Hearth Record

Guttenberg Municipal Hospital

A critical access hospital in Guttenberg, Iowa 52052

200 Main Street, Guttenberg, Iowa 52052. (563) 252-1121.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 30, 2025: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 30, 2025: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “42 CFR 485.623(d) Guttenberg Municipal Hospital was found to be not in compliance with the requirements for participation in Medicare/Medicaid at 42 CFR 485.623(d), Life Safety from Fire, and the related National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 101 - 2012 Edition. Guttenberg Municipal Hospital is a three (3) story building that was built in 2011. The building is composed of Type II (111) construction. The facility is fully sprinklered and there is supervised smoke detection located in the corridors and the spaces open to the corridors. The facility has 25 certified beds. At the time of the survey, the census was 4. The requirement at 42 CFR 485.623(d) is NOT MET as evidenced by:”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Lighting

    The inspectors’ words, 135 words

    “Emergency Lighting CFR(s): NFPA 101 Emergency Lighting Emergency lighting of at least 1-1/2-hour duration is provided automatically in accordance with 7.9. 18.2.9.1, 19.2.9.1 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 23031 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to test the battery backup emergency lights in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101, Life Safety Code (Section-7.9.3.1.1(3)), 2012 Edition. This deficient practice affects all residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. This facility has a capacity of 25 and a census of 4. Findings include: Record review and interview on 01/30/25 at 11:06 a.m., revealed the facility was unable to provide current documentation for Annual 90-Minute Functional Testing for the battery backup emergency lights. The Maintenance Supervisor and Support Services Manager verified this observation at the time of the survey process.”

    Rule K0291. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 23031 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the automatic sprinkler system in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems (Section-14.2.1) & (Section-13.4.4.2.2.2), 2011 Edition. This deficient practice affects all residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. This facility has a capacity of 25 and a census of 4. Findings include: 1. Record review and interview on 01/30/25 at 10:35 a.m., revealed the facility failed to have a 5-year internal obstruction inspection performed for the automatic sprinkler system. The last documented 5-year internal obstruction inspection from the facility ’ s sprinkler contractor was dated 01/11/17. Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor indicated that the test had not been completed. The Maintenance Supervisor and Support Services Manager verified this observation at the time of the survey process. 2. Record review and interview on 01/30/25 at 10:53 a.m., revealed the dry pipe sprinkler valve was past due for a 3-year full trip of the system. The last 3-year full trip was conducted in August of 2017. Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor indicated that the test had not been completed. The Maintenance Supervisor and Support Services Manager verified this observation at the time of the survey process.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing The generator or other alternate power source and associated equipment is capable of supplying service within 10 seconds. If the 10-second criterion is not met during the monthly test, a process shall be provided to annually confirm this capability for the life safety and critical branches. Maintenance and testing of the generator and transfer switches are performed in accordance with NFPA 110. Generator sets are inspected weekly, exercised under load 30 minutes 12 times a year in 20-40 day intervals, and exercised once every 36 months for 4 continuous hours. Scheduled test under load conditions include a complete simulated cold start and automatic or manual transfer of all EES loads, and are conducted by competent personnel. Maintenance and testing of stored energy power sources (Type 3 EES) are in accordance with NFPA 111. Main and feeder circuit breakers are inspected annually, and a program for periodically exercising the components is established according to manufacturer requirements. Written records of maintenance and testing are maintained and readily available. EES electrical panels and circuits are marked, readily identifiable, and separate from normal power circuits. Minimizing the possibility of damage of the emergency power source is a design consideration for new installations. 6.4.4, 6.5.4, 6.6.4 (NFPA 99), NFPA 110, NFPA 111, 700.10 (NFPA 70) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 23031 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inspect and exercise main and feeder circuit breakers for their emergency generator in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 99, Health Care Facilities Code (Section-6.4.4.1.2.1), 2012 Edition. This deficient practice affects all residents, staff, and visitors throughout the facility. This facility has a capacity of 25 and a census of 4. Findings include: Record review and interview on 01/30/25 at 11:25 a.m., revealed that the facility was unable to provide documentation for annual inspection and exercising of the main and feeder circuit breakers for their emergency generator. The Maintenance Supervisor and Support Services Manager verified this observation at the time of the survey process.”

    Rule K0918. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 30, 2025Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited
Jan 29, 2025Standard inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 1; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 87% would definitely recommend it.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 96 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 61% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Feb 1, 2001.
  • Ownership: government - local.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Government - Local.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 98% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • City of Guttenberg owns 100% directly since Jan 3, 1966.
  • Mercy Health Network Inc. runs it.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Janice Lee Andregg (corporate officer, 20%); William L Allyn (corporate officer, 20%); Susan A Osterhaus (corporate officer, 20%); Robin S Esmann (managing employee (on the payroll)); Timothy J Ahlers (managing employee (under contract)); Timothy J Ahlers (corporate officer); Stephanie Radabaugh (corporate officer); Jill M Knepper (managing employee (on the payroll)); Austin Coon (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
City of GuttenbergOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 3, 1966
Mercy Health Network Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Oct 1, 2017

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Clayton County, none has an overall star rating from CMS.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Mercyone Elkader Medical CenterNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.