Hearth Record

Memorialcare Saddleback Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Laguna Hills, California 92653

24451 Health Center Drive, Laguna Hills, California 92653. (949) 837-4500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 17, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 17, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Discharge Planning- Transmission Information

    The inspectors’ words, 1,338 words

    “DISCHARGE PLANNING- TRANSMISSION INFORMATION CFR(s): Discharge of the patient and the provision and transmission of the patient’s necessary medical information. (b) The hospital must discharge the patient , and also transfer or refer the patient where applicable, along with all necessary medical information pertaining to the patient’s current course of illness and treatment, post-discharge goals of care, and treatment preferences, at the time of discharge, to the appropriate post-acute care service providers and suppliers, facilities, agencies, and other outpatient service providers and practitioners responsible for the patient’s follow-up or ancillary care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39199 Based on interview and record review, the hospital failed to ensure one of eight sampled patients (Patient 1) was discharged in accordance with the physician’s discharge order and to an appropriate post-hospital level of care. Patient 1 was transferred from Hospital 2 to Hospital 1 for medical treatment. Following medical clearance, the physician ordered discharge back to Hospital 2. However, there was no bed hold in place, a new intake evaluation was required for readmission, and Social Worker 1 did not complete the intake process or notify the physician that the patient could not return as ordered. Despite the absence of an accepting psychiatric facility and without notifying the physician that the ordered discharge disposition could not be carried out, Patient 1 was discharged to self-care and transported by ridesharing to Hospital 2 to retrieve their personal belongings. Upon arrival at Hospital 2, the staff reported that Patient 1 appeared disheveled, confused, disorganized, had slurred speech and difficulty keeping their eyes open, and reported that they had been rushed out of the hospital. Due to concerns regarding the patient’s condition, Hospital 2 staff contacted 911, and Patient 1 was transported to the emergency department for further evaluation. These failures resulted in Patient 1 not being discharged as ordered, interruption of the patient’s ongoing care needs, and an emergency transfer for further medical evaluation. The failures had the potential to delay access to appropriate follow-up services, worsen the patient’s condition, and place the patient at risk for harm. Findings: During a review of the hospital’s P&P titled “Admission/Discharge/Transfer,” dated 1/31/24, the P&P showed the following: - Discharge is the formal release by the hospital, upon a physician order, of an inpatient/outpatient. This can be to the following facilities: psychiatric hospital, acute rehabilitation, or home. - Discharge planning begins on admission and is a continuous process utilizing an interdisciplinary approach to facilitate and ensure an appropriate, timely, and safe discharge plan, in accordance with the patient needs and preferences. - Prior to discharge, the Care Manager/Discharge Planner ensures that the appropriate facility has accepted the patient and needed resources can be provided. Facility referrals, requests for procurement of services and supplies, and communication of pertinent clinical information are sent. - Patients are discharged when the physician determines that the patient has met the predetermined criteria for discharge or transfer from acute care (and prior appropriate arrangements have been made to continue care at home, long-term care, skilled nursing facility, or acute care facility). - Upon determination that a patient requires acute psychiatric care, the RN/case manager ensures physician order for discharge. The RN/case manager/social worker verifies with the Psychiatric Evaluation Team transportation arrangements and/or arranges as necessary. During a review of Patient 1’s medical record on 6/9/26, the medical record showed Patient 1 was admitted to Hospital 1 on 4/15/26 and discharged on 4/17/26 at 1739 hours. During a review of the ED Provider Notes dated 4/15/26 at 1722 hours, the ED Provider Notes showed Patient 1 was brought to the emergency department by ambulance from Hospital 2 for altered mental status. During a review of Patient 1’s H&P examination dated 4/15/26 at 2254 hours, the H&P showed Patient 1 presented to Hospital 1 with a chief complaint of altered level of consciousness. The patient was brought from Hospital 2 where the patient had been voluntarily admitted for suicidal ideation with a plan to slit their wrists. During a review of the Hospitalist Medicine Progress Note dated 4/17/26 at 1455 hours, the Hospitalist Medicine Progress Note showed Patient 1 had been voluntarily admitted to Hospital 2 for suicidal ideation with a plan to slit their wrists. The note showed Patient 1 was found with altered mental status and demonstrated mild improvement following Narcan (a medication used to quickly reverse effects of opioids [pain relievers] administration). The physician documented that Patient 1 was medically cleared and planned for discharge back to Hospital 2. During a review of Patient 1’s physician order dated 4/17/26 at 1515 hours, the physician’s order showed Patient 1 was to be discharged back to Hospital 2, from which he had been transferred. During a review of Patient 1’s Social Work progress note dated 4/17/26 at 1122 hours, the Social Work progress note showed Social Worker 1 spoke with the staff at Hospital 2 and was informed that Patient 1 did not have a bed hold and a new intake evaluation was required for readmission once Patient 1 was medically cleared for discharge. During a review of Patient 1’s Interdisciplinary Discharge Plan Report dated the Interdisciplinary Discharge Plan Report showed the patient’s discharge goals were to return to Hospital 2 to continue inpatient therapy. During a review of Patient 1’s Social Work progress note dated 4/17/26 at 1645 hours, the Social Work progress note showed Social Worker 1 met with Patient 1 and discussed that Hospital 2 did not hold a bed for the patient but the patient was ready for discharge and Hospital 1 would arrange for transportation for them to retrieve their belongings at Hospital 2. During a review of Patient 1’s medical record, the medical records failed to show documentation that the physician was notified that Patient 1 could not return to Hospital 2 as ordered due to the absence of a bed hold and the need for a new intake evaluation. Additionally, Patient 1’s medical record failed to show evidence that Hospital 2 had accepted Patient 1 for readmission prior to discharge. During a review of Patient 1’s nursing discharge note dated 4/17/26 at 1740 hours, Patient 1’s nursing discharge note showed the discharge disposition was documented as Hospital 2 per the physician. However, the note also showed Patient 1 was transported by ridesharing service to Hospital 2 to retrieve personal belongings, rather than being transferred to an accepting psychiatric facility as ordered. During a concurrent interview and Patient 1’s medical record review on 6/10/26 at 1111 hours, with the Executive Director of Acute Care Services, Director of Emergency Services, and Social Worker 2, who verified the findings. They stated Patient 1 had a physician order to discharge back to Hospital 2; however, Social Worker 1 discharged the patient to self-care, contrary to the physician’s discharge order. They stated Social Worker 1 had been informed that no bed hold was in place and that a new intake evaluation was required for the patient to return to Hospital 2. They confirmed Patient 1’s medical record contained no evidence that the physician was notified that Patient 1 could not return to Hospital 2, as ordered. They stated the appropriate action would have been to notify the physician and initiate the intake evaluation process. During a telephone interview on 6/10/26 at 1212 hours, with staff at Hospital 2 who reported that Patient 1 was dropped off by a ridesharing service. Staff reported that Patient 1 appeared disheveled, confused, disorganized, had slurred speech and difficulty keeping their eyes open, and reported that they had been rushed out of the hospital. The psychiatric hospital staff stated that due to concerns regarding Patient 1’s condition, they contacted 911 and Patient 1 was transported to the emergency department for further evaluation. During a review of the ED Care Timeline, the ED Care Timeline showed Patient 1 was brought by ambulance to a different hospital’s emergency department on 4/17/26 at 1912 hours, for altered mental status and weakness. Documentation showed the patient was falling asleep during triage and was disoriented to place.”

    Rule A0813. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 17, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Apr 9, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 16, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 27, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 2 better and 0 worse of 7.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (1,973 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.2%, heart failure 11.3%, pneumonia 15.7%, COPD 9.2%, stroke 12.1%, heart bypass surgery 2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.8%, heart failure 20.2%, pneumonia 19.6%, COPD 19.8%, heart bypass surgery 10%, hip or knee replacement 5.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 206 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 82% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.06 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jan 27, 1974.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 32 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 76% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Memorial Health Services owns an unstated share directly since May 22, 1969.
  • 18 owners or officers are people: Theresa Evans (corporate director); Dale Vital (corporate director, 0%); Catherine Y Han (corporate director, 0%); Thomas Rogers (corporate director); Thomas Feldmar (corporate director, 0%); Tam Nguyen (corporate director, 0%); David Wolf (corporate director, 0%); Sharon Cheever (corporate director); Julio A Ibarra (corporate director); Lalita M Komanapalli (corporate director, 0%); Frank J Marino (corporate director, 0%); Shela Kaneshiro (corporate officer, 0%); Barry Arbuckle (corporate director); Michael D Moneta (corporate director, 0%); Christopher Finch (corporate officer); Christopher Finch (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aaron Coley (corporate officer); Aaron Coley (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospitals CMS lists in Orange County, 20 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 7 rated 4 of 5, 2 rated 3 of 5, 6 rated 2 of 5, 3 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.