Hearth Record

Ozark Health

A critical access hospital in Clinton, Arkansas 72031

2500 Highway 65 South, Clinton, Arkansas 72031. (501) 745-7000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 2, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 2, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Compliance With 489.24

    “COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37145 Based on policy and procedure review, medical record review and interview, the hospital failed to adhere to the provider’s agreement that required a hospital to be compliant with §42 CFR 489.24, Special responsibilities of Medicare hospitals in emergency cases. The hospital was not in compliance with the EMTALA Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) requirements. See C2406 for details.”

    Rule C2400. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical Screening Exam

    The inspectors’ words, 1,854 words

    “MEDICAL SCREENING EXAM CFR(s): 489.24(a) and 489.24(c) (a) Applicability of provisions of this section. (1) In the case of a hospital that has an emergency department, if an individual (whether or not eligible for Medicare benefits and regardless of ability to pay) “comes to the emergency department”, as defined in paragraph (b) of this section, the hospital must- (i) Provide an appropriate medical screening examination within the capability of the hospital’s emergency department, including ancillary services routinely available to the emergency department, to determine whether or not an emergency medical condition exists. The examination must be conducted by an individual(s) who is determined qualified by hospital bylaws or rules and regulations and who meets the requirements of §482.55 of this chapter concerning emergency services personnel and direction; and (ii) If an emergency medical condition is determined to exist, provide any necessary stabilizing treatment, as defined in paragraph (d) of this section, or an appropriate transfer as defined in paragraph (e) of this section. If the hospital admits the individual as an inpatient for further treatment, the hospital’s obligation under this section ends, as specified in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. (2)(i) When a waiver has been issued in accordance with section 1135 of the Act that includes a waiver under section 1135(b)(3) of the Act, sanctions under this section for an inappropriate transfer or for the direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location do not apply to a hospital with a dedicated emergency department if the following conditions are met: (A) The transfer is necessitated by the circumstances of the declared emergency in the emergency area during the emergency period. (B) The direction or relocation of an individual to receive medical screening at an alternate location is pursuant to an appropriate State emergency preparedness plan or, in the case of a public health emergency that involves a pandemic infectious disease, pursuant to a State pandemic preparedness plan. (C) The hospital does not discriminate on the basis of an individual’s source of payment or ability to pay. (D) The hospital is located in an emergency area during an emergency period, as those terms are defined in section 1135(g)(1) of the Act. (E) There has been a determination that a waiver of sanctions is necessary. (ii) A waiver of these sanctions is limited to a 72-hour period beginning upon the implementation of a hospital disaster protocol, except that, if a public health emergency involves a pandemic infectious disease (such as pandemic influenza), the waiver will continue in effect until the termination of the applicable declaration of a public health emergency, as provided under section 1135(e)(1)(B) of the Act. (c) Use of dedicated emergency department for nonemergency services. If an individual comes to a hospital’s dedicated emergency department and a request is made on his or her behalf for examination or treatment for a medical condition, but the nature of the request makes it clear that the medical condition is not of an emergency nature, the hospital is required only to perform such screening as would be appropriate for any individual presenting in that manner, to determine that the individual does not have an emergency medical condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37145 Based on clinical record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure an appropriate medical screening exam was provided and not delayed for one (# 1) of one patient with suicide attempt received by ambulance to the Emergency Department (ED). This failed practice had the likelihood to affect all suicidal psychiatric patients coming to the ED. Findings follow: A. Review of the facility Policy “EMTALA GUIDELINES”, revised May 2, 2019, showed: “All patients presenting to (Referring hospital) for a non-scheduled visit and seeking care must be accepted and evaluated regardless of the patient’s ability to pay. All patients shall receive a medical screening exam that includes providing all necessary testing and services within the capability of the hospital to reach a diagnosis. Federal Law requires that all necessary definitive treatment be given to the patient and only maintenance care can be referred to a physician’s office or clinic. Emergency Medical Conditions under EMTALA Law constitute any condition that is a danger to the patient or unborn fetus or could result in a risk of dysfunction or impairment to the smallest body part or organ if the patient is not treated in the near future. B. Review of the facility policy “EMERGENCY TREATMENT OF MINORS” revised, September 22, 2021, showed, “All attempts will be made to contact the parents or guardian of a non-emancipated minor prior to treatment. If unable to obtain permission from parent or guardian, the Child Protective Agency or the local law enforcement agency will be contacted to assume responsibility. In the event of a life-threatening condition, treatment will not be delayed, the Emergency Department physician will sign for treatment. If phone consent is obtained from parent(s) or legal guardian; two nurses must verify the phone consent and document in nursing documentation. When phone consent has been obtained for treatment of the minor, arrangements should be made to discharge the minor.” C. Review of the facility policy “PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS” revised, April 2019 showed, “When there are two psychiatric patients admitted to the Emergency Department, this ER (Emergency Room) will be considered at psych(psychiatric) capacity. Emergency Department staff will notify EMS dispatch that this Emergency Department is at psych capacity and cannot accept any known patients needing psychiatric evaluation.” D. Review of the facility policy “TRIAGE” effective, May 2016 showed, “Category of Level 2 acuity: Life/Limb loss is eminent unless intervention is taken and considered unstable. The treatment and assessment should occur between 5-15 minutes.” E. Review of the prehospital care report by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dated 04/13/24 showed, “unit notified at 11:54 AM, and dispatched Emergent with complaint reported to dispatch of a 14-year-old female with suicidal ideations. Officer was reported to be on scene. EMS arrived at scene at 12:16 PM. Patient was found in back seat of local deputy’s patrol car and said she wanted to go for some help. She walked with the deputy to the ambulance, entered the back and lay on the cot. Her primary complaint was suicidal for five (5) days. After EMS evaluation transport required nonemergent transport to a hospital capable of providing adequate care for the chief complaint. EMS transported patient to the (Referring Facility), the closest most appropriate facility capable of providing care for the patient. F. Review of the EMS Response Times and Mileage dated 03/14/24 showed, “unit dispatched at 11:55 AM, at scene at 12:16 PM, Departed scene at 12:27 PM, and arrived at destination (Referring facility) at 12:45 PM. EMS was back in service at 2:05 PM.” G. Review of the Transfer of Patient Care form dated 04/13/24 showed, the ED Director signed the transfer of patient care form on 04/13/24 at 2:03 PM. H. Review of the Referring ED Physician Chart showed, “Time to room, assessment, triage, and Physician notification were completed on 04/13/24 at 2:06 PM. I. Review of the Physician chart dated 03/14/24 at 2:06 PM showed, “Provider treatment notes, Ambulance arrived without report and (named EMS staff) escorted patient into ER (Emergency Room) MD (Medical Doctor) saw patient on arrival and had EMS and patient go to room 2(Psychiatric room). (Named EMS staff) advised all vitals stable, MD verified patient not in distress.” J. Review of the Triage Assessment dated 04/13/2024 at 2:06 PM showed Patient was moved from room 1 with initial vitals at presentation blood pressure (BP 111/68, heart rate (HR) 96, respiratory Rate (RR) 20, Temperature (temp) 98.0 Fahrenheit (F). There was no evidence vital signs were ever repeated. There was no evidence of cardiac monitoring or IV (intravenous fluids) given to the patient in the ED record. At transfer, the record showed, IV status not applicable. K. Review of the Nursing Chart showed, “Note: date 04/13/24 at 2:55 PM, Patient arrived with EMS and seen by MD (Medical Doctor) upon arrival. EMS told this nurse, grandfather signed for patient to be transported. This nurse in the room with patient as blood being drawn and EKG (electrocardiogram) completed. Patient # 1 told this nurse she had a plan to run away and run into oncoming traffic because she feels worthless because her family is always yelling and cussing at her about dumb things and was mad because she told her grandparents she wanted to live in OK (Oklahoma) with her other grandparents. Patient then told this nurse she tried to OD (overdose) this morning by taking three (3) of her Effexor pills when she woke up around 7:00 AM.” Review of Treatment Notes dated 04/13/24 at 3:05 PM showed, “ED Medical Director notified of patient statement to this nurse about possible OD. At 3:23 PM Called poison control. Patient takes Effexor ER 75 mg. Patient told this nurse she took three pills this morning. Poison control said there is a delayed possible cardiac and seizure effect and patient needs to be observed/admitted for 11-18 hours. At 3:38 PM, Medical Director called Arkansas Children’s hospital for transfer at 3:34 PM, patient accepted by Physician at Arkansas Children’s hospital, will be going to ED. At 4:48 PM, EMS called for urgent transfer, at 5:57 PM EMS arrived for transfer of patient to Arkansas Children’s hospital.” L. Review of patient # 1’s clinical record was completed with the ED Manager on 05/02/24 at 8:40 AM. The ED Manager verified patient # 1 arrived at ED at 12:45 PM and time to room, assessment, triage, and Physician notification were completed on 04/13/24 at 2:06 PM. M. On 05/02/24 at 9:39 AM the Medical Director was asked to review patient # 1’s ED record with Surveyor and was asked: 1.What time did this patient arrive in the ED? He said the EMS arrived around 12:45 PM, and walked the patient into the ER, they had not called report in to us. The ER was burning up that day. We were full and the 2 nurses were with some critical patients. I saw patient # 1 come in with EMS and met them at the desk. I did a quick assessment, took a report from EMS, and told them to go to room 2 (a psychiatric room) with the patient. The 2 EMS personnel remained in attendance with Patient #1 until care assumed by ED nurse at 2:06 PM. The Mental Health Screening showed the patient room was assessed for safety, Social Services referral submitted, and Columbia Suicide Severity Scale addressed. The scale was not provided in the ED record. 2.What time does the record show that patient # 1 was placed in a room, triaged, and you were notified? It says 2:06 PM, but there was no delay in assessment or treatment, there was a delay in registration. Patient # 1’s Medical Screening exam started at 12:45 PM when EMS walked her through the doors. I saw her, asked her some questions, made sure she was stable and had EMS take her to exam room 2, EMS remained with patient until nursing staff assumed care.””

    Rule C2406. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 2, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
  • In CMS’s patient survey (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 62% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 71% would definitely recommend it.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 17%, COPD 19.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 132 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Apr 1, 2001.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • 75% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Ozark Health, Inc. owns an unstated share directly since Jan 7, 2008.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Rebecca Sutterfield (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jamie Beavers (corporate officer); Steve Smith (corporate officer); Kristi King (managing employee (on the payroll)); Steve Schoettle (corporate officer); Melvin Morgan (corporate officer); David Deaton (corporate officer); John William Hastings (corporate officer); Shirl Williams (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Van Buren County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.