Hearth Record

Wayne County Hospital

A critical access hospital in Corydon, Iowa 50060

417 South East Street, Corydon, Iowa 50060. (641) 872-2260.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 31, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 31, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 1,580 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): A registered nurse or, where permitted by State law, a physician assistant, must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient, including patients at a SNF level of care in a swing-bed CAH. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47335 Based on review of the Critical Access Hospital (CAH)’s policies and procedures, patient medical records, and interviews with staff, the CAH’s administrative staff failed to ensure hospital staff provided appropriate assessments of the patient’s care needs, health status, and response to interventions for 1 of 10 sampled patients (Patient #2). The cumulative effect of these failures and deficient practices increased the risk of Patient #2 (P2) not receiving effective or appropriate treatment to meet the care needs of the patient. Failure to provide appropriate nursing assessments for all patients could increase the risk of patients experiencing adverse health outcomes, including a deterioration in health and well-being. The CAH’s administrative staff identified an average daily inpatient census of 4 patients. Findings include: 1. Review of policy number 8179229, “Nursing Practice Standard for Routine Care, 514,” last revised 7/20, revealed in part: a. “All patients will be provided a basic level of care individualized to meet his/her personal needs based on the assessment done at the time of admission and changes with assessment during the patient’s hospital stay.” b. “Purpose: ...To assess the patient and plan for his/her care ...” c. “ ... The RN [Registered Nurse] will interview patient/responsible party/family member for a complete nursing history and complete a physical assessment of each patient ... This information will be documented in the patient’s medical record ...” d. “ ... The physical assessment will include ...: Baseline complete vital signs ... Complete system review. Complete skin assessment ... Mobility level, assistive devices, restrictions, and risk of falls ...” e. “ ...An entry will be made in the medical record. This entry will include ... Admit status and reason for admission, including diagnosis ..., and assessment findings ...” 2. Review of policy number 18355111, “Hourly Rounding - The 8 P’s of Purposeful Rounding,” last revised 2/23, revealed in part: a. “ ... During rounding, clinical staff will use the 8 P’s: ...Pain-evaluate the patient’s pain level ...” 3. Review of P2’s 2/21/26 medical record revealed the following: a. On 2/21/26 at 11:41 AM, P2 presented to the ED with complaints of back pain. Nursing staff documented the patient rated their pain as 0 out of 10 (with zero being no pain and ten being the worst possible pain). b. On 2/21/26 at 12:22 PM, Provider A evaluated P2. P2 complained of chronic lower back and hip pain with acute flares. Provider A ordered P2 intramuscular (IM) injections of two steroids and a pain medication. c. On 2/21/26 at 12:41 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) G administered two steroid IM injections. d. On 2/21/26 at 1:44 PM, RN G administered an IM injection of pain medication. e. On 2/21/26 at 3:04 PM, staff discharged P2 home. Nursing staff failed to complete follow-up pain assessments, per hospital policy, following the administration of IM injections of pain medication. Additionally, staff failed to perform a pain reassessment prior to the patient’s discharge. f. On 2/21/26 at 4:40 PM, Provider A documented a follow-up with P2. The patient reported the injections of pain medication helped “a little.” Provider A documented P2’s diagnosis as acute bilateral (both sides) hip pain, lumbar pain, and urinary tract infection (UTI). g. On 2/23/26 at 1:28 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) H documented contacting P2’s family member with an arrival time for surgery, and pre-operative (pre-op) teaching was reviewed. RN H noted P2’s presenting symptoms were flank pain. Hospital staff failed to document what surgery P2 was scheduled for or the reason for the surgery. Staff also failed to document anything regarding P2 being notified of having a kidney stone. h. On 2/24/26 at 12:07 PM, P2 arrived at the hospital for the scheduled surgery for a left kidney stone. i. On 2/24/26 at 12:17 PM, Surgery Director documented “surgery case canceled per anesthesia due to abnormal EKG.” j. On 2/24/26 at 1:59 PM, P2’s electrocardiogram (EKG) showed normal sinus rhythm (NSR). k. On 2/24/26 at 2:45 PM, P2 discharged home. Hospital staff failed to perform any assessments, including a pain assessment on P2. Hospital staff failed to provide any cares or treatment to P2. Hospital staff failed to document P2 had an intravenous (IV) catheter inserted for the scheduled surgery. Hospital staff failed to document that P2’s surgery was canceled due to P2 not having a CT that showed a kidney stone. 4. Review of a hospital incident report for P2 revealed: a. On 2/23/26, Provider C reviewed the referral form and the attached CT results for P2. Provider C called P2 and informed the patient they needed a procedure for a kidney stone. Hospital staff scheduled P2 for a procedure on 2/24/26 for a diagnosis of a kidney stone. b. On 2/24/26, P2 arrived at the hospital and began prep for surgery. The anesthesia provider arrived and provided a consultation for P2. Anesthesia reviewed P2’s history and ordered an EKG pre-op. During Anesthesia’s review of P2’s chart, it was discovered P2 did not have a recent CT in their medical record. Anesthesia questioned where and when P2 had the CT completed. Surgery staff reviewed the original referral form for P2 and discovered P2’s identification patient sticker was placed on the referral form with another patient’s CT results attached. Anesthesia reviewed P2’s EKG results and confirmed an abnormal EKG reading. Hospital staff notified Provider C, and Surgery Director and Anesthesia informed P2 and their family of the canceled procedure. 5. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 12:25 PM, Paramedic G recalled P2 came to the ED complaining of pain. Paramedic G reported administering IM medication to P2, and they performed a blood draw. Paramedic G acknowledged pain assessments should be completed after a patient receives pain medication and prior to discharge. Paramedic G reported they could not speak to why P2 did not have a pain assessment after receiving pain medication or prior to discharging from the ED. 6. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 11:45 AM, RN L recalled being assigned as P2’s nurse during the patient’s ED visit on 2/21/26. RN L reported P2 presented with complaints of back pain. RN L recalled administering medication ordered by the provider to P2, but could not recall whether it was pain medication. RN L reported they could not say why a pain assessment was not performed on P2 following the administration of pain medication or prior to P2’s discharge. RN L acknowledged P2 should have had a follow-up pain assessment completed. 7. During an interview on 3/31/26 at 1:00 PM, ED Director reported the hospital’s expectation was for nurses to complete a pain assessment after pain medications are administered, and prior to a patient’s discharge. ED Director acknowledged the ED staff failed to reassess P2’s pain after receiving pain medication and prior to discharge. 8. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 1:30 PM, RN H recalled contacting P2’s daughter by phone, and they scheduled P2 for surgery due to a kidney stone. RN H reported the provider wanted P2 scheduled for a laser lithotripsy (procedure to break up kidney stones) on 2/23/26, but the family was not able to bring P2 until 2/24/26. 9. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 1:00 PM, Anesthesia Provider D recalled P2 came for the scheduled surgery with their daughter. Anesthesia D reviewed with P2 and their daughter that P2 had a kidney stone, and both P2 and their daughter agreed. Anesthesia D reported after further review, Anesthesia and the surgery staff found P2 did not actually have a CT completed, and the referral form for the scheduled surgery had P2’s patient information present, but was attached to another patient’s CT results. Anesthesia D acknowledged P2’s surgery was canceled because P2 did not have a CT completed on 2/21/26 to support the diagnosis of a kidney stone. Anesthesia D reported obtaining an electrocardiogram (EKG) on P2 due to P2’s medical history, but explained P2’s surgery was not canceled due to an abnormal EKG. Anesthesia D reported P2’s EKG revealed NSR. Anesthesia D recalled starting an IV on P2, but did not recall if any other staff attempted to insert an IV prior to Anesthesia’s attempt. 10. During an interview on 3/31/26 at 10:00 AM, Surgery Director recalled P2. Surgery Director acknowledged P2’s surgery was canceled due to P2’s patient information being placed on a referral form with another patient’s CT results. Surgery Director acknowledged staff failed to document P2’s surgery being canceled due to the CT error, and P2 not having a CT to support a diagnosis of kidney stones. Surgery Director could not speak to whether P2 had a nursing assessment completed or an IV started and acknowledged the lack of staff documentation. 11. During an interview on 3/31/26 at 1:30 PM, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) acknowledged P2’s EKG results were normal according to Anesthesia D. CNO acknowledged P2’s surgery was canceled because there was no CT or radiology imaging to support P2’s diagnosis of kidney stones. CNO also acknowledged nursing staff’s failures to complete any nursing assessments and/or documentation for P2 to support nursing staff’s assessment of P2’s care needs, health status, and/or response to interventions. 12. During an interview on 3/31/26 at 9:00 AM, Director of Quality/Process Excellence reported the hospital did not have a policy for patient pain assessment.”

    Rule C1048. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 31, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 6.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.1%, pneumonia 17%, hip or knee replacement 5.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 149 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Aug 1, 2004.
  • Ownership: government - local.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Government - Local.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 11 owners or officers are people: Daren L Relph (corporate officer, 100%); Denise A Hook (corporate officer); Denise A Hook (managing employee (on the payroll)); Darrell Cook (corporate director); Daren L Relph (managing employee (under contract)); Donna Donald (corporate director); Cynthia Shelley (corporate director); Dewayne Watters (corporate director); David Mcelvain (corporate director, 0%); Callie Mehrhoff (corporate director); Jill Tueth (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Wayne County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.