Union Hospital Inc.
An acute care hospital in Terre Haute, Indiana 47804
1606 N Seventh St, Terre Haute, Indiana 47804. (812) 238-7606.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 318 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 11, 2026: a complaint inspection.
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 3 of them at condition level, the most serious.
3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 7, 2026: complaint inspection6 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation for consent to treat by a health care representative of an altered mental status patient in 1 of 10 MRs (Medical Records) reviewed (P5); and failed to renew restraint orders every calendar day for 1 of 10 MRs reviewed (P4). The cumulative effect of this systemic problem resulted in the facility’s inability to ensure that Patient Rights were promoted.”
-
Nursing Services
The inspectors’ words, 134 words
“NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview nursing services failed to inform a patients family of patient surgery and provide education regarding the procedure, risks, benefits, or alternatives and failed to document daily skin assessments of wounds for 1 of 10 MRs (Medical Records) reviewed (P4); and failed to ensure other departments involved in a patient’s care were included in an incident report for follow up of skin tears in 1 of 3 incident reports reviewed (P4). The cumulative effect of these systemic problem resulted in the facility’s inability to provide nursing care in a safe manner.”
-
Patient Rights: Informed Consent
The inspectors’ words, 302 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: INFORMED CONSENT CFR(s): 482.13(b)(2) The patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law) has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care. The patient’s rights include being informed of his or her health status, being involved in care planning and treatment, and being able to request or refuse treatment. This right must not be construed as a mechanism to demand the provision of treatment or services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation for consent to treat by a health care representative of an altered mental status patient in 1 of 10 MRs (Medical Records) reviewed. (P5) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Consents, 348, PolicyStat ID: 17995423, Last Revised 4/2025, Page 1, under Purpose: To obtain written permission for treatment/procedure. Page 2, under Special Instructions: 1. Consent forms must be filled out completely prior to obtaining a signature. Page 3, 10. Persons authorized to consent for incapable parties: 3. An adult child. 2. Review of P5 MR indicated: a. P5 presented to Facility on 4/15/26 at 1151 hours with altered mental status. b. Consent to Treatment and Financial Responsibility for P5 on 4/15/26 indicated P5 had an altered mental status and gave verbal consent to treat. 3. In interview on 5/7/26 at 0925 hours with A5 (Director Clinical Education), he/she confirmed the consent for treatment form indicated P5 had an altered mental status and gave verbal consent to treat to the F1 staff. 4. In interview on 5/7/26 at 1130 hours with A7 (Director Patient Access), he/she confirmed that the Consent for Treatment form for P5 on 4/15/26 was filled out incorrectly. A patient with altered mental status cannot give verbal consent for treatment.”
-
Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion
The inspectors’ words, 187 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(8) [Unless superseded by State law that is more restrictive,] (iii) Each order for restraint used to ensure the physical safety of the non-violent or non-self-destructive patient may be renewed as authorized by hospital policy. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview facility failed to renew restraint orders every calendar day for 1 of 10 MRs (Medical Records reviewed. (P4) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Restraints, 4128, PolicyStat ID: 20211910, Last Revised: 03/2026, Page 9, under C. Use of Physical Restraints for Non-Violent Behavior, 2. ACHC 15.02.11 Obtain/Provide for a Non-Violent Restraint Order: c. Non-violent restraints require a new order each calendar day. 2. Review of P4 MR indicated: a. On 2/28/26 at 1430 hours soft restraints were ordered for P4 for non-violent behavior and were discontinued on 3/3/26 at 0100 hours. b. MR lacked documentation of a new restraint order on 3/1/26 per policy. 3. In interview on 5/7/26 at 0925 hours with A5 (Director Clinical Education), he/she confirmed P4 MR lacked documentation of an order for non-violent restraints on 3/1/26.”
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 399 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview nursing services failed to inform a patients family of patient surgery and provide education regarding the procedure, risks, benefits, or alternatives and failed to document daily skin assessments of wounds for 1 of 10 MRs (Medical Records) reviewed. (P4) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Consents, 348, PolicyStat ID: 17995423, Last Revised 4/2025, Page 1, under Purpose: To inform the patient/patient’s family/significant other concerning procedures/surgery and answer any questions. To provide education to patient/family/significant other concerning the procedure and any risks, benefits, and alternatives by the provider. 2. Facility policy titled Documentation and Assessment Guidelines, 3095, PolicyStat ID: 19943337, Last Revised 2/2026, Page 7, under Daily assessment and Care Guidelines: h. Complete an assessment of the integumentary system, including by but not excluding description of an anomaly, defining characteristics, type of tissue in wound bed, exudate, condition of surrounding skin and any interventions in place to prevent pressure ulcers and other types of skin breakdown. 3. Review of P4 MR indicated: a. On 2/28/26 at 1245 hours Operative Note indicated P4 underwent an exploratory laparotomy, incarcerated ventral hernia repair, 4 cm (centimeter) lysis of adhesions, with release of small bowel obstruction, small bowel resection with anastomosis. b. MR lacked documentation P4’s family was notified of P4’s surgery prior to the procedure on 2/28/26. c. MR lacked documentation of initial assessment of skin tears to the base of P4’s left thumb and left medial wrist on 2/28/26. d. MR lacked documentation of skin tears to base of P4’s base of left thumb and left medial wrist from 2/28/26 through 3/3/26. 4. Review of facility Incident Reports form indicated the following incident involving P4: a. On 2/28/26 incident report indicated P4 was found to have a skin tear to the base of his/her left thumb and medial left wrist in PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit). 5. In interview on 5/7/26 at 0925 hours with A5 (Director Clinical Education), he/she confirmed P4 MR lacked documentation of daily skin care assessments to include skin tears to P4’s base of left thumb and medial left wrist from 2/28/26 through 3/3/26. A5 also confirmed P4 MR lacked documentation of P4’s family being notified P4 was going to surgery on 2/28/26,”
-
Supervision Of Contract Staff
The inspectors’ words, 312 words
“SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50584 Based on document review and interview, facility failed to ensure other departments involved in a patient’s care were included in an incident report for follow up of skin tears in 1 of 3 incident reports reviewed. (P4) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled Patient/Visitor Incident, Adverse Event, Good Catch (Near Miss) Reporting, 330, PolicyStat ID: 20504384, Effective: 05/2026, Page 2, under Procedure: 3. It is the responsibility of the involved supervisor/manager/director to review the report for completion and to take any necessary actions. Actions may include but are not limited to the following: d. Ensure other departments/locations involved are included in report for necessary follow up. 2. Review of P4 MR indicated: a. MR lacked documentation of skin tears to base of P4’s left thumb and left medial wrist from 2/28/26 through 3/3/26. 3. Review of facility Incident Reports from 11/6/25 through 5/6/26 indicated the following incident regarding P4: a. On 2/28/26 incident report indicated P4 was found to have a skin tear to the base of his/her left thumb and medial left wrist in PACU. b. Incident lacked documentation to other departments involved in P4s care to ensure follow up of skin tears. 4. In interview on 5/7/26 at 0918 hours with A1 (Director of Quality), he/she confirmed the incident report on 2/28/26 involving P4 did not include notification to the ICU (Intensive Care Unit) to follow up on wounds.”
Jan 20, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights: Notice Of Grievance Decision
The inspectors’ words, 307 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: NOTICE OF GRIEVANCE DECISION CFR(s): 482.13(a)(2)(iii) At a minimum: In its resolution of the grievance, the hospital must provide the patient with written notice of its decision that contains the name of the hospital contact person, the steps taken on behalf of the patient to investigate the grievance, the results of the grievance process, and the date of completion. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review, the facility failed to provide a patient/patient family, a written response from grievance submitted to facility in one instance. (P1) Findings include: 1. Review of the Policy titled “Patient Grievance/ Complaint Procedure, 340”, PolicyStat ID: 18398064, last revised 08/2025, indicated to provide a mechanism by which a patient or patient’s representative will be able to voice complaints regarding the quality of care or services received or a premature discharge. Procedure 8. F1 will address the substance of each patient grievance through the patient/complaint process as soon as possible. In any case, a written response will be provided to the patient or patient representative within seven (7) days from the date of receipt of a Patient Grievance. 2. Review of a grievance form titled “Complaint and Grievance Report” related to patient P1 on 01/20/26, indicated a grievance was received on 09/18/2025 from P1 family regarding quality of care, P1 was restrained in bed with food tray sitting open on bedside table and was cold. Grievance indicated that the nurse manager was notified of this incident on 09/18/2025. Report lacked any correspondence verbal or written was given to the complainant post investigation of the grievance. 3. In interview with A1 (Quality Manager) on 01/20/2026 at 1445 hours confirmed that the complaint/grievance record did not reflect that P1 family had any written and/or verbal response following the complaint/grievance that was received on 09/18/2025 from P1 family.”
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 400 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that meal intake/meal percentage was recorded for 2 (P1 and P2) of 10 patients medical record (MR) reviewed. Findings include: 1. Policy titled “Documentation and Assessment Guidelines”, PolicyStat ID: 19530238, last revised 12/2025, indicated provides standards to guide documentation for inpatients of all ages. Daily Assessment and Care Guidelines: 3. Intake and output will be completed every 4 (four) hours, unless ordered more frequently by a physician. Measure and record all sources of intake and output, including meals, on all patients with an order for intake and output, or as appropriate. 2. Review of patient P1 MR indicated the patient was admitted to F1 (Acute Care Hospital) on 09/11/2025 with a diagnosis of declining mental status. MR review indicated P1 was ordered a regular diet on 09/11/2025. Review of P1 Nutritional Service Flowsheet indicated recorded meal consumption of having 7 (seven) documented meal intakes during his/her stay 09/11/2025 through 09/16/2025. Lacked documentation of 12 (twelve) recorded oral meal intake. Review of nutrition service flowsheet for 09/17/2025 through 09/19/2025 while P1 had non-violent restraints applied lacked documentation meal intakes. Unable to verify that P1 had been offered or helped with meals during his/her stay. 3. Review of patient P2, medical record (MR) indicated the patient was admitted to F1 on 09/12/2025 with a diagnosis of altered mental status. He/She was placed in non-violent restraints from dates 09/15/2025 at 0025 hours and removed on 09/15/2025 at 1530 hours. P2 was back in non-violent restraints on 09/17/2025 until 09/19/2025. Review on MR indicated P2 had an ordered diet of a dysphasia diet with bite size level 6. Review of P2 Nutrition Service Flowsheet indicated documentation of P2 having 15 (fifteen) documented meal intakes during his/her stay 09/12/2025 through 09/19/2025. Lacked documentation of 9 (nine) recorded meal intakes. P2 was discharged from F1 on 09/19/2025. 4. In interview on 01/20/2025, at approximately 1150 hours with N10 (Patient Care Technician) confirmed that we are supposed to chart meal intakes on all patients. 5. In an interview on 01/20/2025, beginning at approximately 1450 hours, A4 (Quality Specialist) indicated that she/he could not obtain any more oral meal intake recorded for P1 and P2 from MR reviewed.”
Mar 13, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Nursing Services
“NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review and interview, the registered nurse failed to ensure patients medication was given as ordered by the physician for 1 of 11 patient’s (P#2). See Tag A0405 The cumulative effect of this deficient practice prevented the facility from providing a safe environment by the nursing staff.”
-
Administration Of Drugs
The inspectors’ words, 447 words
“ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44532 Based on document review and interview, the registered nurse failed to ensure patients medication was given as ordered by the physician for 1 of 11 patients (P#2). Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled “Medication and Intravenous Therapy Administration Documentation (D), 3075”, PolicyStat ID: 12583523, last revised 06/2022 indicated the purpose to provide an accurate daily permanent record of medication and intravenous therapy administration, medications are documented by using bedside computer documentation with barcoding. Page 2. 4. Administer medications utilizing 5 rights. a. Right Patient b. Right Medication c. Right dose d. Right time e. Right route Page 3. 1. Medications may have one or both of the following barcodes: b. Scanning the patient’s armband will verify the patient. Scanning the manufacturer barcode will verify the correct medication, as an error could occur in the process of pharmacy labeling. If the medication barcode will not scan, contact pharmacy. 2. Review of medical record for P#2 medical indicated the patient had a order written on 01/01/2024 at 0453 for norepinephrine additive 8 mg (milligram) plus sodium chloride 250 ml (milliliter), Intravenous (IV). The MR indicated that norepinephrine was administered to P#2 on 01/01/2024 at 0512 hours. 3. Review of the Override Medication Scan Reason Report dated 01/01/2024 indicated when attempting to administer P#2 medications, the medication that was scanned by N2 (Registered Nurse) with the barcode was nicardipine 50 mg and sodium chloride 0.9% 250 ml on 01/01/2024 at 0512 hours producing an error code. N2 overrode this error message by selecting norepinephrine from the P#2 ordered medication list on the computer screen. N2 proceeded by administering the incorrect medication without a provider’s order. 4. Interview on 03/13/2024 with A1 (Chief Nursing Officer) at 0915 hours, confirmed that the facility failed to administer the correct medication as ordered (Norepinephrine) and the incorrect medication (Nicardipine) was administered to P#2.”
All 6 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 16, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 2, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| May 7, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Mar 13, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 2 better and 2 worse of 11.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (958 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), better than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.7%, heart failure 12.6%, pneumonia 17.3%, COPD 9.3%, stroke 13.3%, heart bypass surgery 2.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.1%, heart failure 24%, pneumonia 19.6%, COPD 20.6%, heart bypass surgery 11.5%, hip or knee replacement 6.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 183 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.01 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care (ACHC), whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 27 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 97% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Union Hospital Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 1966.
- 18 owners or officers are people: John Aidoo (corporate director, 0%); Mary Doti (corporate director, 0%); Tim Sullivan (corporate director, 0%); Robert A Coons (corporate officer, 0%); Robert A Coons (corporate director, 0%); John C Etling (corporate director, 0%); Kenneth M Kigorwe (corporate director, 0%); Luke Terry (corporate officer, 0%); Luke Terry (corporate director, 0%); Kathleen D Coutinho (corporate director, 0%); Donald T Scott (corporate officer, 0%); Donald T Scott (corporate director, 0%); Steven M Holman (corporate officer, 0%); Steven M Holman (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Richard Templeton (corporate director, 0%); Sara D Smith (corporate officer, 0%); Sara D Smith (corporate director, 0%); Molly A Callahan (corporate director, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Hospital Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jan 1, 1966 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 hospitals CMS lists in Vigo County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Hamilton Center Inc. | Not given |
| Terre Haute Regional Hospital | 2 |
| Harsha Behavioral Center Inc. | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.