San Luis Valley Regional Medical Center
An acute care hospital in Alamosa, Colorado 81101
106 Blanca Ave, Alamosa, Colorado 81101. (719) 587-1202.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 15 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 59 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2026: a complaint inspection.
15 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 23, 2025: standard inspection15 deficiencies
-
Physical Environment
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 482.41 The hospital must be constructed, arranged, and maintained to ensure the safety of the patient, and to provide facilities for diagnosis and treatment and for special hospital services appropriate to the needs of the community. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on the life safety code recertification survey conducted 4/22/2025 through 4/23/2025, the facility failed to comply with regulations set forth in the Life Safety Code. The Condition of Participation §482.41 Physical Environment was out of compliance. A-0700 - The hospital must be constructed, arranged, and maintained to ensure the safety of the patient, and to provide facilities for diagnosis and treatment and for special hospital services appropriate to the needs of the community. The facility failed to comply with the regulations set forth for Life Safety. Deficiencies were cited under the Life Safety Code deficiencies K-0345, K-0353, K-0372, K-0521, K-0700, K-0918, K-0924. See survey event ID R1VY21 for full details of the cited deficiencies.”
-
Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation
The inspectors’ words, 559 words
“A recertification LSC survey was completed on 4/23/2025. Seventeen deficiencies were cited. § 482.41 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT The Initial Comments (ID Tag 0000) are informational only and are intended only to represent the facility’s general characteristics. This survey, conducted in accordance with the Federal Register, Section 42, CFR Part 482.41(b), included a full Life Safety Code® survey pursuant to the facility electing to give up its deemed status and place its facilities under the purview of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. This three-story structure, hereinafter referred to as the Main Hospital, and licensed for 49 beds at the time of this survey, is an addition to an original structure constructed in 1938 with additions made in 1963, 1958, 1960, 1968, 1998 and 2004. Although this structure has a mixture of construction types, the lowest fire-resistive rating of the Main Hospital structure is Type II (222). The original hospital structure, separated from the Main Hospital by a two-hour separation, is a single-story, Type II (222) structure with a partial basement. The original hospital structure is protected by an automatic sprinkler system, and it is used as a typical business occupancy containing offices, conference rooms, and records storage. In addition to the original hospital structure, there is another fire-resistive structure adjacent to the Main Hospital. This structure, too, is separated from the Main Hospital by a two-hour fire separation. This adjacent structure, although owned by the hospital, is leased and operated independently as a community clinic. The first floor of the Main Hospital houses the emergency room, MRI, X-Ray, cafeteria, office, OB-GYN and Pediatric care facilities. The second floor houses maternity, ambulatory surgical, and surgery facilities. The third floor houses critical care, and ICU facilities. Additionally, this facility has a helipad on the roof. This survey, conducted April 22-23, 2025, inspected the Main Hospital for compliance with Chapter 19, “Existing Health Care Occupancies,” of the 2012 edition of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Life Safety Code® (NFPA 101), and other publications as referenced. In addition to the main hospital campus, there are two Offsite Campus Locations (OCLs) operated under the purview of the San Luis Valley Regional Medical Center license. These are business occupancies, one of which is referred to as the Physicians’ Services (PS) building, also known as the Stuart Street facility, located in Alamosa, the other, located in Monte Vista, CO, is referred to as the Monte Vista facility. The PS building, located in Alamosa, is a “slab-on-grade,” two-story, Type II (000) structure, which is partially sprinklered in the older section. This older section was utilized in the past for surgical and other medical procedures; it is now utilized as office space and records storage. Also, the PS building has a hydraulically driven elevator. The OCL in Monte Vista, is a non-sprinklered, “slab-on-grade,” fully-sheathed, two-story, Type V (000) structure. This survey evaluated the PS building in Alamosa and the OCL in Monte Vista for compliance with Chapter 39, “Existing Business Occupancies,” of the 2012 edition of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Life Safety Code (NFPA 101), and other publications as referenced. As constructed and protected, these three facilities will meet the prescriptive requirements of the 2012 edition of NFPA 101 with all deficiencies contained herein corrected. This survey concluded April 23, 2025 with an Exit Conference with the Director of Compliance, and the Maintenance Director.”
-
Egress Doors
The inspectors’ words, 590 words
“Egress Doors CFR(s): NFPA 101 Egress Doors Doors in a required means of egress shall not be equipped with a latch or a lock that requires the use of a tool or key from the egress side unless using one of the following special locking arrangements: CLINICAL NEEDS OR SECURITY THREAT LOCKING Where special locking arrangements for the clinical security needs of the patient are used, only one locking device shall be permitted on each door and provisions shall be made for the rapid removal of occupants by: remote control of locks; keying of all locks or keys carried by staff at all times; or other such reliable means available to the staff at all times. 18.2.2.2.5.1, 18.2.2.2.6, 19.2.2.2.5.1, 19.2.2.2.6 SPECIAL NEEDS LOCKING ARRANGEMENTS Where special locking arrangements for the safety needs of the patient are used, all of the Clinical or Security Locking requirements are being met. In addition, the locks must be electrical locks that fail safely so as to release upon loss of power to the device; the building is protected by a supervised automatic sprinkler system and the locked space is protected by a complete smoke detection system (or is constantly monitored at an attended location within the locked space); and both the sprinkler and detection systems are arranged to unlock the doors upon activation. 18.2.2.2.5.2, 19.2.2.2.5.2, TIA 12-4 DELAYED-EGRESS LOCKING ARRANGEMENTS Approved, listed delayed-egress locking systems installed in accordance with 7.2.1.6.1 shall be permitted on door assemblies serving low and ordinary hazard contents in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system or an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system. 18.2.2.2.4, 19.2.2.2.4 ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS LOCKING ARRANGEMENTS Access-Controlled Egress Door assemblies installed in accordance with 7.2.1.6.2 shall be permitted. 18.2.2.2.4, 19.2.2.2.4 ELEVATOR LOBBY EXIT ACCESS LOCKING ARRANGEMENTS Elevator lobby exit access door locking in accordance with 7.2.1.6.3 shall be permitted on door assemblies in buildings protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic fire detection system and an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system. 18.2.2.2.4, 19.2.2.2.4 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to arrange and maintain the means of egress in accordance with Life Safety Code Section 19.2 and Chapter 7. 1. Stair 4 Delayed egress egress door 3rd floor (no signage or alarm) (non-compliant IAW NFPA 101) Door corrections need to come in for plan review 2. Stair 4 Delayed egress baby ward (non-compliant IAW NFPA 101) 3. ED department stairway 4 needs an eye to disable the maglock NFPA 101 19.2.2.2.4 Doors within a required means of egress shall not be equipped with a latch or lock that requires the use of a tool or key from the egress side, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following: Locks complying with 19.2.2.2.5 shall be permitted. *Delayed-egress locks complying with 7.2.1.6.1 shall be permitted. *Access-controlled egress doors complying with 7.2.1.6.2 shall be permitted. Elevator lobby exit access door locking in accordance with 7.2.1.6.3 shall be permitted. Approved existing door-locking installations shall be permitted. 19.2.2.2.5 Door-locking arrangements shall be permitted in accordance with either 19.2.2.2.5.1 or 19.2.2.2.5.2. 19.2.2.2.5.1* Door-locking arrangements shall be permitted where the clinical needs of patients require specialized security measures or where patients pose a security threat, provided that staff can readily unlock doors at all times in accordance with 19.2.2.2.6. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Exit Signage
The inspectors’ words, 332 words
“Exit Signage CFR(s): NFPA 101 Exit Signage 2012 EXISTING Exit and directional signs are displayed in accordance with 7.10 with continuous illumination also served by the emergency lighting system. 19.2.10.1 (Indicate N/A in one-story existing occupancies with less than 30 occupants where the line of exit travel is obvious.) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Through observation during the survey and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the exit signage requirements in accordance with NFPA 101, 19.2.10.1. This was evidenced by: 1.Exit signs in the lobby need to be listed: Lobby, Admin, Imaging Hallway 2.Photoluminescent signs need light for charging signs throughout the facility’s exits NFPA 101 7.10.5 Illumination of Signs. 7.10.5.1* General. Every sign required by 7.10.1.2, 7.10.1.5, or 7.10.8.1, other than where operations or processes require low lighting levels, shall be suitably illuminated by a reliable light source. Externally and internally illuminated signs shall be legible in both the normal and emergency lighting mode. 7.10.7 Internally Illuminated Signs. 7.10.7.1 Listing. Internally illuminated signs shall be listed in accordance with ANSI/UL 924, Standard for Emergency Lighting and Power Equipment, unless they meet one of the following criteria: (1)They are approved existing signs. (2)They are existing signs having the required wording in legible letters not less than 4 in. (100 mm) high. (3)They are signs that are in accordance with 7.10.1.3 and 7.10.1.6. 7.10.7.2* Photoluminescent Signs. The face of a photoluminescent sign shall be continually illuminated while the building is occupied. The illumination levels on the face of the photoluminescent sign shall be in accordance with its listing. The charging illumination shall be a reliable light source, as determined by the authority having jurisdiction. The charging light source, shall be of a type specified in the product markings. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Fire Alarm System - Installation
The inspectors’ words, 457 words
“Fire Alarm System - Installation CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Alarm System - Installation A fire alarm system is installed with systems and components approved for the purpose in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electric Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code to provide effective warning of fire in any part of the building. In areas not continuously occupied, detection is installed at each fire alarm control unit. In new occupancy, detection is also installed at notification appliance circuit power extenders, and supervising station transmitting equipment. Fire alarm system wiring or other transmission paths are monitored for integrity. 18.3.4.1, 19.3.4.1, 9.6, 9.6.1.8 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that facility did not follow installation and testing requirements for the fire alarm system IAW NFPA 72 for past construction project. 1.UnPermitted work conducted without AHJ approval/final testing for the MRI remodel project NFPA 72 14.4.1 System Testing. 14.4.1.1 Initial Acceptance Testing. 14.4.1.1.1 Initial acceptance testing shall be performed as required in 14.4.1.1.1.1 through 14.4.1.1.1.2. 14.4.1.1.1.1 All new systems shall be inspected and tested in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 14. 14.4.1.1.1.2 The authority having jurisdiction shall be notified prior to the initial acceptance test. 14.4.1.2* Reacceptance Testing. 14.4.1.2.1 Reacceptance testing shall be performed as required in 14.4.1.2.1.1 through 14.4.1.2.1.4. 14.4.1.2.1.1 When an initiating device, notification appliance, or control relay is added, it shall be functionally tested. 14.4.1.2.1.2 When an initiating device, notification appliance, or control relay is deleted, another device, appliance, or control relay on the circuit shall be operated. 14.4.1.2.1.3 When modifications or repairs to control equipment hardware are made, the control equipment shall be tested in accordance with Table 14.4.2.2, items 1(a) and 1(d). 14.4.1.2.1.4 When changes are made to site-specific software, the following shall apply: (1)All functions known to be affected by the change, or identified by a means that indicates changes, shall be 100 percent tested. (2)In addition, 10 percent of initiating devices that are not directly affected by the change, up to a maximum of 50 devices, also shall be tested and correct system operation shall be verified. (3)A revised record of completion in accordance with 10.18.2.1 shall be prepared to reflect these changes. 14.4.1.2.2 Changes to all control units connected or controlled by the system executive software shall require a 10 percent functional test of the system, including a test of at least one device on each input and output circuit to verify critical system functions such as notification appliances, control functions, and off-premises reporting. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director.”
-
Fire Alarm System - Testing And Maintenance
The inspectors’ words, 392 words
“Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance CFR(s): NFPA 101 Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance A fire alarm system is tested and maintained in accordance with an approved program complying with the requirements of NFPA 70, National Electric Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. Records of system acceptance, maintenance and testing are readily available. 9.6.1.3, 9.6.1.5, NFPA 70, NFPA 72 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the fire alarm system components and devices in accordance with the Life Safety Code Section 9.6 and NFPA 72. 1. Annual Fire Alarm Report - Need to clarify if all heat detection was tested for the elevator and elevator pits - Detectors that were missed during the remodel need to be tested - Emergency Control Functions need to be tested IAW NFPA 72 (Smoke/Fire Dampers) - Semi-annual visual inspection not documented on the report NFPA 101, Section 9.6.1.5* To ensure operational integrity, the fire alarm system shall have an approved maintenance and testing program complying with the applicable requirements of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. NFPA 72- 14.4.2.2* Systems and associated equipment shall be tested according to Table 14.4.2.2. (15). Alarm notification appliances (a) Audible: Test shall be performed in accordance with the manufacturer ’ s published instructions. Appliance locations shall be verified to be per approved layout, and it shall be confirmed that no floor plan changes affect the approved layout. It shall be verified that the candela rating marking agrees with the approved drawing. It shall be confirmed that each appliance flashes. 14.4.2.2* Systems and associated equipment shall be tested according to Table 14.4.2.2. 23. Emergency control functions Emergency control functions (i.e., fan control, smoke damper operation, elevator recall, elevator power shutdown, door holder release, shutter release, door unlocking, etc.) shall be tested by operating or simulating alarm signals. Testing frequency for emergency control functions shall be the same as the frequency required for the initiating device that activates the emergency control function. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing
The inspectors’ words, 596 words
“Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observations and records review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the automatic sprinkler system in accordance with National Fire Protection Association NFPA 25 and NFPA 101. 1. Sprinkler in OR area not flush with the ceiling 2. Woman ’ s imaging sprinkler head damaged 3. Missing sprinkler cover in office 123 4. Sprinkler in freezer missing escutcheon 5. Hydro sign blank for sprinkler riser in basement 6. Sprinkler pipe in the basement has wires attached 7. Sprinkler coverage needs to be evaluated in the basement, multiple sprinkler heads obstructed by HVAC work, Records storage room: protection and sprinkler not in compliance with NFPA 99 15.10 and 15.11 8. Stairwell between 3rd floor of the hospital and the leased space is not sprinklered IAW NFPA 13 9. ATS room bump out not sprinklered in accordance with NFPA 13 and facility’s life safety plans 10. Penthouse area not protected with an approved sprinkler system NFPA 101: 4.6.12.1 Whenever or wherever any device, equipment, system, condition, arrangement, level of protection, fire-resistive construction, or any other feature is required for compliance with the provisions of this Code, such device, equipment, system, condition, arrangement, level of protection, fire-resistive construction, or other feature shall thereafter be continuously maintained. Maintenance shall be provided in accordance with applicable NFPA requirements or requirements developed as part of a performance-based design, or as directed by the authority having jurisdiction. NFPA 25 5.2.6* Hydraulic Design Information Sign. The hydraulic design information sign for hydraulically designed systems shall be inspected quarterly to verify that it is attached securely to the sprinkler riser and is legible. NFPA 13 8.15.3.2 Noncombustible Construction. 8.15.3.2.1 In noncombustible stair shafts having noncombustible stairs with noncombustible or limited-combustible finishes, sprinklers shall be installed at the top of the shaft and under the first accessible landing above the bottom of the shaft. NFPA 101 19.3.5 Extinguishment Requirements. 19.3.5.3 Where required by 19.1.6, buildings containing hospitals or limited care facilities shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7, unless otherwise permitted by 19.3.5.5. NFPA 99 15.10* Compact Storage. Compact storage shall be protected by sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. 15.11 Compact Mobile Storage. 15.11.1 Rooms with compact mobile storage units greater than 50 ft2 (4.65 m2) shall be protected as a hazardous area in accordance with the applicable building code, NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, or fire code. 15.11.2 Smoke detection shall be installed above compact mobile storage units greater than 50 ft2 (4.65 m2) in accordance with NFPA 72. 15.11.3* Compact mobile storage units greater than 50 ft2 (465 m2) shall be protected by automatic sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Corridor - Doors
The inspectors’ words, 593 words
“Corridor - Doors CFR(s): NFPA 101 Corridor - Doors Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas resist the passage of smoke and are made of 1 3/4 inch solid-bonded core wood or other material capable of resisting fire for at least 20 minutes. Doors in fully sprinklered smoke compartments are only required to resist the passage of smoke. Corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials have positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited by CMS regulation. These requirements do not apply to auxiliary spaces that do not contain flammable or combustible material. Clearance between bottom of door and floor covering is not exceeding 1 inch. Powered doors complying with 7.2.1.9 are permissible if provided with a device capable of keeping the door closed when a force of 5 lbf is applied. There is no impediment to the closing of the doors. Hold open devices that release when the door is pushed or pulled are permitted. Nonrated protective plates of unlimited height are permitted. Dutch doors meeting 19.3.6.3.6 are permitted. Door frames shall be labeled and made of steel or other materials in compliance with 8.3, unless the smoke compartment is sprinklered. Fixed fire window assemblies are allowed per 8.3. In sprinklered compartments there are no restrictions in area or fire resistance of glass or frames in window assemblies. 19.3.6.3, 42 CFR Parts 403, 418, 460, 482, 483, and 485 Show in REMARKS details of doors such as fire protection ratings, automatics closing devices, etc. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain corridor doors in accordance with NFPA 101. 1. Room 2112 doors need to be self-closers and on mag locks if they want to be held open. Staff area door should be a rated door 2. The drop-down door in the admin area needs to be maintained or removed NFPA 101, 8.3.3.1 Openings required to have a fire protection rating by Table 8.3.4.2 shall be protected by approved, listed, labeled fire door assemblies and fire window assemblies and their accompanying hardware, including all frames, closing devices, anchorage, and sills in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, except as otherwise specified in this Code. NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.1* Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas shall be doors constructed to resist the passage of smoke and shall be constructed of materials such as the following: (1) 13/4 in. (44 mm) thick, solid-bonded core wood (2) Material that resists fire for a minimum of 20 minutes NFPA 101, 19.3.6.3.5* Doors shall be provided with a means for keeping the door closed that is acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction, and the following requirements also shall apply: (1) The device used shall be capable of keeping the door fully closed if a force of 5 lbf (22 N) is applied at the latch edge of the door. (2)Roller latches shall be prohibited on corridor doors in buildings not fully protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 19.3.5.7. NFPA 101 4.6.12.3* Existing life safety features obvious to the public, if not required by the Code, shall be either maintained or removed. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Subdivision Of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie
The inspectors’ words, 352 words
“Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrie CFR(s): NFPA 101 Subdivision of Building Spaces - Smoke Barrier Construction 2012 EXISTING Smoke barriers shall be constructed to a 1/2-hour fire resistance rating per 8.5. Smoke barriers shall be permitted to terminate at an atrium wall. Smoke dampers are not required in duct penetrations in fully ducted HVAC systems where an approved sprinkler system is installed for smoke compartments adjacent to the smoke barrier. 19.3.7.3, 8.6.7.1(1) Describe any mechanical smoke control system in REMARKS. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observation and staff interview during the course of the survey it was determined the facility failed to maintain fire/smoke barriers in accordance with NFPA 101. 1.Ortho Electrical Closet Penetrations in closet (Need to know listing of material used in closet) NFPA 101 8.3.1.2* Fire barriers shall comply with one of the following: (1) The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, or a combination thereof, including continuity through all concealed spaces, such as those found above a ceiling, including interstitial spaces. (2)The fire barriers are continuous from outside wall to outside wall or from one fire barrier to another, and from the floor to the bottom of the interstitial space, provided that the construction assembly forming the bottom of the interstitial space has a fire resistance rating not less than that of the fire barrier. 8.3.4 Opening Protectives. 8.3.4.1 Every opening in a fire barrier shall be protected to limit the spread of fire and restrict the movement of smoke from one side of the fire barrier to the other. 8.3.4.2* The fire protection rating for opening protectives in fire barriers, fire-rated smoke barriers, and fire-rated smoke partitions shall be in accordance with Table 8.3.4.2, except as otherwise permitted in 8.3.4.3 or 8.3.4.4. Table 8.3.4.2 was revised by a tentative interim amendment (TIA). These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Hvac
The inspectors’ words, 219 words
“HVAC CFR(s): NFPA 101 HVAC Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning shall comply with 9.2 and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. 18.5.2.1, 19.5.2.1, 9.2 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain smoke dampers in accordance with Life Safety Code and NFPA 105 1. Fire Damper report showed multiple dampers not reachable or failed, with no repair reports available (invoice available but no repair report) NFPA 105, 6.5.1 Smoke dampers for dedicated and non-dedicated smoke control systems shall be inspected and tested in accordance with NFPA 92A, Standard for Smoke-Control Systems Utilizing Barriers and Pressure Differences. 6.5.2* Each damper shall be tested and inspected one year after installation. The test and inspection frequency shall then be every 4 years, except in hospitals, where the frequency shall be every 6 years. 6.5.3 Care shall be exercised that all tests are completed in a safe manner wearing the appropriate personal protective equipment. 6.5.4 Full unobstructed access to the damper shall be verified and corrected as required. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Elevators
The inspectors’ words, 326 words
“Elevators CFR(s): NFPA 101 Elevators 2012 EXISTING Elevators comply with the provision of 9.4. Elevators are inspected and tested as specified in ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators. Firefighter’s Service is operated monthly with a written record. Existing elevators conform to ASME/ANSI A17.3, Safety Code for Existing Elevators and Escalators. All existing elevators, having a travel distance of 25 feet or more above or below the level that best serves the needs of emergency personnel for firefighting purposes, conform with Firefighter’s Service Requirements of ASME/ANSI A17.3. (Includes firefighter’s service Phase I key recall and smoke detector automatic recall, firefighter’s service Phase II emergency in-car key operation, machine room smoke detectors, and elevator lobby smoke detectors.) 19.5.3, 9.4.2, 9.4.3 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the elevator components and devices in accordance with NFPA 101. 1.No Elevator monthly com checks (Facility working on plan to update system) NFPA 101 9.4.6 Elevator Testing. 9.4.6.1 Elevators shall be subject to periodic inspections and tests as specified in ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators. 9.4.6.2 All elevators equipped with fire fighters ’ emergency operations in accordance with 9.4.3 shall be subject to a monthly operation with a written record of the findings made and kept on the premises as required by ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators. 9.4.6.3 The elevator inspections and tests required by 9.4.6.1 shall be performed at frequencies complying with one of the following: (1)Inspection and test frequencies specified in Appendix N of ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators (2) Inspection and test frequencies specified by the authority having jurisdiction These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Operating Features - Other
The inspectors’ words, 342 words
“Operating Features - Other CFR(s): NFPA 101 Operating Features - Other List in the REMARKS section any LSC Section 18.7 and 19.7 Operating Features requirements that are not addressed by the provided K-tags, but are deficient. This information, along with the applicable Life Safety Code or NFPA standard citation, should be included in Form CMS-2567. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the Rooftop Landing Facilities in accordance with the Life Safety Code NFPA 418. Two portable foam extinguishers, each having a rating of 20-A:160-B, not available in lieu of foam suppression system Unable to provide training documentation for firefighting operations NFPA 418 7.7 Fire Protection.The fire protection requirements in Section 7.7 shall be permitted to be modified where a fire risk assessment, as outlined in Chapter 4, identifies that an alternative means of protection is acceptable as outlined in the fire risk assessment. 7.7.1 General. A foam fire protection system with either a fixed discharge outlet(s) in accordance with 7.7.2 or a hose line(s) in accordance with 7.7.3 shall be designed and installed to protect the rooftop landing pad, unless otherwise permitted by the following: (1) A foam fire protection system shall not be required for heliports, helistops, vertiports, or vertistops, located on open parking structures or buildings that are not normally occupied. (2) For A-1 heliports, helistops, vertiports, and vertistops, two portable foam extinguishers, each having a rating of 20-A:160-B, shall be permitted to be used to satisfy the requirement of 7.7.1. (3) Where foam extinguishers per 7.7.1(2) are not available, approved extinguishers with a 20-A:160B:C rating shall be permitted. (4) Where approved, alternative fire protection systems shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 4. 7.7.1.1 Where trained personnel are not available, fixed fire protection outlet(s) shall be provided. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director.”
-
Electrical Systems - Maintenance And Testing
The inspectors’ words, 318 words
“Electrical Systems - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Maintenance and Testing Hospital-grade receptacles at patient bed locations and where deep sedation or general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing. Additional testing is performed at intervals defined by documented performance data. Receptacles not listed as hospital-grade at these locations are tested at intervals not exceeding 12 months. Line isolation monitors (LIM), if installed, are tested at intervals of less than or equal to 1 month by actuating the LIM test switch per 6.3.2.6.3.6, which activates both visual and audible alarm. For LIM circuits with automated self-testing, this manual test is performed at intervals less than or equal to 12 months. LIM circuits are tested per 6.3.3.3.2 after any repair or renovation to the electric distribution system. Records are maintained of required tests and associated repairs or modifications, containing date, room or area tested, and results. 6.3.4 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on documentation review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility did not maintain proper electrical practices in accordance with NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code (2012). This was evidenced by: 1.No documentation available to show hospital grade receptacles have been inspected IAW with performance data NFPA Standard: NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code (2012) 6.3.4.1 Maintenance and Testing of Electrical System. 6.3.4.1.1 Where hospital-grade receptacles are required at patient bed locations and in locations where deep sedation or general anesthesia is administered, testing shall be performed after initial installation, replacement, or servicing of the device. 6.3.4.1.2 Additional testing of receptacles in patient care rooms shall be performed at intervals defined by documented performance data. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste
The inspectors’ words, 401 words
“Electrical Systems - Essential Electric Syste CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Systems - Essential Electric System Maintenance and Testing The generator or other alternate power source and associated equipment is capable of supplying service within 10 seconds. If the 10-second criterion is not met during the monthly test, a process shall be provided to annually confirm this capability for the life safety and critical branches. Maintenance and testing of the generator and transfer switches are performed in accordance with NFPA 110. Generator sets are inspected weekly, exercised under load 30 minutes 12 times a year in 20-40 day intervals, and exercised once every 36 months for 4 continuous hours. Scheduled test under load conditions include a complete simulated cold start and automatic or manual transfer of all EES loads, and are conducted by competent personnel. Maintenance and testing of stored energy power sources (Type 3 EES) are in accordance with NFPA 111. Main and feeder circuit breakers are inspected annually, and a program for periodically exercising the components is established according to manufacturer requirements. Written records of maintenance and testing are maintained and readily available. EES electrical panels and circuits are marked, readily identifiable, and separate from normal power circuits. Minimizing the possibility of damage of the emergency power source is a design consideration for new installations. 6.4.4, 6.5.4, 6.6.4 (NFPA 99), NFPA 110, NFPA 111, 700.10 (NFPA 70) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on observation and record review during the survey, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the back-up emergency generator in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 110. This was evidenced by the following: 1. Generator Documentation Missing - No weekly Inspections documented - Documents state specific gravity testing; however, batteries are sealed - Monthly transfer switch time is not logged 8.1.1 The routine Maintenance and operational testing program shall be based on all of the following: Manufacturers recommendations Instruction manuals Minimum requirements of this chapter The authority having jurisdiction 8.3.7.1 Maintenance of lead-acid batteries shall include the monthly testing and recording of electrolyte specific gravity. Battery conductance testing shall be permitted in lieu of the testing of specific gravity when applicable or warranted. These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
-
Gas Equipment - Testing And Maintenance Requi
The inspectors’ words, 316 words
“Gas Equipment - Testing and Maintenance Requi CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas Equipment - Testing and Maintenance Requirements Anesthesia apparatus are tested at the final path to patient after any adjustment, modification or repair. Before the apparatus is returned to service, each connection is checked to verify proper gas and an oxygen analyzer is used to verify oxygen concentration. Defective equipment is immediately removed from service. Areas designated for servicing of oxygen equipment are clean and free of oil, grease, or other flammables. Manufacturer service manuals are used to maintain equipment and a scheduled maintenance program is followed. 11.4.1.3, 11.5.1.3, 11.6.2.5, 11.6.2.6 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47557 Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the fire alarm system components and devices in accordance with the Life Safety Code and NFPA 99. 1. Med Gas: Shows deficiencies on report (Recommend reaching out to MedGas to get a documented response for what these affect, DFPC is unable to determine distinct life hazard based on the report) 2. Oxygen outside needs coverage NFPA 99 5.1.1.4 An existing system that is not in strict compliance with the provisions of this code shall be permitted to be continued in use as long as the authority having jurisdiction has determined that such use does not constitute a distinct hazard to life. 11.6.5.4 Cylinders stored in the open shall be protected as follows: (1)Against extremes of weather and from the ground beneath to prevent rusting (2)During winter, against accumulations of ice or snow (3)During summer, screened against continuous exposure to direct rays of the sun in those localities where extreme temperatures prevail These deficiencies have the potential to affect occupants, who might include residents, staff, and visitors within the entire facility. Deficient items were discussed with the Director of Compliance and the Maintenance Director at the exit conference.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 10, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Standard inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Apr 23, 2025 | Standard inspection | 14 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 7.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (209 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 62% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 19.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17.6%, COPD 19.3%, hip or knee replacement 5.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 168 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 76% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.11 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 4 of 5.
- 91% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 7 owners or officers are people: Javier Martinez (corporate officer); Karla Hardesty (corporate director); Christine Hettinger Hunt (corporate officer); Shane Mortensen (corporate director); Carmelo Hernandez (corporate officer); Konnie Martin (corporate officer); Konnie Martin (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Alamosa County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.