Hearth Record

Little Colorado Medical Center

A critical access hospital in Winslow, Arizona 86047

1501 North Williamson Avenue, Winslow, Arizona 86047. (928) 289-4691.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 5, 2024: a standard inspection.

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 5, 2024: standard inspection12 deficiencies
  • Governing Body Or Responsible Individual

    The inspectors’ words, 802 words

    “GOVERNING BODY OR RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL CFR(s): The CAH has a governing body or an individual that assumes full legal responsibility for determining, implementing and monitoring policies governing the CAH’S total operation and for ensuring that those policies are administered so as to provide quality health care in a safe environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46598 Based on facility records and staff interviews the Department determined that an Administrator failed to ensure that 4 out of 7 medical providers were credentialed and granted facility privileges according to the requirements in the facility’s Medical Bylaws, Rules, and Regulations. This deficient practice poses a health and safety risk to the patient if the medical provider is treating patients without being appointed to the facility staff. Hospital document titled “Medical Staff Bylaws, Rules and Regulations” revealed: “...Article III Membership ...3.1 Nature of Appointment. Staff appointment is a privilege extended by the institution, not a right of any practitioner. Appointment to the staff or exercise of temporary privileges shall be extended to professionally competent practitioners who continually meet the qualifications, standards, and requirements set forth in these Bylaws ...3.5 Terms of Appointment. Appointments shall be made by the Board of Directors, as set forth in Article V Section 5.1 of these bylaws, after the recommendation of the Medical Staff and shall be for a period of up to two (2) years ...3.6 Procedure for appointment. 3.6.1. Appointment and reappointment to the Medical Staff begins with completion of the application form. Each applicant is appraised by the Medical Executive Committee. Applicants approved by the Medical Executive Committee are considered by the Board of Directors at their next regular meeting. Additionally, the applicant shall be responsible for the submission of ...B. Peer references familiar with the applicant’s professional competence and ethical character ...3.7 Reappointment 3.7.1 Recommendations for reappointment shall be considered at a Medical Executive Committee meeting preceding expiration of an appointment so that timely action may be taken by the Board of Directors ...Procedure for Reappointment. 3.8.1 ...Only after all information required as set forth in these Bylaws, Rules, and Regulations has been received will an application be considered complete. The Medical Executive Committee shall review information and, obtain additional information it deems needed, and make a recommendation to the Board of Directors ... 3.10 Extension of Appointment. If an application for reappointment has not been fully processed by the expiration date of a member’s appointment, the staff member shall maintain membership status and clinical privileges for up to four (4) months until the processing is completed, unless the delay is due to the member’s failure to provide timely documentation or cooperation, in which case the appointment may lapse. At that point, the reappointment application may be closed and the applicant may be required to submit a new initial application in order to rejoin the Medical Staff ...3.11 Failure to file reappointment application. Failure to file a timely completed application for reappointment may result in suspension of the member’s privileges ....” Document titled “Facility Plan of Correction” submitted to Arizona Department of Health Services, 1/02/2024, revealed the process that the facility will take to ensure how the deficiency that was cited the previous year 12/14/2023, is to be corrected on both a temporary and permanent basis. The facility failed to follow through with the process. “ ...d. Any provider that has not completed process within 120 days of the due date will be reported to the CEO and Medical Staff President for further action, including voluntary relinquishment of privileges until the application is complete. 2. Anticipated date the correction will be completed. 2/8/2024. A review of Medical Provider Credentialing Files revealed that 4 out of 7 providers have not been re-credentialed within the required time. Employee # 35 confirmed during an interview conducted on 12/04/2024, that the providers fail to submit the required peer review letters in a timely fashion, which holds up the credentialing process. Employee # 35 confirmed during an interview conducted on 12/04/2024, that 4 out of 7 physician files revealed that the physician privileges are out of date. In January 2024, the Governing Body decided to extend temporary privileges to the physicians who were not fully credentialed. The temporary privileges would be extended to April 2024. Employee # 35 confirmed during an interview conducted on 12/04/2024, after a review of the Medical Executive Committee Meeting Minutes dated 01/09/2024, 02/13/2024, 03/12/2024 for 2024, 05/14/2024, 06/11/2024, 08/13/2024, 09/10/2024 and the Governing Body Meeting Minutes dated 02/28/2024, 04/24/2024, 06/26/2024, 08/28/2024, and 10/25/2024, there was no further mention of the providers whose privileges have lapsed or what the plan will be going forward. Employee # 4 and Employee # 35 both confirm that providers # 1, # 2, # 5, and # 6 have been practicing at the facility without privileges since April 2024.”

    Rule C0962. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 469 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on a review of the facility’s Emergency Plan, record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a facility-based risk assessment and include all the identified risks as a policy in its emergency plan. Failure to establish emergency plans based on a facilities-based risk assessment poses a potential danger. It may cause harm to the patients and staff during an emergency if the specific needs of both the patient and staff are not identified as part of the EP plan. Findings include: Observations made during a document review on December 4, 2024, revealed that the facility failed to write a policy for each of the hazards identified in the facility-based risk assessment. The HVA identified mass casualty as a risk for the facility but did not create a plan for dealing with this risk. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed during the exit conference that the HVA/risk assessment identified risks not addressed in the policies.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Initial Comments - Not A Deficiency Citation

    “Critical Access Hospital The facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 Edition of the National Fire Protection Association’s Life Safety Code. This is a Recertification survey for Medicare under LSC 2012, Chapter 19, Existing. The entire facility was surveyed on December 3-5, 2024. The facility meets the standards based on acceptance of a plan of correction.”

    Rule K0000. Standard-level.

  • Corridor Access

    The inspectors’ words, 807 words

    “Corridor Access CFR(s): NFPA 101 Corridor Access All habitable rooms not within suites have a door leading directly outside to grade or have a door leading to an exit access corridor. Patient sleeping rooms with less than eight patient beds may have one room intervening to reach an exit access corridor provided the intervening room is equipped with an approved automatic smoke detection system. 18.2.5.6.1 through 18.2.5.6.4, 19.2.5.6.1 through 19.2.5.6.4 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on the document review, it was determined that the facility did not identify exit corridors for some patients. Failure to correctly identify exit corridors could result in patients being unable to find the nearest exit in the event of a fire. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code 2012 edition, Chapter 19 Existing Health Care Occupancies Section 19.2.5.6 Corridor Access.19.2.5.6.1* Every habitable room shall have an exit access door leading directly to an exit access corridor unless otherwise provided in 19.2.5.6.2, 19.2.5.6.3, and 19.2.5.6.4. 19.2.1 General. Every aisle, passageway, corridor, exit discharge, exit location, and access shall be in accordance with Chapter 7, unless otherwise modified by 19.2.2 through 19.2.11. 7.8.1 General. 7.8.1.1* Illumination of means of egress shall be provided in accordance with Section 7.8 for every building and structure where required in Chapters 11 through 43. For the purposes of this requirement, exit access shall include only designated stairs, aisles, corridors, ramps, escalators, and passageways leading to an exit. For the purposes of this requirement, exit discharge shall include only designated stairs, aisles, corridors, ramps, escalators, walkways, and exit passageways leading to a public way. The means of egress (i.e., exit access, exit, and exit discharge) encompasses practically all spaces where persons can be present. The subject addressed by Section 7.8 is illumination of means of egress. It would seem that the title of Section 7.8 indicates that such illumination needs to be provided throughout all portions of the exit access, the exit, and the exit discharge, but this is not so. Illumination is required throughout the exit (e.g., an enclosed exit stair or exit passageway). Yet, 7.8.1.1 clarifies that, for the purposes of applying the requirements of Section 7.8, the portions of the exit access and exit discharge requiring illumination are only the “designated” egress paths, such as aisles, corridors, stairs, and ramps. “Designated” is meant to indicate designation by the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). For example, most authorities having jurisdiction do not designate the space within an individual’s work cubicle as a portion of the exit access required to be illuminated, but the aisles serving multiple cubicles are typically designated as requiring illumination. Illumination of means of egress is not required unless specifically called for in the appropriate occupancy chapter. However, all occupancy chapters do require illumination, but there are a few exemptions. For example, in new assembly occupancies, 12.2.8 exempts private-party tents not larger than 1200 ft2 (112 m2) from the illumination requirement. Subsection __.2.8 (e.g., 36.2.8 for new mercantile occupancies) of each occupancy chapter provides illumination requirements. 7.8.1.2 Illumination of means of egress shall be continuous during the time that the conditions of occupancy require that the means of egress be available for use, unless otherwise provided in 7.8.1.2.2. 7.8.1.2.1 Artificial lighting shall be employed at such locations and for such periods of time as are necessary to maintain the illumination to the minimum criteria values herein specified. 7.10.1.1 Where Required. Means of egress shall be marked in accordance with Section 7.10 where required in Chapters 11 through 43. 7.10.1.2 Exits. 7.10.1.2.1* Exits, other than main exterior exit doors that obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits, shall be marked by an approved sign that is readily visible from any direction of exit access. 7.10.1.2.2* Horizontal components of the egress path within an exit enclosure shall be marked by approved exit or directional exit signs where the continuation of the egress path is not obvious. Findings include: Observations during the tour conducted on December 3-5, 2024, revealed that the Med Surgery and Labor and Delivery areas were modified in August 2022 per documents provided by the facility. Both places were left with hallways containing patient rooms that do not lead to a marked exit corridor. Hallways on both sides and connecting Med Surg and Labor and Delivery do not have any visible exit signs from the patient room exit doors. The facility could not provide documents proving review by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)approval showing the State Department of Health approval or notification or a Waiver approval from CMS from the Life Safety Code. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed they could not find documents proving a building permit was acquired. The city AHJ did not review and approve variations from the Life Safety Code or International Building Code. CMS did not provide documents waiving the requirements for compliance with the Life Safety Code..”

    Rule K0254. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 313 words

    “Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing Automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems are inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintaining of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Records of system design, maintenance, inspection and testing are maintained in a secure location and readily available. a) Date sprinkler system last checked _____________________ b) Who provided system test ____________________________ c) Water system supply source __________________________ Provide in REMARKS information on coverage for any non-required or partial automatic sprinkler system. 9.7.5, 9.7.7, 9.7.8, and NFPA 25 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on a record review, it was determined that the facility failed to perform quarterly inspections of its sprinkler systems. Failing to perform the required inspections may cause harm to patients and staff. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.5.1. “Buildings containing health care facilities shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7.” Section 9.7.5 “All automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems required by this Code shall be inspected, tested, and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25, 2011 Edition, “Standard for the Inspection, Testing , and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems.” NFPA 25, 2011 Edition, “Water Based Extinguishment Systems,” requires monthly, quarterly, and annual testing of automatic sprinkler systems. Findings Include: Observations while on tour on December 3-5, 2024, revealed the facility failed to show proof of quarterly testing of the sprinkler systems in accordance with NFPA 25 Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems. The facility was conducting Simi annual testing but did not have quarterly testing conducted by the vendor as required in NFPA 25. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed during the exit conference that the facility failed to conduct the required quarterly testing of the sprinkler systems.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Out Of Service

    The inspectors’ words, 611 words

    “Sprinkler System - Out of Service CFR(s): NFPA 101 Sprinkler System - Out of Service Where the sprinkler system is impaired, the extent and duration of the impairment has been determined, areas or buildings involved are inspected and risks are determined, recommendations are submitted to management or designated representative, and the fire department and other authorities having jurisdiction have been notified. Where the sprinkler system is out of service for more than 10 hours in a 24-hour period, the building or portion of the building affected are evacuated or an approved fire watch is provided until the sprinkler system has been returned to service. 18.3.5.1, 19.3.5.1, 9.7.5, 15.5.2 (NFPA 25) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on the document review, the facility did not have a policy addressing suppression systems that were out of service. Failure to address requirements for suppression systems out of service could result in a fire not being stressed, putting patients and staff members in danger if a fire were to occur. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code 2012 edition Chapter 9 Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment Section 9.6.1.6* Where a required fire alarm system is out of service for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period, the authority having jurisdiction shall be notified, and the building shall be evacuated, or an approved fire watch shall be provided for all parties left unprotected by the shutdown until the fire alarm system has been returned to service. NFPA 25 2011 edition. standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems. Chapter 15 Impairments. Section 15.4 Impaired Equipment. 15.4.1 The impaired equipment shall be considered to be the water-based fire protection system or part thereof that is removed from service. 15.4.2 The impaired equipment shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (1) Sprinkler systems. (2) Standpipe systems (3 )Fire hose systems (4) Underground fire service mains (5) Fire pumps (6) Water storage tanks (7) Water spray fixed systems (8) Foam-water systems (9) Fire service control valves Section 15.5.2 Before authorization is given, the impairment coordinator shall be responsible for verifying that the following procedures have been implemented: (1) The extent and expected duration of the impairment has been determined. (2) The areas or buildings involved have been inspected, and the increased risks have been determined. (3) Recommendations have been submitted to management or the property owner or designated representative. (4) Where a required fire protection system is out of service for more than 10 hours in a 24-hour period, the impairment coordinator shall arrange for one of the following: (a) Evacuation of the building or portion of the building affected by the system out of service (b)* An approved fire watch (c)* Establishment of a temporary water supply (d)* Establishment and implementation of an approved program to eliminate potential ignition sources and limit the amount of fuel available to the fire (5) The fire department has been notified. (6) The insurance carrier, the alarm company, the property owner or designated representative, and other authorities having jurisdiction have been notified. (7) The supervisors in the areas to be affected have been notified. (8) A tag impairment system has been implemented. (9) All necessary tools and materials have been assembled on the impairment site. Findings include: Observation during document review on December 3- 5, 2024, revealed that the facility had a policy addressing out-of-service fire alarm systems but did not address out-of-service suppression systems. The policy did not discribe actions to take and how to do fire watch. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed during the exit conference that policy addressing fire alarms did not address fire protection / suppression systems”

    Rule K0354. Standard-level.

  • Corridor - Doors

    The inspectors’ words, 467 words

    “Corridor - Doors CFR(s): NFPA 101 Corridor - Doors Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas resist the passage of smoke and are made of 1 3/4 inch solid-bonded core wood or other material capable of resisting fire for at least 20 minutes. Doors in fully sprinklered smoke compartments are only required to resist the passage of smoke. Corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials have positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited by CMS regulation. These requirements do not apply to auxiliary spaces that do not contain flammable or combustible material. Clearance between bottom of door and floor covering is not exceeding 1 inch. Powered doors complying with 7.2.1.9 are permissible if provided with a device capable of keeping the door closed when a force of 5 lbf is applied. There is no impediment to the closing of the doors. Hold open devices that release when the door is pushed or pulled are permitted. Nonrated protective plates of unlimited height are permitted. Dutch doors meeting 19.3.6.3.6 are permitted. Door frames shall be labeled and made of steel or other materials in compliance with 8.3, unless the smoke compartment is sprinklered. Fixed fire window assemblies are allowed per 8.3. In sprinklered compartments there are no restrictions in area or fire resistance of glass or frames in window assemblies. 19.3.6.3, 42 CFR Parts 403, 418, 460, 482, 483, and 485 Show in REMARKS details of doors such as fire protection ratings, automatics closing devices, etc. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on observation, it was determined that the facility had fire doors that did not fully close and latch upon release. Failing to protect resident sleeping rooms from heat or smoke will harm residents and staff. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2012 edition, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.6.3.5. “Doors shall be provided with a means for keeping the door closed that is acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.” NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2012 edition, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.6.3 Corridor Doors Section 19.3.6.3.1* Doors protecting corridor openings in other than required enclosures of vertical openings, exits, or hazardous areas shall be substantial doors, such as those constructed of 1-3/4 inch solid-bonded core wood, or capable of resisting fire for at least 20 minutes. Doors in fully sprinklered smoke compartments are only required to resist the passage of smoke. Doors shall be provided with a means suitable for keeping the door closed. Findings Include: During a facility tour conducted on December 3-5, 2024, revealed two fire/smoke barrier doors did not close and latch when released from the hold-open magnets. These doors did not pass annual inspections by the facility Employees #1 and #2 confirmed some doors did not close and latch during testing”

    Rule K0363. Standard-level.

  • Hvac

    The inspectors’ words, 739 words

    “HVAC CFR(s): NFPA 101 HVAC Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning shall comply with 9.2 and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. 18.5.2.1, 19.5.2.1, 9.2 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to inspect and maintain its fire /smoke dampers or fusible links. Failure to inspect and maintain the facility’s smoke dampers may harm the patients and staff. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012 Edition Chapter 21, section 21.5.2.1 “Heating, ventilating and air conditioning shall comply with the provisions of section 9.2 and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacture’s specifications” Section 9.2.1 “ Air Conditioning, Heating, Ventilating, Ductwork, and Related Equipment.” Air conditioning, heating, ventilating ductwork, and related equipment shall be in accordance with NFPA 90 A.” “Standard for Installation of Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, NFPA 105 Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protective’s. NFPA 90 A 2012 Edition Section 5.4.8 Maintenance Section 5.4.8.1 Fire dampers and ceiling dampers shall be maintained in accordance with NFPA 80 Standard for Fire Doors and Other opening Protective’s. Section 5.4.8.2 Smoke dampers shall be maintained in accordance with NFPA 105 Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protective’s. NFPA 80 Standard for Fire Doors and Other opening Protective’s Chapter 19 Installation, Testing, and Maintenance of Fire Dampers, Section 19.4* Periodic Inspection and Testing The test and inspection frequency shall be every 4 years, except in hospitals, where the frequency shall be every six years. Section 19.4.4 if the damper is equipped with a fusible link, the link shall be removed for testing to ensure full closure and lock-in place if so equipped. Section 19.4.5 The operational test of the fire damper shall verify that there is no damper interference due to rusted, bent, misaligned, or damaged frame or blades, or defective hinges or other moving parts. Section 19.4.6 The damper frame shall not b penetrated by any foreign objects that would effect fire damper operations. Section 19.4.7 The fusible link shall be reinstalled after testing is complete. Section 19.4.8.1 if the link is damaged or painted, it shall be replaced with a link of the same size, temperature and rating. Section 19.4.9 All inspections and testing shall be documented, indicating the location of the fire damper or combination fire/smoke damper, date of inspection, name of inspector, and deficiencies discovered. Section 19.4.9.1 The documentation shall have a space to indicate when and how the deficiencies were corrected. Section 19.4.11 Periodic inspections and testing of a combination fire/smoke damper shall also meet the inspection and testing requirements contained in Chapter 6 of NFPA 105 Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protective’s. NFPA 105 Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protective’s Chapter 6 Installation, Testing and Maintenance smoke dampers. Section 6.5.2 Each damper shall be tested and inspected one year after installation. The test and inspection frequency shall then be every 4 years, except hospitals, where the frequency shall be every 6 years. Section 6.5 Periodic Inspection and Testing. Section 6.5.11 All inspections and testing shall be documented, indicating the location of the fire damper or combination fire/smoke damper, date of inspection, name of inspector, and deficiencies discovered. Section 19.4.9.1 The documentation shall have a space to indicate when and how the deficiencies were corrected. Section 6.5.11 Section 6.6 Maintenance. Section 6.6.1 Any reports of abrupt changes in airflow or noise from the duct system shall be investigated to verify that it is not related to damper operation. Section 6.6.2* All exposed moving parts of the damper shall be dry lubricated as required by the manufacturer. Section 6.6.3 if the damper is not operable, repairs shall begin as soon a s possible. Section 6.6.4 Following any repairs, the damper shall be tested for proper operation in accordance with Section 6.6.5 Smoke damper actuation shall be initiated at a time interval recommended by the actuator manufacturer. Section 6.6.6 All maintenance shall be maintained and records shall be retained in accordance with 6..5.11 and 6.5.12. Findings Include: The facility documentation reviewed on December 3-5, 2024, revealed that the facility had fire or smoke dampers. Still, no documentation indicated that the smoke dampers had been maintained in the past six years. The paperwork provided only showed documentation of testing conducted in 2014. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed they did not have proof of damper testing in the last six years.”

    Rule K0521. Standard-level.

  • Smoking Regulations

    The inspectors’ words, 484 words

    “Smoking Regulations CFR(s): NFPA 101 Smoking Regulations Smoking regulations shall be adopted and shall include not less than the following provisions: (1) Smoking shall be prohibited in any room, ward, or compartment where flammable liquids, combustible gases, or oxygen is used or stored and in any other hazardous location, and such area shall be posted with signs that read NO SMOKING or shall be posted with the international symbol for no smoking. (2) In health care occupancies where smoking is prohibited and signs are prominently placed at all major entrances, secondary signs with language that prohibits smoking shall not be required. (3) Smoking by patients classified as not responsible shall be prohibited. (4) The requirement of 18.7.4(3) shall not apply where the patient is under direct supervision. (5) Ashtrays of noncombustible material and safe design shall be provided in all areas where smoking is permitted. (6) Metal containers with self-closing cover devices into which ashtrays can be emptied shall be readily available to all areas where smoking is permitted. 18.7.4, 19.7.4 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on the document review, it was determined that the facility did not provide an up-to-date patient smoking policy for the hospital. Failure to have a current smoking policy could harm patients if it violates state law and could result in a fire from mishandled smoking materials. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2000, Chapter 19, Section 19.7.4 “Smoking regulations shall be adopted and shall include not less than the following provisions: Smoking Regulations: Smoking regulations shall be adopted and shall include not less than the following provisions: (1) Smoking shall be prohibited in any room, ward, or compartment where flammable liquids, combustible gases, or oxygen is used or stored and in any other hazardous location, and such area shall be posted with signs that read NO SMOKING or shall be posted with the international symbol for no smoking. (2) In healthcare occupancies where smoking is prohibited and signs are prominently placed at all major entrances, secondary signs with language that prohibits smoking shall not be required. (3) Smoking by patients classified as not responsible shall be prohibited. (4) The requirement of 19.7.4 (3) shall not apply where the patient is under direct supervision. (5) Ashtrays of noncombustible material and safe design shall be provided in all areas where smoking is permitted. (6) Metal containers with self-closing cover devices into which ashtrays can be emptied shall be readily available in all areas where smoking is permitted. Findings include: Observations during a review of facility documentation conducted on December 3-5, 2024, revealed that the policy reviewed had not been updated since April 4, 2008, and did not include the current state regulations or the above-listed required information from NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed that the smoking policy provided was last reviewed in 2008 and did not include the required information.”

    Rule K0741. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Equipment - Power Cords And Extens

    The inspectors’ words, 643 words

    “Electrical Equipment - Power Cords and Extens CFR(s): NFPA 101 Electrical Equipment - Power Cords and Extension Cords Power strips in a patient care vicinity are only used for components of movable patient-care-related electrical equipment (PCREE) assembles that have been assembled by qualified personnel and meet the conditions of 10.2.3.6. Power strips in the patient care vicinity may not be used for non-PCREE (e.g., personal electronics), except in long-term care resident rooms that do not use PCREE. Power strips for PCREE meet UL 1363A or UL 60601-1. Power strips for non-PCREE in the patient care rooms (outside of vicinity) meet UL 1363. In non-patient care rooms, power strips meet other UL standards. All power strips are used with general precautions. Extension cords are not used as a substitute for fixed wiring of a structure. Extension cords used temporarily are removed immediately upon completion of the purpose for which it was installed and meets the conditions of 10.2.4. 10.2.3.6 (NFPA 99), 10.2.4 (NFPA 99), 400-8 (NFPA 70), 590.3(D) (NFPA 70), TIA 12-5 This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on Observation, it was determined that the facility allowed the use of power strips but did not mount to the equipment in the operating rooms. Failure to properly use power strips and outlets could lead to electrical overload or fire, harming the patients and staff. NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2012. Chapter 2, Section 2.1 The following documents or portions thereof are referenced within this Code as mandatory requirements and shall be considered part of the requirements of this Code. Chapter 2 “Mandatory References” NFPA 99 “Standard for Health Care Facilities, “ 2012 Edition. NFPA 99, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.2.6.2 , “All Patient Care Areas,” Sections 6.3.2.2..6.2 (A) through 6.3.2.2.6.2 (E) Receptacles (2)” Minimum Number of Receptacles.” “The number of receptacles shall be determined by the intended use of the patient care area. There shall be sufficient receptacles located so as to avoid the need for extension cords or multiple outlet adapters. CMS S&C: 14-46-LSC- Life Safety Code surveyors assess the use of power strips in healthcare facilities. However, the following guidance is provided as reference for healthcare surveyors as they survey physical environment along with other CoP requirements. Any observed power strip deficiencies should be conveyed to the LSC surveyors for citation. If line-operated medical equipment is used in a patient care room/area, inside the patient care vicinity: o UL power strips would have to be a permanent component of a rack-, table-, pedestal-, or cart-mounted & tested medical equipment assembly o Power strips providing power to medical equipment in a patient care room/area must be UL 1363A or UL 60601-1 o Power strips cannot be used for non-medical equipment If line-operated medical equipment is used in a patient care room/area, outside the patient care vicinity: o UL power strips could be used for medical & non-medical equipment with precautions as described in the memo o Power strips providing power to medical equipment in a patient care room/area must be UL 1363A or UL 60601-1 o Power strips providing power to non-medical equipment in a patient care room/area must be UL 1363 If line-operated medical equipment is not used in a patient care room/area, inside and outside the patient care vicinity: o UL power strips could be used with precautions Power strips providing power to non-medical equipment in a patient care room/area must be UL 1363. In non-patient care areas/rooms, other UL strips could be used with the general precautions. Findings include: Observations made during the tour from December 3-5, 2024, revealed that both of the operating rooms had power strips that were not mounted to a rack, table, pedestal, or cart-mounted and tested medical equipment assembly. Employees # 1 and #2 confirmed the improper use of power strips by not having them permanently mounted to equipment in the operating rooms.”

    Rule K0920. Standard-level.

  • Gas Equipment - Cylinder And Container Storag

    The inspectors’ words, 736 words

    “Gas Equipment - Cylinder and Container Storag CFR(s): NFPA 101 Gas Equipment - Cylinder and Container Storage Greater than or equal to 3,000 cubic feet Storage locations are designed, constructed, and ventilated in accordance with 5.1.3.3.2 and 5.1.3.3.3. >300 but <3,000 cubic feet Storage locations are outdoors in an enclosure or within an enclosed interior space of non- or limited- combustible construction, with door (or gates outdoors) that can be secured. Oxidizing gases are not stored with flammables, and are separated from combustibles by 20 feet (5 feet if sprinklered) or enclosed in a cabinet of noncombustible construction having a minimum 1/2 hr. fire protection rating. Less than or equal to 300 cubic feet In a single smoke compartment, individual cylinders available for immediate use in patient care areas with an aggregate volume of less than or equal to 300 cubic feet are not required to be stored in an enclosure. Cylinders must be handled with precautions as specified in 11.6.2. A precautionary sign readable from 5 feet is on each door or gate of a cylinder storage room, where the sign includes the wording as a minimum “CAUTION: OXIDIZING GAS(ES) STORED WITHIN NO SMOKING.” Storage is planned so cylinders are used in order of which they are received from the supplier. Empty cylinders are segregated from full cylinders. When facility employs cylinders with integral pressure gauge, a threshold pressure considered empty is established. Empty cylinders are marked to avoid confusion. Cylinders stored in the open are protected from weather. 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 11.3.3, 11.3.4, 11.6.5 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on Observation, the facility failed to store full oxygen (O2) cylinders properly. This could result in the combustible items becoming oxygen-saturated and easily ignitable which could cause a fire to start prematurely. Failing to store oxygen properly could result in personnel entering the area unaware of the hazards. NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.2.4 “Medical gas storage and administration areas shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities.” NFPA 99 2012 Edition Chapter 11 Section 11.6.2.3 (11) Free standing cylinders shall be properly chained or supported in a proper cylinder stand or cart.” NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, 2012, Chapter 19, Section 19.3.2.4 “Medical gas storage and administration areas shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 99, Standard for Health Care Facilities.” NFPA 99 2012 Edition Chapter 11 Section 11.6.5. Special Precautions - Storage of Cylinders and Containers. Section 11.6.5.4 #3 During summer, screened against continuous exposure to direct rays of the sun in those localities where extreme temperatures prevail. NFPA Chapter 5 section 5.1.3.3.1.7 Cylinders in use and in storage shall be prevented from reaching temperatures in excess of 54°C (130°F). NFPA 99: Health Care Facilities Code, 2012 Edition - Chapter 11 Gas Equipment Section 11.3.4.1 ‘A precautionary sign, readable from a distance of 1.5 m (5 ft), shall be displayed on each door or gate of the storage room or enclosure. 11.3.4.2 The sign shall include the following wording as a minimum: CAUTION: OXIDIZING GAS(ES) STORED WITHIN NO SMOKING” NFPA 99: Health Care Facilities Code, 2012 Edition - Chapter 11 Gas Equipment Section 11.3.2.3 “Oxidizing gases such as oxygen and nitrous oxide shall be separated from combustibles or materials by one of the following: (1) Minimum distance of 6.1 m (20 ft)(2) Minimum distance of 1.5 m (5 ft) if the entire storage location is protected by an automatic sprinkler system designed in accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. (3)Enclosed cabinet of noncombustible construction having a minimum fire protection rating of 1/ 2 hour Findings include: While on tour conducted on December 3-5, 2024, observation revealed the following locations with Oxygen being stored properly in areas within 5 feet of combustible materials combustible construction and not labeled correctly in the following areas. 1. Emergency room storage room: two full bottles in the empty rack 2. The Care Coordinator Office is not labeled full or empty and within 5 feet of combustibles Oxygen storage on the helicopter pad reveals one cylinder on a cart exposed to direct sunlight. The facility was not able to prove that the temperature in direct sunlight would not reach 130°. All the oxygen storage areas did not have proper labeling on the doors. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed throughout the tour that oxygen is improperly stored throughout the facility.”

    Rule K0923. Standard-level.

  • Features Of Fire Protection - Fire Loss Preve

    The inspectors’ words, 505 words

    “Features of Fire Protection - Fire Loss Preve CFR(s): NFPA 101 Features of Fire Protection - Fire Loss Prevention in Operating Rooms Periodic evaluations are made of hazards that could be encountered during surgical procedures, and fire prevention procedures are established. When flammable germicides or antiseptics are employed during surgeries utilizing electrosurgery, cautery or lasers: * packaging is non-flammable * applicators are in unit doses * Preoperative “time-out” is conducted prior the initiation of any surgical procedure to verify: o application site is dry prior to draping and use of surgical equipment o pooling of solution has not occurred or has been corrected o solution-soaked materials have been removed from the OR prior to draping and use of surgical devices o policies and procedures are established outlining safety precautions related to the use of flammable germicide or antiseptic use Procedures are established for operating room emergencies including alarm activation, evacuation, equipment shutdown, and control operations. Emergency procedures include the control of chemical spills, and extinguishment of drapery, clothing and equipment fires. Training is provided to new OR personnel (including surgeons), continuing education is provided, incidents are reviewed monthly, and procedures are reviewed annually. 15.13 (NFPA 99) This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 43814 Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to have a documented fire loss prevention program in operating rooms. Failure to establish procedures for operating room emergencies and periodic evaluations made of hazards that could be encountered during surgical procedures could lead to patient injury or death. NFPA 99 2012 Edition, Section 15.13 Fire Loss Prevention in Operating Rooms. Section 15.13.1.1 “An evaluation shall be made of hazards that could be encountered during surgical procedures.” Section 15.13.1.2 “The evaluation shall include hazards associated with the properties of electricity, hazards associated with the operation of surgical equipment, and hazards associated with the nature of the environment.” Section 15.13.3.8 “Health care organizations shall establish policies and procedures outlining safety precautions related to the use of flammable liquid or aerosol germicides or antiseptics used in anesthetizing locations, as required in 15.14.1, whenever the use of electrosurgery, cautery, or a laser is contemplated.” Section 15.13.3.9.1 “Procedures for operating room/surgical suite emergencies shall be developed.” Section 15.13.3.9.2 “Procedures shall include alarm actuation, evacuation, and equipment shutdown procedures and provisions for control of emergencies that could occur in the operating room, including specific detailed plans for control operations by an emergency control group within the organization or a public fire department.” Section 15.13.3.10.1 “New operating room/surgical suite personnel, including physicians and surgeons, shall be taught general safety practices for the area and specific safety practices for the equipment and procedures they will use.” Findings include: During a review of the facility’s documentation conducted on December 3-5, 2024, it was revealed that the policy pertaining to fire loss did not address fires in the operating rooms. Employees #1 and #2 confirmed during the exit conference that the policy provided for a fire did not address a fire in the operating rooms..”

    Rule K0933. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 5, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited
Dec 5, 2024Standard inspection11 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 3.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 65% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 65% would definitely recommend it.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 18.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 132 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Nov 1, 2004.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 79% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 16 owners or officers are people: Travis Udall (corporate officer); Frank B Armao (corporate director); Rhonda Greer (corporate officer, 0%); Lona M King (corporate officer); Lona M King (corporate director); Lona M King (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thomas E Greenwood (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Melvin G Hackler (corporate director); Sage J White (corporate director); Kathleen Smith (corporate director); Daren Patrick Fry (corporate director); Allysen Kelly (corporate director); Christopher J Bavasi (corporate director); Elizabeth Mckey (corporate director); Robert Salabye (corporate director); Roberta Cano (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospitals CMS lists in Navajo County, 1 has an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.