Hearth Record

Piggott Community Hospital

A critical access hospital in Piggott, Arkansas 72454

1206 Gordon Duckworth Drive, Piggott, Arkansas 72454. (870) 598-3881.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 18, 2024: a complaint and standard inspection.

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 18, 2024: complaint and standard inspection11 deficiencies
  • Special Requirements For Cah Providers Ltc

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CAH PROVIDERS LTC CFR(s): A CAH must meet the following requirements in order to be granted an approval from CMS to provide post-CAH SNF care, as specified in §409.30 of this chapter, and to be paid for SNF-level services, in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on observation, review of Arkansas State Board of Health Rules for Critical Access Hospitals Section 56: Physical Facilities, Rehabilitation Therapy Department, review of personnel files and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the physical facilities that were necessary to meet the needs of the patients, and failed to assure no individuals were hired who had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law, in one of one Rehabilitation Therapy Departments. By not providing sufficient physical facilities, the facility could not assure they were meeting the rehabilitation patients’ needs, prior to being discharged. Failure to perform criminal background checks did not assure each patient would be protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment. See C1612 and C1622 for details.”

    Rule C1600. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Construction

    The inspectors’ words, 430 words

    “CONSTRUCTION CFR(s): The CAH is constructed, arranged, and maintained to ensure access to and safety of patients, and provides adequate space for the provision of services. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47688 Based on observation of the Emergency Department, Outpatient Facilities, and Medical Surgical Nursing Unit and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain the building physical structure, safety, environment, and equipment in a state of good repair. The failed practice promoted the spread of infection and/or placed the patients at risk of fire. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients, staff and visitors. Finding follow: A. Observation of the Emergency Department on 04/15/24 showed the following: 1) At 1:08 PM, peeling wallpaper in front of the definitive observation unit. 2) At 1:16 PM, Emergency Room #4 showed to have holes in the walls. 3) At 1:08 PM, there was a hole in the door from a previously replaced deadbolt in the door leading into the radiology office. 4) At 1:17 PM, a rusty X-ray viewing box on the decontamination room. 5) At 1:25 PM, calcium build up in the sink of the medication room. 6) At 1:27 PM, bugs in the light fixture in front of the nurses’ station. B. The findings in A were verified by the Head of Maintenance on 4/15/24 at the time of observation. C. Observation of the Outpatient Department on 04/15/24 showed the following: 1) At 1:29 PM, peeling and exposed wood on doors throughout the outpatient department. 2) At 1:31 PM, peeling counters in the endoscopy room. 3) At 1:35 PM, a rusty scope tester on the counters in the endoscopy department. D. The findings in C were verified by the Head of Maintenance on 4/15/24 at the time of observations. E. Observation of the Medical Surgery Department on 04/15/24 showed the following: 1) At 1:46 PM, the counter peeling on the nurses station. 2) At 1:47 PM, Room 110 had dirt and rust on the sink. 3) At 1:48 PM, wall penetration in room 110 under the white board. 4) At 1:49 PM, a rusty glove holder in the negative pressure room. 5) At 1:51 PM. unlocked breaker boxes in the hallways. 6) At 1:53 PM, a damaged sink, peeling laminate around the sink, items stored under the sink in the medication room. 7) At 1:57 PM, peeling on Formica on the nurses station cabinets and also damage to the floors behind the nurses station. F. The findings of E were verified with the Head of Maintenance on 04/15/24 at the time of observation.”

    Rule C0912. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Maintenance

    The inspectors’ words, 368 words

    “MAINTENANCE CFR(s): The CAH has housekeeping and preventive maintenance programs to ensure that-- (1) All essential mechanical, electrical, and patient-care equipment is maintained in safe operating condition; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47688 Based on observation, review of policies and procedures and interview, it was determined the facility failed to create and review policies and procedures on a biennial basis for: 1) Annual scheduled polarity and tension testing 2) Yearly door checks 3) Yearly load bank tests 4) Ceiling tile checks 5) Patient room water temperature checks By not creating and reviewing the policies and procedures biennially, the facility had the likelihood to not be able to identify hazardous conditions and take steps to minimize the risks to patients and patient care staff. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of the facility’s policy and procedures on 04/15/2024 showed that the facility failed to create and maintain a policy and procedure for scheduling annual Polarity and tension testing. Documentation for annual Polarity and tension testing was requested and none was provided. B. Review of the facility’s policy and procedures on 04/15/2024 showed that the facility failed to create and maintain a policy and procedure for annually checking fire doors. Documentation for annually checking fire doors was requested and none was provided. C. Review of facility’s policy and procedure on 04/15/2024 showed that the facility failed to create and maintain a policy and procedure for yearly load bank tests for the generator. Documentation for yearly load bank tests was requested and none was provided. D. Review of the facility’s policy and procedures on 04/15/24 showed that the facility failed to create and maintain a policy and procedure for conducting ceiling tile checks. Documentation for ceiling tile checks was requested and none was provided. E. Review of the facility’s policy and procedures on 04/15/24 showed that the facility failed to create and maintain a policy and procedure for testing patient room water temperature checks. Documentation for water temperature checks was requested but none was provided. F. The findings of A through E were confirmed in an interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 04/15/2024 at 1:21 PM.”

    Rule C0914. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Life Safety From Fire

    The inspectors’ words, 310 words

    “LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47688 Based on observation, review of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 101 standards and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the Generator was maintained in that an emergency stop switch was installed on the generator and there was no battery powered emergency light installed on the generator. The failed practice did not ensure the facility had the means of stopping the generator in the event of an emergency, the generator would be able to run in the event of an emergency and did not ensure the facility staff had the ability to view the generator in the event of an emergency. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients, visitors and staff in the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of NFPA 101 standards showed the facility was to provide battery-powered emergency lighting as required by NFPA 101, 2012 edition. B. On 04/15/2024 at 3:05 PM observation of the emergency generator showed there was no covered emergency stop switch installed 10 to 15 feet away from the generator. C. On 04/15/2024 at 3:10 PM, observation of the emergency generator showed there was no battery powered emergency light installed on the generator. D. The findings in A through C were verified by the Head of Maintenance on 04/15/2024 at the time of the observations.”

    Rule C0930. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Care Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 462 words

    “PATIENT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): [The policies include the following:] (iv) Rules for the storage, handling, dispensation, and administration of drugs and biologicals. These rules must provide that there is a drug storage area that is administered in accordance with accepted professional principles, that current and accurate records are kept of the receipt and disposition of all scheduled drugs, and that outdated, mislabeled, or otherwise unusable drugs are not available for patient use. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of Arkansas Department of Health - Pharmacy Services and Drug Control Branch Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Controlled Substances [12/01/2014], review of EPA’S (Environmental Protection Agency) Ban on Sewering Pharmaceuticals Introductory Fact Sheet and interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow accepted professional principles in that they wasted pharmaceutical narcotics in the sharps container instead of into a receptacle that would render them non-retrievable or in the sink, in three of three (Emergency, Outpatient Procedure and Medical/Surgical) departments toured. By not wasting the narcotics according to accepted professional principles, the facility was not in compliance with Arkansas Department of Health’s Pharmacy Services and Drug Control Branch’s Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Controlled Substances. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all medications wasted in the facility. Finding follow: A. Record review of Arkansas Department of Health - Pharmacy Services and Drug Control Branch Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Controlled Substances 12/01/2014, showed Controlled Substance waste should have been disposed of in a receptacle that would render it non-retrievable. B. Record review of the EPA’s Ban on Sewering Pharmaceuticals Introductory Fact Sheet, dated April 2022, showed effective August 21, 2019, EPA prohibited all healthcare facilities from disposing of their hazardous waste pharmaceuticals down the drain (e.g., no flushing or pouring down a sink). This “sewer ban” is in effect at healthcare facilities of all sizes in all states, territories, and Indian country. In addition to the sewer ban, EPA strongly discourages the sewering of any pharmaceutical, with very few exceptions by any type of facility (Sodium Chloride intravenous fluids, Lactated Ringers, etc). C. During an interview on 04/15/2024 at 1:23 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1, when asked how they dispose of narcotic waste, they indicated the sharps container, or the sink was where they waste narcotics in the Emergency Department. D. During an interview on 04/15/2024 at 1:31 PM, the Director of Outpatient Procedures, when asked how they dispose of narcotic waste, indicated the sharps container, or the sink was where they waste narcotics in Outpatient Procedure Department. E. During an interview on 04/15/24 at 1:58 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing, when asked how they dispose of narcotic waste, indicated the sharps container, or the sink was where they waste narcotics in the Medical/Surgical Department.”

    Rule C1016. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Care Policies

    The inspectors’ words, 389 words

    “PATIENT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): [The policies include the following:] (v) Procedures for reporting adverse drug reactions and errors in the administration of drugs. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of policy, review of Medication Occurrence /Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction Form, review of Clinical Records and interview, it was determined the Facility failed to assure evidence of medication errors were recorded along with notification to the practitioner in two of two (#11 & #12) patients who received the wrong medication. The failed practice did not ensure the medical record would reflect exactly what medications the patients received in error and treatments the patients received in response to the error. Also, had these patients needed to be transferred to a higher level of care, their records would not have given the next care providers a clear and accurate picture of these patients’ medical history. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect any patients who received medication in error. The findings follow: A. Record review of the facility’s policy titled, “Adverse Drug Reactions,” revised 04/01/22, showed when a medication occurrence or a suspected adverse drug reaction happens, it was to be reported on a Medication Occurrence /Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction Form. Nowhere in the policy did it instruct the person that discovers the medication error to document what happened in the patients’ medical records nor document the contact of, and instructions from, the physician responsible for the patients’ care. B. Review of Medication Occurrence /Suspected Adverse Drug Reaction Forms for the previous 6 months (October 2023- March 2024) showed 2 errors that involved a patient receiving the wrong medication. The errors were as follows: 1. On 01/24/2024 at 7:30 PM, Patient #11 was administered a dose of Advair, that was not prescribed. 2. On 12/31/2023 at 5:10 PM, Patient #12 was administered #2 Percocet 5/325 milligram, instead of the #2 Hydrocodone 5/325 milligram that was ordered. C. Review of patient medical records on 04/16/2024 showed the following: 1. Patient # 11’s did not have any documentation of Advair being administered. 2. Patient #12’s record showed the patient was administered #2 Hydrocodone 5/325 milligrams instead of the oxycodone that was described in the error report. D. During an interview on 04/16/2024 at 2:00 PM, the Director of Pharmacy verified the findings at A, B, and C.”

    Rule C1018. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): A nursing care plan must be developed and kept current for each inpatient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47891 Based on policy and procedure review, clinical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have individualized care plans for 4 (#1, #3, #4, and #5) of 10 (#1-#10) patients. By not individualizing the care plans the facility could not ensure that the patients received care for all their needs. This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients cared for in the facility. The findings follow: A. Review of clinical records on 04/17/2024 at 1:30 PM, showed Patient #1 and #3 had fall risk identified for both patients and there was no Fall Risk in the patients Nursing Care Plan. B. Review of clinical records on 04/17/2024 at 1:30 PM, showed Patient #4 and #5 had skin breakdown listed as a potential problem by Braden score but, there was no Risk for Skin Breakdown plan in the Nursing Care Plan. C. The findings in A and B were verified by Assistant Director of Nursing on 04/17/2024 at 1:30 PM.”

    Rule C1050. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Designation Of Qualified Practitioners

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “DESIGNATION OF QUALIFIED PRACTITIONERS CFR(s): The CAH designates the practitioners who are allowed to perform surgery for CAH patients, in accordance with its approved policies and procedures, and with State scope of practice laws. Surgery is performed only by-- (1) A doctor of medicine or osteopathy, including an osteopathic practitioner recognized under section 1101(a)(7) of the Act; (2) A doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine; or (3) A doctor of podiatric medicine. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on interview, the facility failed to have a current roster listing each practitioner’s specific surgical privileges available in the surgical suite, for one of one Outpatient Procedure Department. By not having this information available to the staff and employees in the Outpatient Procedure Department, the staff and employees were not informed if the procedures they assisted with and scheduled for were procedures the physicians had been granted privileges to perform. This deficient practice had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted for procedures at the hospital. Findings follow: During a tour of the Outpatient Surgical/Procedure Department on 04/15/2024 from 1:27 PM to 1:45 PM, the Director of the Outpatient Procedure Department was interviewed at 1:31 PM and was asked to provide a current roster listing each practitioner’s specific surgical privileges. The Director did not have one nor did they know they needed to maintain one.”

    Rule C1142. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Infection Prevent Surveil & Control Of Hais

    The inspectors’ words, 749 words

    “INFECTION PREVENT SURVEIL & CONTROL OF HAIs CFR(s): The infection prevention and control includes surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs, including maintaining a clean and sanitary environment to avoid sources and transmission of infection, and that the program also addresses any infection control issues identified by public health authorities; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on observation, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in that they failed to keep hand washing sinks and sink areas clean, in three of three (Emergency Room, Outpatient Procedure and Medical/Surgical) departments toured. By not keeping the hand washing sinks and sink areas clean, the facility could not assure employees hands were clean to perform tasks like medication preparation, medication administration and patient care, to prevent the spread of infection. This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients receiving medications and patient care in these three areas. Findings follow: A. During a tour of the facility on 04/15/2024 from 1:08 PM to 2:02 PM, observation showed the following: 1) Emergency Department’s Medication Room: The hand-washing sink was visibly dirty, with a dark grimy substance accumulated around the entire sink’s edges and the backsplash where it attached to the counter. Where the backsplash met the counter, a brown thick liquid substance accumulated between the back of the sink and the backsplash. The faucet head had white, brown, and green substances built up around it. 2) Outpatient Procedure Room #1: The hand-washing sink was visibly dirty, with a dark substance accumulated around small portions of the sink’s edges. The faucet head had white and light brown substances built up around it. 3) Medical / Surgical Floor Medication Room Sink: The hand-washing sink was visibly dirty, with white and brown substances in the sink and a dark grimy substance accumulated around the entire sink’s edges and the backsplash where it (used to be) attached to the counter. The back splash on the left and back side of the sink was warped, pulling apart from the backsplash and had a black accumulation soaked into the particle board behind the Formica. There were cracks around the sink in the countertops. The faucet head had white, brown, and green substances built up around it. B. The findings of A were verified at the time of observation with the Director of Nursing. 47891 Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to assure the environment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in that in the Emergency Department Room Five there was an x-ray viewing box with rust spots exposed and the door to the room was worn to bare wood. By failing to maintain these items in a clean manner the facility could not ensure this room was sanitary for use. This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients treated in Emergency Department Room Five. The findings follow: A. Observation during a tour of the Emergency Department Room Five on 04/15/2024 at 1:15 PM, showed there was a large x-ray viewing box with rust spots along the bottom panel. B. Observation during a tour of the Emergency Department Room Five on 04/15/2024 at 1:15 PM, showed the door was worn to bare wood with no sealant left. C. The findings in A and B were verified with the Director of Nursing at on 04/15/2024 at 1:15 PM. Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to assure the environment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in that in the Emergency Department Room One, the floor seem was broken and peeling showing black material in the broken seem. The floor was cut and scored in many places with black material in the damaged spots. By failing to maintain these items in a clean manner the facility could not ensure this room was sanitary for use. This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients treated in Emergency Department Room One. The findings follow: A. Observation during a tour of the Emergency Department Room One on 04/16/2024 at 11:25 AM, showed the seam of the floor was broken and peeling back exposing black material. B. Observation during a tour of the Emergency Department Room One on 04/16/2024 at 11:25 AM, showed the floor had many cuts and scores in the floor exposing black material. C. The findings in A and B were verified with the Director of Nursing at on 04/16/2024 at 11:30 AM.”

    Rule C1208. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Freedom From Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation

    The inspectors’ words, 901 words

    “FREEDOM FROM ABUSE, NEGLECT & EXPLOITATION CFR(s): Freedom from abuse, neglect and exploitation (§483.12(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), (a)(4), (b)(1), (b)(2), (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this chapter). “ §483.12(a)(1) Freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined in this subpart. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms.(a) The facility must-(1) Not use verbal, mental, sexual, or physical abuse, corporal punishment, or involuntary seclusion; “ §483.12(a)(2) Ensure that the resident is free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident’s medical symptoms. When the use of restraints is indicated, the facility must use the least restrictive alternative for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints. “ §483.12(a)(3) Not employ or otherwise engage individuals who- (i) Have been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law; (ii) Have had a finding entered into the State nurse aide registry concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of their property. “ §483.12(a)(4) Report to the State nurse aide registry or licensing authorities any knowledge it has of actions by a court of law against an employee, which would indicate unfitness for service as a nurse aide or other facility staff. “ §483.12(b) The facility must develop and implement written policies and procedures that: (1) Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, (2) Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations, “ §483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: (1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures. (2) Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. (3) Prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while the investigation is in progress. (4) Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified appropriate corrective action must be taken. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review personnel files and interview, it was determined prior to May 2023, the facility failed to assure three of three (#1-#3) Physical Therapists (PT), two of two (#1-#2) Physical Therapist Assistants (PTA), one of one (#1) Occupational Therapist (OT), one of one (#1) Occupational Therapist Assistant (OTA), one of one (#1) Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) and two of two (#1 and #2) Physical Therapist Technicians (PT Tech) were screened to assure no individuals were hired who had been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. Failure to perform criminal background checks did not assure each patient would be protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility for swing bed services. Findings follow: A. Review of personnel files showed the following: 1) PT #1 was hired on 03/25/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 2) PT #2 was hired on 08/09/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 3) PT #3 was hired on 03/14/2023 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 4) PTA #1 was hired on 03/11/2019 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 5) PTA #2 was hired on 03/02/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 6) OT #1 was hired on 04/20/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 7) OTA #1 was hired on 11/08/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 8) SLP #1 was hired on 01/28/2021 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; 9) PT Tech #1 was hired on 02/16/1995 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; and 10. PT Tech #2 was hired on 02/16/1995 and did not have a criminal history background check prior to working with patients; B. During an interview on 04/17/2024 at 10:40 AM, the Administrative Assistant/ Human Resources verified the findings at B, and stated the facility started doing criminal background checks on all new hires starting May 2023.”

    Rule C1612. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Specialized Rehabilitative Services

    The inspectors’ words, 922 words

    “SPECIALIZED REHABILITATIVE SERVICES CFR(s): Specialized Rehabilitative Services (§483.65 of this chapter). “ §483.65 (a) Provision of services. If specialized rehabilitative services such as but not limited to physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitative services for a mental disorder and intellectual disability or services of a lesser intensity as set forth at §483.120(c), are required in the resident’s comprehensive plan of care, the facility must- (1) Provide the required services; or (2) In accordance with §483.70(g), obtain the required services from an outside resource that is a provider of specialized rehabilitative services and is not excluded from participating in any federal or state health care programs pursuant to section 1128 and 1156 of the Act. (b) Qualifications. Specialized rehabilitative services must be provided under the written order of a physician by qualified personnel. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on observation, review of Arkansas State Board of Health Rules for Critical Access Hospitals Section 56: Physical Facilities, Rehabilitation Therapy Department, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide the physical facilities that were necessary in one of one Rehabilitation Therapy Departments. By not providing sufficient physical facilities, the facility could not assure they were meeting the rehabilitation patients’ needs, prior to being discharged. This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients who received services from the Rehabilitation Therapy Department. Findings follow: A. Record review of Arkansas State Board of Health Rules for Critical Access Hospitals Section 56: Physical Facilities, Rehabilitation Therapy Department showed the following shall be provided: 1. Physical Therapy. If physical therapy is part of the service, the following at least, shall be included: a. Individual treatment area(s) with privacy screens or curtains. Each such space shall have not less than 70 square feet of clear floor area; b. Exercise area and facilities; c. Clean linen and towel storage; d. Storage for equipment and supplies; e. Separate storage for soiled items; and f. Handwashing stations for staff either within or at each treatment space (one handwashing station may serve several stations). 2. Occupational Therapy. If this service is provided, at least the following shall be included: a. Work areas and counters suitable for wheelchair access; b. Handwashing stations; c. Storage for supplies and equipment; and d. An area for daily living activities shall be provided. It shall contain an area for a bed, kitchen counter with appliances and sink, bathroom, and a table/chair. 3. Speech, Hearing, and Audio Therapy. If this service is provided, at least, the following shall be included: a. Space for evaluation and treatment of patients. The space shall be protected with acoustical treatment of walls and finishes; b. Space for equipment storage and supplies. B. During a tour of Rehabilitation Therapy Department on 04/17/2024 from 1:00 PM to 1:56 PM, observation showed a very small rehabilitation gym with very little space for patient evaluation, treatment or storage. The treatment table was pushed into a corner and had approximately seven other pieces of equipment stored on it. Pushed up against it were two bedside tables with equipment on them, and pushed up next to those, were two more pieces of large equipment. There were walkers leaning against the file cabinets. The sink area counter was covered with small pieces of equipment, tools and manipulation tools for therapy. When asked to see the storage room for equipment, observation showed a small closet in a hallway outside of therapy that was only large enough to house a small amount of equipment. C. During an interview on 04/17/2024 at 1:56 PM, the Director of Rehabilitation was asked where they perform Activities of Daily Living rehabilitation therapy. The following were questions that were asked, and the answers received: 1. Where do you perform shower training for a patient that will go home to a shower? It was explained they had one shower that was large enough, and had a handheld shower head, to roll a wheelchair into. It was in a patient’s room, so if someone was occupying the room, the likelihood was a patient that needed showering therapy, would go home without it. Many of the rooms in the hospital had bathtubs that were not appropriate for all patients to shower in. Many of the rooms had a shower, with a large lip, and were too small for a wheelchair and a therapist to fit in there with them to properly (safely) transfer, etc. 2. Where do you rehabilitate patients that will go home and cook for themselves? It was explained they did not have a specific kitchen counter with appliances to practice those skills. 3. Where do you rehabilitate patients that have steps in/out of their homes? It was explained they did their best to re-create the patient’s homelike environment, so they may go to the loading dock to practice stairs, but the safety issue was it only has one railing and if the weather was bad, they weren’t able to utilize them. It was explained they did have a set of rehabilitation stairs but can’t use them due to lack of space. 4. Where do you rehabilitate patients that need to get in and out of their beds when they go home? It was explained, they did the best they can with the hospital beds, but hospital beds were different from regular beds in patients’ homes. 5. Does the Speech Therapist have a designated area to evaluate and treat Speech patients? It was explained they did not, they used the main office/treatment room or the patient’s room.”

    Rule C1622. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 18, 2024Complaint and standard inspection11 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; readmission, 0 better and 1 worse of 4.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (140 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 77% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 12.7%, pneumonia 17.1%, COPD 7.4%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.1%, pneumonia 18.3%, COPD 19.7%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 118 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Dec 28, 2005.
  • Ownership: government - local.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Government - Local.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 11 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 88% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • City of Piggott owns an unstated share directly since Jul 1, 1979.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: James L Magee (corporate director, 50%); James L Magee (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Barry Dehart (corporate director); Travis Williams (corporate director); Cody Knight (corporate director); Stephanie Lowe (corporate director); David Gregory (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Clay County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.