 2:30 p.m. indicated nursing can initiate an order for observation levels and communicate with the provider. The medical record orders should reflect the 1:1 order and patient 3’s medical record did not have an order for 1:1 observation.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Form And Retention Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 215 words

    “FORM AND RETENTION OF RECORDS CFR(s): 482.24(b) The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentication and protects the security of all record entries. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48704 Based on document review and interview, facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in 1 of 10 patient (Patient 2) medical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Patient 2’s medical record indicated on 11/22/2024 15-minute observation checks were completed as ordered between 5:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. 2. Review of Incident Report dated 11/22/2024 indicated S2 (Security Associate) indicated staff falsified 15-minute observation check documentation in patient 2’s medical record and the 15-minute checks were not completed as documented during the time of the incident. Video surveillance indicated patient 3 was in patient 2’s room for approximately 20 minutes before staff entered patient 2’s room. 3. Interview with A2 (Director of Nursing Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Urgent Care) and on 01/02/2025 at approximately 11:35 a.m. confirmed S2 during the investigation indicated they did not complete the 15-minute checks as ordered and documented that they were completed.”

    Rule A0438. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 8, 2025Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited
Jan 6, 2025Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited
Jan 11, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 2 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 2 worse of 8; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,328 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 65% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.5%, heart failure 13.8%, pneumonia 17%, COPD 8.6%, stroke 16.2%, heart bypass surgery 2.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.9%, heart failure 21.9%, pneumonia 16.9%, COPD 19%, heart bypass surgery 9.8%, hip or knee replacement 7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 171 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 62% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.99 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care (ACHC), whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 20 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 93% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc. runs it.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Paul Lingle (corporate officer, 100%); Robin Henry (corporate officer, 100%); Denise Retz (corporate officer, 100%); Heather Wierzbins-Cross (corporate officer); Samuel W Iden (corporate officer); Brett Guiley (corporate officer); James Tanner (corporate officer); Morgan Howard (corporate officer); Annuradha Bhandari (corporate officer); Bonita Washington-Lacey (corporate officer); Thomas Hilkert (corporate officer); John Edward Mcginty (corporate officer, 0%); Garry Kleer (corporate officer); Mark Harrington (corporate officer); Benjamin Wells (corporate director); Benjamin Wells (managing employee (on the payroll)); Benjamin Wells (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brad Collins (corporate officer); Aleasia Stewart (corporate officer); John Jones (corporate officer); John Henderson (corporate officer); Jordan D Raynor (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Reid Hospital & Health Care Services Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Dec 2, 1966

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Wayne County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Richmond State HospitalNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.