Clarinda Regional Health Center
A critical access hospital in Clarinda, Iowa 51632
220 Essie Davison Drive, Clarinda, Iowa 51632. (712) 542-2176.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 25 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2023: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 20, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patients Rights
The inspectors’ words, 140 words
“PATIENTS RIGHTS CFR(s): A CAH must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 30076 Based on document review, policy review and staff interviews, the Critical Access Hospital’s (CAH) administrative staff failed to seperate an employee after an incident of abuse. Staff witnessed an incident of abuse between Paramedic D and Patient #3 and failed ensure Patient #3 and all other patients were free from abuse. The CAH administrative continued to allow the alleged abuser to remain in work status and provide care to patients. The cumulative effect of this failure and deficient practice resulted in the hospital staff failing to ensure they protected all patients and failed to ensure patients were free from abuse. The hospital’s administrative staff identified a census of 3 patients at the start of the investigation. Please see C-2525”
-
Privacy And Safety
The inspectors’ words, 1,819 words
“PRIVACY AND SAFETY CFR(s): The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 30076 Based on medical record review, policy review, hospital incident report review and staff interview, the Critical Access Hospital’s (CAH) administrative staff failed to separate an alleged abuser from all patients after a witnessed incident of abuse for 1 of 1 patients (Patient #3). Failure to remove an alleged abuser from all patients resulted in the alleged abuser continuing to have access to Patient #3 and all other patients. This placed vunerable patients at risk for further incidences of abuse. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 11/7/23, at 2:10 PM, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) A acknowledged he was absent from the facility the week the alleged abuse incident occurred between Paramedic D and Patient #3 and confirmed Paramedic D had not been removed from patient care until his return on 10/2/23. CEO A attributed this due to the staffs lack of experience with abuse allegations and reported upon his return, the CAH started following their abuse policy and reported the abuse allegation to the state agency and suspended Paramedic D. CEO A confirmed he thought Paramedic D finished his shift on 9/25/23 and worked 1 other shift before his suspension and ultimate termination on 10/4/23. 2. Review of policy, “Patient Abuse in a Clinical Setting”, last reviewed 12/2022, revealed in part: “... The [CAH] CEO/designee will thoroughly investigate all alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of patient property ... [CAH] will take all appropriate steps to prevent any further potential abuse while the investigation is in process ...”. 3. Review of the CAH’s investigation revealed the following: a. Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) F interviewed Paramedic D on 9/25/23, at 10:00 AM, and Paramedic D reported Patient #3 was behind him and grabbing at his belt on his right side. Paramedic D explained when he started turning around to his left, he knocked Patient #3 off balance causing the fall. b. CNO F interviewed Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) I, Paramedic H, Registered Nurse (RN) E and Director of Physical Therapy J on 9/25/23. EMT I reported he was turning toward the door and he saw Patient #3 on the ground. Paramedic H reported he witnessed Paramedic D push Patient #3 and the patient fell. Director of Physical Therapy J described Paramedic D’s actions as an aggressive shove causing Patient #3 to fall and RN E described Paramedic D’s actions as aggressively knocking the patient over. c. The CAH suspended Paramedic D and reported the abuse allegation to the state agency and the Bureau of Emergency Medical Services and Trauma on 10/2/23. 4. Review of the Emergency Medical Services Schedule for September revealed Paramedic D remained on the schedule for 9/25/23 for a 24-hour shift and 9/29/23 for another 24-hour shift. 5. Review of Paramedic D’s timesheet showed his hours worked on 9/25/23 as 7:54 AM to 8:09 PM and on 9/29/23 as 7:53 AM to 8:10 PM. 6. Review of Paramedic D’s personnel file showed documentation of his notification of suspension on 10/2/23 at 12:47 PM and notification of termination on 10/4/23 at 11:45 AM. 7. On 9/25/25, at 9:15 AM, RN E documented in Patient #3’s medical record that an altercation occurred between Patient #3 and Paramedic D due to patient’s aggression and patient fell to the floor. RN E documented staff immediately responded and the patient had no obvious injuries and the provider had been notified. 8. Review of an Occurrence Report Summary, completed on 9/25/23, at 10:29 AM, revealed RN E documented Charge Nurse G, Paramedic H, EMT I Paramedic D and herself entered Patient #3’s room at 9:10 AM to change his brief and everyone had exited the room after the brief change, except Paramedic D, to allow the patient to decompress. RN E further documented Paramedic H, EMT I and herself remained in the hallway. RN E documented she saw Patient #3 grabbing and attempting to strike Paramedic D, then Paramedic D punched Patient #3 in the chest with both fists causing him to fall onto the floor beside his bed. RN E identified Paramedic H, EMT I and herself witnessed the altercation from the hallway and the altercation had been reported to Patient #3’s provider, CNO F, Charge Nurse G and the Medical Director. 6. During an interview on 11/7/23, at 4:15 PM, CNO F reported Charge Nurse G informed him of an incident between Paramedic D and Patient #3, around 9:30 AM on 9/25/23. CNO F reported he went to the area of Patient #3’s room and found Paramedic D sitting in the hallway and took him to an empty room and asked Paramedic D to explain what happened. CNO F reported Paramedic D explained Patient #3 had been grabbing at this belt and thought he must have nudged Patient #3 with his arm as he turned and reported he did not put his hands on Patient #3. CNO F reported he viewed the video footage of the hallway, around the time of the incident, to identify who might have witnessed the incident and interviewed Director of Therapy J, RN E, EMT I and Paramedic H and all but EMT I admitted to witnessing Paramedic D placing his hands on or about Patient #3’s chest and pushing him, resulting in a fall. CNO F acknowledged Paramedic D remained at work for the remainder of the 24 hour shift and could not confirm he had not interacted with Patient 3#, or any patients again during the shift. 7. During an interview on 11/8/23, at 7:30 AM, EMT I acknowledged he witnessed the incident between Paramedic D and Patient #3 on 9/25/23. EMT I reported he couldn’t recall what time it occurred, but had left Patient #3’s room and while standing in the hallway, heard something that caused him to turn around. EMT I reported at the time he turned around, he saw Patient #3 appeared to be off balance and falling and Paramedic D had a hand on Patient #3’s arm, up by the shoulder, which Paramedic D described as a push. EMT I confirmed Patient #3 fell to the floor after being pushed by Paramedic D. 8. During an interview on 11/8/23, at 8:08 AM, Paramedic H acknowledged he witnessed the incident between Paramedic D and Patient #3 on 9/25/23 and reported he had been in Patient #3’s room that morning, with Paramedic D and EMT I to assist the nursing staff in the completion of a brief change. Paramedic H explained all of the staff left the room except Paramedic D, who remained in the doorway of Patient #3’s room. Paramedic D reported he was in the hallway outside of the patient’s room when the incident occurred. Paramedic H reported Patient #3 appeared off balance as Paramedic D turned toward the patient and Paramedic D pushed Patient #3 back and he fell to the floor. Paramedic H recalled hearing Paramedic D tell Patient #3 to stop touching him twice and described the push as “aggressive”. Paramedic H confirmed Paramedic D pushed Patient #3 with both hands up near the shoulders. 9. During an interview on 11/8/23, at 9:00 AM, Director of Therapy J reported being at the nurse’s station, across the hall from Patient #3’s room, and estimated the incident occurred between 9:00 and 10:00 in morning. Director of Therapy J recalled Paramedic D had been just inside the doorway of Patient #3’s room, and reported she saw him put both hands on Patient 3#’s upper chest and pushed, resulting in the patient falling to the floor. Director of Therapy J described the push as “fairly aggressive” and reported hearing Paramedic D say to Patient #3 something about not touching him as he pushed the patient. 10. During an interview on 11/8/23, at 9:41 AM, RN E reported Paramedic D assisted in managing Patient #3 during a brief change, along with Charge Nurse G, RN P, Paramedic H and EMT I, because Patient #3 could display aggressive and combative behaviors with staff when attempting to provide personal care. RN E reported after completion of the brief change, everyone left Patient #3’s room to allow Patient #3 some time to calm down, except Paramedic D, who remained just inside the doorway of the room. RN E reported as she turned toward Patient #3’s doorway, she heard Paramedic D yell an expletive to Patient #3 to keep hands off him and described Paramedic D used a “double fist punch” to Patient #3’s chest, and Patient #3 fell to the floor. RN E described Paramedic D’s behavior as “aggressive”. RN E confirmed Paramedic D continued to work after the incident, seated outside of Patient #3’s room for awhile after the incident, and came to the unit a few times during the rest of her shift to see if the nursing staff needed any help. 11. During an interview on 11/8/23, at 10:30 AM, Charge Nurse G reported she had been in Patient #3’s room to assist with the brief change and had exited the room and went across the hall into the nurse’s station. Charge Nurse G acknowledged her back was turned to the room so did not witness the incident, but heard the noise from Patient #3’s fall and when she turned around, saw Patient #3 on the floor. Charge Nurse G explained she asked RN E what had happened and RN E reported to her Paramedic D pushed the patient. Charge Nurse G acknowledged she notified CNO F, Medical/Surgical Unit Manager O and Emergency Room Manager Q of the incident. Charge Nurse G reported CNO F informed her he would talk to Paramedic D and handle the incident. Charge Nurse G confirmed Paramedic D remained on the unit and sat outside of Patient #3’s room for awhile after the incident and checked with her periodically to see if the nursing staff needed any help. 12. Review of the saved video clip on 9/25/23, from approximately 09:29:40 to 09:30:51, revealed a view of the hallway outside of Patient #3’s room, located across from the medical/surgical unit nurse’s station. The Director of Therapy Services walked into the nurses’s station at the beginning of the clip and her legs and feet could be seen standing near the doorway of the nurse’s station, at the time of the incident. The video confirmed RN E, Paramedic H and EMT I stood in the hallway outside of Patient #3’s room and faced toward the patient’s door at the time of the incident, allowing a clear view into the room. 16. During an interview on 11/9/23 at 1:15 PM, CEO A reported CNO F knew the appropriate steps to take for an abuse allegation but confirmed the CAH failed to identify the incident as an abuse allegation and ensure separation of Paramedic D from all patients, pending the CAH’s investigation.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 6.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
- In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 13.8%, pneumonia 17.2%, COPD 8.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 20.9%, pneumonia 17.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 153 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
- 91% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Sep 1, 2003.
- Ownership: government - local.
- It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Government - Local.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- 68% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- City of Clarinda owns 100% directly since Nov 14, 2007.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Tyler Hill (corporate officer, 100%); Tyler Hill (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Charles W. Nordyke (corporate officer, 100%); Charles W. Nordyke (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Bryan L Whipp (corporate director, 0%); Dale D Fulk (corporate director, 0%); Robert J Marsh (corporate director, 0%); Katharine Boysen (corporate director, 0%); Jeffrey Clark (corporate director, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of Clarinda | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Nov 14, 2007 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Page County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Shenandoah Medical Center | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.