Homestead Hospital
An acute care hospital in Homestead, Florida 33033
975 Baptist Way, Homestead, Florida 33033. (786) 243-8000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 4of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 147 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2026: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 20, 2026: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Medical Staff - Bylaws And Rules
The inspectors’ words, 1,405 words
“MEDICAL STAFF - BYLAWS AND RULES CFR(s): 482.12(a)(4) [The governing body must] approve medical staff bylaws and other medical staff rules and regulations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33162 Based on record review and staff interviews, the Hospital failed to follow its own medical staff rules and regulations that were approved by the governing body to ensure physicians are in charge of Codes Blue and Codes Rescue, but has implemented a policy for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) to be in charge of those codes instead of physicians. This has the potential to affect the safety of any patient who experiences an emergent event requiring a Code Blue or Code Rescue response. This affected Patient #4, for whom the responding APRN identified an anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) but did not timely administer epinephrine, instead administering other medications he incorrectly reported as “first line treatment” for allergic reactions, resulting in a delay of over an hour for Patient #4 to receive the first line treatment of anaphylaxis, epinephrine, and which likely contributed to the inability to prevent Patient #4’s death. The findings included: The Hospital’s Medical Staff Rules and Regulations, approved and adopted by signatures of the President of Medical Staff, Hospital Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and the Chairperson of the Board of Directors dated 06/01/2017 to 06/09/2017, documents under Code Blue/Code Rescue, “The first physician on the scene of a Code Blue or Code Rescue is in charge unless that physician decides to direct it to some other physician who is more experienced than himself/herself. The responsibility of the physician is to direct the administration of medication, IV [intravenous] fluids, and defibrillation or any other procedures deemed necessary,” and under Physician Substitute, “A physician, who is unable to attend to his or her patients, is to designate a substitute physician who is a member of the Medical Staff with suitable privileges. In the event the attending physician fails to do so, the Clinical Service Chief or Medical Staff President or either of their designees shall have the authority to call any appropriate member of the Medical Staff.” During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 9:33 AM, the Supervisor of Medical Staff provided the Definitions Manual and stated physicians are defined as Medical Doctors or Doctors of Osteopath, and that APRNs are Allied Health Professionals. Review of the Hospital’s Definitions Manual, approved and adopted by signatures of the President of Medical Staff on 05/04/2015, the Hospital Chief Executive Officer on 05/27/2015, and Chairperson of Board of Directors on 05/27/2015, documents, “”Physician(s)” means doctors of medicine licensed under chapter 458 of the Florida Statutes, as amended or doctors of osteopathy licensed under chapter 459 of the Florida Statutes, as amended.” During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 1:33 PM, the Assistant Vice-President of Nursing confirmed the Medical Staff Rules and Regulations manual approved in 2017 and Definitions Manual approved in 2015 are the most current versions of those documents but that according to the Delineation of Privileges and Code Blue policy, APRNs (rather than physicians) can run the “Codes.” The hospital’s Policy titled Code Blue Response, approved 12/02/25 and released 01/06/26, documents under definitions, “The Code Blue team includes but is not limited to the following: Patient Care House Supervisor; Critical Care (ICU) Team: ICU Patient Care Supervisor [and] ICU Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN); Patient’s Nurse; Patient Care Supervisor (PCS)/Relief charge from patient’s unit; Respiratory Therapist; Nursing Unit designee; (and) Emergency Department ED Team: ED Charge Nurse and/ or designee when code is called in areas on the first floor” and does not include a physician. A Memorandum to HH [Homestead Hospital] Staff from Medical Staff/Administration, with the subject ICU APRNs, dated 12/28/22 documents, “Effective Monday January 2, 2023, Homestead Hospital will have 24/7 ICU APRN coverage. They will be responsible for attending Code Rescues and Code Blues, in addition to managing the ICU patients. Part of their scope of responsibility will include intubations and central lines insertions for ICU patients. ED physicians, Hospitalists and e-ICU (electronic (virtual) ICU) will be available for additional support if needed. The ICU APRN’s can be contacted directly via...” Review of the record revealed Patient #4 was 23 years old and was admitted to the hospital on 01/16/2026 for sickle cell crisis and bilateral knee pain. Patient #4’s medication record documents he was given the first dose of ceftriaxone on 01/17/26 at 6:14 PM. During a telephonic interview on 02/18/26 at 4:18 PM, Registered Nurse, Staff B stated after she gave Patient #4 the IV push antibiotic on 01/17/26, she was about to start the next antibiotic but he started screaming that he was burning, that his whole body was burning, and she called a Code Rescue; that a couple minutes later, before the Code Team arrived, he started gasping for air and she called a Code Blue; and that she believed it to be a reaction to the antibiotic. Patient #4’s Code Blue Resuscitation Report documents a Code Blue was started on 01/17/2026 at 6:24 PM, Patient #4 was administered Solumedrol IV (intravenous) at 6:27 PM, Benadryl IV at 6:28 PM, and Pepcid 20 mg IV at 6:30 PM; was intubated at 6:34 PM; had a chest x-ray to confirm successful intubation on 6:36 PM; was taken to CT at 6:40 PM; and Patient #4 arrived in the ICU at 6:59 PM; but no evidence of epinephrine administration. Further review of the record reveals APRN C ordered epinephrine 0.3 mg (milligrams) IM on 01/17/2026 at 7:23 PM and it was administered on 01/17/2026 at 7:30 PM, over an hour after the Code Blue response started. Patient #4’s Critical Care Consultation note by APRN C for service date/time of 01/17/2026 at 7:31 PM documents after antibiotic the patient reported feeling hot and had a syncopal episode; that a Code Blue was called; that on arrival the patient was foaming at the mouth and unresponsive to any painful stimuli; that with concerns for allergic reaction secondary to IV antibiotic administration, the decision was made to emergently intubate him for airway protection; that he was “quickly treated with Benadryl, Solumedrol, Pepcid and epinephrine IM (intramuscular injection);” and will be sent to the ICU. During a telephonic interview with APRN C on 02/19/2026 at 3:21 PM, he stated after some of Patient #4’s notes were read to him that he remembered Patient #4 and the Code Rescue and Code Blue on 01/17/26 and explained Code Blues are either for CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or intubation and Patient #4 was not cardiac, he needed intubation; that he thought it was anaphylaxis and treated it with solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid, which he claimed are the first line treatment for anaphylaxis; that he was sure he ordered epinephrine during the code but someone handed him the wrong concentration and he said it was the wrong one; that the patient was not responsive and foaming at the mouth so he proceeded with intubation; that after intubation the patient went to CT (Computed Tomography); that when he saw the radiologist’s CT report that the back of the throat was completely closed except for the tube, he ordered epinephrine and went upstairs and gave it himself. During this interview when asked if epinephrine, rather than solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid, is the first line treatment for anaphylaxis, APRN C stated he was not sure if those medications could reverse anaphylaxis but he decided to transfer the patient to the ICU, where he knew where the correct epinephrine was, rather than to wait for it and give it first; he stated he was been on the Code Blue Team since he started working at this hospital and has treated allergic reactions with solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid before and they always resolved without needing to intubate those patients but that he never saw a case like this before, which was really severe. During an interview on 02/19/26 at 11:25 AM, Clinical Pharmacist, Staff D confirmed she remembered Patient #4’s Code Blue, that during the code she asked what medications Patient #4 had already received and if it was anaphylaxis; that they said they already gave solumedrol and Benadryl, and did not think it was anaphylaxis; that APRN C asked for racemic epinephrine, which relaxes the throat for intubation and is not for anaphylaxis; that Staff D got the racemic epinephrine for APRN C but does not know if it was used; and denied awareness of an order or request for IM epinephrine.”
-
Contracted Services
The inspectors’ words, 487 words
“CONTRACTED SERVICES CFR(s): 482.12(e) The governing body must be responsible for services furnished in the hospital whether or not they are furnished under contracts. The governing body must ensure that a contractor of services (including one for shared services and joint ventures) furnishes services that permit the hospital to comply with all applicable conditions of participation and standards for the contracted services. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33162 Based on record review and interviews, the governing body failed to ensure radiology services were furnished in a manner to comply with standards for radiological services. This affected 3 of 3 patients sampled for MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) STAT (immediate or without delay) orders resulting in undue delays of STAT MRIs for Patient #1, whose condition deteriorated during this delay until an MRI could no longer be completed because he then required continuous IV (intravenous) medication and the hospital did not have a functioning MRI-safe intravenous pump, as well as Patients# 2 and 3. Cross refer to A 529. The findings included: Review of the Hospital’s Policy and Procedure for the Imaging Department titled Scope of Care and Services, revision date 05/23/2023, released 07/11/2023, documents, “The department provides the following imaging services 24 hours a day to Emergency and in-house patients ranging from newborn to aging adult. ... e. MRI;” and “Elective outpatient procedures are available at the hospital Monday through Friday from 0700 until 1900 and Saturday from 0800 until 1200. Outside of these hours, the focus of the department’s resources is on emergency and inpatient needs;” “The services not provided by the Imaging Services Department at Homestead Hospital are: ...d. Stat MRI Services;” “The department of Imaging Services recommends referral to other Baptist Health facilities for imaging procedures not provided here;” and “The Imaging Services Department will provide diagnostic imaging sufficient to meet the needs of the patients and medical staff of Homestead Hospital.” During an interview with Staff A on 02/19/26 at 2:10 PM she stated she was told they do not have “STAT MRIs” because they schedule outpatient MRIs for the MRI machines. During a virtual interview on 2/19/26 at 2:15 PM, the Director of Radiology stated “there is no timeframe” for when a STAT MRI should be completed but it depends on the necessity of orders; that the goal is within 4 hours but there is a lot of prep work that has to take place; that roughly 40% of their MRIs are for outpatients; that one machine is staffed 8 hours a day Monday through Friday and the other machine is staffed 24 hours a day 7 days a week; and denied awareness that a functioning intravenous pump was not available for Patient #1’s MRI on 12/01/2025 but stated he would not need to be informed of this because they can still do MRIs, just not patients who need continuous intravenous medication, such as in the ICU (Intensive Care Unit).”
-
Medical Staff Credentialing
The inspectors’ words, 1,581 words
“MEDICAL STAFF CREDENTIALING CFR(s): 482.22(a)(2) The medical staff must examine the credentials of all eligible candidates for medical staff membership and make recommendations to the governing body on the appointment of the candidates in accordance with State law, including scope-of-practice laws, and the medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. A candidate who has been recommended by the medical staff and who has been appointed by the governing body is subject to all medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations, in addition to the requirements contained in this section. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33162 Based on record review and staff interviews, the Hospital failed to follow its own medical staff rules and regulations that were approved by the governing body to ensure physicians are in charge of Codes Blue and Codes Rescue, but has implemented a policy for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) to be in charge of those codes instead of physicians. This has the potential to affect the safety of any patient who experiences an emergent event requiring a Code Blue or Code Rescue response. This affected Patient #4, for whom the responding APRN identified an anaphylaxis (severe allergic reaction) but did not timely administer epinephrine, instead administering other medications he incorrectly reported as “first line treatment” for allergic reactions, resulting in a delay of over an hour for Patient #4 to receive the first line treatment of anaphylaxis, epinephrine, and which likely contributed to the inability to prevent Patient #4’s death. Cross refer to A 048. The findings included: The Hospital’s Medical Staff Rules and Regulations, approved and adopted by signatures of the President of Medical Staff, Hospital Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and the Chairperson of the Board of Directors dated 06/01/2017 to 06/09/2017, documents under Code Blue/Code Rescue, “The first physician on the scene of a Code Blue or Code Rescue is in charge unless that physician decides to direct it to some other physician who is more experienced than himself/herself. The responsibility of the physician is to direct the administration of medication, IV [intravenous] fluids, and defibrillation or any other procedures deemed necessary,” and under Physician Substitute, “A physician, who is unable to attend to his or her patients, is to designate a substitute physician who is a member of the Medical Staff with suitable privileges. In the event the attending physician fails to do so, the Clinical Service Chief or Medical Staff President or either of their designees shall have the authority to call any appropriate member of the Medical Staff.” During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 9:33 AM, the Supervisor of Medical Staff provided the Definitions Manual and stated physicians are defined as Medical Doctors or Doctors of Osteopath, and that APRNs are Allied Health Professionals. Review of the Hospital’s Definitions Manual, approved and adopted by signatures of the President of Medical Staff on 05/04/2015, the Hospital Chief Executive Officer on 05/27/2015, and Chairperson of Board of Directors on 05/27/2015, documents, “”Physician(s)” means doctors of medicine licensed under chapter 458 of the Florida Statutes, as amended or doctors of osteopathy licensed under chapter 459 of the Florida Statutes, as amended.” During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 1:33 PM, the Assistant Vice-President of Nursing confirmed the Medical Staff Rules and Regulations manual approved in 2017 and Definitions Manual approved in 2015 are the most current versions of those documents but that according to the Delineation of Privileges and Code Blue policy, APRNs (rather than physicians) can run the “Codes.” The hospital’s Policy titled Code Blue Response, approved 12/02/25 and released 01/06/26, documents under definitions, “The Code Blue team includes but is not limited to the following: Patient Care House Supervisor; Critical Care (ICU) Team: ICU Patient Care Supervisor [and] ICU Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN); Patient’s Nurse; Patient Care Supervisor (PCS)/Relief charge from patient’s unit; Respiratory Therapist; Nursing Unit designee; (and) Emergency Department ED Team: ED Charge Nurse and/ or designee when code is called in areas on the first floor” and does not include a physician. A Memorandum to HH [Homestead Hospital] Staff from Medical Staff/Administration, with the subject ICU APRNs, dated 12/28/22 documents, “Effective Monday January 2, 2023, Homestead Hospital will have 24/7 ICU APRN coverage. They will be responsible for attending Code Rescues and Code Blues, in addition to managing the ICU patients. Part of their scope of responsibility will include intubations and central lines insertions for ICU patients. ED physicians, Hospitalists and e-ICU (electronic (virtual) ICU) will be available for additional support if needed. The ICU APRN’s can be contacted directly via...” Review of the record revealed Patient #4 was 23 years old and was admitted to the hospital on 01/16/2026 for sickle cell crisis and bilateral knee pain. Patient #4’s medication record documents he was given the first dose of ceftriaxone on 01/17/26 at 6:14 PM. During a telephonic interview on 02/18/26 at 4:18 PM, Registered Nurse, Staff B stated after she gave Patient #4 the IV push antibiotic on 01/17/26, she was about to start the next antibiotic but he started screaming that he was burning, that his whole body was burning, and she called a Code Rescue; that a couple minutes later, before the Code Team arrived, he started gasping for air and she called a Code Blue; and that she believed it to be a reaction to the antibiotic. Patient #4’s Code Blue Resuscitation Report documents a Code Blue was started on 01/17/2026 at 6:24 PM, Patient #4 was administered Solumedrol IV (intravenous) at 6:27 PM, Benadryl IV at 6:28 PM, and Pepcid 20 mg IV at 6:30 PM; was intubated at 6:34 PM; had a chest x-ray to confirm successful intubation on 6:36 PM; was taken to CT at 6:40 PM; and Patient #4 arrived in the ICU at 6:59 PM; but no evidence of epinephrine administration. Further review of the record reveals APRN C ordered epinephrine 0.3 mg (milligrams) IM on 01/17/2026 at 7:23 PM and it was administered on 01/17/2026 at 7:30 PM, over an hour after the Code Blue response started. Patient #4’s Critical Care Consultation note by APRN C for service date/time of 01/17/2026 at 7:31 PM documents after antibiotic the patient reported feeling hot and had a syncopal episode; that a Code Blue was called; that on arrival the patient was foaming at the mouth and unresponsive to any painful stimuli; that with concerns for allergic reaction secondary to IV antibiotic administration, the decision was made to emergently intubate him for airway protection; that he was “quickly treated with Benadryl, Solumedrol, Pepcid and epinephrine IM (intramuscular injection);” and will be sent to the ICU. During a telephonic interview with APRN C on 02/19/2026 at 3:21 PM, he stated after some of Patient #4’s notes were read to him that he remembered Patient #4 and the Code Rescue and Code Blue on 01/17/26 and explained Code Blues are either for CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or intubation and Patient #4 was not cardiac, he needed intubation; that he thought it was anaphylaxis and treated it with solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid, which he claimed are the first line treatment for anaphylaxis; that he was sure he ordered epinephrine during the code but someone handed him the wrong concentration and he said it was the wrong one; that the patient was not responsive and foaming at the mouth so he proceeded with intubation; that after intubation the patient went to CT (Computed Tomography); that when he saw the radiologist’s CT report that the back of the throat was completely closed except for the tube, he ordered epinephrine and went upstairs and gave it himself. During this interview when asked if epinephrine, rather than solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid, is the first line treatment for anaphylaxis, APRN C stated he was not sure if those medications could reverse anaphylaxis but he decided to transfer the patient to the ICU, where he knew where the correct epinephrine was, rather than to wait for it and give it first; he stated he was been on the Code Blue Team since he started working at this hospital and has treated allergic reactions with solumedrol, Benadryl, and Pepcid before and they always resolved without needing to intubate those patients but that he never saw a case like this before, which was really severe. During an interview on 02/19/26 at 11:25 AM, Clinical Pharmacist, Staff D confirmed she remembered Patient #4’s Code Blue, that during the code she asked what medications Patient #4 had already received and if it was anaphylaxis; that they said they already gave solumedrol and Benadryl, and did not think it was anaphylaxis; that APRN C asked for racemic epinephrine, which relaxes the throat for intubation and is not for anaphylaxis; that Staff D got the racemic epinephrine for APRN C but does not know if it was used; and denied awareness of an order or request for IM epinephrine. Review of APRN C’s credentialing files reveals privileges for his appointment as a member of Allied Health Staff for 02/22/2023 to 06/30/2025 included under Core Privileges “Airway management, cardioversion, defribillation, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (must have current ACLS (Advanced Care Life Support certification).” However, APRN C’s reappointment for 09/30/2025 to 09/30/2028 (gap in credentialing noted in retrospect and not explained), date stamped for Credentials Committee action and “Medical action Executive Committee” (sic) on 08/04/2025 and for Board of Directors action on 08/08/2025, documents Core Privileges that now include, “Management of Codes Rescue and Codes Blue (must have current ACLS)” as “current” (renewal of that privilege) rather than “new.””
-
Scope Of Radiologic Services
The inspectors’ words, 1,072 words
“SCOPE OF RADIOLOGIC SERVICES CFR(s): 482.26(a) [§482.26 Condition of Participation: Radiologic Services The hospital must maintain, or have available, diagnostic radiologic services...] §482.26(a) Standard: Radiologic Services The hospital must maintain, or have available, radiologic services according to the needs of the patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33162 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete STAT (immediately or without delay) Magnetic Resonance Imagings (MRIs) in a timely manner for 3 out of 4 patients (Patients# 1, 2, and 3) sampled for STAT MRI orders. The findings included: Review of the Hospital’s Policy and Procedure for the Imaging Department titled Scope of Care and Services, revision date 05/23/2023, released 07/11/2023, documents, “The department provides the following imaging services 24 hours a day to Emergency and in-house patients ranging from newborn to aging adult. ... e. MRI;” and “Elective outpatient procedures are available at the hospital Monday through Friday from 0700 until 1900 and Saturday from 0800 until 1200. Outside of these hours, the focus of the department’s resources is on emergency and inpatient needs;” “The services not provided by the Imaging Services Department at Homestead Hospital are: ...d. Stat MRI Services;” “The department of Imaging Services recommends referral to other Baptist Health facilities for imaging procedures not provided here;” and “The Imaging Services Department will provide diagnostic imaging sufficient to meet the needs of the patients and medical staff of Homestead Hospital.” 1) Review of the record revealed Patient #1 was 33 years old and was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation with no neurological deficits upon examination when he was admitted to the hospital on 11/25/2025 for a gastrointestinal problem. Patient #1’s neurology consultation for service date/time of 12/01/2025 at 9:21 AM documents Patient #1’s previous brain MRI (on 11/28/25) for headache/migraine was unremarkable, that Patient #1 had increased headache and confusion that day, was sleepy but arousable and agitated, the presence of nuchal rigidity (severe neck stiffness), and “At this point I recommend start MRI with contrast to rule out any meningeal enhancement since patient is too agitated to perform LP (lumbar puncture). Review of Patient # 1’s physician orders revealed an order for Brain MRI with contrast STAT on 12/01/2025 at 11:51 AM. A Nursing Narrative Note dated 12/01/2025 at 10:41 PM documents, “Call placed to MRI for pending order, unable to take patient at this time . Per tech only one MRI IV (intravenous) pump is working.” Further record review revealed Patient #1’s MRI order was canceled without being completed on 12/02/2025 at 8:46 PM. Patient #1’s Brain CT (Computed Tomography) without contrast, resulted on 12/02/2025 at 8:09 AM documents the Impression: “Acute intraparenchymal hemorrhage (life-threatening brain bleed) in the right frontal lobe (45 cc (cubic centimeters)). New diffuse cerebral edema (brain swelling) with slitlike ventricles and effacement of the basal cisterns (indicating swelling has displaced structures within the skull).” Patient #1’s Brain Flow study, resulted on 12/02/2025 at 2:50 PM documents “No evidence of intracerebral blood flow” (brain death). An Infectious Disease Progress Note for service date/time of 12/04/2025 at 3:44 PM documents, “This unfortunate young man did NOT had a CNS infection but obviously a intraparenchymal bleed. There is no need for any antibiotics...” During an interview on 02/19/2026 at 2:19 PM, the Imaging Services Director confirmed Patient #1 had an order for Brain MRI with contrast that was cancelled and never performed but stated he could not find who canceled the order or the reason why it was canceled. During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 11:19 AM, the Imaging Services Manager stated Patient #1’s order on 12/01/2025 at 11:51 AM was for a STAT Brain MRI with contrast but based on their protocol the order needed to be “with or without contrast;” therefore, the first order was changed to a STAT Brain MRI with and without contrast on 12/01/2026 at 1:49 PM. The Imaging Services Manager stated the technologist received the STAT order, put it in a “bin,” and proceeded with other scheduled (routine) tests, prioritizing other patients. The Imaging Services Manager added that the technologist did not get a call to prioritize the MRI and, by the time the afternoon technologist came in and triaged Patient #1, he was already in the Intensive Care Unit and could no longer be brought down to MRI because by that time Patient #1 needed an IV (intravenous) drip and the MRI-safe IV pump in the MRI suite was not working. The Imaging Services Manager confirmed the MRI was never performed and the order was discontinued without being completed on 12/02/2025, and also stated that according to the facility’s protocol, STAT orders need to be done prior to routine inpatient and outpatient orders. 33988 2)Review of Patient #3’s physician orders revealed an order for Brain MRI without contrast STAT on 02/14/2026 at 11:59 AM with a procedure reason of stroke/TIA. Review of Patient #3’s Brain MRI without contrast STAT result revealed the procedure was not performed until 02/14/2026 from 11:32 PM to 11:54 PM, nearly 12 hours later, and was resulted at 11:57 PM. During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 3:12 PM, the Imaging Services Manager confirmed that Patient #3’s STAT Brain MRI without contrast was ordered on 02/14/2026 at 11:59 AM and was not completed until 02/14/2026 at 11:54 PM. The Imaging Services Manager stated that she was aware of the delay and she spoke to the technologist who was working that day. Additionally, the Imaging Services Manager stated that a STAT MRI should be completed within 4 hours. 3) Review of Patient #2’s physician orders revealed an order for STAT Left Foot MRI without contrast on 12/02/2025 at 11:39 AM with a procedure reason of osteomyelitis. Review of Patient #2’s STAT Left Foot MRI without contrast result revealed the MRI was not performed until 12/02/2025 from 9:39 PM to 10:32 PM and was resulted the following day, on 12/03/25 at 8:48 AM. During an interview on 02/20/2026 at 3:15 PM, the Imaging Services Manager confirmed the STAT left Foot MRI without contrast ordered on 12/02/2025 at 11:39 AM was not completed until 10:32 PM. The Imaging Services Manager reported that she was aware of the delay. Additionally, the Imaging Services Manager stated that when they had a STAT order, the patient’s nurse would usually call the Imaging Department to escalate the order so the MRI could be prioritized but in that case the nurse did not call.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 4 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 5; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 5; readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 6.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (529 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 67% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 10.2%, pneumonia 12.7%, COPD 8.9%, stroke 13%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.7%, pneumonia 16.6%, COPD 19.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 228 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 2% left before being seen.
- 73% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.98 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 23 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 85% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Homestead Hospital Inc. and Baptist Health South Florida Inc. run it.
- 21 owners or officers are people: Kenneth Spell (corporate officer); Kenneth Spell (managing employee (on the payroll)); Steven Sapp (corporate director); Albert Boulenger (managing employee (on the payroll)); Maria Costa Smith (corporate director); Mark A Hernandez (corporate director); Rene W. Taylor (corporate director); Jose Prado (corporate director); Jeanne Jacobs (corporate director); Subbarao Uppaluri (corporate director); John P. Maas (corporate director); David Michael Trueba (corporate director); Johanna Paterson (corporate director); David B Abercrombie (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bill R. Tillet (corporate director); George E Cadman III (corporate director); Ana Cabrera (managing employee (on the payroll)); Matthew Arsenault (corporate officer); Matthew Arsenault (managing employee (on the payroll)); William Chambers III (corporate director); Willie Carpenter (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homestead Hospital Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Jun 1, 1995 | |
| Baptist Health South Florida Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Jun 1, 1995 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 hospitals CMS lists in Miami-Dade County, 17 have an overall star rating from CMS: 3 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 3 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.