OSF Saint Clare Medical Center
A critical access hospital in Princeton, Illinois 61356
530 Park Avenue East, Princeton, Illinois 61356. (815) 875-2811.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 20 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 25 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 10, 2025: a standard inspection.
20 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
20 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 10, 2025: standard inspection14 deficiencies
-
Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“The Life Safety Code portion of a Recertification Survey was conducted on March 10, 2025. The surveyor was accompanied during the document review and the survey walk-through by: The Facility Supervisor (FS) The Safety Officer (SO) The Facility consists of the following: The Main Hospital building is three-story with a basement plus penthouses and dates from 1968. Single-story (some with basements) additions were completed in 1976, 1985, 1995, 2002, and 2006. An adjacent four-story-plus-penthouse Medical Office Building (MOB) also exists which was constructed in 1978 and is separated by a 2-hour fire resistant separation. The Main Hospital was surveyed as a single building. The Main Hospital’s original building was observed to be cast-in-place concrete of Type I (332) construction type. The Hospital additions and the MOB were observed to be protected steel frame construction also indicated to be of Type I (332) construction type. The Main Hospital, the Medical Office Building and the 1960 buildings are not fully sprinkler protected. The facility was surveyed as an Existing Healthcare and Business occupancy under the 2012 Edition of NFPA 101 Life Safety Code including Chapter 19 and Chapter 39. Unless otherwise noted, those code sections listed herein that do not include a reference to a specific NFPA code and year of issue (such as NFPA 70 2011) are taken from the 2012 Edition of the NFPA 101 Life Safety Code. Unless otherwise noted, all deficiencies cited herein were found through direct observation during the survey walk-through, staff interview, or document review. The requirements of 42 CFR Subpart 485.623, Physical Plant and Environment, are NOT MET as evidenced by the deficiencies cited under the following K-Tags.”
-
Doors With Self-Closing Devices
The inspectors’ words, 233 words
“Doors with Self-Closing Devices CFR(s): NFPA 101 Doors with Self-Closing Devices Doors in an exit passageway, stairway enclosure, or horizontal exit, smoke barrier, or hazardous area enclosure are self-closing and kept in the closed position, unless held open by a release device complying with 7.2.1.8.2 that automatically closes all such doors throughout the smoke compartment or entire facility upon activation of: * Required manual fire alarm system; and * Local smoke detectors designed to detect smoke passing through the opening or a required smoke detection system; and * Automatic sprinkler system, if installed; and * Loss of power. 18.2.2.2.7, 18.2.2.2.8, 19.2.2.2.7, 19.2.2.2.8 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based an observations, not all exit doors required to be self closing are installed or maintained to permit egress and provide protection of the exit enclosure. This deficiency could affect patients, staff and visitors if the exit access door did not provide the proper protection during a fire emergency. The finding is: On 03/10/25 at 10:10 am while accompanied by the FS it was determined that not all exit components are provided with elements that maintain the fire resistant rating of the enclosure. Exit stair door hardware components did not provide a self closing assembly. This does not comply with the requirements of 19.3.1. 19.3.6.3.11 Location obsetved: Exit door at the top of Stair #1 (used as an exit from the Penthouse).”
-
Stairways And Smokeproof Enclosures
The inspectors’ words, 160 words
“Stairways and Smokeproof Enclosures CFR(s): NFPA 101 Stairways and Smokeproof Enclosures Stairways and Smokeproof enclosures used as exits are in accordance with 7.2. 18.2.2.3, 18.2.2.4, 19.2.2.3, 19.2.2.4, 7.2 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all stairs or smokeproof enclosures are constructed and maintained as required including stair components within the stair enclosure. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because their egress from the building could be impeded if the stairs and smokeproof enclosures are not properly constructed and maintained. The finding is: At 11:20 am while in the company of the FS it was observed that the exit stair #S2203 also known as stair #3 lacked guards to prevent a 4” sphere from passing through the guard rail (or 6” sphere at the riser/tread triangle) to comply with 19.2.2.3, 7.1.8, 7.2.2.4 and 7.2.2.4.5.3. The exit stair is considered a means of egress for Second through Ground levels.”
-
Emergency Lighting
The inspectors’ words, 291 words
“Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Emergency Lighting Emergency lighting of at least 1-1/2-hour duration is provided automatically in accordance with 7.9. 18.2.9.1, 19.2.9.1 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, battery powered emergency lighting system is not maintained in accordance with Code requirements. Failure to properly perform maintenance activities can result in failure of the lighting system affecting patients, staff, and visitors. Findings include: A. On 3/10/2025 at 9:50 a.m. while in the company of the FS. it was observed that a battery powered emergency luminaire was not operational. The units battery appeared to not be charged. There is a switch installed on the unit which was in the off position, this appeared to prohibit the proper functioning of the units battery which is not in compliance with NFPA 70, 2011, 700.20. Location observed: Fourth floor Mechanical room 4002 Based on observation, not all portions of the electrical system are constructed and maintained as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the emergency lighting could fail to operate properly when needed if they are not properly installed. Findings include: B. On 3/10/25 at 11:15 a.m. while in the company of the F.S. it was observed that a battery powered emergency luminaire was supplied from a receptacle not determined to be on a lighting circuit to comply with NFPA 70 2011 700.12(F). Location observed: First floor corridor C1104, across from Operating Room 1105 C. On 3/10/25 at 11:30 a.m. while in the company of the F.S. it was observed that a battery powered emergency luminaire was supplied from a receptacle not determined to be on a lighting circuit to comply with NFPA 99 2012, 6.3.2.2.11.3. Location observed: Operating Room 1105”
-
Exit Signage
The inspectors’ words, 161 words
“Exit Signage CFR(s): NFPA 101 Exit Signage 2012 EXISTING Exit and directional signs are displayed in accordance with 7.10 with continuous illumination also served by the emergency lighting system. 19.2.10.1 (Indicate N/A in one-story existing occupancies with less than 30 occupants where the line of exit travel is obvious.) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based upon observation, exit signs are not provided to identify access to two remote exits from the building. Failure to provide exit signs to correctly identify exit access can prevent occupants from reaching a required exit if the primary exit is blocked by a fire/smoke condition. The finding is: On 03/10/25 at 10:35 am while accompanied by the FS it was observed that corridors lacked proper exit signs to clearly identify access to at least two remote means of egress from the building to comply with 19.2.4.3, 19.2.10 and 7.10. Location observed: Second floor corridor (containing Wound Care Clinic) leading to Stair S3304.”
-
Vertical Openings - Enclosure
The inspectors’ words, 188 words
“Vertical Openings - Enclosure CFR(s): NFPA 101 Vertical Openings - Enclosure 2012 EXISTING Stairways, elevator shafts, light and ventilation shafts, chutes, and other vertical openings between floors are enclosed with construction having a fire resistance rating of at least 1 hour. An atrium may be used in accordance with 8.6. 19.3.1.1 through 19.3.1.6 If all vertical openings are properly enclosed with construction providing at least a 2-hour fire resistance rating, also check this box. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all vertical openings in the building are protected as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because smoke and fire could pass between building stories if vertical openings are not protected. Findings include: On 03/10/25, while accompanied by the FS, observation determined that a water pipe had been installed through the 2 hour fire rated enclosure walls and into the exit stair enclosure, this pipe installation goes through the stair and does not serve the stair which does not comply with 7.1.3.2.1(10). . Locations observed: Lower Level Exit Stair #3 shared wall with Mechanical room”
-
Hazardous Areas - Enclosure
The inspectors’ words, 424 words
“Hazardous Areas - Enclosure CFR(s): NFPA 101 Hazardous Areas - Enclosure Hazardous areas are protected by a fire barrier having 1-hour fire resistance rating (with 3/4 hour fire rated doors) or an automatic fire extinguishing system in accordance with 8.7.1 or 19.3.5.9. When the approved automatic fire extinguishing system option is used, the areas shall be separated from other spaces by smoke resisting partitions and doors in accordance with 8.4. Doors shall be self-closing or automatic-closing and permitted to have nonrated or field-applied protective plates that do not exceed 48 inches from the bottom of the door. Describe the floor and zone locations of hazardous areas that are deficient in REMARKS. 19.3.2.1, 19.3.5.9 Area Automatic Sprinkler Separation N/A a. Boiler and Fuel-Fired Heater Rooms b. Laundries (larger than 100 square feet) c. Repair, Maintenance, and Paint Shops d. Soiled Linen Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) e. Trash Collection Rooms (exceeding 64 gallons) f. Combustible Storage Rooms/Spaces (over 50 square feet) g. Laboratories (if classified as Severe Hazard - see K322) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based upon observation, hazardous areas are not separated from the remainder of the occupancy and the means of egress. Failure to properly separate storage of combustible material (which represents a degree of hazard greater than that normal to the general occupancy due to quantity and density of materials) from required means of egress paths can compromise the safety of occupants if a fire were to originate at the stored material to block exiting. The findings are: A. On 03/10/25 at 10:10 am while in the company of the FS it was observed that a door to storage room contains a closer with a hold open therefore the door is not self closing to comply with 19.3.2.1.3. Location observed : third floor room #342. B. On 03/10/25 at 10:50am while in the company of the FS it was observed that a door to a sprinklered soiled utility room lacks the requirements to maintain a smoke tight installation to comply with 19.3.2.1.2, 8.4 due to containing a 1 inch by 2 inch hole filled with wood putty of unknown materials. Location observed Second floor soiled utility room #2003 near Pharmacy. C. On 03/10/25 at 10:55am while in the company of the FS it was observed that the ceiling within a sprinklered soiled utility room lacks the requirements to maintain a smoke tight installation to comply with 19.3.2.1.2 due to unprotected conduit penetrations and holes within the ceiling tiles. Location observed Second floor soiled utility room #2003 near Pharmacy.”
-
Anesthetizing Locations
The inspectors’ words, 375 words
“Anesthetizing Locations CFR(s): NFPA 101 Anesthetizing Locations Areas designated for administration of general anesthesia (i.e., inhalation anesthetics) are in accordance with 8.7 and NFPA 99. Zone valves are: located immediately outside each life-support, critical care and anesthetizing location of moderate sedation, deep sedation, or general anesthesia for medical gas or vacuum; readily accessible in an emergency; and arranged so shutting off any one anesthetizing location will not affect others. Area alarm panels are provided to monitor all medical gas, medical-surgical vacuum, and piped WAGD systems. Panels are at locations that provide for surveillance, indicate medical gas pressure decreases of 20 percent and vacuum decreases of 12 inch gauge HgV, and provide visual and audible indication. Alarm sensors are installed either on the source side of individual room zone valve box assemblies or on the patient/use side of each of the individual zone box valve assemblies. The EES critical branch supplies power for task illumination, fixed equipment, select receptacles, and select power circuits, and EES equipment system supplies power to ventilation system. Heating, cooling, and ventilation are in accordance with ASHRAE 170. Medical supply and equipment manufacturer’s instructions for use are considered before reducing humidity levels to those allowed by ASHRAE, per S&C 13-58. 19.3.2.3 (LSC) 5.1.4.8.7, 5.1.4.8.7.2, 5.1.9.3, 5.1.9.3.4, 6.4.2.2.4.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, the facility failed to install and maintain its piped medical gas system as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the piped medical gas system could fail to operate when needed if not properly installed and maintained. The finding is: On 03/10/25while in the company of the FS it was observed that medical gas shut off valves for any critical care, life support and anesthetizing location also served other locations. This is not in accordance with NFPA 99-2012, 5.3.6.19.3 Locations observed: 1. At 11:46am third floor med/surg patient rooms medgas outlets and the medgas outlets in the Special Procedure rooms (which was a remodeled area not part of original building) share the same shutoff valves. 2. At 11:16am second floor med/surg patient rooms #201-#214 medgas outlets and the medgas outlets in the Intensive Care rooms #259, #267 and #268 share the same shutoff valves.”
-
Corridors - Areas Open To Corridor
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Corridors - Areas Open to Corridor CFR(s): NFPA 101 Corridors - Areas Open to Corridor Spaces (other than patient sleeping rooms, treatment rooms and hazardous areas), waiting areas, nurse’s stations, gift shops, and cooking facilities, open to the corridor are in accordance with the criteria under 18.3.6.1 and 19.3.6.1. 18.3.6.1, 19.3.6.1 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all spaces open to exit access corridors are protected in accordance with Code requirements. Failure to provide protective features can compromise the use of corridors during a fire condition. Findings include: On 03/10/25 at 10:50 am while in the company of the FS areas open to the corridor were observed, that lacked smoke detection or continuous supervision to comply with 19.3.6.1. Through staff interview it was determined that the door to this room remains in the open position at all times. Location observed: ICU Waiting room”
-
Gas And Vacuum Piped Systems - Information An
The inspectors’ words, 230 words
“Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Information an CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas and Vacuum Piped Systems - Information and Warning Signs Piping is labeled by stencil or adhesive markers identifying the gas or vacuum system, including the name of system or chemical symbol, color code (Table 5.1.11), and operating pressure if other than standard. Labels are at intervals not more than 20 feet, are in every room, at both sides of wall penetrations, and on every story traversed by riser. Piping is not painted. Shutoff valves are identified with the name or chemical symbol of the gas or vacuum system, room or area served, and caution to not use the valve except in emergency. 5.1.14.3, 5.1.11.1, 5.1.11.2, 5.2.11, 5.3.13.3, 5.3.11 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, the facility failed to install and maintain its piped medical gas system as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the piped medical gas system could fail to operate when needed if not properly installed and maintained. The finding is: On 03/10/25 At 11:20am while in the company of the FS it was observed that medical gas outlets for vacuum are present within the ICU however gas zone valves serving these outlets could not be located. This is not in accordance with NFPA 99-2012, 5.1.4.8.4 Location observed Second floor”
-
Electrical Systems - Other
The inspectors’ words, 248 words
“Electrical Systems - Other CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Other List in the REMARKS section any NFPA 99 Chapter 6 Electrical Systems requirements that are not addressed by the provided K-Tags, but are deficient. This information, along with the applicable Life Safety Code or NFPA standard citation, should be included on Form CMS-2567. Chapter 6 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation during survey walk through, egress from the working space around electrical equipment is not maintained in accordance with Code requirements. This deficiency could affect staff and visitors in the event of an electrical equipment failure. Findings include: A. On 3/10/25 at 1:00 p.m. while in the company of the FS. it was observed that doors intended for entrance to and egress from electric rooms G210A and G210B were not equipped with hardware that releases with simple pressure, therefore not in compliance with NFPA 70 2011, 110.26(C)(3). Based on direct observation during survey walk through, not all portions of the electrical system are constructed in accordance with Code requirements. This deficiency could affect patients and staff in the event of electrical equipment failure during a procedure. Findings include: B. On 3/10/25 at 11:45 a.m. while in the company of the F.S. it was observed that the isolated power systems serving rooms did not include a line isolation monitor visible within the room. This condition does not comply with NFPA 99 2012, 6.3.2.6.3.4. Example locations Operating rooms 1107 and 1109”
-
Electrical Systems - Receptacles
The inspectors’ words, 221 words
“Electrical Systems - Receptacles CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Receptacles Power receptacles have at least one, separate, highly dependable grounding pole capable of maintaining low-contact resistance with its mating plug. In pediatric locations, receptacles in patient rooms, bathrooms, play rooms, and activity rooms, other than nurseries, are listed tamper-resistant or employ a listed cover. If used in patient care room, ground-fault circuit interrupters (GFCI) are listed. 6.3.2.2.6.2 (F), 6.3.2.2.4.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all portions of the electrical system are constructed and maintained as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the electrical systems could fail to operate properly when needed if they are not properly installed. Findings include: A. On 03/10/2025 at 9:45 a.m. while in the company of the F.S. it was observed that receptacles installed in the fourth floor elevator machine room were not equipped with G.F.C.I. protection for personnel. This condition does not comply with NFPA 70, 2011, 620.55. B. On 3/10/2025 at 10:55 a.m. while in the company of the F.M. it was observed that receptacles located in the second floor Pharmacy room 2006 were labeled as being supplied from the equipment branch of the essential electrical system which does not comply with NFPA 99 2012, 6.4.2.2.5”
-
Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste
The inspectors’ words, 238 words
“Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Receptacles Electrical receptacles or cover plates supplied from the life safety and critical branches have a distinctive color or marking. 6.4.2.2.6, 6.5.2.2.4.2, 6.6.2.2.3.2 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all portions of the essential electrical system are constructed and maintained as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the electrical systems could fail to operate properly when needed if they are not properly installed. Findings include: A. On 03/10/25 while in the company of the FS the surveyor observed branch circuit panels installed not marked to identify the device or equipment where the power supply originates. The labeling convention could not be determined to identify and locate the panel and circuit from which the receptacle was fed. therefore this does not comply with NFPA 70 2011, 408.4(B) 517.30 (C). Example locations: 1. At 10:25 am Third floor Endo Procedure rooms, Recovery rooms 2. At 11:20 am Second floor ICU 3. At 11:36 am Second floor Surgery area B. On 3/10/25 at 9:42 while in the company of the F.S., inside the fourth floor elevator machine room it was observed that lighting for the elevator cars is not supplied by the Life Safety branch of the Essential Electrical System, therefore not in compliance with NFPA 99 2012, 6.4.2.2.3.”
-
Electrical Equipment - Other
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Electrical Equipment - Other CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Equipment - Other List in the REMARKS section any NFPA 99 Chapter 10, Electrical Equipment, requirements that are not addressed by the provided K-Tags, but are deficient. This information, along with the applicable Life Safety Code or NFPA standard citation, should be included on Form CMS-2567. Chapter 10 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation, not all portions of the electrical system are constructed and maintained as required. This deficient practice could affect patients, staff, and visitors in the building because the electrical systems could fail to operate properly when needed if they are not properly installed. Findings include: On 3/10/25 at 9:40 a.m. while in the company of the FS. it was observed that an externally operable disconnecting means for elevator car lighting has not been provided in the fourth floor elevator machine room, therefore not in compliance with NFPA 70 2011, 620.53.”
Feb 27, 2025: standard inspection5 deficiencies
-
Physical Plant And Environment
“PHYSICAL PLANT AND ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): §485.623 Condition of Participation: Physical Plant and Environment This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation during the survey walk-through, staff interview, and document review during the Life Safety portion of a Critical Access Hospital Recertification Survey conducted on March 10, 2025, the surveyor finds that the facility failed to provide and maintain a safe environment for patients and staff. This is evidenced by the number, severity, and variety of Life Safety Code deficiencies that were found. Also see C930.”
-
Drug And Biologicals
The inspectors’ words, 221 words
“DRUG AND BIOLOGICALS CFR(s): Drugs and biologicals commonly used in life-saving procedures, including analgesics, local anesthetics, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidotes and emetics, serums and toxoids, antiarrythmics, cardiac glycosides, antihypertensives, diuretics, and electrolytes and replacement solutions. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50645 Based on observation, and interview, it was determined that the Facility failed to ensure all patient care supplies was not discarded when they expired. Findings include: 1. A tour of the treatment and storage areas was completed on 2//24/25 between 1:00 PM and 4:00 PM. During the tour, the following supplies were found outdated and were available for patient use. a. Nine 22 Gauge x 3.50-inch Spinal Needles. The manufacturer’s expiration date was 10/2024. b. Two 1.5-liter Jevity Complete Balanced Nutrition with Fiber. The manufacturer’s expiration date was 12/2024. c. Twenty packets of Sterile Aquasonic ultrasound transmission gel 20 grams. The manufacturer’s expiration date was 11/2023. 2. On 2/24/25 at approximately 2:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Quality and Safety Coordinator (E #2). E #2 verbally agreed the supplies were expired and the expired supplies were removed from the treatment area. 3. On 2/24/25 at approximately 3:00 PM an interview was conducted with the Chef manager (E #9). E #9 verbally agreed the supplies were expired and the expired supplies were removed from the kitchen/dietary area.”
-
Maintenance
The inspectors’ words, 254 words
“MAINTENANCE CFR(s): The CAH has housekeeping and preventive maintenance programs to ensure that-- (1) All essential mechanical, electrical, and patient-care equipment is maintained in safe operating condition; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49555 Based on observation, document review and interview, it was determined for 1 of 1 Radiology Temperature log, the Hospital failed to ensure that all mechanical, electrical, and patient-care equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. Findings include: 1. During an observational tour of the CAH on 2/24/25 at approximately 2:30 PM, the “Radiology Temperature Log” was observed to have checklists to monitor the temperature of the CT (Computed Tomography) Refrigerator Contrast, CT Refrigerator Water, and Blanket Warmer each day. The following checklists were not completed: a) For the month of December 2024, 20 days (12/11, 12/12, and 12/14-12/31/24) lacked documentation of the temperatures being checked. b) For the month of January 2025, 31 days (1/1-1/31/25) lacked documentation of the temperatures being checked. c) No log observed for the month of February 2025. 2. An interview was conducted during the observational tour with Radiology Manager (E #15) on 2/24/25 at approximately 2:45 PM. E #15 reviewed the Radiology Temperature Log and verbally agreed the daily checklist had not been completed and should have been. 3. An interview was conducted on 2/27/25 at approximately 10:15 AM with the Quality and Safety Coordinator (E #2). E #2 stated, “Although we do not have a policy regarding monitoring the temperatures of the blanket warmers and refrigerators, the logs should have been completed.””
-
Life Safety From Fire
The inspectors’ words, 165 words
“LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 20224 Based on observation during the survey walk-through, staff interview, and document review during the Life Safety portion of a Critical Access Hospital Federal Recertification Survey conducted on March 10, 2025, the surveyor finds that the facility does not comply with the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the NFPA 101 Life Safety Code. See the Life Safety Code deficiencies identified with K-Tags on the CMS Form 2567, dated March 10, 2025.”
-
Restraint And Seclusion
The inspectors’ words, 203 words
“RESTRAINT AND SECLUSION CFR(s): The CAH must provide patient- centered, trauma informed competency- based training and education of CAH personnel and staff, including medical staff, and, as applicable, personnel providing contracted services in the CAH, on the use of restraint and seclusion. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30383 Based on document review and interview, it was determined for 1 of 2 (E#13 Employee) Physician files reviewed, the hospital failed to ensure the Physician’s ordering non-violent and violent restraints had a working knowledge of the hospital’s policy. Findings include: 1. The policy titled “Restraint and Seclusion Management” was reviewed on 2/26/25. The policy noted “9. Training: a. Physicians... that order and or evaluate for restraints, have working knowledge about the hospital policy for restraint use. Training occurs during orientation and as deemed necessary...” 2. The Physician files were reviewed on 2/26/25 at approximately 10:30 AM. E#13 (Employee-Medical Doctor) file lacked documentation the Physician had working knowledge of the hospital’s restraint/seclusion policy and competence in ordering restraints: 3. During an interview on 2/26/25 at approximately 11:40 AM, the Director of Quality and Safety (E#14) verbally agreed that E#13 personnel file lacked any documentation of violent and/or non violent restraint training and competence.”
Jul 31, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Records System
The inspectors’ words, 252 words
“RECORDS SYSTEM CFR(s): For each patient receiving health care services, the CAH maintains a record that includes, as applicable-- (i) Identification and social data, evidence of properly executed informed consent forms, pertinent medical history, assessment of the health status and health care needs of the patient, and a brief summary of the episode, disposition, and instructions to the patient; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30383 Based on document review and staff interview it was determined for 1 of 3 (Pt #8) medical records reviewed the Hospital failed to follow the policy for consent to treat and failed to ensure consent for treatment was signed by the legal representative for minor patients. This has the potential to affect all patients who receive care by the hospital. Findings include: 1. The policy titled “General Informed Consent to Treat- Minor (effective 5/13/23) was reviewed on 7/31/24. The policy noted “Policy: ...2. Written or verbal consent from parent/ guardian is necessary to provide to a minor if parent/ guardian is unable to accompany minor...” 2. The clinical record of Pt #8 was reviewed on 7/30/24. Pt#8 was admitted on 6/17/24 to the ED with chief complaint of Psychiatric Evaluation. The patient was a minor. The record lacked a written/ verbal consent to treat by parent./ guardian. 3. On 7/31/24 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with E#2 (Quality Safety Regulatory Coordinator) verbally agreed the lack of the consent for treatment from the mother for the consent for treatment for the 6/17/24 admission.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025 | Standard inspection | 14 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 27, 2025 | Standard inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 26, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jul 31, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 2 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 6.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (109 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 11.9%, pneumonia 19.2%, COPD 10.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.8%, pneumonia 18.9%, COPD 19.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 112 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
- 79% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Jul 15, 2004.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - church.
- It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Church.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
- 93% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- OSF Healthcare Ministries runs it.
- 22 owners or officers are people: Patricia A Brazeau (corporate officer); Patricia A Brazeau (corporate director); Anne M Ziegler (corporate director); Melanie R Mann (corporate officer); Melanie R Mann (corporate director); Gerald J Mcshane (corporate director); Kathleen F Williams (corporate officer); Kathleen F Williams (corporate director); Kirsten M Largent (corporate officer); Kirsten M Largent (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kirsten M Largent (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Michelle D Conger (corporate officer); Michelle D Conger (corporate director); Michelle D Conger (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Judith A Duvall (corporate officer); Judith A Duvall (corporate director); Heather J Bomstad (managing employee (on the payroll)); Heather J Bomstad (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brian J Silverstein (corporate director); Paula K Selamat (corporate director); Bridget J Meidl (corporate officer); Bridget J Meidl (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Jul 1, 2021.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Bureau County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.