Hearth Record

Good Samaritan Regional Hlth Center

An acute care hospital in Mount Vernon, Illinois 62864

1 Good Samaritan Way, Mount Vernon, Illinois 62864. (618) 899-2201.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 29, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Informed Consent

    The inspectors’ words, 390 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: INFORMED CONSENT CFR(s): 482.13(b)(2) The patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law) has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care. The patient’s rights include being informed of his or her health status, being involved in care planning and treatment, and being able to request or refuse treatment. This right must not be construed as a mechanism to demand the provision of treatment or services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39025 Based on document review and interview for 1of 10 (Pt#1) clinical records reviewed, the Hospital failed to ensure a consent form was obtained prior to administration of a vaccine. Findings include: 1. Pt #1’s “Order Sheet” documented a standing order for “Hepatitis B vaccine (used to prevent hepatitis B), Peds (pediatric) 10 mcg (microgram) / 0.5 mL (milliliter) (Hepatitis B) 0.5 mL, dated 01/16/26 at 9:18 AM by ordering provider physician (E#12), per protocol.” Pt #1’s record indicated this vaccine was given on 01/27/26 at 5:13 AM. 2. Pt#1’s “Vaccine Administration Record” form was reviewed. The form was not completed and lacked parental signature consenting for the administration of the vaccine. The form had a handwritten zero with a slash through it over the consent area. 3. A policy titled, “Informed Consent” dated revised 02/15/22 was reviewed. It documented, “ ... 4. Either parent of the patient ... II. ... F. Ensure the patient or surrogate decision maker has signed the standardized consent form in the presence of a witness who is an employee of the hospital prior to ...” 4. An interview was conducted on 04/29/26 at 9:45 AM with OB RN (Obstetrics Registered Nurse) (E#11). When asked if E #11 recalled checking for consent prior to administering (Pt #1’s) hepatitis B vaccine, E#11 stated, “I don’t remember. I know now there was no signed consent to give (Pt #1) the hepatitis vaccine.” 5. An interview was conducted on 04/29/26 at 9:50 AM with the Director of Women’s Services (E #5). E #5 stated, “I was not on site the weekend of 01/17/26. It was a month after the fact before I knew of the event. We did conduct an internal investigation. Unfortunately, (E #11) did not look at written consent or verbal consent and does realize it was a mistake.””

    Rule A0131. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 377 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39025 Based on document review and interview, for 1 (Pt#1) of 10 patients reviewed, the Hospital failed to ensure a vaccination was given with consent. Findings Include: 1. Pt#1’s “Order Sheet” documented a standing order for “Hepatitis B vaccine (used to prevent hepatitis B), Peds (pediatric) 10 mcg (microgram) / 0.5 mL (milliliter) (Hepatitis B) 0.5 mL, dated 01/16/26 at 9:18 AM by ordering provider physician (E#12), per protocol.” Pt#1’s record indicated this vaccine was given on 01/27/26 at 5:13 AM. Pt#1’s record lacked a signed consent for administration of the vaccination. 2. A policy titled, “Informed Consent” dated revised 02/15/22 was reviewed. It documented, “ ... 4. Either parent of the patient ... II. ... F. Ensure the patient or surrogate decision maker has signed the standardized consent form in the presence of a witness who is an employee of the hospital prior to ...” 3. An interview was conducted on 04/29/26 at 9:45 AM with OB RN (Obstetrics Registered Nurse - E#11). When asked if E #11 recalled checking for consent prior to administering (Pt#1’s) hepatitis B vaccine, E #11 stated, “I don’t remember. I know now there was no signed consent to give (Pt#1) the hepatitis vaccine.” 4. An interview was conducted on 04/29/26 at 9:50 AM with the Director of Women’s Services (E #5). E #5 stated, “We did conduct an internal investigation. Unfortunately, (E #11) did not look at written consent or verbal consent.””

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 29, 2026Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 0 better and 3 worse of 10.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (538 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 69% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 69% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), worse than the national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.1%, heart failure 11%, pneumonia 16%, COPD 7.4%, stroke 11.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14.6%, heart failure 21.8%, pneumonia 18.2%, COPD 20.3%, hip or knee replacement 5.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 193 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
  • 57% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.98 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 11 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
  • 71% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • SSM Regional Health Services owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2015.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Jeremy Midura (corporate director); Susan Niepoetter (corporate director); Temple Jackson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Paula Friedman (corporate director); Damon R Harbison (corporate officer); Eric Ibendahl (corporate director); Suzie Schmidt (corporate director); Rajendra Shroff (corporate director); Joseph Minerath (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jeremy M Fotheringham (corporate director); Monica Heinzman (corporate director); Matthew Flanigan (corporate officer); Sudeep Nair (corporate director); Timothy Buller (corporate officer); Tena Hoyt (corporate officer); Jean-Benoit Houle (corporate director); Patricia Williams (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
SSM Health Care CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2015
SSM Regional Health ServicesOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 1, 2015

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Jefferson County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Deaconess Illinois CrossroadsNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.