Mcgehee Hospital
A critical access hospital in McGehee, Arkansas 71654
900 South Third Street, McGehee, Arkansas 71654. (870) 222-5600.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- Not rated CMS’s overall rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 18 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 6, 2026: a complaint and standard inspection.
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 6, 2026: complaint and standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Building Safety
The inspectors’ words, 618 words
“BUILDING SAFETY CFR(s): Except as otherwise provided in this section, the CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Health Care Facilities Code (NFPA 99 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, TIA 12-4, TIA 12-5 and TIA 12-6). (1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities Code do not apply to a CAH. (2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required under paragraph (e) of this section would result in unreasonable hardship for the CAH, CMS may waive specific provisions of the Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely affect the health and safety of patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48468 Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide documentation for the following required inspection, testing, and maintenance activities, and has the likelihood of affecting the health and safety of patients, staff, and visitors by preventing the facility from ensuring critical life safety systems, emergency power systems, water systems, fire protection systems, and environmental controls are functioning properly and maintained in accordance with regulatory standards. “ Battery backup light inspections “ Electrical panel and infrared inspections “ Ceiling tile inspections “ Smoke and fire damper inspections “ Emergency door inspections “ Generator weekly run tests with supporting documentation “ Generator fuel documentation “ Generator battery checks “ Monthly generator load testing “ Load bank testing “ Emergency generator light testing “ Polarity and tension testing on emergency receptacles “ Facility inspections “ Water temperature checks “ Ice machine checks “ Backflow preventer (RPZ) inspections “ Boiler stack inspections “ Sprinkler riser inspections “ Air filter logs Findings include: 1. The facility was unable to provide inspection logs or maintenance records demonstrating battery backup light inspections were completed monthly as required by NFPA 101 and 99. 2. The facility failed to provide yearly electrical panel and infrared inspection documentation required under NFPA 101 and 99. 3. Documentation for monthly ceiling tile inspections was not available for review. 4. The facility could not provide required five-year smoke and fire damper inspection documentation or maintenance logs as required under NFPA 90A and ADH Physical Plant standards. 5. Required yearly emergency door inspection records and inspection checklists were unavailable. 6. Generator weekly run test documentation, including run logs, battery testing, and load test reports, was incomplete or unavailable for review. 7. No evidence of Weekly generator fuel records was presented to show was not maintained. 8.No evidence of Generator battery check was presented in documentation and required battery testing reports were unavailable. 9. No evidnece of Monthly generator load test was presented and documentation not available for review. 10. No eveidence of Annual load bank testing was presented and documentation was not provided during survey. 11. No evidence of Monthly emergency generator light testingwas presented and logs were unavailable. 12. No evidence of Required yearly polarity and tension test reports for emergency receptacles was presented and were not available. 13. No evidence of Weekly facility inspection documentation was presented an incomplete or unavailable. 14. No evidence of Weekly water temperature logs and water treatment plan documentation was presented and were unavailable for review. 15. No evidence of Monthly ice machine cleaning, maintenance, and temperature logs was presented and were not maintained. 16. No evidence of Annual backflow preventer inspection and maintenance records was presented and were unavailable. 17. No evidence of Daily boiler stack inspection and testing logs was presented and were not available 18. No evidence of Annual sprinkler riser inspection and testing documentation was presented and were not provided. 19. No evidence of Monthly air filter maintenance logs was presented and were unavailable.”
-
Patient Care Policies
The inspectors’ words, 424 words
“PATIENT CARE POLICIES CFR(s): (1) The CAH’s health care services are furnished in accordance with appropriate written policies that are consistent with applicable State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50014 C-1006 Based on review of policy and procedures, observations, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have a policy in place regarding the monitoring of telemetry units. The failed practice placed the patients at risk of going into a fatal heart rhythm while not being monitored and had the likelihood to affect all patients on telemetry in the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of McGehee Hospital Policy “Emergency Department Cardiac Monitoring” effective 09/20/2022, showed “To be ensure timely identification, monitoring, and management of patients with actual or potential cardiac instability through continuous cardiac monitoring in the emergency department. Applies to all ER clinical staff involved in patient care, including physicians, nurses and clerks.” B. Review of McGehee Hospital Policy “Nursing Cardiac/Telemetry Monitoring: effective 02/05/2015, showed “To provide guidelines for implementation of cardiac/telemetry monitoring for any patient requiring continuous cardiac monitoring, but not requiring intermediate or intensive care. The Telemetry/Cardiac Monitoring station should be attended at all times by a staff member who has attended Cardiac Arrythmia class and passed a competency exam OR is certified in ACLS.” C. Observation on 05/04/26 at 1:35 PM, showed RN #2 was walking between Emergency Room and technician was not in front of Telemetry monitor. D. Observation on 05/04/26 at 1:35 PM, showed Telemetry monitor was not being watched. RN #2 stated that “Today is a busy day.” Noted that the patient in observation telemetry was off. Staff aware at that time. E. Observation on 05/05/26 at 1:15 PM, showed no one at the telemetry monitor. F. In an interview with Director of Emergency Services on 05/04/26 at 2:45 PM, she stated “Medical Surgery and ER share telemetry. Usually, there would be someone sitting in front of the monitor. We also rely on the nurses in the Medical Surgical floor to observe any issues and we reciprocate for them.” G. In an interview with RN #1 on 05/05/26 at 1:25 PM, she stated “We all watch the telemetry board. The ER monitors our telemetry so that we have a backup. There are times when no one is at the desk watching because of the census.” H. In an interview with the CNO (Chief Nursing Officer) 05/04/26 at 1:32 PM, she stated “We try to keep on eye on the telemetry monitors. We do not have a dedicated technician hired any longer.””
-
Nursing Services
The inspectors’ words, 481 words
“NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): §485.635(d)(3) All drugs, biologicals, and intravenous medications must be administered by or under the supervision of a registered nurse, a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, or, where permitted by State law, a physician assistant, in accordance with written and signed orders, accepted standards of practice, and Federal and State laws. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of facility policy, medication error reports and interview, it was determined the lack of scanning patient identification barcodes at bedside prior to administering medications per policy) caused medication errors for 5 of 5 (#1, and #3-6) incidents reviewed that involved nursing not scanning the patient identification barcodes prior to dispensing. By not scanning patient identification barcodes prior to administering medications, the facility could not assure patients were receiving the correct medications. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients receiving medications at the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of facility policy titled, “Administration of Medications,” revised 11/18/2015, showed nurses on the Medical Surgical floor were to utilize the CPSI Med-Verify application to identify the correct patient, dose, drug, time and route. The application is to be utilized for the safe and effective administration of medication to the patients on the Medical Surgical floor. B. Review of medication error reports showed the following: 1) Incident #1 showed a dose of Amlodipine 10 milligram (mg) was administered to the wrong patient. The conclusion notes of the investigation showed bedside scanning of the patient’s identification barcode and the medication would prevent future occurrences of this type. 2) Incident #3 showed a dose of Omeprazole 20 mg was given at 1833. The patient and family stated it was not given. The recommendations/actions notes of the investigation showed medication scanning was to be completed at bedside. 3) Incident #4 showed a nurse discovered the wrong type of Intravenous Fluid (IV) was hung. The conclusion notes of the investigation showed bedside scanning of the patient’s identification barcode at the bedside would have prevented this error. 4) Incident #5 showed a patient received an incorrect IV fluid. The conclusion notes of the investigation showed the nurse did not perform the 7 rights of medication administration by not verifying the correct medication. The recommendation/actions notes of the investigation showed scanning before administration would have prevented this error. 5) Incident #6 showed a dose of Symbicort was charted as administered at 1013. Patient stated she did not get it. Recommendation/actions notes showed bedside scanning should be used to reduce medication errors. C. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 10:00 AM, the director of Pharmacy verified the nurses are supposed to be scanning the patient identification barcodes at bedside prior to administering medications. D. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 10:15 AM, the Director of Nursing verified the nurses are supposed to be scanning the patient identification barcodes at bedside prior to administering medications.”
-
Rehabilitation Therapy Services
The inspectors’ words, 185 words
“REHABILITATION THERAPY SERVICES CFR(s): Physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language therapy pathology services furnished at the CAH, if provided, are provided by staff qualified under State law, and consistent with the requirements for therapy services in §409.17 of this subpart. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of the Occupational Therapist’s (OT) Job Description, review of Occupational Therapist’s personnel file and interview, it was determined one (OT #1) of two (OT #1-#2) did not have evidence of current CPR (Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation) certification, per Occupational Therapist’s (OT) Job Description. By not having evidence of this qualification, the facility could not assure services provided to patients would be given by a qualified therapist. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients that receive Rehabilitation Services. Findings follow: A. Record review of Occupational Therapist’s (OT) Job Description showed they were to maintain current CPR certification. B. CPR certification was requested upon entrance and was not received for OT #1. C. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 2:19 PM, the Rehabilitation Director verified OT #1 did not have a current CPR certification.”
-
Records System
The inspectors’ words, 400 words
“RECORDS SYSTEM CFR(s): (1) The CAH maintains a clinical records system in accordance with written policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of facility policy and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clinical records system in that the Information Systems Director had not collected or was not provided records of information system activity, according to policy, for the previous twelve out of twelve (May 2025-April 2026) months. By not implementing procedures to regularly review records of information system activity, the facility could not assure the security and privacy of their patients’ medical records. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients treated at the facility. Findings follow: A. Record review of the facility’s policy titled, “Information System Activity Review,” undated, showed the following: 1) There shall be a formal documented process which at minimum will include a) Define who will review records of activity b) Define what activity is significant c) Define which activity records need to be archived and for what period of time d) Define what activity constitutes a security incident to be reported e) Define procedures for preserving records of significance activity f) Workforce members should not monitor, or review activity related to their own account g) The HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) Security Officer shall be responsible for reviewing results of information system activity review reports h) The HIPAA Security Officer shall be responsible for enforcing this policy i) All data collected and/or used as part of the Risk Management policy shall be maintained by the organization for a period of 7 years. 2) The policy showed the following information shall be provided to or collected by the HIPAA Security Officer on a monthly basis: a) Security audit logs b) Access reports c) Security incident tracking reports 3) The policy showed the HIPAA Security Officer shall review and study the reports and contact the appropriate individual for any questions, concerns or identified trends. 4) The policy showed the HIPAA Security Officer shall document findings from the monthly review and determine action plans as appropriate. B. During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 3:06 PM, the Information System Director (also HIPAA Security Officer) and Health Information Manager stated there was no evidence the audits and monitoring of the information system activity and required elements were being done, and documentation maintained.”
-
Records System
The inspectors’ words, 225 words
“RECORDS SYSTEM CFR(s): The records are legible, complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 31039 Based on review of wrong person medication errors for 05/01/25 through 04/30/26, review of clinical records and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain accurate records in that one (#2) of two (#1 and #2) incidents of a wrong person medication error were not documented in the chart of the patient that received the medication in error. By not documenting the medication errors, the facility was not keeping an accurate record of the patient’s course of treatment and outcomes, which is essential for planning and delivering future care of the patient. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients that are treated at the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of medication errors for wrong person medication errors showed Incident #2 the patient received Metronidazole 2000 milligram by mouth that was intended for another patient. B. Review of clinical record for Incident #2 showed there was no documentation in the patient’s medical record the patient received Metronidazole 2000 milligram by mouth in error, if the doctor was notified, and what course of treatment was to proceed the error. C. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 10:13 AM, the Director of Pharmacy verified the findings at A. and B.”
Mar 11, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Life Safety From Fire
The inspectors’ words, 284 words
“LIFE SAFETY FROM FIRE CFR(s): §485.623(c) Standard: Life Safety From Fire (1) Except as otherwise provided in this section: (i) The CAH must meet the applicable provisions and must proceed in accordance with the Life Safety Code (NFPA 101 and Tentative Interim Amendments TIA 12-1, TIA 12-2, TIA 12-3, and TIA 12-4.) (ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, corridor doors and doors to rooms containing flammable or combustible materials must be provided with positive latching hardware. Roller latches are prohibited on such doors. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48468 Based on observation, review of National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) guidelines and interview, it was determined the facility failed to prevent the likelihood of the spread of fire and smoke in the respiratory storage closet in that was a hole in fire wall with wires passing through. The failed practice placed patients at risk of fire and/or smoke spreading. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients in the facility. The findings will follow: A. Review of the NFPA 101 guidelines showed, “Penetrations for cables, cable trays, conduits, pipes, tubes, vents, wires, and similar items to accommodate electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and communications systems that pass through a smoke partition shall be protected by a system or material that is capable of limiting the transfer of smoke.” B. On March 11, 2024, at 11:18 a.m., observation showed the respiratory storage closet had a hole in the fire wall with cables passing through the hole. There was no material protecting the hole to prevent fire and/or smoke passing through the hole. C. The findings of B were confirmed in an interview with the Administrator on March 11, 2024 at 11:18 a.m.”
Feb 1, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Infection Prevent & Control & Abt Stewar Prog
The inspectors’ words, 259 words
“INFECTION PREVENT & CONTROL & ABT STEWAR PROG CFR(s): The CAH must have active facility-wide programs, for the surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs and other infectious diseases and for the optimization of antibiotic use through stewardship. The programs must demonstrate adherence to nationally recognized infection prevention and control guidelines, as well as to best practices for improving antibiotic use where applicable, and for reducing the development and transmission of HAIs and antibiotic-resistant organisms. Infection prevention and control problems and antibiotic use issues identified in the programs must be addressed in coordination with the facility-wide quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50014 Based on policy review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the physical environment was not maintained as a safe and functional environment throughout Shook Hall and North Hall of the facility to avoid sources and transmission of infection in that: A.Throughout Shook Hall showed: 1.Storage rooms with black substance on ceiling tiles. 2.Storage rooms with water stains on ceiling tiles. 3.Storage rooms with dust on clean supplies. 4.Storage rooms with holes in the walls. 5.Clean patient supplies were stored alongside dirty cleaning supplies. 6.Clean patient supplies stored with black substance on ceiling tiles. 7.Clean patient supplies stored in hallway with active construction. B.North Hall showed uncontained construction. The failed practice had the likelihood to cause the spread and transmission of infection to all staff and patients in the facility. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility. See C1208 for details.”
-
Infection Prevent Surveil & Control Of Hais
The inspectors’ words, 780 words
“INFECTION PREVENT SURVEIL & CONTROL OF HAIs CFR(s): The infection prevention and control includes surveillance, prevention, and control of HAIs, including maintaining a clean and sanitary environment to avoid sources and transmission of infection, and that the program also addresses any infection control issues identified by public health authorities; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50014 Based on policy review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the physical environment was not maintained as a safe and functional environment throughout Shook Hall and North Hall of the facility to avoid sources and transmission of infection in that: A. Throughout Shook Hall showed: 1. Storage rooms with black substance on ceiling tiles. 2. Storage rooms with water stains on ceiling tiles. 3. Storage rooms with dust on clean supplies. 4. Storage rooms with holes in the walls. 5. Clean patient supplies were stored alongside dirty cleaning supplies. 6. Clean patient supplies stored with black substance on ceiling tiles. 7. Clean patient supplies stored in hallway with active construction. B. North Hall showed uncontained construction. The failed practice had the likelihood to cause the spread and transmission of infection to all staff and patients in the facility. The failed practice had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility. Findings follow: A. Review of Policy and Procedure “Infection Prevention and Control Program” dated 5/25/23 showed the following: 1) The Infection Preventionist and the Infection a Prevention and Control Committee are responsible for identifying, investigating, reporting, preventing, and controlling infections and communicable diseases through the maintenance of a sanitary hospital environment and the development and implementation of infection prevention and control measures related to hospital staff. 2) The Infection Preventionist and the Infection a Prevention and Control Committee are responsible for conducting surveillance within the hospital on a wide basis to identify infectious risks or communicable disease problems at any location or department. B. Review of Policy and Procedure “Sanitary Environment Policy,” dated 8/23/23 showed all areas of the hospital must be clean and sanitary. This includes all hospital units/departments, campuses, and off-site locations. C. Review of the “Infection Control Risk Assessment 2.0 Matrix of Precautions for Construction, Renovation and Operations Table 5 - Minimum Required Infection Control Precautions by Class, Before and During Work Activity” provided by the architects of the construction project on 2/7/2024 at 1:33 PM, showed that: 1) Construct and complete critical barriers meeting NFPA 241 requirements including: Barriers must extend to the ceiling or, if ceiling tile is removed, to the deck above, and all penetrations through the barrier shall meet the appropriate fire rating requirements. 2) All (plastic or hard) barrier construction activities must be completed in a manner that prevents dust release. Plastic barriers must be effectively affixed to ground and ceiling and secure from movement or damage. Apply tape that will not leave a residue to seal gaps between barriers, ceiling, or floor. 3) Seal all penetrations in containment barriers, including floors and ceiling, used approved materials (UL schedule firestop if applicable for barrier type). 4) Containment units or environmental containment units (ECUs) approved for Class IV precautions in small areas totally contained by the unit and that have HEPA-filtered exhaust air. 5) Worker clothing must be clean and free of visible dust before leaving the work area. HEPA vacuuming of clothing or use of cover suits is acceptable. 6) Workers must wear shoe covers prior to entry into the work area. Shoe covers must be changed prior to exiting the anteroom to the occupied space (non-work area). Damaged shoe covers must be immediately changed. 7) Install an adhesive (dust collection) mat at entrance of contained work area based on facility policy. Adhesive mats must be changed routinely and when visibly soiled. Consider collection of particulate data during work to monitor and ensure that contaminates do not enter the occupied spaces. Routine collection of particulate samples may be used to verify HEPA filtration efficiencies. D. During an interview on 1/31/2024 at 3:00 PM, the Chief Executive Office (CEO) and Infection Control Preventionist confirmed A-C. E. Observation on 1/31/2024 at 10:15 AM showed the following: 1. Throughout Shook Hall showed: a) Storage rooms with black substance on ceiling tiles. b) Storage rooms with water stains on ceiling tiles. c) Storage rooms with dust on clean supplies. d) Storage rooms with holes in the wall. e) Clean patient supplies were stored alongside dirty cleaning supplies. d) Clean patient supplies stored with black substance on ceiling tiles. e) Clean patient supplies stored in hallway with active construction. 2. North Hall showed uncontained construction. F. During an interview on 1/31/2024 at 3:00 PM, the CEO and Infection Control Preventionist confirmed the findings in E.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2026 | Complaint and standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
| Mar 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Feb 1, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: readmission, 0 better and 0 worse of 1.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “The number of cases/patients is too few to report a star rating.”
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 142 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Jul 1, 2000.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is not accredited by a private organisation, so the state carries out its routine inspections for Medicare.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- 76% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 11 owners or officers are people: Clarissa Herren (corporate director); Andrew Wargo (corporate director); Robert Bob Lucky (corporate director); Eddie Allen (corporate director); Alfonzo Dixon (corporate director); Mike Smith (corporate director); Carla Taylor (managing employee (on the payroll)); Don M Smith (corporate director); Terry Amstutz (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Terry Amstutz (corporate officer, 0%); Lisa M Hutchison (corporate director, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on Jul 1, 2010.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Desha County, none has an overall star rating from CMS.
- CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Delta Memorial Hospital | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.